
Here's a map of all the countries invaded by them during those 250 - 300 years. They depleted natural resources, starved millions of people to death, killed them, enslaved them, took their personal wealth among many other hideous crimes.
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
This sounds like you are crying here... this could have had a much more academic approach though. I agree with you, but I don't think it is because they are British, it is because of capitalism, so I don't really blame them and asking for anything in return is down right childish. They were able to make themselves stronger and benefit off of others, any other country then and now would do the same, and those that say they would not, are not or have never really been in a situation to do so. I am not saying it is fair or correct, but it is how it went down.
The British, as in the people - no. Their government - perhaps. And besides, that map is misleading, it doesn't show countries that the Brits invaded but countries where British forces have fought in. My country is colored on the map but I know for a fact that the Brits only sent a ship here in WW1, and even then to not fight us but to help us.
Yeah 10% of the English/Welsh/Scottish population was also enslaved during the colonial era iirc
Humans have been invading countries and killing their neighbours since time began. Yeah we were awesome at it for a long time, yeah lots of heinous things occurred (like the death camps - British invention, not German!) but if we start counting them up then we would never stop as every country has blood on its hands... Yeah you too Switzerland!
Doesn't excuse it, doesn't make it right and it won't stop it from happening again with other countries.
Some people are way more peaceful than others!
WW2 has 65 million casualties iirc. The British starved 35 million people to death in India alone. Nobody has more blood on their hands. Nobody has been so cruel and viscous. The English also reduced the Irish population by a third or a half iirc.
The worst country in the history of the world is by far, England. If you Brits wanna do the right thing today, how about returning all that money? I mean, you're still living off that loot.
How about the fact my country is still getting fucked over by the English?
You're comparing this to all of history are you? The Romans, the ottoman empire... I mean I'm not arguing but you're making a lot of claims here...
Well the English are just "awesome at it" I guess? Fuck off.
Well obviously they were awesome at it, how else do you explain their success? I'm not saying it's a good thing, I was agreeing with you fucktard.
Britain did have a lot of colonies in the past around the world and depleted tons of natural resources from other countries. But I have to say most britons are really sweet and friendly. This type of question has many answers as each individual is different.
Hahahaha This title made me laugh...
p.gr-assets.com/.../880466.gif
I dislike the French the most, though. I just do. They are the ugly mole on the face of Europe .
xD
Opinion
13Opinion
Some fucking angry Indian blaming his countries shit economy on an imperialistic occupation that happened hundreds of years ago
STFU, the British didn't kill 35 Million indians, Famine an Disease killed 35 million.
You know, I have grandparents who died in WW2, does that mean I should hate all Germans today? No... That's fucked up, so why are you hating on British people so fucking much? These are people from a long ass time ago, so grow the fuck up and stop being so god damn arrogant...
Forgive and forget mate...
Indian was economically shit before Britain occupied India, it was economically shit when the Brits were in India And Indias economy was shit once the British left... So don't blame it on the Brits...
It's not our fault your country sucks ass,...
You are totally right, dude. And colonists brought more advanced social systems into those areas. If they did not go there, those areas will be even worse than they are now.
I'm British and I voted definitely. Haha we are I admit, but we came from getting beaten up by most countries in mainland Europe to creating one of the most powerful naval forces around then we beat them up, plus a lot of other countries that probably didn't deserve it ;)
There's no shame in accepting the realities of history. The British navy was inferior to the Indian navy when we went to their shores. But soon after robbing Bengal of its immense wealth and starving a third of it's population, we started the Industrial Revolution and got ahead of them.
I doubt it.
The Chinese and Indians were extremely rich and powerful before the mid 18th century, but they never invaded Europe , Africa or even the middle-East. Not many attempts were made either.
Also, slavery and starvation? I don't think so. There seems to be something in English blood. lol
Not that slavery doesn't exist/hasn't existed. But nothing compares to what The Empire did.
Asker, China is too busy enslaving and conquering itself to be able to expand. And actually it did try, it's hard arguments and invasions over the centuries. China was basically lots of different countries fighting and invading each other until one war lord took over the majority and united them into the China we see now.
nothing compared to the British crimes
I don't think any other empire conquered the entire planet the way the British empire did, so yes an argument can be made that they were quite invasive. Were they the most brutal or cruel in their methods? Probably not. Some of the atrocities committed by such people as Hitler, Stalin, Kahn, the vikings and the Romans far exceeded the methods employed by the British.. But there's no denying that excessive genocide, invasion, rape, and destruction of culture were at the hands of the Monarchy.
Mao and stalin only acted on their own continet with their own people, which is horrible too, but not like brits, Spanish, french or dutch, come on now!
I agree, but I had to give some other options. It's not that obvious to some people. lol
Yeah, i see. Some people get so nervous lol
Even tiny Denmark had colonies: Groenland since the early 19th century, the Far Oer and some towns in India and Southern America.
It's the Dutch and French. They stole land from Africa.
I wouldn't say so... there must be a reason the Pound is the strongest currency, don't think it has anything to do with being a bastard... Then again, maybe they are... lol
@GirlScoutsRevenge Is Switzerland even in denial? lol blood on its hands.. sure. but by actively trying to expand it's borders and invasion? doubtful.
No, I was messing about :)
Switzerland is just a fortified bank posing as a country, ha!
hahaha the criminals need a place to launder and store their money too @GirlScoutsRevenge
They do, and murderous war criminals need a safe haven to continue their weird secret society shit #knightstemplar
@GirlScoutsRevenge hahaha I love conspiracies!
Have you heard the one about Jesus escaping on a boat to Spain with a prostitute? Sounds like a joke doesn't it... Ha!
Why are you talking to me on other people's comments when you blocked me you fucking cunt? Fuck off!
Pardon me, bubble tea
@GirlScoutsRevenge yeah.. haha maybe he just saved her from customers xD
Asker, I did but I didn't fucking mean to and there is no option to unblock you you fucking cunt! Calm the fuck down! If you weren't fucking anon I'd be able to unfucking block you.
And the Americans are not big bastards too?
Who else still insisted on having slavery, when the British officially abolished it in the late 1700s
British didn't stop keeping slaves until they got destroyed by WW2, fyi, and overall the Americans are the worst maybe today... but not historically
The French Revolution abolished slavery but 10 years later Napoleon reintroduced it for the French colonies. (I supposed it didn't stop there during those 10 years)
Only in 1848 it was completely outlawed in all French territories.
@zoooot
The Spaniards introduced slavery in the Americas, first using Indians but they weren't 'strong enough' thus the Spaniards brought slaves from Africa. RC Bishop Las Casas justified it.
By the year 1516, Las Casas began to advocate for the importation of African slaves to compensate for the decreasing Indian population.
Then the Belgians, mainly king Leopold II himself. :
Shocking claims - often well documented - that 10 million Congolese were either murdered or worked to death by Leopold's private army, that women were systematically raped, that people's hands were cut off and that the local populace endured kidnapping, looting and village burnings, have never been the subject of serious debate in Belgium, let alone brought an apology.
www.theguardian.com/.../congo.andrewosborn
Look at this typical Belgian view of history: the triumphant missionary and the kneeling slave:
wilrijk.cdenv.be/.../pater-de-deken.jpg
I can't blame all of them but still they robbed my countries for many years that is we we didn't became developed yet😑
India was the wealthiest land of the world for thousands of years until the British came with their guns.
Now India is home to the most poor, uneducated and impoverished people. They destroyed 90% of the forest cover. Actually, Britain owes over 1 million pounds to every Indian citizen.
Oh... great info
Thanks 😊
British caused famines in India that resulted in the death of over 35 million people or more. Second to only WW2
no problem!
Omg... but now ! any good pbritan people I can see here.
We can't blam people all Britishers now right?
I can't answer that question well, but...
Everything they have done/made is mostly because of the wealth they stole from India. They are still living on this loot, because of which they are rich, while Indians are poor.
The guys who invaded my country were to be blamed but I still can't say bad about an entire nation based on its past. I won't say anything more.
lol wtf
Hmm, I'm not that good when it comes to history, lol :P
Well I'm half German but I believe what they did kinda put them on the list of the biggest Bastards.
They conquered other countries
hitler is worse...
The WW2 death toll is 65 million iirc which involved all countries. The British starved over 35 million people in India alone.
yes, to death!
Well then throw the bomb in fish and chips
I'm going to eat fish and chips shortly. haha
Voted F: Tied with the Spaniards/French/Americans
Actually, most Americans are Germans and Irish-slave descendants. haha
@zoooot
Indeed but they declared themselves independent
Maybe it were the Romans?
why do you say that?
The Egyptians had their pyramids built by slaves, not by hired volunteers.
Another anti-white post... *sighs*
remember that black israelite nutjob?
So the British are the only whites? Is Mao white? Fuck off
Your question focuses more on Britain since your question clearly asks if British are the "biggest bastards in history" and also describing the invasions they committed.
Mao is not even relevant to British history nor have you discussed any of his crimes. Therefore, it technically is an anti-white post.
Anonymous,
Can't you face history?
Anonymous, you bastard.
Asker, you're also anonymous, hyporcrite.
How is this anti-white?
@Itsallover
Non-white trolls on the internet love going on about European history of colonising other lands to continue to make white people look evil in this day still. Especially the asker who may be talking about the British in particuraly, whom are white by asking people if they are "bastards"
Therefore, pretty much an anti-British question but can also count as an anti-white post as it is to do with European colonisation. People who post things like this are unable to get over a past they never lived in and move on with their lives.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions