Deleting messages.
I once had a long argument with a Holocaust denialist, until they stopped responding. I checked back a few days later to see if I'd missed a response, only to find that they'd simply deleted my final comment, making it look like I was the one who had no response.
With blocking, what I'd like to see is existing posts to be marked "User has been blocked by the Asker" (or "Opinion Owner") if it happened once a conversation had been started. At the moment, the messages remain visible, but there's no indication why they stopped.
@goaded Why are you choosing a thread from over a year ago to prove your point? Is Jim Smith even here anymore?
Both. But the first one is worse because it shows that you're afraid of what people might say
Deleting. I will be honest though, I have done it before.
People who block you just because you have a differing opinion are the biggest pussies on gag. One particular person is named Jack (i forget the rest of his name), who tries to bait liberals then, blocks them after they respond. He's such a pussy ass, little bitch.
It probably depends on whether you are anon or not. You can try to block them but if that doesn't work you can always delete their replies.
I'm against deleting replies unless they're actually abusive. Blocking is okay if you really don't want to interact with someone.
stand your fucking ground! Let them post shit - then they post their rebuttal - insult - then block!
Hint its not just trump supporters who do those things.
Blocking someone midway through their sentence is hilarious
This site is filled with assholes, so it's best to just delete their replies.
I'd go with blocking is probably worse.
You're a fucking loser.
You sound pretty pathetic.
Aiko you're still here
Yay ☺😍
I think i know who you are 🤗
Stop being a whining bitch.
Most Helpful Guys