Ugh... No. Nobody is "redefining" what it means to be a man. I don't know why but I find that statement so annoying. Probably because it's just mid-wit bullshit.
Anything weird and people will speak about how that person is redefining beauty, femininity, masculinity etc. "Why this woman with a beard is redefining female standards of beauty". No. Not to be mean but that's just a woman with a hormonal disorder, women aren't suddenly gonna start growing beards and men are never going to find it attractive.
The same goes here. Men aren't gonna start wearing dresses, and women aren't gonna be attracted to men in dresses. A lot of libtard women are talking about how hot he is or men who "embrace their femininity" are, and I can guarantee that 99.9% of them would not date such a guy at all. They wouldn't respect such a man at all. They're talking out of their asses.
As @Ally247 mentioned he's getting this kind of (mostly bullshit) admiration because he's Harry Styles, a famous and successful pop singer. The average man would be laughed at if he dresses so ridiculously. The guy is just pandering to the woke brigade anyway too.
Most Helpful Opinions
I think he is exemplifying what it is to NOT be masculine. There seems to be an effort to really push gender fluidity in this country.
People can be trannies if that's who they are. But it's the antithesis of masculinity. Look at the latest fashion industry styles.
I love Harry Styles but he's not a trailblazer, many others have done this before him. Price and David Bowie did it, Little Richard before them.
I don't think it's redefining what it means to be masculine but I think it's shows men that it's okay to be feminine... if they want to be.
He isn't redefining masculinity because he's Harry Styles, he can do what he wants. If another guy walked down the street with a dress on, it won't be met by the same levels of admiration.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
16Opinion
Well strictly speaking dresses and other "female wear" is the culmination of all human achievement up to this point. I would be disappointed in us if in the year 2020 we did NOT exclusively wear clothes that were amazing.
The fact that there are entire styles of clothes I am socially not able to wear because of my gender is a strange concept to me. The idea that women should wear dresses because dresses looks good but men are not allowed to wear clothes that "look good" is weeeeeird. It is not normal and the world would probably be a better place if both men and women could wear whatever damn clothes they wanted to. Personally I still prefer pants with pockets but that is just my personal taste.Maybe I’m old fashioned, but... dresses are for chicks. I mean, do you, don’t let me tell you how to party. Just don’t tell me being feminine is the “new” masculine, lmao. Just say you’re a dude and you like feminine shit, I’m not gonna eat your lunch for that, knock yourself out.
It’s hard to be “counter-culture” when your actually going with the flow!
media, academia, post-modernists... they have all been pushing this narrative of genders being a social construct for a long time. this stuff it riddled all through culture these days. When a man puts on a dress these days... “average people just shake their head and go about their day But the elites just worship them for it”! it’s not exactly like he’s being edgy.Don't be daft. Harry Styles is barely a man, let alone any sort of beacon of masculinity.
He's dropping to a z list celebrity now that one direction has gone all directions and he's no longer relevant anywhere else. He'll probably come out as being a "woman" next for a bit of attention.No, he's feminine and they gays liberal news fucked him in his ass or told him like Harvey Weinstein told Jennifer Lawrence
Suck a dick for a role
They are attackingg masculinity so when the wolves come their be little to no men to fight. It's also a way of population controlThis is how media manipulates you into thinking a certain way. Put a dress on a celebrity everyone likes and watch every man question themselves. I bet there are people behind the scenes that play some sick game and make bets on how many men or women they can manipulate to follow a stupid trend. Who the heck started licking toilet challenge? Smh
He can do what he wants but I think he is an idiot. If he is transgendered then I can understand but if not then I think that he just wants the attention that he used to get from 1 direction but no longer does
A real man wears whatever the fuck he wants. Whether that's heavy duty flannel or a pink floral dress.
You can't redefine masculinity or femininity, any attempts to do so are stupid, and any "results" yielded from such attempts are make-beliefs because of illogical "acceptance and tolerance" tendencies
Men should wear whatever the fuck they want and people should mind their own business.
No he is not. A man wearing a dress is not masculine.
I feel like people should be allowed to wear what they want. Like who’s gonna stop you?
No. he's a gay. I dont think anyone looks to gays to define masculinity.
no, he is more likely affirming most people's idea that everyone in boy bands are gay
Simple answer , NO. Guys aren't looking to a pop star for guidance on masculinity.
No, it's a calculated publicity stunt. A lame attempt to be shocking and outrageous.
no. He's defining himself as a feminine male that is lacking in masculinity. The end.
Hell no, he's a cross dresser
No; he's just violating it.
No, he's redefining what it means to be feminine.
Learn more