Search Results: perfect girlfriend

I’m 25 and my parents still have not noticed I have tattoos. My family are surper religious goody goody people, no tattoos, marry perfect white guy, no sex, be innocent angel. Since I was 23 I got tatoos it was always my dream & I like tattoos. I have a heart on my finger, rose on my wrist and plan get a small butterfly on my other wrist. I have another tattoo on my finger that says a word from my business. I wear longsleeve 24/7 and live alone so I don’t see them often. But I put makeup for my finger tattoos. One time a guy said he likes my finger tattoos and my mom said what? She didn’t like tattoos nor has any. The guy looked so confused. Then mom once said oh this guys girlfriend is so ugly she has a million tattoos disgusting. my dad has a tattoo of our dog that passed away but my mom never got mad , but when it comes to me she’ll beat me if she finds out when I visit her. She’ll hit me really hard be furious and even cry as she wants control my life have my life be how she wants only. My boyfriend has a lot of tattoos too.

I was inspired to ask this question when I came across the above photo on Reddit. It was apparently a post about a guy and his girlfriend who used to be very religious Mormons who always dressed "modestly" now becoming "ex-Mormons" who enjoy wearing "short shorts" together and don't pay attention to modesty anymore. And while I thought that was very sweet and "good for them," I couldn't help but notice the enormous length difference between the girl's shorts and the guy's shorts. And whether I liked it or not, it pissed me off. Not necessarily because of this isolated incident itself, but because of how common/widespread this phenomenon is in general. Even when it comes to children's shorts.

Like just look at the picture itself, it's a perfect example... her "short shorts" only have like a 2-3 inch inseam to them and stop at the very TOP of her thighs; while his "short shorts" have at least a solid 7-8 inch inseam to them and stop only SLIGHTLY above the knees, exposing only merely his very lower thighs.

Keep in mind these are supposed to be "short" male shorts too. Usually men's shorts don't show a few inches of thigh above the knee like in the photo. It's not uncommon for men's shorts to be knee-length or below the knee, with an inseam ranging from 12-15 inch inseam. So the length disparity is often even bigger than shown here.

Meanwhile, while the girl's shorts are indeed "short shorts" it's also hard to find shorts longer than that in the women's section, and as a result almost every woman wears that same length of shorts. So by female shorts standards they're not "short" but just "normal." And even the normal length women's shorts are short as fuck when compared to men's "short shorts"... you can kind of see the problem here.

It just feels like the fashion industry is unnecessarily sexualizing women and trying to get them to show way more skin/thigh than their male counterparts. It doesn't feel right.