If having sex while drunk is rape because a woman doesn't consent then how is it cheating when a drunk TAKEN man has sex with another woman?

[Anonymous]

If a taken DRUNK man having sex with another woman is cheating but if a drunk single woman having sex with a man is rape, then how can a drunk person cheat and get raped at the same time?

Why can't a drunk taken man be considered raped if being drunk=no consent?

According to feministic logic whether you give consent to sex or not depends on if you're a taken man or a woman?
Some girls (on my other question about the same topic) said that it is still CHEATING and it is still RAPE. So it turns out that a drunk taken man CHEATED and got RAPED at the same time.
This is ridiculous. If someone rapes you that is never cheating. If you cheated that is never rape. Cheating and rape oppose each other.
But let's not forget that feminists said it is cheating in the case ogf the drunk TAKEN man because I said a drunk TAKEN MAN but if I said a drunk TAKEN WOMAN, now they wouldn't say it is still cheating. They would say it is rape.
I need a lifetime to call feminists on their BS. Their BS is never ending.

[Stoner710]

I would say immoral because she there’s no exactly know what she’s doing but it’s not rape she chose to get drunk and then go out and sleep with a guy now she’s passed out and hasn’t given any sort of consent that’s right if she is merely drunk and wants to have sex it’s a foolish decision but it’s not right she might regret it in the morning but regretting something doesn’t mean you have been raped and it is cheating because you are actively going out and getting intoxicated and then sleeping with somebody that you had no intention of sleeping with but you gave your drunken consent

[Cammy137]

Didn't you already ask this?

In my view, if being drunk removes the ability to consent, then either side should (in theory) be able to claim that they were raped. But I don't view being drunk (unless passed out) as being a valid excuse to claim rape.

You do have a point though!

[Asker]

I did but some girls' opinions made me post another question. They said it's rape and cheating. Well I already mentioned why I made this question.

[Cammy137]

I believe that all drunk people should be held accountable for their actions. If they choose to get so drunk that they do things that they regret, that's on them.

[morimeme1]

You already asked a question like this 🙄

[Anonymous]

Men are held responsible for their choices even when black out drunk.
Women are never held responsible for their choices and actions.

[Asker]

None of those women look like rape victims. So unsexy pictures. Gross!!

[sean1234]

It's not rape, but it's just as bad considering on how there is a chance that bad stuff can happen when you are being controlled by the alcohol you are drinking. People know how bad alcohol is. People know that they could drink, drive and run someone over. Aren't you arrogant as crap if you know it will never happen, then kill someone with your car from being drunk? Same goes for doing other things when you aren't in your right mind.

[boggboss]

It's because people like to rig the game in there favour they associate drunk with passed out when yes you can pass out from being drunk but it don't mean when drunk you are always unconscious at the end of the day if the law holds a women responsible for drunk driving or any crime whilst drunk I'm not sure why men should take responcabilty for the choices a women makes whilst drunk again not when she is black out unconscious but whilst drunk

[abc3643]

It has nothing to do with being passed out.
It has to do with the ability to make a rational decision.

[boggboss]

Yet a drink person is expected to rationally follow the law and if broken will get prosecuted no exception because they where drunk?

[ChefCurry]

Because double standards exist. It's mostly because of social pressure. If a girl has guilty drunken sex and regrets it later she can call rape to save her the humility. If a guy regrets sex with a girl it becomes a story to his guy friends of how he fucked a fat chick once. One is looked down upon while the other is just sad at worst.

[Ephemera1]

You have thoughts. You get drunk, so your sense of awareness is fogged. It causes you to act on the thoughts you normally wouldn't. A guy who was thinking of cheating should be held responsible, he shouldn't have had so many drinks either

[abc3643]

Being drunk DOES = no consent. That's the law.

As to "cheating", there is no legal definition of that and that's between couples themselves as to how they define it.

[TheSpartan]

That’s not the law in the United States; what country are you referring to?

[Asker]

it's no about the law itr's about the double standard. drnk=no consent if it's a woman, drunk=consent if it's a drunk taken man.

[SlothySlob]

Let me remind you that the definition of rape, if taken as a sexual act, is when someone is penetrated sexually without consent.

[Anonymous]

You are 100% correct. Congratulations for being one of the few honest women without a victim complex.

[rjroy3]

I like the way you think. Lending credence to the old adage "it isn't cheating if you were drunk".

[chriscdi]

I don't know this shit and i wouldn't want my girl getting drunk without my presence

[bangyourhead]

Another very good question. Too bad you'll never get a rational answer from the feminists.

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

Having sex while being drunk isn't rape.