Search Results: they are not being themselves

I really miss my MGTOW days. it seems like we are no longer as cool as we used to be back in the 2010s. ever since they pull the plug on our subreddit back in 2021 we all been quiet.

oh well the battle might of been stolen from us but we still won the war for the fact that even though we are no longer trending we still left an impact behind...

• the vast majority of men are no longer simping
• marriage is crumbling
• most men know how apathetic relationships are today
• feminism doesn't have the credibility it used to
• authorities dont side with women like they did decades ago
• women are complaining nonstop about the above

and the list goes on. nevertheless feminism which has been around for over a century is still around whining about the same problems and creating new ones along the way. it seems like at first feminist wanted women to have the right to vote, then they wanted to have the right to work, then hate men and encourage women to reject being mothers and housewive, then #metoo came along the way and now all of the sudden 4B has arised.

it seems like feminists are forever changing their narratives and agendas in order to keep their existence going. but the more they keep going the more imaginary their problems turn out to be. so this makes me wonder is the fact that they keep changing their agendas and creating more variants of themselves a sign that they are desperate to admit they are fighting a losing battle?

I’ve had probably a thousand matches over time and not a single one materialised. Yet women claim they are just looking for a ‘nice/genuine guy.’ No they’re not!!

They’re looking for something that doesn’t exist, or so far out of reach for them. Most guys are actually nice, they’re just not ALL super rich, 6’5, super models, and jacked like they think they see is common on social media

Women are too greedy. Till they have to settle at 30, when they’re already old. Women, they oversell themselves. Think they’re 10X what they are, they have failed us.

For example, No girl would’ve obsessed over JB if he wasn’t JB. It’s all about status/fame and just being too much of an outlier

I am already exceptional with a big future and struggling. The whole dating game is so dead and boring. When I’ve rejected women - it’s for a good reason.

In my career as a teacher I started out being what I now consider to be a complete unreasonable prick. I would assign work over the vacation as well as frown upon parent/student chosen off days. I wouldn't even give any consideration to cuts of class when the student was having personal problems (think like crying in the bathroom, family crisis, had to work, didn't have child care - yes, I've had teen parents as students, etc). I still shudder when I think that I was that awful person.

Like everything else in life I lived and I learned. I now ENCOURAGE IF NOT DEMAND students to take a day off and I tell their parents explicitly "If adults can give themselves a day off why can't kids if they're not up to it?". I realized that there is nothing going on in my classroom that is more important than the lives that they live. The entire concept of giving school work over a break is so ludicrous to me now! It's called a "break" for a fucking reason (plus HW of ANY kind has ZERO discernable statistical difference in grades, retention, class satisfaction, etc).

I have a theory that very few white people across all history literally think black people attach the ape like comparison in simple ways that is assumed. it’s more an symbolic association with what white people think of their energy, things like the way they vibe and their intelligence, but not that they are ape like in that way. When it happens it’s more like they can see certain facial features that remind them of it
(When certain skull features are present, not just skin color or hair) but since they look too human (upright, human amount of body hair) the brain shifts it’s perspective of them being ape like to humans, and they attach things like being hypersexual, not as intelligently inclined in certain areas, and an assumption that they are or may be aggressive in situations. But thinking they are ape like simply from looks alone is not such a simple one to one connection. It’s more their perceived energy from what I just described.

I believe black people actually are more likely to think this of themselves and they project it onto white people, both today and their perception of the past, when in reality the animalistic association was about black peoples perceived energy and connection to nature which they thought was different, looks may have played a major role but not not in such a simple ape like connection, they saw them as human but with different energy based on looks, not that they were more ape like because of their looks in such a way that is assumed.

And some white people may imagine other white people think this since they can conjure up that thought in their head but they don’t actually think that when seeing black people, their thought process is what I described.


*disclaimer, this isn’t meant to put black people down, I am describing real dynamics that are helpful to address both for the black community to understand these dynamics so they know how they are seen by white people and society as well.