
Do you agree drunk sex is rape?


Whether one or both of them were drunk changes nothing. If you consent, then you consent. I don't know any man on the planet that is so stupid that he could be tricked into getting drunk and having sex when he doesn't want to. Women should be held to that same standard, if they expect to be treated like adults.
If a person can't handle that standard, the answer is simple. Just don't drink. Give up your rights to drink, and remain a child for the rest of you life, because they clearly can't be held responsible for their own actions. People can not seriously expect to separate alcohol and sex. Lots of men and women purposely get drunk because it relaxes them so they are more open to sex all the time, and most of them love it. You can't expect them not to have a right to do that anymore because everyone is too afraid to touch them. If a person wants to be treated like an adult and drink, then they need to accept responsibility for the choices they make while drunk. They really need to grow up and accept responsibility for their own choices.
Anyone that claims that one of them being sober makes it rape clearly haven't thought things through. Not only does the person being sober not change the fact a drunk person is still responsible for their own behavior, but at that point you are basically just turning alcohol into a shield so they don't get a rape charge. ll the person has to do is to take a few drinks and do what they were going to do anyway.
Dude, you clearly have no sense of humor.
Drunk rape isn't rape unless one of the individuals is unconscious or clearly in a state where they can't make decisions.
It is amazing how a man is responsible for his actions 100% of the time, but women are excused in this situation. Why? If both are drunk, why is he at fault, and not her?
Ridiculous.
I don't think many people would think he was wrong. Obviously in this situation they are both simply drunk. Ex) Kent and Jade are hanging out. They go back to Jade's place and get drunk. They have sex while drunk. End of story, no matter how much either of them regrets it.
However, if she passed out before she agreed, even if he was drunk, it is rape. Ex) Mike and Sara have been flirting all night at Mike's house. Sara and Mike get drunk. Sara passes out. Drunken Mike penetrates Sara while she is passed out. Mike raped Sara.
Having sex with someone who passes out during sex is wrong as well. That's rape, they gave consent 5 minutes ago when they would be an active, engaging partner, they didn't give consent to physically black out and give their body to that person to use in whatever they want (which might be in ways the person would say no to if awake.)
I think people get mad because just because the guy isn't thinking straight when he commits a crime, that doesn't make it any less of a crime. If I kill someone when drunk, I still killed a person, in the right mind or not.
What if the guy blacked out and the girl kept going but the room is dark so she doesn't know? Should she be jailed for 20yrs?
How is the room so dark you don't know you're fondling a dick? People have sex in the dark and know exactly what's going on. I don't see what you're getting at, no pun intended.
@mikeaaa That's what I'm trying to say. A woman's name can be put into the examples as well. Maybe I read QA's comment wrong, what are you getting out of it?
Personally I don't think anyone should have a set of rules or laws that doesn't apply to another group.
Be it male/female, black/white/other, or rich/poor.
Rape already is scary, but when you add in date rape and now this it's safer to stay single.
Modern feminist blame guys for everything while taking no personal responsibility for their own actions. As is if a girl doesn't enjoy it guys get accused of date rape.
It's disgusting.
Western feminist aren't fighting for equality they already have that. It's now about dominance.
Take money as an example. A guy's income is both money, but a feminist income is hers alone. That's not right but it's the attitude.
Sex is funny. Girls sleep around, 50+ by 21, (actual numbers posted repeatedly here) and get upset if guys don't like that. Say we are slut shaming, my view is don't sleep around slut.
Most men I know can cook, raise kids, etc.., it's overlooked.
This post shows the reason guys get scared. It's a double standard. Feminist disagree
@mikeaaa
media.giphy.com/media/fd1TSJqq3b4GI/giphy.gif ok, no. Just forget it.
@mikeaaa logic and feminist don't go hand in had dude. She'll wouldn't get it lol
Hand*
Your 'logic' is pure stupidity. Why is it by "default", the guy is guilty of committing a crime when both parties are drunk? Why can't women be held responsible too? Read the comments, most women here disagree with you.
FYI please read over the 3rd to last line of your comment before you criticize others lol.
No come back? Typical idiot, nothing in your head except air lol
As a person who was raped via physical force, no it is not. While being drunk may impair people's ability to make decisions in a manner similar to date rape drugs, the difference is that if they got drunk they willingly put themselves in that impaired situation and have to live with the consequences of their decision. If a girl can call drunk sense "rape" because her capacity to make informed decisions was impaired then a guy who physically raped a girl while he was drunk could just as easily he should be off the hook because he shouldn't be held accountable for his decisions because he was impaired.
I agree, and I am sorry for what happened to you. I am surprised more rape victims aren't getting pissed off at how the word rape is so easily tossed around now and speaking up more often. Or maybe they are but the media never reports on them.
This is why innocent guys get thrown in jail, and why girls who were actually raped are called liars. Drunk sex is not rape. If a girl can't consent when she is drunk than neither can a guy. This is just excusing girls to lie about being raped when they really weren't. Rape is such a serious topic, and I hate how people take it so lightly or lie about it.
Agree with you 100%
If she was unconscious but he wasn't, then he raped her.
If they were both drunk and conscious of what was happening, it wasn't rape.
If he was sober and she was considerably drunk/unconscious, then he clearly took advantage of her drunk state and I would call that rape as well.
And vice versa, if we reverse the genders.
Opinion
36Opinion
women and men should not put themselves in a position to be so drunk -at least in public- that they dont know what they doing. Many bad things can happen, the world is not ideal and people should not put themselves in a state that they have no idea whats going on around them. To answer the question depends, did he know she is out of her face and "lure" her to have sex (then he should know she didn't consent) or at the time she was ok to do it and he genuinely didn't try to take advantage (then drunk or not she consented) .
If both parties are drunk then it should not be. Both parties should just get their lawyers and attorneys or something. Gee, that must be a really messy and sticky situation that guy got himself into. I hope eventually everyone learn this and becomes aware of it and not end up in the same situation that he was in. They seriously need to update the laws or some shit on this one. Both parties should take equal blame for what they had done to each other/with each other.
If one party is and one isn't then legally it is defined "rape".
Getting drunk and getting into trouble really sucks big time, therefore always drink responsibly and be careful about how much alcohol you consume.
Just don't get drunk if you aren't trying to get down. Most girls are total teases. If you are gonna start the engine, best take it for a ride! In VERY RARE cases, this may be fact... but more often than not, it's bunk. Just totally stupid. Ladies bes screaming "rape" all too often.
Only if one person is basically dead drunk so it's clear they couldn't give consent while the other is still very aware of what's happening so they're taking advantage of the situation. Even worse if they filled that person up or put something in their drinks with the motif of raping them in the first place, which actually happens far more often than people like to believe!
In any other situation it's just that, drunk sex.
FUCK NAW, but by the #WHITE man's LAW it is LOL. So yeah I guess my OP on/of this whole topic doesn't even matter.
i1127.photobucket.com/.../laughing-hyaenas.gif
How in the hell can a girl purposely get drunk (on his dime more times than not), tease a guy all night, go to the hotel with him, get pleased for the night, wake up and regret it and then he gets "charged" for it? Like huh? He didn't FORCE her to do anything and IMHO if she got so wasted to the point where she couldn't even remember what happened that night, maybe it was meant for her to be "raped" by the horndog who had been talking that sweet shit all day long to her -_-.
I think that if a guy stays sober and pruposely gets a girl drunk in order to take advantage of her, then it is rape.
But that's usually not the case. Most times, the man is drunk too, and therefore wasn't technically able to give consent either. In this case they should either both be treated like victims or both be treated like rapists.
I have to disagree with the first part. Even if that really was rape, and it isn't, any guy that wants to "rape" a drunk girl, would just take a few drinks himself in order to not be held responsible. Since that would mean he wasn't responsible anymore. As such that is a horrible standard as it will never protect anyone, an instead just punish innocent guys that want to stay responsible and not drink and drive when he is taking a girl back to his place.
Unless a person is drugged against their will, they are always responsible for the choices they make. Heck, maybe I should start selling a beer called rape shield, that advertises to guys as a way to get out of rape charges. I am pretty sure you see the problem with someone doing that, but that is exactly the standard people are currently trying to use. I don't understand why anyone would think being drunk should free either gender from their responsibility.
@heavensgift2girls I meant to add that even if a girl does get drunk, she should be held responsible for choosing to drink and putting herself in the situation.
I knew i forgot something.
It all depends on every situation. What do you consider drunk? I can be legally drunk ie blow a 0.08. But I don't feel drunk and remember everything.
Its really hard because I was about to say that if both parties are drunk it still can be skewed. Because the girl could be home walking by herself home and some guy saw her and decided to play gentleman like to take advantage of her.
I think its all depending on how they met ideally. Because you know it's not a split second decision. Its hey that guys cute. I'll go home with him tonight. Every situation is different
I did a myTake on this subject:
www.girlsaskguys.com/.../a8240-craziness-on-campus-if-she-was-drunk-she-gets-to-decide-if-she-was
Tbh, I am totally OVER people who drink and refuse to take responsibility for themselves... the end!
the only case where you can consider it rape is when one of them is so drunk that it's really obvious that she doesn't consent to it... like if she's almost passed out or something like that, and the other one has still a clear mind.
but if we talk about the normal drunk like 99.9% of people are... then nope, definitely no rape.
I am sorry, That picture is feminism in action. It is not. The only time it is, is if she or he was forced. Full stop end of story end of discussion. Saying that he or she is not responsible for actions while drunk is the same as saying. I am going to drink and drive, hit a family of three, kill them, and the judge will be ok with it because i am not responsible because i was too drunk to know any better. Feminists stop playing the victim, and stop turning good girls in to victims.
Well if it not consented to.. yes.. but being drunk and it was consented to I do not think he would be too good of a partner for this activity.. although he would think so.. being drunk makes you think you can do many things.. sex is not one of them in my view.. nor is much else.. take care
drunk sex is not rape its your choice to get drunk in public and if both parties are drunk then its still just sex
Even if both are drunk, someone has to initiate sex, usually the guy. If he was too drunk he would not be able to keep a hard on and sex would fail to take place.
On that basis, if sex took place, it can be classed as rape if she said no!
I think it's rape when someone says no or when someone is clearly not in the right state of mind. When someone is intoxicated, that doesn't mean they are necessarily blacked out and incapable of making decisions for themselves. I've had sex drunk many times. That being said, I don't agree with victim blaming so if someone truly believes they were a victim, then I do think it was rape.
What does this have to do with victim blaming? Look at the poster, do you agree with it or not.
You can't claim to be a victim because you want to be a victim.
I'm saying if someone was drunk enough that they felt like they didn't make the decision to have sex, it's not their fault that they had sex. I do agree with the poster, I think you just need to be more than drunk for it to lack consent.
Why is the woman automatically the victim? They were both drunk. Why can't the man be the victim? If you agree with the poster something is wrong with you.
I didn't mean I agreed with the original poster, I meant I agreed with the poster in its entirety including the text that was inserted. I do NOT think females are automatically the victim whatsover. Sorry I was unclear in my wording.
Not at all. People shouldn't be stupid enough to get that drunk if they can't make decent life choices. Accept responsibility for your actions people.
If they are both drunk then no. It's just a bad mistake that both of them made. But sense guys want to get laid it's always put that women was taken advantage of.
It's not rape if a woman knows that she can't make clear decisions when she's drunk. It's called personal responsibility. An idea feminists seem to hate. All you gotta do is know your limit and don't get drunk at a place where you know people go to hook up. Simple.
"Equality" means women have all rights, and no responsibilities.
If drunk sex is rape, than what is drunk driving? Deception by vehicle? How about drunk brawling, do we agree people were drunk and could not consent to fight?
As others have previously stated sometimes yes and some times no. One thing I will say is that the legal system while ok is highly flawed with many instances of illogical thinking. For example the idea that if you are to drunk to drive you are to drunk to consent to sex however if you crash your car while under the influence we still hold you responsible for your actions regardless of how intoxicated you were.
I think the lgoic for this is he showed intent by inserting his penis into her even though he was drunk. However, Im sure there are situations where the female shows intent. Also in court, in a rape trial, you cannot use as a defence that they raped you.
As a side note according to that leaflet Im a serial rapist. My girlfriend and I have often had drunk sex.
Unless a person purposely gets another person drunk, I don't consider it rape, tho it is immoral if someone gets their self drunk and a another takes advantage of them.
It's not rape if both parties are drunk. Being a woman doesn't mean that you're automatically a victim even if you and the guy are equally drunk
If he made her drunk on purpose e certainly isn't an inocent lamb!
most guys can hold the booze better than girls, tthus they should stop the girl in time before things go too far. Or just leave her alone.
Boozing with a girl hoping to fuck her isn't ethical.
@Dandeus I don't think they complain afterwards, unles the guy was a badass
This is why If I ever get drunk its gonna be in my room with gag! lol
If that pamphlet is for real then that's terrifying.
Just because you're drunk shouldn't mean your no longer responsible for your own actions. You don't get a free pass from drunk driving, why should you if you have sex?
Having sex while conscious and drunk should not equal rape.
No I don't. If you're "too drunk" then you're drinking too much and that's the real issue. I've been plenty drunk before but never that much.
depends.
moral: you wanna get drunk and passed out, do it in your room.
Drunk sex is stupidity on both parties part, but not necessarily rape.
if both are drunk both f***ed up not just the guy. Not rape cause they were both drunk and its also rape cause they were both drunk because they both raped each other. hence no one should be charged cause they were both drunk.
it's rape, men have the control (the d**k) and they need to be responsible with it.
What? So women can't be in control when having sex?
no not at all, but in a tricky situation where the partners aren't in their right minds to decided rolls, it comes down to the man having "it" and needing to realize that she could not have wanted "it"
This is complete nonsense
@carlitoswayy why because you don't have to take responsibly for your actions?
We are both drunk... how is it really my fault again?
So why is it by default the man wanting to have sex? If they are both drunk why is it his fault and not hers as well? ... So you have no problem with the guy going to jail for 20yrs and the woman walking free even tho she did the same thing?
@carlitoswayy because it is logic, what would you say if she got pregnant, "oh it's not my fault it's the drinks fault"
I dont get it.
If your drunk, and im drunk and we have drunk sex.. we are both doing it.
If you get pregnant by drunk sex.. of course im going to blame it on the alcohol and should you...
Do you really think im raping you cause i have the dick? Again, nonsense
if something happened and you went to the police and said that you were both drunk, that would be rape on the mans part. It's just how it is. And I agree with it.
Looks like the feminazis have gotten to this one.
So much for equallity are you huh? Bye
@ThePetSquirrel shut up, do you even know what feminist are? damn you white sexist males
@ThePetSquirrel yeah.. its scary bro
@carlitoswayy listen don't wanna take responsibly than become trans or cut it off? but for now it's considered rape!
Honey something is wrong with you and I hope you never have sex because you'll put some inocent guy in jail. You are a disgusting human being for rhinking like that.
I never said I would press charges i'm just saying if someone did go wrong the it would be seen in the eye of the law as rape.
@carlitoswayy this has to be a guy trolling.
You also said that you agree with the law.. I am sorry but there is never a situation where no matter what happens, no matter the situation, the man is at fault.
Lets put it this way. I am a male victim of domestic violence. The ex used to hit me, kick me and do other nasty things to me just because i would talk to the opposite sex. She literally told me that the act of conversation between my self and the opposite sex was cheating.
The worst example of this is i had talked to the cashier at a store while i was checking out. On the way out, she tripped me, and started kicking me in the ribs and head. Never once did i lay a finger on her. Later on when i kicked her out, she came by with a broken pool cue, and hit me in the face with it causing enough damage that i needed surgery to fix.
The law sees it as my fault, so by your logic because the law sees it as my fault, you agree with it.
Talk about evil, straight, pure distilled evil.
You probably also believe that men can't be victims of DV or Rape, and yet 46% of men experience both.
Ehh it can be I guess. Some of the best sex I've had was when we were both drunk
It can be sometimes but not always. There's a bit of a grey area here i think
Well then I've been raped repeatedly on a consistent basis for most of my adult life.
just have her sign a written statement prior to getting drunk.
Ya can't rape the willing!
Sometimes it is, sometimes it isn't.
this kinda made me lose hope in humanity
Not unless someone forced you to get drunk.
It is rape. I don't think there's really any reason it wouldn't be.
Both should be charged.
It's simple: they raped each other.
It's not rape if we both dont want it
Wtf? Going and start walking with contracts now.
YES...
What?
That's just scary
Stop drinking SOLVED
no never
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions