When guys say they like Asian women, they usually are talking about women that look like this:
Which are usually women of Japanese, Chinese Korean, or even Mongolian decent.
They never refer to women like this:
Or this:
Which are women from India and the Middle East. Since these are countries that are technically in Asia, I was wondering if these women are considered Asian too. This confused me for a while.
So so when guys say they like Asians, are they talking about women of Indian and Middle Eastern decent as well, or just women from Japan, China, Korea, etc?
Yes, women from the Middle East and Asia are considered Asian women.
No, they are totally different categories.
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
Are Indian and Middle Eastern women considered "Asian" women?
Asian is an big category, but like some people here was already saying, most people think mainly about east Asian when they say Asian, almost on the the same principle that most people think mainly about vaginal sex when they say sex without anything else, it's better to call indian and middle eastern women exactly like this and instead of "asian", even if calling them Asian might be technically right.
Indian and many Middle Eastern women are technically Asian because they reside in the Asian continent. They just are not East Asian, but we shouldn't generalize Asians anyways. Taiwanese, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Filipino, etc are all Asian but not close and while looking "Asian" or specifically East Asian, they still have very distinguishing features and cultures.
Here in the UK, if you come from the continent of Asia then you will be referred to as Asian when people are speaking of your race. When British people say Asian's they often mean Indian and Pakistani people, we have a much higher number of people from that area than from far East Asia.
We have a large population of Asian people from that area, less so from East Asia so it makes sense that we refer to those people when speaking of people of an Asian Persuasion.
Given that they are all from Asia, yes. Only ignorant people this Asian means Chinese, Vietnamese, Korean or Japanese. The majority of Asians are none of those.
That's not an easy question. Geographically there's no doubt of course. But when people talk about the Asian look they generally mean the East Asian look: Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Singaporese,...
Turkish girls are mainly Asian, Saudi girls are Asian, Yemenite girls, Israeli girls and many Inuit girls too. But geography is an unknown idea for too many people.
Here in England when we say Asian we mean Indian/Pakistani/Sri Lankan/Bengali etc. People who are labelled as Asians by Americans are known as Oriental here. And Middle Eastern is called Middle Eastern.
racerelations.about.com/.../racialnamestoavoid.htm It mentions the reasoning in this article a bit. I think it's a dark history that's unique to the US that makes the word offensive here and not in the UK.
No usually Asian girls are Chinese, Jap, or Korean, but not Indian, or middle Eastern, bc they are different categories and they can't be grouped together.
Geographically middle eastern are western Asian And India is south Asian But India is so diverse, there are mongoloid, negroid, and Caucasian people in India depending on which region you go to
I do not consider Brown women to be equivalent to Asian women despite both being from the same continent much like I don't consider Russian women to be Asian on the same grounds.
Yes they are technically Asian. Indian is South Asian and Chinese, Japanese, Korean is East Asian but they're all under the Asian category. It's the Asian continent after all.
Most Helpful Opinions