@JamesRandiDebates i'm glad you asked. there was a lot of debate about his genetics. he has a lot of African facial features and this is not just my opinion. i mean the guy is white, but it does look questionable.
@Britantic the amount of stuff you post about being a white queen and how whitequeens shouldn't intermix makes you seem like a white nationalist. Prove me wrong.
It's stupid that people changing their outward appearance changes their identity at all.
If you take identity in your race, then you don't have much character. The appearance of a car doesn't change it's functuion, just as you will be just as gross a person regardless of what skin you're wearing
I wish you'd talk about people as individuals rather than members of their race.
From how much you speak about the white race and a white heritage, it seems like you want it to remain separated from other cultures--a separation which white nationalists espouse.
I'm very conservative, so I don't go on any anti-racist crusades like leftists do, but I find white nationalism to be an antiquated idea supported by the most foundational left-wing values which I find abhorrant.
"When did i say White Queens shouldn't intermix and what do you mean by intermix?" Interracial relationships. If they have kids would the girl still be a white queen?
I think what @Adam_INTJ is alluding at the way you keep talking about white queens it resembles the same kind of rhetoric white nationalists use.
" antiquated idea supported by the most foundational left-wing values which I find abhorrant. " I'm kind of confused what do you mean here? Also what left-wing values you find abhorrent.
While I agree with opposition to collectivism (as I strongly stand for Individualism). I would disagree with racism, concept also predates rise of leftwing. Racism is exactly that discrimination against an individual or a group including of such individuals. Civil rights movement in America is an example against entrenched racism.
@Oram52 there are actually two left political movements which now define the term: the french left, which supported the French Revolution's overthrow of the old order, and then the American left, which opposes the ideals of the American Revolution.
The french revolution developed a collectivist conflict narrative of the poor classes being oppressed by the monarchy/nobles, instead favoring the subjugating the will of the individual to the collective will, aided by the cult if reason.
The American Left developed a collectivist conflict narrative under Thomas Jefferson (Early Democrat) as well, who believed that large landowners were undermining small farmers: another class conflict.
Eventually, Andrew Jackson, another Democrat, blazed a racist future for the Democratic party, committing Genocide against the remaining Native Americans (Particularly the Creek). This path was continued with James Polk, who advocated the expansion of slavery into the west, and much later by Woodrow Wilson, who oversaw the expansion of the KKK under his presidency.
The left continues to pit racial groups against one another in the collectivist narrative of left wing politics. Notice how they place race above specifics of income and background in terms of stopping oppression. To the modern American Left, if you're black, you're oppressed and have less capability than white or Asian people, no matter what other data exists about you specifically (unicorn exceptions: Neil Degrasse Tyson, Kanye West, and black conservatives, who are supposedly not even human).
Both French and Americans were Classical Liberals. Individualism is the foundation Liberalism stand on. Individual Liberty. They're not collectivists they opposed collectivists. Hence why Jefferson said Life Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness.
Its conservatives who opposed Enlightenment Values, hence why Edmund Burke proposed different ideals. Modern Conservatives adopted individualism from Classical Liberals. Classical Liberals who were leftwing originally in opposition to conservatives were pushed to right after rise of Socialism. So Conservatives and Classical Liberals would have common front against Socialists.
Standing up against racism is not collectivism, it is standing up for individual rights. No one deserves to discriminated against.
Today ideologically only Libertarians and Classical Liberals are individualists. I oppose collectivism in any form be it Social Conservatism, Nationalism or Marxism.
Conservatism is not collectivist. Conservativism's core message is more about how the individual relates to the collective, but is more important than it: The individual is sovereign and has freedom to pursue what he wishes and a duty to preserve that freedom for others as well.
Conservatives also tend to hold to more religious values, which solves the problem of needing the individual to be subjected to something higher than himself rather than having atomized individualism by voluntarily subjecting himself to God rather than the collective.
"solves the problem of needing the individual to be subjected to something higher " That immediately violates individual liberty :) That's not individualism. If an individual is coerced or forced in anyway either by state or other cultural influences then its not individualism.
Collectivism is a value that is characterized by emphasis on cohesiveness among individuals and prioritization of the group over the self. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collectivism
That's exactly what you described. Social Conservatism is collectivism as there is external force or pressure be it state or cultural or religious authority. Which ensure individuals comply to certain set ethic, morals and standards. The group or collective ideal is more important than individual choice.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
53Opinion
What's happening to women these days? Can't trust any of them. Fake looks, fake personalities.
You should watch videos on transformations using makeup.
@Shezadi Oh I did. Especially the Asian ones. They turn into a completely different person. So scary and creepy.
Imagine, if you end up dating one of them? That's why it is a good idea to take your to a swimming pool to make the makeup melt.
First I've heard of it. Seems to be just attention seeking airheads wanting their 5 mins of instagram fame.
you can change the color of your skin but you can't hide the genetics... a good example would be tom jones.
Tom Jones? Please explain.
@JamesRandiDebates i'm glad you asked. there was a lot of debate about his genetics. he has a lot of African facial features and this is not just my opinion. i mean the guy is white, but it does look questionable.
This seems to be a variant of the " I want what I can't have " syndrome , " I wanna be somebody that I am not !! "
We can not only choose our gender but also our race now? And how is this not black face? How are black people not enraged by this?
Excellent analysis, excellent discussion! I agree with @CT_CD particularly
I couldn't care less about what some Instagram Thots do. Low quality women do low quality actions.
this was the best funny ever. Never seen such a honest person before in a world of political correctness.
@Shezadi
hahahahahahaha I am looking forward to see many other forms then.
I've never met any women that wanted to be darker. All the women in my area try to stay white and youthful looking.
People just need to learn to accept who they are altogether regardless of race or ethnicity.
Best to be true to yourself in the end. As long as you are not racist, you can and should own your identity.
I agree with you. Everyone should be proud of their race.
@Britantic
the amount of stuff you post about being a white queen and how whitequeens shouldn't intermix makes you seem like a white nationalist. Prove me wrong.
It's stupid that people changing their outward appearance changes their identity at all.
If you take identity in your race, then you don't have much character. The appearance of a car doesn't change it's functuion, just as you will be just as gross a person regardless of what skin you're wearing
When did i say White Queens shouldn't intermix and what do you mean by intermix?
My mistake, you didn't actually say that.
I wish you'd talk about people as individuals rather than members of their race.
From how much you speak about the white race and a white heritage, it seems like you want it to remain separated from other cultures--a separation which white nationalists espouse.
I'm very conservative, so I don't go on any anti-racist crusades like leftists do, but I find white nationalism to be an antiquated idea supported by the most foundational left-wing values which I find abhorrant.
"When did i say White Queens shouldn't intermix and what do you mean by intermix?"
Interracial relationships. If they have kids would the girl still be a white queen?
I think what @Adam_INTJ is alluding at the way you keep talking about white queens it resembles the same kind of rhetoric white nationalists use.
" antiquated idea supported by the most foundational left-wing values which I find abhorrant. "
I'm kind of confused what do you mean here? Also what left-wing values you find abhorrent.
Oram52 collectivism, viewing history as a power struggle between groups. Racism itself is a left wing value as it is collective in nature
While I agree with opposition to collectivism (as I strongly stand for Individualism). I would disagree with racism, concept also predates rise of leftwing. Racism is exactly that discrimination against an individual or a group including of such individuals. Civil rights movement in America is an example against entrenched racism.
@Oram52 there are actually two left political movements which now define the term: the french left, which supported the French Revolution's overthrow of the old order, and then the American left, which opposes the ideals of the American Revolution.
The french revolution developed a collectivist conflict narrative of the poor classes being oppressed by the monarchy/nobles, instead favoring the subjugating the will of the individual to the collective will, aided by the cult if reason.
The American Left developed a collectivist conflict narrative under Thomas Jefferson (Early Democrat) as well, who believed that large landowners were undermining small farmers: another class conflict.
Eventually, Andrew Jackson, another Democrat, blazed a racist future for the Democratic party, committing Genocide against the remaining Native Americans (Particularly the Creek). This path was continued with James Polk, who advocated the expansion of slavery into the west, and much later by Woodrow Wilson, who oversaw the expansion of the KKK under his presidency.
The left continues to pit racial groups against one another in the collectivist narrative of left wing politics. Notice how they place race above specifics of income and background in terms of stopping oppression. To the modern American Left, if you're black, you're oppressed and have less capability than white or Asian people, no matter what other data exists about you specifically (unicorn exceptions: Neil Degrasse Tyson, Kanye West, and black conservatives, who are supposedly not even human).
Both French and Americans were Classical Liberals. Individualism is the foundation Liberalism stand on. Individual Liberty. They're not collectivists they opposed collectivists. Hence why Jefferson said Life Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individualism
Its conservatives who opposed Enlightenment Values, hence why Edmund Burke proposed different ideals. Modern Conservatives adopted individualism from Classical Liberals. Classical Liberals who were leftwing originally in opposition to conservatives were pushed to right after rise of Socialism. So Conservatives and Classical Liberals would have common front against Socialists.
Standing up against racism is not collectivism, it is standing up for individual rights. No one deserves to discriminated against.
Today ideologically only Libertarians and Classical Liberals are individualists. I oppose collectivism in any form be it Social Conservatism, Nationalism or Marxism.
Conservatism is not collectivist. Conservativism's core message is more about how the individual relates to the collective, but is more important than it: The individual is sovereign and has freedom to pursue what he wishes and a duty to preserve that freedom for others as well.
Conservatives also tend to hold to more religious values, which solves the problem of needing the individual to be subjected to something higher than himself rather than having atomized individualism by voluntarily subjecting himself to God rather than the collective.
"solves the problem of needing the individual to be subjected to something higher "
That immediately violates individual liberty :)
That's not individualism. If an individual is coerced or forced in anyway either by state or other cultural influences then its not individualism.
Collectivism is a value that is characterized by emphasis on cohesiveness among individuals and prioritization of the group over the self.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collectivism
That's exactly what you described. Social Conservatism is collectivism as there is external force or pressure be it state or cultural or religious authority. Which ensure individuals comply to certain set ethic, morals and standards. The group or collective ideal is more important than individual choice.
People should be proud of themselves no matter if they are black or white...
I have NEVER heard of the term. The concept sounds stupid to me.
I don´t understand it either. Why do people wanna appear different than they actually look like?
White girls are indeed very beautiful. The average black girl only wishes she was as attractive as the average white girl.
You are who you are and should be proud of it. Cultural diversity is healthy and to be applauded. We have one planet and one human race.
I agree but she's not talking about cultural diversity but more racially.
I like white women. I date white women. I am black. I really dont care one way or the other. As long as they are funny and sexy I am cool with them.
I agree with this mytake. I call this ethnomasochism. People that hate their own ethnicity.
Well I don’t have this problem. I see it... but I carry on.