Its hard to answer
Cause on the one hand it could be good that way people can have better financial support from each other and a more economically stable place for the children
On the other hand it can drag people to stay with absuive partners or relationships that aren't going well that will just make it worse not only for the partners but the kids aswell
So its a hard one to answer if this does take place there are gonna need to be a lot of things to add on to it to make sure people dont stay with absuive partners for money or bad relationships that could hurt the kids
there's a lot more to do in between the lines so it all depends how much the government is willing to put into it to actually make it something that works and worthwhile but if theyre not gonna put effort into it they better not do it cause a lot of people and kids would suffer if its not working properly
Most Helpful Opinions
No. Using welfare as an incentive to encourage needy families to form two-parent households will pressure people to stay in unhealthy or even abusive relationships just so they can get by financially. That's not good for anyone, especially the children.
No. People who aren't financially as well off might feel encouraged to stay with abusive partners.
No, people should live however they want to live. It makes much more sense for the government to make sure that single-parents get alone well too, without falling into poverty. This can be achieved by subsidizing daycare (or even better, making them free), closing the gender pay gap for women and giving widows a decent compensation for their deceased husband/wife, to only name a few.
it depends on the statistics and the region. if single parents do receive welfare because they are single parents and we can use the welfare to encourage two parents family I think it is a really good idea. depending on the impact that it has on the particular family.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
21Opinion
encourage? sure. frankly we need to encourage 2 parent families for everyone regardless if they are on welfare or not.
but i don't think we can or should try to mandate itNo it shouldn't matter what their circumstances are. No one deserves special treatment. In my opinion, people on welfare should have to test negative for drugs and only get welfare if their family income is less than 20k per year. It should also certainly has limits on what it can be spent on
You know, I'm starting to think that the Conservative hatred of welfare has less to do with fiscal conservativism and much more to do with the line of the bible that says to punish children for the sins of their fathers, or in this case possibly mothers
sometimes living in a 2 parent family isn't an option... or at least not a healthy one...
my history is a bit bad, but if i remember correctly...100 years after slavery in the US, two parent black families were high, then in 1960 you had the welfare government kick in and within a decade two parent black families had declined significantly.
No, the government shouldn't do anything with the family structure, and that means stop giving single moms welfare, that's what's ruining the family structure in America, and the West in general.
Here the govt encourages grandparents to build or buy a big house with a small apt for each generation.
They call it kangaroo housing.
In that way the grandparents can help with the kids and get helped later but neither is ever free.
Not my idea of happiness: living with your parents in law and changing their pampers later. :pThey can make tax lower. But it isn't financially possible to pay everyone. Also people on welfare do not pay taxes, so your income will be lower than your spending.
The government should make people in the welfare system do something that could be considered work. Even if that work is picking up trash off the side of the freeway. At least until they could find a job.
The government currently monetarily discourages couples with kids from getting married.
I personally know families whose adults are not married because to do so would reduce benefits.Although everyone should have the freedom to live alone, without children, or in any other way, there is no denying that the nuclear family is at the core of society's backbone.
No we should just tax single parents for being single parents. As soon as they get married with a new partner we relieve their taxes. The more years they are married the more taxes are relieved, after 25 years of marriage taxation is completely removed.
Welfare actually removes the desire in the citizen to work and innovate. It is a system that does not produce nor create, it simply consumes.Welfare is tape on the capitalist system, it fixes nothing. what is needed is a better system.
The welfare system, combined with feminism, is what destroyed the family in the first damn place.
More of the same isn't going to help.you should not be able to get welfare unless you are agree to be sterilized. If you can't take care of yurself or the kids you have you dont need to burden society with more.
Can't feed em, don't breed em.its there to help people when they need help. not as a tool of control
No. Forcing people to live within a specific set of means is the exact opposite of a democracy. As a person who came from a divorced home I can't think of anything more toxic than forcing two people to live together that clearly hate one another.
in my opinion no because it may lead to more families in which abuses are acted.
Governments should pay mothers a wage to stay at home and raise their kids.
No. People should be paid properly.
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions