
Chicago crime by race. Blacks and Hispanics commit more crimes than others. Why?

Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
2009- a bit out of date, don't you think? Also, this breakdown of the Chicago PD's personnel by race:
big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/...o_officerrace.png
Illinois' supreme court judges:
www.chicagobusiness.com/.../...12_supremeCourt.jpg
And of the Northern District of Illinois' Master Jury Wheel at the time, with more than 76% of the 50,000 jurors on it being white, 10% being Hispanic/Latino, 8% being Black, and the remaining 7% being Asian or 'other'. Given that level of imbalance in the courts, is it any wonder that Blacks and Hispanics are arrested for allegedly having committed these crimes, and convicted of them, at a far higher rate than white people are? People look after their own, and empathize with their own community more than others. You're effectively asking why juries comprised predominantly of relatively older, affluent and middle class white people are so much less likely to find white people guilty of committing violent crimes than they are to find Black and Latino people to be guilty of violent crimes. Gee, I wonder why?
Why not? Let me guess- you're going to go off on some bullshit rant about how black people are less evolved monkeys, right? Poor, sad little boy. Maybe if you actually went to school, you'd stand a chance of gaining the qualifications needed to get your head around simple concepts like evolutionary theory too. But then again, given the level of intellect you've displayed thus far, I wouldn't bet on it.
Many theories. Some will say that blacks are predisposed to violent crime genetically.
But the far more plausible response is that it is due to social factors, particularly lack of education and poor environment (these two go hand in hand though.)
If you want crime to drop educate people.
Poverty rates.
One parent not being there (usually fathers) and driving them into gangs to be their family. Thus committing lot of crime.
Lots*
Poverty. Limited access to quality education. Lack of strong community.
I'm Hispanic and from Chicago. From the "bad" neighborhoods.
They're poor, kiddo. Poor people have shittier lives so they commit more crime because jail isn't some scary far removed concept.
Opinion
11Opinion
Means little without alternative data.
The conviction rate in Japan is abnormally high at over 92%. It could mean that the Japanese police are exceptional at digging out evidence and the prosecutors are good in the court. Or it could be because the Japanese police just sweep everything under the rug and only prosecute defenseless people or only when they are absolutely secured with their evidence to quarant a conviction. That means most of the criminals just laugh and leave.
US police is the same. They do not prosecute people who can lawyer up (read: rich people) unless they are super certain with their evidence AND they think the result would be something substantial. For defenseless people with an over worked public attorney, who only wants settlements and move on, they will get prosecute as long as they think there is a chance.
Crime is most often a result of poverty and, since the majority of American blacks live in single-parent households, it wouldn't be a great leap to say that the majority of blacks in these crime-ridden areas are poor and turn to crime to make ends meet.
Some people believe they are genetically more prone to violent behavior.
Some believe it's entirely due to social conditioning and the fact they are more likely to grow up in unstable poor environments.
Others believe its a combination of both.
Take your pick.
mexicans have to deal with blacks so they commit more crime. blacks are affected by feminist culture to the max where there are no father figures and thus the kids grow up to uncivilized thugs. get rid of the patriarchy and you get extreme violence. black communities are proof of this.
you will find in cities where its mexicans and whites and very few blacks the city will be one of the safest in the country. when its just whites safest in the country just mexicans safest in the country as soon as blacks are over represented in a city meaning more then 13% of the population. when they reach about 20% of the population the crime rate explodes. im currently writing a paper on this and trying to come up with a mathematical equation that can predict rates of violent crime taking into consideration population density, income, racial composition and average age by race.
Friendly Maryland,
Fort Washington, Maryland
Mitchellvile, Maryland
Bowie, Maryland
Ladera Heights, California
Hillcrest, New York
Wheatly Heights, New York
Olympia Field, Illinois
Elmont, New York
Kettering, Maryland
All these cities have something in common. They all have a Black population of over 50% and have one of the lowest crime rates in the entire nation. These cities are where the affluent Black population lives ($70,000 - $300,000 income) and as you can see no body is getting shot in the road or raped or assaulted or gangbanging.
Your premise that blacks brings crime is flawed and is not back by any study since Race and Crime do not correlate and NEVERED correlated. Poverty that is isolated to one geographical areas produces a counterculture which then breeds criminality.
Also, Mexico has a murder rate higher then the US and Canada combined, but there's hardly any Black's (1.16% of the population) in Mexico so why the large crime rate?
Well your study is limiting itself since majority of the cities in the US are below 200,000.
I don't know what made your study choose cities with 200k and above, but a city does not need 200k in order to be classified as a city. As long as the region in question has a mayor and it's own city council, then it can be regarded as a city regardless of if its population is 100, 20K, 50K or 500K.
Also, I'm still waiting on my math equation for my sugar cookies. :/
Uhm I am going to have to do a little bit of correction. The African American family's plight does not trace it's roots to feminism although yes Women's suffrage does play a part in this, but that is more recent. The no father figure can be traced back to *surprise surprise* Chattle Slavery. The Enslaved African family was broken apart, usually because the women were raped and bred like cattle while the Slave owners (whites mostly.) sold their sons, daughters and husbands to work. This continued on until Jim Crow where these (now instinctual due to the length of this retched crime). and into the newest form which is to fund the prison systems. Yes, remove the patriarchy and you get children who are in families that are out of balance. and thus violence ensues.
