Kill 10 per year and earn a $5,000.00 check.
Would you be in favor of a unrevocable law that lets citizens hunt rapists and other sex predators for sport?
Kill 10 per year and earn a $5,000.00 check.
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News Hell yeah, sign me up... Don't even gotta pay me, I'd do it for free
To all the downvoters...
would you still feel that way if it's YOUR child raped or/and brutally murdered...
Part of what's wrong with this country is there seems to be more concern for criminals rights than their victims or the innocence and safety of our children...
Not only do these animals usually get out to repeat offend, they get housed on the government's (TAXPAYERS) dime, usually in neighborhoods not far from schools or where children live and play... Just do a search of sex offenders in your area if you don't believe me 🤷🏼♀️
Just use my 5k to educate people about victims and victims rights, oh wait that might just be an oxymoron, victims rights get trampled all the time in favor of criminals smh it's truly fucked up there
That too!!
Right
Funny people act like that's more inhumane than what these animals do to innocent children... Anyone EVER hurts one of MINE, I'm not waiting for the courts to do NOTHING
@Brainsbeforebeauty you do realize that with your thinking anyone can accuse you, your kid , your husband, your siblings, your parents of rape? Are you going to pull that trigger? Mob justice usually targets the innocent, not guilt. Look back in history and see which group have been the biggest victims of being falsely accused of rape.
@SnackAttack7 first my husband dead and gone so that would hardly matter I'm not saying don't prove them guilty first, but this give them a slap on the wrist, let them out to repeat offend.. How many kids have to get molested, raped, murdered before people realize that the current system of catering to criminals is not working
@SnackAttack7 don't make this a race issue... What funny, why is there NO MENTION if the innocent children raped molested, kidnapped and brutally murdered every year. Why don't you look it up and tell me which one is the higher number!
You are extremely naive if you don't think race is a factor. But you're white you'll never understand it SMH.
As the @asker said , innocent or not , kill them all. That's what you support.
@SnackAttack7 don't presume to put words in my mouth... And funny, most child molesters, rapists are white, and I don't give a F if they white, black, Chinese, Asian... A rapist is a rapist is a rapist as a child molester, pedophile is as well. I think you're the one being nieve here not me, but okay... I'll discuss, I'll debate, but when you start with the putting words in sometimes mouth or the put downs, convo over...
Thanks for mh
I mean, I'd do it for free. So that's just icing on the cake.
Yeah, but I'd hand load mine to make it more personal.
Oh, that sounds fun too. Maybe keep a trophy to mount on my wall, practice my taxidermy with it.
Lol, some guy got all butt hurt by this one.
Opinion
32Opinion
I like the concept especially for child traffickers, clean them out so kids can run around in their yards without any fear. its really called a firing squad. Get caught... you get shot, that's that. save a lot of children. I prefer to beat them into submission because I don't like all the blood and screaming. Reality is... they are all little children trapped in some wicked ass adult bodies. But they can be too far gone for society to deal with... the amount of therapy needed immense. It's the training that's the problem, corruption of society.
it's same age old problem Jesus was dealing with... they were taking babies and throwing them to the dogs to eat back 2000 years ago (and worse), not much has changed in humanity. How do you fix humans? Jesus tried. Every few decades leaders come up with a brilliant idea... "we'll have a war... and clean "them" out"... the other guy is always the wrong one. This is your solution, it's just more random and dramatic with explosions and terror. This war, that war, WWI, WWII, Vietnam and it keeps going. Jesus tried to change the heart which is where the problem is. But wickedness grows faster than good. Its easy to corrupt a child and trap them in a state of trauma, decades to fix it. And here we are... evil just keeps propagating, even in churches as we know.
the good thing with your law is those crimes would diminish. some innocent people would get caught. And lets not even get into race, right? that isn't going over well having white people hunt down black rapists, or visa vis.
maybe you need to watch "the running game", or logans run.
I agree with you on most things, but I can't agree with you on this one. I can see the utilitarian logic in what you're saying, but my objection over this issue isn't even really just about rape or sexual offenses. Think of murder charges or theft or all sorts of crimes that would be judged similarly in a similar criminal justice system. And add in the racial bias in jurists and judges when sentencing a criminal. That would be exacerbated in a system like this. I think it's a really irresponsible idea and just encourages vigilantism.
There are no answers to that question. You could solve a lot of problems with your method. If you took everyone who stole a candy bar outside and shot their brains out, you'd find very quickly that people don't want to steal anymore. But that's a very black and white analysis of a problem that forgets so many things that are relevant in the criminal justice system. Think about somebody who commits a sexual offense when they're 18 vs when they're 64. Does that matter? What if they have mental health issues, does that matter? What about rehabilitation or even paying attention to victims themselves? I know a rape victim. She's gone through extensive therapy and is still broken by the experience, and yet doesn't wish him dead. Listening to victims also means listening to the desires and ideas of victims thay are no suited to exactly what you want to do. Your solution appears to be just "kill everyone who could be a rapist", which incidentally vindicates Trump's desire to execute the Central Park 5, a notriously racist conclusion that is rightfully lampooned. I do respect and appreciate your input on this website of general insanity, but I have to say that it really seems like you wrote this out of pure rage rather than good will.
This isn’t a matter of good will to me, this topic makes my blood boil and dredges up things I don’t like. I’ve lost loved ones to this and nearly myself, so yes it is a bit personal, and admittedly my beliefs are extreme. Yes, I am for killing them all, but not out of mere revenge. It’s more to protect the populace. The current system fails and has failed thousands every year, allowing those predators to go back out into society. They can go back to raping and likely killing people, as they won’t want to get caught again, and a corpse doesn’t squeal. I don’t want a child or anyone, knowing their rapist just got out early or was never imprisoned, and is free to hurt or kill them or the public. I don’t want a rape victim to have to pay for their tormentors to live, have a bed and three meals a day. Most of all, I don’t want them to live in fear for the rest of their lives.
The ineptitude of the current system doesn’t work well enough. Not even close. Yes mine is extreme, but it would either work or it would allow for a next stage to begin, one that works better.
There are things I agree with there. Certainly expecting a victim to fund their captive's prison sentence is appalling. I also agree that sentences are often extraordinarily lenient in cases of violent offenders who show "good behaviour" or know how to manipulate those who monitor for what they consider "good behaviour". We can start by fixing those things, or allowing tax exemption for victims. That would also likely be easy to legislate politically because I think it would be pretty non-partisan.
I also think there are enormous social factors involved in a) who commits specific crimes b) who is victimized or c) who is prosecuting them. I have to be honest, there have been times where I've seen white male prosecutors or judges go lenient on a "good Christian college boy" for rape, and I wanted very much to shoot the judge before I'd shoot the boy.
There are a lot of things that could be changed with the justice system. Believe women when they make accusations, support victims when they come forward, de-stigmatize rape victims, STIGMATIZE rapists, (many of them aren't already), etc etc. But if we expect these things to magically fix everything overnight, it won't. I don't think anything will unfortunately. But there are steps forward we can take.
yea, that would be great (even though ik innocent people would be killed too in the process ). those people usually don't get convicted and if they do, even if what they did is real severe they only stay like a few years behind bars & they cost money. tbh i don't understand why it's thaaat illegal or immoral or whatever to kill someone that you know for sure is a litteral chomo or rapist
Not in the slightest. That assumes they're already guilty before a fair trial. I have no interest in witch trials. Unless they managed to escape prison after sentencing, and I might still be opposed, that is conflating the suspect with the perpetrator. That is the anthesis of a civilized society.
To an extent. Those people would have to be proven guilty with DNA evidence. It would be terrible for an innocent person to end up in that, as that would happen since some innocent people get convicted for this stuff that they did not do.
If it's 100% certain it's them, let the hunt begin.
So pretty much like a bounty hunter. I can bring you in warm or I can bring you in cold...
Yeah, I could (did you get my reference?). But anyways here's another question. Which is a worse punishment: being killed or made to live a long miserable life?
Interesting points, yeah. They'd be a good riddance from society. But if it was common knowledge that this organization killed the innocent to accomplish their goals (even if only a few innocent) then society might not look too kindly on them either.
By the way, that quote was from The Mandalorian
I guess in the end it all comes down to what brings you rest in your soul. You do you. I'm just going to fight my battles over there... waaaay over there.
I got the reference, just finished the season 2 the other day.
@Quackthulu
Eeeyyy, that's the one! Same here. And I've got to say it was a beautiful finally to the season. They've set up some interesting things for season 3.
I was hoping it would have gone differently, but it wasn’t as bad as a lot of people are making it out to have been.
Oh true? I don't know what people are saying bad about it. All my friends that watch the show all say they thought it was great. I usually like to watch heaps of reviews online but I haven't yet.
Yes on a island and place their head over a fireplace.
Especially when done towards children.
Though I’d lock them up put their head in the starcades and whip them.
And every year have them rape with a chipped glass dildo.
No. We shouldn't sacrifice our own humanity for the sake of exacting bloody vengeance. As despicable as these crimes are there are punishments suited for it. And if we suddenly enacted such an all out kill all you want extravaganza, what's to stop people from abusing it by murdering people they simply dislike under the pretense that they were sexual offenders. How would that law be regulated, managed, controlled? Dangerous waters.
I think we should make it into a safari. But give the kill to the family or the victim, arm them to their teeth, and let them hunt the dude, but I'd wound him first, breake a leg, cut off a ball, chop of some fingers, and run forest run...
Aye, not bad. Then we'll have young teens below the age of 18 wielding random weapons and killing and it'll be called "self-defence". 😂
Absolutely not. The collateral damage would far exceed, the "justice " being seeked. Just a little history lesson would show how many innocent black men were lynched or sent to prison having been falsely accused by white women for rape.
How would you know if someone is guilty or not? Without fair trail , evidence and due process. Anyone can accuse a person of rape out of revenge.
Of course a down vote 😂.
Bounties should be more. Unless this is a Hunger games scenario.
but also, what if they’re wrongfully convicted?
Yes, I believe these people will help the police out a lot?
Being a rapist/pedo is bad. Extremely bad. But Being a murderer is worse. Rapists and pedos will get whats coming to em. Maybe beat tf out of em and lock em up. But to kill them would make us no better
You lost me at sending money to the state.
I jest, but seriously... This sounds intriguing, but would come with a plethora of problems, not limited to people being "mistakenly" killed, human rights and constitutional abuses, etc.
I don’t see why not. You’re allowed to hunt rabbits and deer and they did fuck all wrong.
As someone who was accused of a rape that I didn't commit, and was later proven innocent, I would not support that, no.
Seriously got a downvote for saying you shouldn't kill someone if you aren't actually sure they committed a crime? Alright. Sure. I guess I'm the crazy one.
I'd do it for free but that check might help cover the cost of having them stuffed or turned into rugs so I'm all for it
Absolutely not. We have laws for a reason. Also, the idea of hunting other people because you don't like what they did is an absolute abomination. People who commit sex crimes are just as entitled as anyone else (and in some cases perhaps more so) to due process.
That shouldn't include being let it to commit more sex crimes, but did you ever notice how it's a second time, third time offender etc? At what point is enough enough. You don't think it's a problem that these animals are let out to reoffend and run someone else's life?
Due process, while admittedly flawed, is the best mechanism we have for separating the people who are culpable from those who are not. Punishing every person who is accused without providing an opportunity for them to defend themselves is a characteristic of authoritarian societies that is not consistent with our laws, including our Constitution, and was in fact the basis for the witch hunts and burnings in the early 16th century in this country.
So what’s better? Letting some folks off the hook and inevitably letting rapists go free to rape and likely murder people? Face facts, it’s not merely “flawed”, it’s failed thousands each year, every year, ever since the country was founded. Sure some innocents get fucked over, that happens already but I don’t see you hunting for reform. At least with my method, rape will become the last thing someone does.
But hey, I digress. God forbid if someone you love, a sister, a daughter etc. gets raped, just be sure to tell them if the rapist gets off “hey at least we have due process! Don’t worry about him coming after you or others again, because due process is a great protection for you and society!”.
You can do that, I’d rather shoot a 8mm through the rapists skull.
@Brainsbeforebeauty People who are actually convicted of sex crimes usually get fairly long sentences, i. e., 10 to 15 years. The ones who are then, after serving those sentences, deemed to be Sexually Violent Predators are civilly committed to state hospitals in California where if they participate in a "treatment program" (which does not exist), and "complete it" (which they cannot because it doesn't exist), are freed. To the best of my knowledge, nobody has ever been freed on this basis. (Having worked as a Forensic Psychologist in several prisons and a state hospital here in California, I am very familiar with these processes). Is a life sentence long enough for you?
No clue. Honestly, I’d rather just kill them all to be safe. Know what doesn’t happen then?
0% of rapists get away. Your method doesn’t work, mine will. Your method is an abomination to the victims and general population put at risk because of its ineptitude. Mine harms far less.
So, if a loved one was violently raped, and the rapist got off scot free, what would YOU tell them? What would you say to console them in their fear of being harmed again or killed? Or the public facing rape and likely murder?
And when they victimize someone else, who's fault is it... The idiots that keep letting em out as well as the ones that fight for the rights of CRIMINALS more than the rights of VICTIMS and INNOCENT people
@agape93An English jurist, Blackstone, stated "It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer." I agree. It may be your innocent brother or husband or father or male child who is "hunted down and killed" because you don't like due process. In this country, like it or not, we don't do things that way. That is adjudication and murder by a mob. Part of living in a free society is tolerating things like speech we don't like, and legal processes we disagree with.
If you’re not willing to advocate change, then you’re not helping. Not really. Thousands per year get off charges, going free to hurt others and harm the victims again. You say it’s more expensive to execute? Bull crap. A shotgun shell is.25 each. It’s also more cruel to make the RAPE VICTIM pay for their rapists imprisonment for decades if they did manage to get convicted. The system is a failure.
Oh I do advocate for this, this is not a joke post. That’s why I know you’re not really helping.
You’re literally advocating for the rights of criminals, expressly over the rights to life and safety of victims and the public. That’s just vile.
Tell me if someone raped your daughter and got off, would you kill that rapist if you believed he would do it again? Provided it was legal to do so, of course. Or would you let them hurt more people?
“Oh wait, coward? That’s it? Don’t dodge questions and you won’t have that problem.”
Strike one
“No clue. Honestly, I’d rather just kill them all to be safe. Know what doesn’t happen then?
0% of rapists get away. Your method doesn’t work, mine will. Your method is an abomination to the victims and general population put at risk because of its ineptitude. Mine harms far less.
So, if a loved one was violently raped, and the rapist got off scot free, what would YOU tell them? What would you say to console them in their fear of being harmed again or killed? Or the public facing rape and likely murder?”
Strike two. Learn to fucking read.
Don’t change the goal posts.
“Two things - stop calling me names immediately, and answer MY previous question: "Without a trial and due process, how can you separate the monsters from the wrongly accused?"
Is not the same question as
“also, you did NOT answer my question, which was "So in your view, we should just kill every single man accused of rape? What about women accused of raping male children? Them too?"”
Yet you didn’t notice my answers, and mixed up two different questions.
Oh no hon, your nonsense kicked this up. Maybe pay attention and read my questions next time. Like this one you missed:
“Tell me if someone raped your daughter and got off, would you kill that rapist if you believed he would do it again? Provided it was legal to do so, of course. Or would you let them hurt more people?”
I’m not accusing you of anything, I’m reiterating what you just said. You said
“No, I would never kill anyone that wasn't trying to kill me.”
So literally that means you wouldn’t kill a rapist that was raping or killing someone, because they aren’t trying to kill you personally. Or am I wrong and you would kill them then?
No. The witch hunts and collateral damage would be horrendous.
I think they should have a chastity belt like in Robin Hood men in tights. Tied the ground with a magnetic fine glass and burned. Or burned to the stake.
No, sex offenders convicted after due process should just be put in jail for a long length of time depending on the severity of the sex offense.
No , that is a stupid idea. It may start with pervs and rapist's. Where would it end , some one who does not egree with or you don't like..
I realize this is tongue-in-cheek, but no, I wouldn't be in favor of that all. Too slippery a slope !
But what if someone is innocent and convicted? Then you might kill an innocent person.
Nothing should go to the state for a true eye for an eye.
I'm too soft to advocate the death penalty alone in fear of someone being innocent, this is a bit too extreme for me.
If there were 100% undeniable proof they were as such then yes I would be in favor, very much so.
Im all for legalizing revenge killings
Sure
Yes yes yes🙋♀️
What is reward to hunt down Trump?
It is should be more to hunt someone super evil as Trump is!!!
I triggered two Trump slaves lol
What is the bounty for pedo heads?
Paki district in Rotherham UK, literally like Klondike
or Vatican.
Are there any unrevocable laws?
No, I'm in favour of a civilised society.
Would be too easy to say "Oh he wasn't? My baddd"
I'm all for it.
That could turn into a witch hunt very easily.
I can see this going wrong in so many ways
a lot of people would
No, that's how serial killers will be made.
Absolutely not.
Sure sounds fun
Most Helpful Opinions