It does not make sense at all !! How would they make kidds? How would they breastfeed? Or the question is: who would? We are destroying our world if this sh*i continues !!
1. Some (heterosexual) couples choose not to have kids 2. Substitutes exist for breast milk, and so do wet nurses 3. There are plenty of other ways we're destroying this world
The "legal benefits" of marriage exist solely to encourage men and women to stay together and raise well-adjusted children, not to reward same sex couples for staying monogamous.
0
4 Reply
Opinion Owner
+1 y
Society does not benefit from two men or two women being married. It does, however, benefit GREATLY from heterosexual couples staying together and giving their children a two-parent (mother and father) home.
Same-sex couples adopt children and raise families. The children may or may not turn out to be gay themselves. However, the adoption of children by same-sex couples is a topic of controversy. Sometimes, the law disallows same-sex couples from adopting children. Other times, the adoption agencies refuse placement of children in the care of same-sex couples. Lesbian couples may turn to IVF, and Transgender couples may have one biological female and one biological male pair but by gender identity, both identify as the same gender. Some same-sex couples have biological children from a partner's former heterosexual marriage.
Do you have ANY proof that children raised without a father or a mother (depending on which gender the couple is) will be well-adjusted? The statistics of single-parent homes as they are now would beg to differ, and let's face it... two moms or two dads is the equivalent of a single parent family.
@MakeShiftThug Ehm. If some people don't have access to a legal right like, say, marriage or kid adoption, because of their sexual orientation, that doesn't sound like having the same legal rights, does it? It actually sounds like having less legal rights, surprisingly enough.
Here is the misconception that most people have. Everyone regardless of their sexual orientation had the right to get married. It just so happened that the definition of marriage was a legal union between a man and a woman.
Homosexuals did have "the same legal rights as everybody else". Because both straight men and gay men had the right to marry a woman and both straight men and gay men could not get married to a man.
It's not an issue of equality because legally speaking they're both equal however it was an issue of introducing a new law or redefining marriage to suit homosexual couples.
Some influences that the church has had on civil law.
Slavery Paternal authority Marriage Wills and testaments Property rights Legal procedure Legislation, government, and administration of justice Sacred Scripture in legislation
@WombRaider he does to have a say cause he's speaking on terms for himself and it does affect him if he doesn't get to be with the person that he chooses and who are you to deny him for what he wants and another thing you don't have a right taking him out of the acquisition cause he matters just as much as you do
do you know how stupid that sounds getting mad over someone wanting what they want that would be like me getting mad over someone wanting to have ice cream this is their logic on how things are with these idiots
Hey Phoenix98 good to see you again. Don't listen to that nutjob WombRaider it's people like him that make all atheists look bad. I would like to point out however that your argument would be much stronger if religion wasn't the only reason you opposed it. Ben Shapiro who is a religious Jew once said "If your chief citation to your opposition to gay marriage is Leviticus 18:22 I don't think that that's a solid argument that is going to convince a lot of people. I think that there are better arguments against gay marriage than that. This is something I talk about at religious schools, I've been asked by pastors and rabbis and priests to talk to students 'ok you have these religious principles is there any justification outside the Bible says so for why this is correct' and as a religious person who has thought through his positions I tend to believe there is. So if you believe God didn't create stupid rules then you have to come up with some sort of justification for the rules".
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
34Opinion
I don't support gay marriage because I find its weird and that marriage should between a man and woman
I didn't realize the 300 million people in the U. S. needed your permission to live their lives
@john235711 I'm not telling people how they should live there lives I just gave a opinion because I stick up for what I believe in
I dont really care. I think they should legalize it just so i dont have to hear about it anymore.
It does not make sense at all !! How would they make kidds? How would they breastfeed? Or the question is: who would? We are destroying our world if this sh*i continues !!
1. Some (heterosexual) couples choose not to have kids
2. Substitutes exist for breast milk, and so do wet nurses
3. There are plenty of other ways we're destroying this world
The real destructive force is the current Islamic invasion. Homosexual marriage is just a distraction at best.
You like spinning off Takes I see 😛
I agree though, this is better than the other one.
This is the same user. Wow you just love to take spin offs from every controversial mytake 😊
Great take though. It's a lot better than the original.
Eh. It's less taxing for me that way.
Exactly why polygamy should be legal. love is love no?
I like that you contradicted that Jrrichards guy. I hate his take with a passion.
I like how much effort he put into it but his base premise is false.
The "legal benefits" of marriage exist solely to encourage men and women to stay together and raise well-adjusted children, not to reward same sex couples for staying monogamous.
Society does not benefit from two men or two women being married. It does, however, benefit GREATLY from heterosexual couples staying together and giving their children a two-parent (mother and father) home.
Same-sex couples adopt children and raise families. The children may or may not turn out to be gay themselves. However, the adoption of children by same-sex couples is a topic of controversy. Sometimes, the law disallows same-sex couples from adopting children. Other times, the adoption agencies refuse placement of children in the care of same-sex couples. Lesbian couples may turn to IVF, and Transgender couples may have one biological female and one biological male pair but by gender identity, both identify as the same gender.
Some same-sex couples have biological children from a partner's former heterosexual marriage.
Do you have ANY proof that children raised without a father or a mother (depending on which gender the couple is) will be well-adjusted? The statistics of single-parent homes as they are now would beg to differ, and let's face it... two moms or two dads is the equivalent of a single parent family.
Thanks for the topic. That'll be the topic for my next myTake. See ya! :D
I was never in favor of it. Isn't it legal in every western nation now? It'll be almost a year since the US legalized it.
It should be legalized because homosexual people deserve the same legal rights as everybody else, period.
They had the same rights as straight people even before same sex marriage was legalised.
@MakeShiftThug Ehm. If some people don't have access to a legal right like, say, marriage or kid adoption, because of their sexual orientation, that doesn't sound like having the same legal rights, does it? It actually sounds like having less legal rights, surprisingly enough.
Here is the misconception that most people have. Everyone regardless of their sexual orientation had the right to get married. It just so happened that the definition of marriage was a legal union between a man and a woman.
Homosexuals did have "the same legal rights as everybody else". Because both straight men and gay men had the right to marry a woman and both straight men and gay men could not get married to a man.
It's not an issue of equality because legally speaking they're both equal however it was an issue of introducing a new law or redefining marriage to suit homosexual couples.
@MakeShiftThug
Indeed, poor choice of words by my part. Indeed, every 'individual' had the right of heterosexual marriage, but not of homosexual marriage. My bad.
It's all good, fam.
My beliefs said no. However, I will not be in their way euther because it is between them and God.
Lmao same sex marriage is already legal in my country in every state
I live in America
I am disappointed in the lack of a downvote system in GAG. Now more than ever.
I thought they already legalized gay marriage?
Not everywhere.
Take Australia for example. The 'free' country that is still telling its people who theyre allowed to love.
@BaileyisDarcy ohh, i thought you meant in north america
Yeah no thanks.
Wait, so you don't support same-sex marriage?
@WombRaider I never have supported it, marriage is between a man and a woman period.
Says who?
@WombRaider Says the God, the bible, the church and me and I personally just find it wrong, nothing is ever going to change that.
You have absolutely no say in who marries who because it doesn't affect you.
God is a fictional being, he's not here to have his say.
The bible is a book. That's like using Harry Potter as evidence that magic exists.
The Church should have no say in law.
@WombRaider
I don't need to.
False, and he has quite a few times.
Wrong.
False.
Question: Are you schizophrenic?
Name me 3 laws the Church has had a say in.
@WombRaider
Nope I don't hear voices.
Some influences that the church has had on civil law.
Slavery
Paternal authority
Marriage
Wills and testaments
Property rights
Legal procedure
Legislation, government, and administration of justice
Sacred Scripture in legislation
@WombRaider he does to have a say cause he's speaking on terms for himself and it does affect him if he doesn't get to be with the person that he chooses and who are you to deny him for what he wants and another thing you don't have a right taking him out of the acquisition cause he matters just as much as you do
and I'm just like Phoenix98 WombRaider I want to be with a woman and not a man and if you don't like that WombRaider take your ass somewhere else
Lol.
i'm setting my BOUNDARIES and there ain't no son of a bitch going to step all over'em anymore
@CancerianMan81 good.
do you know how stupid that sounds getting mad over someone wanting what they want that would be like me getting mad over someone wanting to have ice cream this is their logic on how things are with these idiots
SMH!!!
@CancerianMan81 Yeah it's pretty ridiculous.
I had a pretty good opinion of you. Now it's gone.
@ThisDudeHere if it's about me I could care less
@CancerianMan81 yes and *couldn't care less would be more correct.
it shouldn't affect you for the way i am cause you have yourself to take care of
if people would start worrying about taking care of themselves instead of other people then maybe things would start getting done
Hey Phoenix98 good to see you again.
Don't listen to that nutjob WombRaider it's people like him that make all atheists look bad.
I would like to point out however that your argument would be much stronger if religion wasn't the only reason you opposed it.
Ben Shapiro who is a religious Jew once said "If your chief citation to your opposition to gay marriage is Leviticus 18:22 I don't think that that's a solid argument that is going to convince a lot of people. I think that there are better arguments against gay marriage than that. This is something I talk about at religious schools, I've been asked by pastors and rabbis and priests to talk to students 'ok you have these religious principles is there any justification outside the Bible says so for why this is correct' and as a religious person who has thought through his positions I tend to believe there is. So if you believe God didn't create stupid rules then you have to come up with some sort of justification for the rules".
@QuestionMan Except religion isn't my only reason for opposing it lol I've always been against it, long before I became a Christian.
@QuestionMan wombraider didn't even say anything bad. He was correct afterall.
@ThisDudeHere His whole shtick was about attacking religion and not the argument.
@Phoenix98 What were you before you became Christian?
@ThisDudeHere By asking if I had a mental disease and then misusing the word bigot? lol.
@QuestionMan I was nothing lol I was just a person who didn't belong to a religion.
What made you turn to Christianity as opposed to any other religion or simply remaining as you were?
@QuestionMan Because I believe in god, would like to worship him and Christianity most closely adheres to my values and morals and my way of living.
phoenix98 cancerianMan81 QuestionMan I don't support gay marriage ether
@Pinkbeauty good.
Lets hope that someone someday won't support your right to something when you need it either.
@Pinkbeauty that's good
What country are you from?
Have my support. Go gay marriage !
isn't it already legalized?
Would you agree to polymory
Yeah... just no.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaG5SAw1n0c