I have never understood that.
https://www.girlsaskguys.com/social-relationships/a52421-yes-white-privilege-is-real-read-on
And should a person be able to post insanely racist posts about groups of people, if they only make sure their points are based upon rational, logical and objective information?
That's thing that always got me about racism. A racist does not see himself as being racist. He seems himself as arriving at merely logical conclusions. And it does not matter if science or logic doesn't support his conclusions. He merely invents a religion in which his reasoning is seen as truth. That's what sets racism apart from other forms of bias. A racist typically does not hate anyone. Though his belief system justifies hatred and genocide. Truthfully if Shockley is right, then it would be perfectly logical to exterminate the "Black" race, the Amerind/Red race (if you believe in that one) because they are inferior and you don't want them tainting the gene pool. And you would destroy the "Yellow" race because you would be scared they would take over. Either that or if you were a "liberal racist", you would create social programs to take care of non-"Whites" since you have deemed them inferior. Why would you entrust people with inferior genes with great responsibility, like running the biggest economy and military on the face of the planet? But racism is nonsense anyway. . .so.
1. The first point is hilarious. Because he isn't even sure of which races exist. So he debunked himself. Raciology is just so weird. It can never define the number of races nor can it tell you its method for determining race.
2. Which leads to the second point. . .again, we have no idea what he is talking about. And neither does he.
3. Which leads to three. He even gets confused about this racial stereotyping. Because east Asians are supposed to be so nerdy they have no skills when it comes to romance. But somehow, there are like 2 billion of them on this earth. They comprise almost 1/3 of this world's population. But somehow the men are stereotyped as being too nerdy to get women.
Look at the confusion. Are Latinos one culture but three races? Are there four races in Latino culture instead? Or is it one race with four cultures? Or is it three? LOLx10!! There are 1.5 billion Indian people. At which point does an Indian stop being an Indian? Does he believe in a south Asian race? As you travel from Bangladesh over to Pakistan at what point do people stop being Indian or South Asian and become Arab?
It is just nuttiness.
Which concludes, all of raciology is consumed by basically two groups. The people who are "White" and the people who are not "White". Raciology never bothered with classifying non-"White" people. They were just thrown here or there without any real regard for culture or color. Because it was not designed to tell non-"Whites" who they were or are. Think about the discussions with racists. They typically talk about two groups, "Whites" and "Blacks" as though "Black" people can represent or speak on behalf of billions of other people who make up the majority of this world's population. Its why our media has "Black" people reflective of all non-"White" experiences. We get a great television series like "Star Trek, the Next Generation". A whole bunch of "White" people with two extra "Black" guys. The first non-"White" captain in the Star Trek universe with his own series is Captain Sisko. And the funny thing is that racism is so mixed with sexism. A "White" woman comes second, Captain Janeway in "Voyager". And don't even try to mention American Indians. It is hilarious how racists avoid talking about this grouping. They claim to have some reverence for American Indians, though American Indians have much in common with other indigenous cultures they have a high disdain for. The weird thing is that raciology may have had the most devastating effect upon American Indians, more so than any other non-"White" grouping.
Again, no anonymous opinions. Let's be adults.
Most Helpful Opinions