Do you think murdering or torturing pedophiles should be legal?

[xANGEx]

why or why not?
Pers I'd say the death penalty should be automatic for them. they usually reoffend and can't be helped, plus I don't want my taxes going to keeping them alive and they just don't deserve life. Torture would be kinda cool in that case too. I'd fully support it. I think we should take lessons from the middle east about how we deal with them. Public hangings and shit like that, would be great.

YES

Just murder

Just torture

no

[Stellargasm]

In the holocaust homosexuals were sent to the concentration camps which is as much of an atrocity as anyone else sent there but also since it’s pretty much impossible to prove it was also used to get people out of the way. Like you just accuse someone of being gay and they’d be hauled off.

You don’t want to live in a world where if someone doesn’t like you for whatever reason they can coach their little kid into saying you molested them so you get hauled off and tortured. In a perfect world people with pedophilic tendencies would have the ability to seek Psychiatric help before they assault someone and if enough would they could establish some Science into possibly curing them and keep kids from becoming victims which is the real goal. That can never happen at the rate we’re going though because we let Redneck Vigilantes keep them hiding in the shadows where they’re even more of a threat to the public.

[topur]

Humans have rights, no matter what they do, they are still human so those rights should be respected to the most possible extend.

The following is generic, not for pedo cases only:
When someone acts against other, you need to: compensate the victim and make sure the guilty person doesn't do it again.
To make sure it doesn't happen again you put guilty persons in prison and try to reabilitate them, there are also restraining orders or domiciliary arrest.
To compensate the victim the guilty has to pay a fine or compensation, you pay their hospital fees, offer them therapy and others.

What changes on pedo cases that would allow murder and torture?
For me it's not justifiable.

On a more logistics point of view : who would be the murderer or the torturer? How could the government ask someone to murder or torture other human being? That goes against my rights.

[Kaneki05]

A person who takes a life takes away someone elses rights so therefore it's fair to say they have no rights no more. Therefore killing them would be okay cause in all purposes they have no rights anyway.

[topur]

No, that's not true. The universal human rights are for everyone at all times.

[topur]

See article 29 which talks about limitation of the human rights.
It is clear that ( by reading it all including paragraph 3) if you can supress the evil that a pedo can do by keeping him in jail, then it is not admissible to impose torture or the death. For you are limiting his rights as little as possible.

[Kaneki05]

My own standers say that if you take away someone's human rights you therefore have no right to yours.

I am not fallowing what others wrote. I am just saying from a logical point of view this makes sense right? And if it don't why not?

It's only logical to get what you give. If you are willing to do something you must be willing for it to be done back and you have nothing you can moan about since that would make them hypocritical and nothing is worse than a hypocrite.

If you just end up fallowing what was wrote to be right your not really thinking by yourself. Logically thinking about it is the only way to figure stuff out. And logically it makes sense for a person who does harm has waved there own protection from harm.

Till this day no one has ever convinced me this isn't logical or unfair. Fairness is the only way to make this world a bit of a better place.

[topur]

Well, I was quoting human rights because I agree with them, but I can argue a bit more explaining my position.

I'll start with the argument that most times there is option that is fair:
Suppose a guy John with a wife Jane, he kills Bruce's wife, Betty. What does your loosing rights logic leads to? John must be killed? Jane must die? John and Jane must get divorced and never see each other again?
None of those is fair for Jane who did nothing.

Other argument:
Suppose that two guys Rob and Bob, they are twins in every way (have wifes, kids, home). Now, Henry is mentally ill and he kills Rob. Max is "sane" guy and he kills Bob. The damage that Henry and Max have inflicted are the same, so both of them loose their rights and both of them should be killed. The logic of no right leads to an unfair situation of Henry being killed even though he is mentally ill.

So most of the times the logic of "you violate rights, you loose your rights" doesn't lead to fair situation like your goal was.
That's why I don't follow it. I'm sure that what I stand for is not perfect and has problems too, I simply think that they are more acceptable.

[Kaneki05]

Mentally ill don't asolve you from your actions. So that wouldn't sway my thoughts on it. Giving them special treatment wouldn't be fair on the person life they took. Wether emotionally this seems wrong to punish someone who is ill or not.

John should die and jane shouldn't of married a killer saying it's not fair on her was john fault so he was still the problem who must be got rid of. Don't really matter what she feels about it or not. Emotions are best left out if you want to keep stuff logically fair.
He still took a life giving up his own right to live.

Human rights just seems to based on emotional choices. Rather than fairness. Since putting someone in jail for taking a life.
Isn't a equal reaction. Compared to you took a life so now you lose your life.

[topur]

We just have different opinions. I understand your logic, but I believe my view is better so just like you believe yours is better.

[Kaneki05]

Fair enough :) Appericate the talk.

[Ellie-V]

No, I’d rather them be put away for the criminally insane until they are properly rehabilitated and if the reoffend then they could get the death penalty. Torture is completely unnecessary and callous.
You can’t expect other pedophiles to have the courage to admit their problem and get help for themselves with all the fear mongering that would would come with legal torture, especially if it was public.
That's just so counterproductive.

[311WasAnInsideJam]

Murder and torture are just about the only things that warrant the death penalty (and cannibalism, I think)

There's a criminal justice system in place so that people don't go around murdering and torturing others in acts of vigilante justice.

TL;DR
No.

[MackToday]

They're sick in the head like serial killers. If they are out of control to the point of acting on their sickness, yes put them down. If they don't act on it then we'll never know about them anyway. The thing is to do the research to find out what went wrong not to try and make this sick shit seem normal. The same with homosexuality , gender dysphoria and the rest of it. If it's making the person act out they are too sick to be in public and need institutionalization. Homosexuals are stable enough to have their own country set aside for them and that might be a viable solution.

[tartaarsaus]

Nope. Torture is barbaric, just like capital punishment. And ideally you would not degrade yourself to the 18th century when punishing someone who is stuck in the 18th century. There are plenty efficient ways to deal with pedophiles (jail) that do the job.

Either way, having capital punishment in a civilized state with being able to appeal decisions (and yes, everyone has the right to do that) leads to cases that take decades and really incredibly high costs (some suggest higher than jail for life). Plus, the costs of them going to jail are insignificant on a budget of a government.

[TheUniqueOne96]

I wouldn't mind seeing (not actually watching it) them, alongside rapists, being killed, though I'm not trying to be all political.

Maybe torture or product testing on them, either way, they have to suffer.

There's a saying though, that goes something like this:

I believe in the death penalty, but I also believe there can be no room for error.

Basically, if this were to happen, let's hope none of the executed were actually innocent, because how sad would that be.

[JackSmy]

Murder is ILLEGAL! And because of this, inciting and eliciting murder, which is also ILLEGAL, might get you into some legal issues, yourself!!
I think you need to think more, before posting such radical things! You post as 18, so what do you really know about life? What about the wrongly accused? What if it is a mental illness?
If pedophilia is a mental illness, and you think they should be murdered, then what about abortion, or children born with Down's syndrome, or children that will need life-long care? Maybe they should be murdered too!!
Make and ABSURD argument, and accept an ABSURD retort!
So easy to take one step, then another takes another, and suddenly we have concentration camps, and a Fuhrer!!
Read history, and have some solid basis!

[abc3643]

No.
1. "Murder" is a felony.
2. It's a violation of the 8th Amendment.
3. How do you bring back the executed convicted pedophile who was wrongly convicted?

God, I hate immature reactionary responses from people who don't think things through.
People this stoopid should be "murdered or tortured".

[abc3643]

"Torture would be kinda cool in that case too"

Have Hitler or Stalin been reincarnated?

[Drumlin2001]

No. It's not justice.
People shouldn't be punished just for being a peadophile. It's a paraphilia that they are born with, haven't chosen, and they should be offered help to manage it.
People who abuse minors should be prosecuted within the law in the same way as a civilised society should treat anyone who breaks the law.

[xANGEx]

that's what I meant. convicted pedos, not virtuous ones

[Drumlin2001]

We don't have death penalty in UK. Doing a little research (thank you google) it seems in the US it costs more to try cases with a death penalty, so you wouldn't save money, quite the opposite. And the sheer numbers if cases that you would need to try as death penalty cases would flood the system.
Prevention is bettwr than a cure. Investing money up front to support people, prevent them from offending, would sve cost of trying cases, poloce time, cohnsleling and fall out from emotiinally damaged kids growing up to gonon and commit other crimes (many abused kids and up using drink and drugs to mask the pain and turn to crime to fund habits)

[Daniel3035]

Sigh you can’t torture a group of people and call yourself as a society that supports equality. Even if a child an adult feels the same way you feel about a boy I know for a fact if I said to you no sex or you’ll be arrested with your boyfriend you’d do exactly as he did.
Whilst touching a child is wrong to treat the offender disproportionately is even worse.

[N192K001]

For offenders, firing-squad (the gold-standard for execution, it seems) may be the way.

For non-offenders trying to protect the kids by keep themselves in check, life-long therapy.

[Ianto]

I'd agree, given a 100% certainty in the conviction. How do you guarantee never getting a miscarriage of Justice?

[xANGEx]

it's very rare, and obviously there would be fair trial and all

[Ianto]

There is a regular procession of overturned convictions in the British Justice system. I have no reason to suppose it is worse than anywhere else.

[Sargentcaptain]

Jails should be used as a way to keep the dangerous people away from the society, not to torture criminals. At that point you are no better than the people you torture.

[ArchEnemy]

Why kill them? Life in prison would bring them way more pain than anything else. Other prisoners would beat their ass all day long as soon as they find out why they are there.

[Kaneki05]

She said why, cause of taxes and paying basically so they can live. And if they get out they will do it again

[ArchEnemy]

@Kaneki05 Life without the possibility of parole problem solved. So what they are living off of people's taxes they still will be punished for the rest of their days. Throw them in maximum security prison.

[Kaneki05]

Well most people seem to care about money and not paying to keep people who hurt others alive.

[ArchEnemy]

@Kaneki05 No it is paying to keep people who hurt others getting their ass beat and raped all day if you wanna get technical about it.

[Kaneki05]

More like paying so people can go into jail stay alive and rape anyone who comes in who just got put in there for robbing a place. Since most of the rapists in there will be raping people who were put in there for lesser crimes. Who don't derserve to be raped.

[ArchEnemy]

@Kaneki05 Pedos get destroyed in jail they are not the predators in prison they are the prey. That is common knowledge. Other inmates will tear their ass apart and beat the shit out of them the last thing I am worried about is tax money going to prison it is not like that money is going back in your pocket if anything it will go to some other government shit.

[Kaneki05]

Smh your still helping rapists live and do what they want in there

[ArchEnemy]

@Kaneki05 You are a complete moron. bottom line I can't keep replying to you I am losing brain cells even talking to you.

[normalice]

Sure, but the problem is the courts - you can't take back an execution, and if it later found that the person was innocent, then everyone who voted for it is an accessory to murder.

[Massageman]

Save time - save money- save a few kids from a lifetime of undeserved shame.
Shoot to kill.

[Ellenaa]

On a 2nd felony child sex conviction mandatory hanging. Could do in public, yea. If f if physichal contact occurs during one of them
What do you think quualifies as "pedophhile"?

[EmperorOfRussia]

Nah, I have a better idea: pedos should be used in medical experiments or be forced to work in concentration camps until they die of exhaustion.

[angeliquedevereux2]

They're disgusting creeps but any human shouldn't be murdered or tortured for anything. The death penalty should only be applicted to actual murderers and not pedophiles. Just my opinion 🤷‍♀️

[OceanMelon]

I think they should just go to jail for a long time.

[Rangers]

No, because that doesn't give them due process and people will kill people who are simply accused and not convicted.

[InternetGuy]

If we're being honest the shitty prision system is torture enough.

[najekim]

Nah. Just castrated them (or the female equivalent) and let them go.