Why people don't undestand why female victims many times don't come forward?

Updates:
Most Helpful Guys
What Girls & Guys Said
323- How do we know they don't come forward? We know that abuse claims are made far more frequently by women then men even though statistical data provided by the CDC/NCVS and other studies shows that men are actually more likely to be abused by a spouse then women are: www.newscastmedia.com/domestic-violence.htm
We also know that lesbian couples report the most sexual assaults and domestic violence. This suggests that either women are far more violent and abusive or that they are far more willing to report then men are. In addition, the CDC/NCVS data found that men did not report but women did, thus showing that in reality its men who do not come forward not women.
Then you have the issue of coming forward years later, which is to say that these are highly unlikely to be true. According to several studies, it was found that 40% of sexual assault and rape allegations where FALSE, either patently and provably or admitted to be false by the one who made the claim. They also found that the longer the period of time between the claimed event and when they made the accusation and "came forward", the more likely the claim is false: johndavis.gonevis.com/how-many-rape-accusations-are-false/
So we can say fairly reasonablly that women not only do come forward but come forward even when no incident even occured and its MEN who are don't come forward (as it was found men did not report rapes against them by women (which is statistically identical to male on female rape: www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2014/09/22/rape-cdc-numbers-misleading-definition-date-forced-sexual-assault-column/16007089/ )
As for this incident, I see nothing wrong beyond denying the request of a female officer and the conduct after. Body searches are very very common, they will run their hand up to your genitals, anywhere where you could be hiding something, by its nature it requires that you touch the person in a way that is inappropriate and by its nature it is uncomfortable.
I don't know the details and they convinently left out any information (selective editing is something the media loves to do). The reasons why they would do this is if she had prior drug convictions, if the husband accused her of having drugs, if she was acting erratic and made them suspicious of her having drugs etc. Women accuse officers of sexual misconduct pretty much all the time because its a sure fire way to get people on her side and hate the officer. I mean even right here we have no idea what happened but you already know he is the bad guy, he is the monster, that a female judge and multiple other officers just stood by and did nothing while a woman was sexually assaulted (something you have never seen in your life and no one else has either because sexual assault and rape is one of the worse things you can do in our society besides harming and doing it to children), and many women in these situations use that knee jerk reaction to their own benefit. Talk to officers and they will tell you this is not abnormal, its the norm to be accused of wrong doing even when their is other people their who can see that it never actually happened.
Now is it entirely possible that this is exactly what it appears to be? Sure, absolutely. Is it likely that the judge, the other officers where all in on it and this officer decided to stop a court preceeding just so he could go through her purse risking his career and his freedom just so he could cop a feel of a random woman? No, no that is highly improbable. In fact I would say so unlikely that its far more likely she is lying then telling the truth. This idea that women NEVER lie is an absurd one, why we presume the guilt of all men and the innocents of all women is insane to me. As for the "internal affairs", they want things to go away so they make them go away and its easier for the state to destroy a persons life then risk being sued and all of them losing their job. I will never understand how people can think a system is so corrupt that police officers just rape and sexually assault women on a whim with a judge on the other side of the door who does nothing BUT would then believe that the entire system is not corrupt and any investigation that results in the guy getting fired is absolutely trust worthy. Either its corrupt and you trust nothing, or you use reason and sound judgment to come to the conclusion i. e. that their was a disturbing lack of information from the other side (they could interview her for a ten second clip, but couldn't get an official statement from him explaining his actions?) and that the cost reward for this action doesn't add up.
Related myTakes
Click "Show More" for your mentions
Most Helpful Opinion(mho) Rate.
Learn more
Learn more
Most Helpful Girls