@TokyoGhoulLover that doesn't happen anymore. it also didn't happen in the 50s before feminism.
hm, I will give you the benefit of the doubt since I am assuming that you are not really familiar with African American Sociology, but just because the decade changes that does not mean the after affects are not present. I would suggest if you have the time Dr. Joy Degruy on this issue. I am sure it will be quite the eye opener. Or if you like I have many books that can confirm these facts that I have presented to you. Or you can live in your head as you have done before. It is your choice, no emotion, no dedication. But still I do find it a tad bit concerning that you are not familiar with these effects being 30 years of age?
History... if you look at history many races were abused which lead to poverty which passes on through each generation. Let's say because of history a mother and father were poor, abusive and lived in poverty. They have a child who's raised by abusive parents and that often leads to crime, then they have children and it's a repeating cycle. Obviously some break it though but it's a vicious cycle. That leads to increased poverty and crime in minority races because of history.
What about the Asian community who faced the same or worse treatment?
@madelacroix I think it comes down to what happened longer, slavery has ruined generations among generations and it didn't get any better because after that was segregation and racism. Weren't Asians only treated badly mostly because of the attacks on pearl Harbor and a war with Japan? I haven't heard much after that I'm afraid, maybe enlighten me?
Read Chinese exclusionary act, setting quotas on them, they faced the same discrimination after including slavery on railroads.
The Great Wall is full of Chinese slaves
Yes, I was speaking of the Asian community in the us. They have done very well
@madelacroix The Asian community is tight knit, as well as people in China and America in the Asian communities look out for each other. They receive loans from each other or from China. We are the only people in America who were stripped of All ties from Africa due to Chattle slavery (haha thanks by the way. anyways). We are also denied loans due to a negative cycle that occurs in this process that was originally meant to keep the minorities in check back during Jim Crow but now it is instinctual. Let me break it down: African Americans are seen as a bad investment due to impoverished area, they cannot start their own businesses, they make less money because more money circles Out of the community than in, the area degrades due to this, African Americans go to receive a loan for a business, they are denied due to being seen as a bad investment. Negative cycle. And also as a side note? BULLSHIIIT. Asians only suffered, what? For a decade? Try 400+ years and ours wasn't voluntary.
So, fifty years ago there was an "ethnicity" whose population was cut by 6 million and all their property taken. They created a superpower since 1948.
Perhaps it's time to stop making excuses bc everyone has one.
@madelacroix siighhhhh. you want to argue with me, seriously? okay present your case, or not. I really dont care. i find chatting with people such as yourself exhausting, because you don't listen, you have a heavy bias, you won't change your mind Anyway, and I would have wasted three days of my life educating someone who has one thing go through one ear and then the other, ultimately changing the subject by finding something to get butt hurt on that has nothing to do with the original argument. So my question for Me is, do I want to waste my time based on the next emotional post/post with "Statistics" on it that Madelacroix will send?
@madelacroix and by the way? The key word is Super power. They are not in a process of literal Nationwide genocide, We are Still dying every day without so much as a fair trial. Xing (not racist just pointing out an example) Can trace his history back to the Very First Xing. that was taken away from us too. And that very same people that you are defending Turned Right back around and started Stepping on African Americans too. With no empathy or understanding whatsoever. So pardon me if I don't cry me a river over people who came to the U. S. willingly and/or have a Home to go back to. because fairly I've had enough of not supporting those whose suffering has a Comma on the end instead of a Period. Thank you very Much. And I am Done.
@tokyoghoul, I do not get emotional, it's one of the benefits of ptsd.
Second, in my undergrad I double majored in biz law and SOCIOLOGY, which had me study this exact subject.
Third, because my professor had the same sentiment as you do I had to read several times as many books to be able to call bs when he called George Washington a child rapist.
So, I ask, do you really want me to put forward a full argument?
So, am I to assume you're done? Very immature to say what you want to say and run, but that's your choice. I've already had this argument and won more times than I can count.
Studies I've read in the past in the U. S. suggest about half is explained by poverty.
The rest is based on sociological factors.
It's also worth asking why southern whites kill each other so much more than other whites.
Southern whites lmao. Apparently you know nothing about the south.
@Thisperson98 I have a lot of impressions, but I don't want to claim to 'know'.
The Democrats keeping them in perpetual poverty whole feeding them breadcrumbs of promises in order to gain their votes.
A mix of poverty and lack of community, plus the fact that they do not come from a line of civilized people.
They're poor. There's a link between poverty and crime.
@dudeman if poverty leads to famine or malnutrition in children, that's possible.
@dudeman pfff racism is rampant here. :-p
They've got nothing better to do, as in they don't have a job and refuse to raise their kids
Dude you are going to get a multiple of excuses...
Higher poverty rates.
Probably connected to community issues.
Your survey is called racial profiling.
I forgot statistics are apparently racist.
@Thisperson98 agreed
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions