In the US, why are liberal men thought of as cowards, wimps, weaklings, and pussies?

[Anonymous]

[MCheetah]

Because Liberal men often ARE cowards, wimps, weaklings, and pussies.

They claim all masculinity is "toxic," yet expect to be taken seriously as men and not the soyboys they are.

They claim women are "oppressed," yet expect everyone to listen to these whiny upper-middle-class Karens without the slightest of clapback or opposition.

They claim Donald Trump is bad, but will unironically support a man who is literally EVERYTHING they claimed Trump is (and worse), in Joe Biden.

They claim Trump got elected by Russian collusion, but will look the other way and ridicule anyone questioning the 2020 US election and the mountain of evidence that foul play occurred there.

They claim to be peaceful and tolerant, but will Cancel Culture and witch mob anyone who doesn't adhere to their dogma.

They claim to be atheist and :logic-minded," but will follow the cult of wokeness and think all blacks, women, gays, and minorities must automatically be on their side and look down on them like they're abused pets or something.

They claim to hate "bigots and hate," but do nothing but spread bigotry towards white men and hate towards conservatives and non-liberals.

They claim to want to "punch Nazis" but will be the first to get their sh*t dropped the second they don a back outfit for ANTIFA.

They claim guns are bad and all gun-owners are murderers, but at the same time, want to defund/abolish the police and allow Black Lives Matter thugs to literally turn Seattle into Mad Max and loot and burn cities with impunity.

They claim to want more rights for minorities and want Daddy Government to rule over everyone, but are also anti-Constitution and generally despise America.

Speaking of which, they despise America and think every single white person in it is "racist," but at the same time, won't move to any non-white-majority country, such as Mexico, Brazil, or China.

They expect to be heard at all times and "allow everyone to have a voice," yet will post on this very site like the spineless pussies and cowards they are, and "report hate speech" against anything that doesn't kowtow to their cult-like ideology of fascism and groupthink.

Obviously, not all Liberals are like this. But speaking as a former (Classical, TRUE) Liberal myself, I detest what that term has come to mean now and now SJW's and wokeness have hijacked it. Nowadays, I'm a Centrist and Independent and don't have any allegiances to any party or side. Modern American Liberals are truly awful, nowadays.

[MCheetah]

They expect to be heard at all times and "allow everyone to have a voice," yet will post *anonymously on this very site

[MCheetah]

Another one:
Liberal men want to try to tell people how to raise their sons and daughters or force them into doing gender transitioning by law, but at the same time, are the ones least likely to ever have kids, get along with their own parents, or have a stable monogamous relationship.

[Noneoyabizness]

Yup, I’ve worked in construction and trucking and can’t think of a single time I’ve worked with a liberal. Democrat, maybe, but they were more moderate.

These whiny victim-players can’t fend for themselves and don’t realize how good they have it. They’d rather suck on big daddy government’s tit and force everyone to do the same so they can be as miserable as they are.

[hellionthesagereborn]

Because they are. First and foremost if you are so terrified of others that you want them disarmed, your a coward. If you need the government to steal other peoples resources to make your life easier, your weak. Also their was a study done that suggested this link: www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2325414/Men-physically-strong-likely-right-wing-political-views.html

We also know that women are far more likely to lean left, in fact so much so that since women had the right to vote they have, as a whole, always voted left. The likely reason is the very reason stated in the other study, that women are by their nature physically less strong then men and more concerned with defense and resource acquisition and a stronger and more powerful (and by extension more oppressive) government can provide those things to her. So men on the left (and that is the correct term as they are not liberal in the slightest (except perhaps when it comes to more hedonistic tendencies)), push for the same things and its more then reasonable to presume that its because they are more biologically inclined towards it due to their physical or perceived physical limitations (since they cannot compete (or believe they cannot compete) in a free society, it only makes sense that they advocate for a system that protects them and provides for them (though I do not think this is a concious view on their part (most people operate subconciously)).

[WowwGirl]

Because 😊😊😊
1. they have no backbone or boundaries.
2. They are fine using the restroom with girls and treating them as equals.
3. They all hate guns , violence, and men being men.
ALSO are cheap
4. They wear pink
5. They think crying is woke6. They War is bad no matter the reason7. Drink smoothies and lattes, go to cafes8. Complain and bitch like a menstruational woman.9. They think things are "gross" like fish or dirt.10. They haven't ever done or can't do manual labor. I'll stop there

[Not_Average]

😂😂

[rcljr]

Bingo !

[WowwGirl]

💪💪

[worldscolide]

@WowwGirl nailed it.

[SmokinAces2000]

I’m sorry but since when does wearing a color or getting a drink that you like or showing emotion make you a pussy. If being a human makes you a pussy then I guess you’re a pussy, the people who liked this comment are pussies, the people who disliked this comment are pussies, I’m a pussy and were all pussies

[WowwGirl]

@SmokinAces2000 I have a pussy but liberal men don't... Something is wrong 🤔🤔🤔

[WowwGirl]

Answer to your question is always it's always made men pussies

[WowwGirl]

And yes you're a pussy I'm not I just have one.

[SmokinAces2000]

WowwGirl you’re the one that said you’re a pussy you said everyone was a pussy

[WowwGirl]

@SmokinAces2000 I said I have one

[WowwGirl]

I gave reasons liberal men are one

[WowwGirl]

Sorry it hot home

[SmokinAces2000]

WowwGirl nothing you said makes a guy a pussy, in fact what you said about crying is the opposite, guys that are pussies don’t cry because they are scared of their emotions. You have a very ignorant way of looking at things

[WowwGirl]

@SmokinAces2000 everything I said makes them a pussy

[WowwGirl]

But no pussy would understand that

[Bluemax]

@WowwGirl
Can you guess my political/social leanings on the left-right spectrum? I'll use your checklist.

1. I can confirm I'm a vertebrate. 😉
Seriously though, I do have a backbone and boundaries.
2. I am *not* fine using the girls bathroom nor vice versa, though private unisex bathrooms are OK by me. I am absolutely fine treating women as equals under the law. This is not to say I believe men and women are the same. Treating people with equal rights and respect doesn't mean treating them the same.
3. I don't hate all guns. I own 2 rifles. I do hate violence, but support it when it's absolutely necessary. I've no problem defending one's self or other innocents with force. However I do believe that many violent people are often too stupid to figure out how to deal with conflict non-violent. I've no problem with men being men, and I especially LOVE what could be construed as traditionally feminine women. My wife enjoyed being womanly. As for cheap? Well... I am on a teacher's salary... so... 😉
4. I don't even own anything pink. I don't like pink.
5. I don't think crying is woke. It is human.
6. Not all wars are bad, but only someone who doesn't know history that well wouldn't acknowledge that most wars are bad.
7. I don't drink lattes, but I will enjoy the occasional smoothie. There's a pink berry AND a Baskin-robbins right by the airport I fly out of! Damnit! I don't go to cafes. I hate coffee. Tea? Well, reminds me of family. My father's side is English.
8. I debate. I argue.

[WowwGirl]

@Bluemax 👍😂😂
I can

[WowwGirl]

That cat don't understand the difference of having a pussy or being a pussy.

[Bluemax]

9. I am not easily grossed out, if at all. Biology and zoology fascinate me, so fish frogs, snakes, scorpions, tarantulas, etc. neither gross me out nor scare me. I enjoy dissecting things. I've eaten a live cricket (extra credit for my zoology class). I have spear fished and can gut, clean and prepare what I catch. Dirt? I hike and camp... and you can't do that stuff if you don't like dirt and bugs.
10. I've done some manual labor (helped build the bathroom in my mom's restaurant). Not the handiest man in the world, but I can do some automotive and household maintenance. I hold a class A cdl, tanks, multi trailer, passenger, and hazmat endorsements. Does that count?

Bonus round.
I have spent the last 22 years in a career that is dominated by and traditionally associated with women (elementary school education)
I enjoy white zinfandel and white merlot
I enjoy bourbon on the rocks and Cuba libres!
I love poetry
I love piano, and have been known to tear up when listening to Beethoven and Rachmaninoff
I love to cook. I was a better cook than my wife.
I love all things aviation
I love all things nautical

So what is my political party? What are my social leanings?

[WowwGirl]

@Bluemax do you believe in gender roles?

[WowwGirl]

Are you religious?

[WowwGirl]

Last did you buy a gun or outdoor something with your stimulus check?

[SmokinAces2000]

WowwGirl you know for a 32 year old you sound like a child smh

[Bluemax]

About gender roles.

I do believe that men and women are generally different. I also believe that the differences are probably innate. However, I don't believe all men are innately the same, nor are all women. I recognize there are HUGE differences within the sexes, as well as between them. Some of my finest math and science students have been girls. I often do lessons on automotive maintenance (amidst some loud and silly protests from parents who believe that this isn't helping their kids get into Stanford). And I would say that as many girls take interest in it as boys. I've also had some boy students who like to play house and seem to enjoy simulating tasks that are traditionally seen as feminine. I've had boy students who introduce me to their new baby brothers and sisters with such care and tenderness. I don't discourage any of this. Boy wants to be a stay at home dad? I wish him well. Girl wants to be an automotive mechanic? You go girl.

But I teach young children. And young children don't display as great a difference in their interests as older kids. I've noticed that a lot of the differences in interests seem to develop around puberty. That's also a time of hormonal upheaval and when the myelinization (I doubt I'm spelling that right) begins to shut finalize. The brain begins to stop its "gotta learn and assimilate everything!" mode and begins to lock things in.

[Bluemax]

I believe a lot of the differences are innate. If I'm wrong, show me the data. I've also read that in countries where women have the greatest affluence and choices in their own destinies, they tend to gravitate *more* towards traditionally feminine roles, not away from them. Similarly, men gravitate towards more masculine roles. This suggests to me that given the widest array of choices, men and women *choose* traditional gender roles.

I believe that there are differences between the sexes, and they are probably innate. At the same time, I want to maximize the opportunities for all sexes and encourage them to do what they feel makes them happy.

[rcljr]

Bought a sweet Israeli 9mm pistol.

[Bluemax]

As for religion, I am an atheist. Well, technically an agnostic, but I lean very heavily in the direction of atheism.

I do, however often prefer the company of theists. I enjoy talking philosophy with them. I even know the Bible better than many of them. This is because I was a practicing and believing Catholic. When my mom was sick, I was the only one in my family who walked to church. My favorite portrait of Washington when I was a child was one that showed him kneeling in prayer.

[Bluemax]

And I hate to say it, but a lot of atheists can be dicks. Like Richard Dawkins? He's right... but he's also a dick about it sometimes.

Speaking of religion, is it just me, or do many churches seem more... feminized these days? I dunno.

So there you have it.

[Bluemax]

Oh, about the stimulus checks. I didn't get one, so...

But the last thing I bought that wasn't a necessity was a bunch of aeronautical charts, an airport directory, and a flying tigers cap.

Is that outdoorsy or indoorsy?

[Not_Average]

I think there are outliers to every stereotype, but stereotypes exist for a reason. My grandfather is a former Marine and Vietnam combat vet. He’s a democrat. He’s an outlier. I think the part that makes this stereotype true is that liberals tend to take the softer and emotionally driven approach to issues. There are clear as day data points that showcase open borders negatively impact crime and carry economic ramifications. Liberal men say we need open borders because they feel bad for them. Unfortunately we can’t make decisions based on emotion when we’re directing millions of a population scale. Logic and data need to be applied considering emotions are fluid and vary from person to person and change throughout the day. The same is applied to fiscal policy. Liberal men tend to apply emotion to economics when economics is based on incentive structure which derives from data. The liberal progressive ideology detests gender roles rendering all biology null in favor to support a narrative that tells men it’s okay to be weak. When liberal men can’t measure up to their biological role, they tend to blame the role and society rather than themselves. The major flaw in this argument is that gender roles are a result of our biology rather than society being mean. Women are more emotionally driven due to biological reasons. One example is that they carry more estradiol than men. Men produce 7x More testosterone than women which impacts our behavior directly. And truth be told, men are wearing dresses and supporting it. That’s not very… “manly”. It’s not manly to look pretty, it’s not manly to not be able to provide but progressive men fully embrace stay at home husbands.

[Not_Average]

That’s not to say men can’t hold emotions, because I’d say that I can be emotional. Meaning emotions can impact me a lot more than others. This includes anger as well. The Marine Corps taught me how to control these emotions and use them to benefit the greater good of everyone around me. Emotional control and restraint should be practiced by men. I don’t just scream at the world saying it’s okay to cry. I think crying is weak and a mans energy should be consumed by leading and using troubling situation as an experience to learn and get ahead. Have I cried? Yeah of course, but those were in my weakest moments and I moved forward from those moments rather than just dwelling and saying it’s “strong” to cry. It’s not strong to cry. Crying is literally a result of someone being too overwhelmed by emotion, and their body has to release that by crying. How can a man lead is he’s constantly that overwhelmed by his own emotion? He can’t.

[Not_Average]

As a Christian, I believe that god has created man and woman to complement one another. The more we tend to deviate away from our godly roles, the more divorce and depression rates go up. Have you noticed that correlation? The institution of marriage has been destroyed by progressive ideology which focuses on “self” more than anything.

[WowwGirl]

@Not_Average I do too

[Hanmakev]

I agree except number 7 I like lattes and smoothies true I top them off with whiskey and rum but they’re okay

[WowwGirl]

@Hanmakev I'll give you one by default

[NYCQuestions1976]

@WowwGirl Savage. 😂

[WowwGirl]

@NYCQuestions1976 🙂🙏

[WowwGirl]

@rcljr Nice

[WowwGirl]

@SmokinAces2000 if I guy who thinks thinks men cutting there dick off is cool and thinks I'm stupid, ,

GOOD!!! I'm right where I should be

[SmokinAces2000]

WowwGirl you literally make no sense 😂

[WowwGirl]

@SmokinAces2000 it's a pride and masculinity thing you wouldn't get it.

[WowwGirl]

I hope you have a good cry, and enjoy your fruit.🍌

[Agape93]

Because often they are

[MzAsh]

I don’t know. I personally like most of the ones I know. I find that they are empathetic, understanding, tolerant, pleasant, great listeners, challenge out dated moths, and respect the autonomy of women. All very attractive and respectable qualities.

[MzAsh]

*challenge outdated norms lol

[haphazard]

Many of the ones I see are irrational and intolerant of other points of views. In addition, they resort to insults 90% of the time when they can't convince you to their perspective or come up with any evidence to validate their opinion.

[MzAsh]

That stinks. That hasn’t been my experience at all.

[haphazard]

Not all people are the same, but have you seen liberal media? They use the exact kind of tactics I just mentioned. Instead of debating facts, they jump straight to attacking someone's character in attempt to invalidate their argument.

[MzAsh]

I think both liberal and conservative media are guilty of that. I prefer neutral.

[haphazard]

I dunno. The overwhelming majority of the mainstream media is liberal biased. Whether it's the "news" or social media. For example, social media is now silencing and removing people from their platforms that they disagree with, instead of debating facts, science, etc. I view this as particularly unhealthy for society when people are not even allowed to have opinions at odds with the mainstream narrative. This type of censorship and forced conformity is something you'd normally see under a communist dictatorship.

[MzAsh]

Social media platforms have a right to set up rules and terms of service. However, they should be clear on those terms and enforce them to everyone.

[haphazard]

The problem is these "platforms" have become so big that they are basically town squares now. The idea that they are private companies, which don't pay taxes and spend millions of dollars lobbying the government says to me that they basically are the government. They do the bidding of the government and the government does their bidding. They are hand in hand with the government but when it comes to making rules they are allowed to run it like a dictatorship because they are a "private company". It's just a lie. Giant corporations that have contracts with the government are required by law to follow the same ethics the government requires of its employees. In my opinion, there is nothing "private" about social media and they have no right to silence people simply because the people running it disagree with those whose political ideology doesn't benefit the corporation. If this is the case, then they are political corporations by default and should be considered extensions of the government.

[MzAsh]

If you were building your own platform, what ethical code would you put in place?

[haphazard]

Freedom of speech. No threats of violence or porn.

[MzAsh]

What else?

[haphazard]

That's good enough for me. The law is sufficient enough to handle most problems already. Offending people isn't a crime and everyone has a block button. Of course I would try to promote people to get along with the realistic expectation that they most likely never will completely.

[MzAsh]

Why are threats of violence important?

[haphazard]

Besides being a crime, threatening people is a way to intimidate people and control them. It would also make people afraid to use the platform and would quickly get out of hand if allowed to run rampant.

[MzAsh]

Yes, indeed. So how else, other than direct threats of violence, can people use words to intimidate and control others?

[haphazard]

Indirect threats of violence? Not sure what you're asking. I guess people can scare monger to intimidate or brainwash them to control them. Not nearly as effective though. There's an old saying that if you repeat a lie enough times it becomes the truth.

[MzAsh]

Yeah. I think you’re starting to touch on the point I wanted to make, which is the fact that people can use words to harm others in many ways other than by using direct threats of violence. And they do through various psychological tactics, or bullying. Psychological or verbal abuse is still defined as abuse by the law. It can and does have an impact on the brain. Though I do agree that it isn’t a crime to be offended, the lines of what language should and shouldn’t be tolerated on a platform by its users can get pretty blurry in many instances.

[Avicenna]

And that is obviously not enforced neutrally

[haphazard]

Like I said, everyone has a block button. It is relatively easy to avoid someone online which is not the case in person. It is possible to physically hurt someone or kill them in person. That is not the case online. While I don't agree with "hate speech" the problem is that the definition is open to interpretation and so it ends up being selectively enforced almost always. Who gets to decide what you are allowed to say or not say? Everyone has a different opinion about what's acceptable and silencing people doesn't solve the problem in the first place, it only offshores it. When you start allowing someone else to dictate what you're allowed to say then you live under a dictatorship. That's as simple as I can boil it down...

[MzAsh]

They’re not dictating what you are allowed to say without being persecuted by the law. They’re setting boundaries for what they will or won’t tolerate on their platform. If you say something hateful and are thrown off of Twitter, then you are thrown off Twitter. That is NOT a dictatorship. You can still say it on your own space that you payed for, likely with no consequences provided that you’re paying for the space.

[Avicenna]

There's an argument that they are public accommodations because they're so universal; furthermore, the Biden Administration has admitted coordinating with them to restrict speech, so there's government involvement as well as a lack of neutral application of censorship.

[haphazard]

People say hateful things on twitter all the time and stay on their platform. It's only when the moderators decide you crossed the line that you are removed from the platform. Maybe they are banning someone to get revenge on them. Maybe they want to destroy their business which is advertised on Twitter. Maybe they feel threatened by a political ideology being promoted which will decrease profits for Twitter. Hate speech has absolutely no definition so they can use that as an excuse to ban anyone at anytime. Since they are technically considered a private company, they can legally do it. Reality is that people spend so much time on social media, it basically is the people's space at this point. Saying it's owned by some group of people that lobby the government to pass laws that benefit the corporation so they can grow bigger and lobby the government even more, all while not paying taxes on any of profits they earn could be considered treason to the country in some respect.

[MzAsh]

Speech moderation on these platforms should be more regulated and enforced. I know that I could go on a racist rampage and I might be thrown off in a range spanning from few hours, days, weeks, or months…and to me that is a problem.

[Avicenna]

Has the Taliban finally been banned from Twitter? That's a perfect example of the arbitrariness and why you can't just say these platforms can do whatever they feel like.

[MzAsh]

Maybe they should just do what they feel like. But keep the government involvement to a minimum.

[Avicenna]

Government can't be involved at all without triggering First Amendment violations. And there's still the public accommodation issue, especially with Facebook being a de facto monopoly.

[haphazard]

There was artificial intelligence invented specifically to detect hate speech on social media. The results? They found the majority of hate speech being committed by "minorities" so they decided not to implement it. It's just a "coincidence" that 90% of minorities have the same political affiliation as the people running the social media platform.

[Avicenna]

@haphazard: No surprise there- thanks for pointing that out.

[MzAsh]

I see context issues with that right off the bat. Nice idea though. Maybe in a different life.

[amandat94132]

@haphazard They even use the same terms and sentences , I always hear " You simply aren't enlightened " as though there is no individual thought, there is no individual thought , everything is scripted And they condescend like crazy

[amandat94132]

I don't like cowardness in anyone, they tend toward group think, view nearly everyone as a' victim' and hide behind their lib friends as a protection.

What ever happened to the individual, logic and reasoning , these are now viewed as 'offensive' , one is thought of as an outsider by daring to think for themselves , looking for alternative information , presenting thoughtful outside the box ideas , this is all seen as abnormal.

Narratives are forced mostly because these people fear standing alone.

When I use the word Lib I'm implying the Neo Lib , the group thinker , the narrative believer and the cancel culture obsessed, they don't believe in free speech, they want only their speech. which is a cowardly act, they cringe at the thought of anyone thinking for themselves.

As a woman , I find the whole sisterhood group think annoying. Men are the enemy, women that don't fall in line are viewed as hating women. They love playing the "victim' and want all other women to think of themselves as " victims' No one gets anywhere in life when they reinforce ' victimhood' status on themselves, they get weaker and weaker.

[TheBigGuy9]

Well, here is my thoughts and this comes from experience.
Just look at the people you grew up with in high school.
In my class, you have two sets of Liberals. You have the idiots. The dumb ones.
The others are book smart and extremely selfish.


Both were never good at sports. If there was an advantage with say a test. If it was easier to cheat, they would do it. They love doing the bare minimum, but will let everyone know they are the hardest working human beings their is and no one comes close.
They love to play games. They rationalize everything they don’t agree with to fit their own narrative. Very authoritarian. Many are Narcissists. Many are followers; sheep. Still, they will never and I mean never admit when they’re wrong. Like when Trump kept beating them at their own game, they come up with some other rules. For example, metoo was created when they manufactured a crime against Kavanaugh, but when a real case accusation came against Joe Biden it was “nothing to see here” and metoo disappeared.


This is a big one. They spend too much time thinking with their right brain instead of their left. Fantasy vs reality.


Both groups don’t care about anything, but money and power. Perfect example. Cuomo putting sick in nursing homes along with 4 other Democrats allowing for over 200,000 deaths and not one peep from the base. But cheered when Cuomo got an award.


The Democrats have the biggest divide. They have the elite and those that either think they are or want to be Elite. Mostly it’s the very rich and the poor. The ones that get it, but still choose to deceive others. The ones that use zero critical thinking skills, are easily controlled through emotions, the useful idiots.
The media perfects that. Controlling people through emotions and Fear. Covid a 99.8% recovery rate and we have people flipping out over everything.
Man made Climate Change is another one. Control people through Fear.

[Avicenna]

Im going to say its because they identify less with their society and are less protective of it, especially of women, children and other vulnerable people.

This was really laid bare for me seeing the reaction by leftists to the 2015 New Year‘s Eve sexual assaults in Cologne, Germany and the many others committed by fake asylum seekers around that time and the years after it. Leftist European males tried to cover them up or, when that was impossible, tried to downplay them or even threaten to prosecute people for talking about them. If that doesn’t show weakness, I don’t know what does.

[TrueConfection]

I recall the Germans telling parents to have their daighters walk a different route to school and to cover their skin, "so as to not create any misunderstandings," with the men. Tragic

[Avicenna]

@TrueConfection: Yeah, and there is another problem when they get to school- some of their classmates are men up to 30 years old who have lied about their age to get into high school.

[TrueConfection]

The saddest part is that those 30 yo men aren't fooling anyone. They are allowed to continue their charade.

[Avicenna]

@TrueConfection: Yeah, in part because leftist men won't do something about it; for example, the German Doctors Association opposed using bone scans to detect migrants' actual ages.

[TrueConfection]

Exactly

[TrueConfection]

The leftist men have sold out their daughters, their women, and their country.

[Avicenna]

@TrueConfection: Many of these leftist men don't have children, much less daughters

[TrueConfection]

I know a lot that do. The liberals I know are married and act like an extra child to their overbearing wife. They have confused children.

[Avicenna]

@TrueConfection; That makes it even worse

[Avicenna]

But you bring up an interesting aspect of this weakling persona for leftists

[MCheetah]

@Avicenna
I agree. The political side that thinks everything is part of a "rape culture" or that tipsy women having consensual sex with men is "rape" will also be the first ones to cover up ACTUAL rapes if done by minorities or powerful liberals on their side, such as what happens all the time in Hollywood. Everyone knew the shenanigans of Harvey Weinstein and Kevin Spacey, but just looked the other way. They all also knew how much of a cunt Amber Heard was, but let Johnny Depp get sacrificed to the mob, while protecting her. There's no bigger cowards and pussies on the Left than in Hollywood, in fact.

[Avicenna]

@MCheetah: Yup, 100% correct

[Bluemax]

It's kinda weird to me how many liberals seem to be outspoken of their support of Islamic countries where women's rights are curtailed... and yet be so supportive of feminism.

I don't get it.

[Avicenna]

@Bluemax: They want allies against straight, white Christian males, who they despise, and there are lots of Muslims in the world. They don't really care about women, as we see in their support for Islamic extremist groups and their desire to let biological men do time in women's prisons and compete in women's athletics,- they just want campaign cash and votes, plus something to use to pretend they're , morally superior

[Avicenna]

But, above all, for leftists, it's about ganging up on straight, white Christian males. The Islamic extremists are happy to use them as useful idiots.

[BeMuse]

Because most people in the US don’t know what liberalism is even though it’s principles are the central tenets of the constitution. The media has conditioned them with misinformation. As a result conservatives think communists (social democrats/progressives/Left-Libertarians/Anarchists) are liberals, and the communists by any other name don’t realize they are working for the communists agenda. Meanwhile the real liberals are independent of political party and as patriots stay true to our constitutional foundations.

[BeMuse]

Communists are subjugated obedient people that through history have starved due to bad central planning and malign policies of control thus they are generally pretty small, weak, and unable fight and resist...

[Avicenna]

True, and the Communists obviously want to market themselves as something they aren't, so they misrepresent themselves.

[Lliam]

Because they are afraid of things like guns and covid, an indication that they follow the herd and don't have the the reasoning ability to research and think things through for themselves.
They may also buy into things like white guilt, third-wave feminism, and trans' rights to invade women's only sports and facilities.
Some wear unisex or androgynous clothing.
They may support gender fluidity.
They may be militantly vegan.
They may claim to support non violence while being more than eager to call cops to do their violence for them.
They tend to support legislation to trample the rights of people with whom they disagree.
They may support censorship based on the idea that words hurt people's feelings.
Many of them are passive aggressive or cry babies.

[ohshee]

Well I like your question I don't see it only being in the US I see it in every country no matter the title did they have. whether it's in the US or any other country that has politicians no matter what title they have. No matter if they're men or women they got hired to do a job. they got hired to do the right thing for all of us little people.. And they got hired to stand up and do the right thing and 2 be great not to be a follower not to work with the good old boys. Not to be a sheep. I don't care what title they get or they have. We have over five hundred and something elected officials in our country I don't know about your country. I don't care what title they have. I don't care if they're male or female. I don't care if they're black or white. All I care about is that at the end of their term. Is that they stand up and be fucking great make a difference. I don't care if your dishwasher fucking restaurant stand up and be great. quit with all the bulshit all the lies

[Rangers]

www.sciencedirect.com/.../S1090513816303907
The study found liberal men are significantly weaker than conservative men, but of course you don't need a study to tell you that men who want to give up their rights to the government are weak and beta compared to alpha conservatives who tell the government to stick it.

[Bluemax]

In the words of Mr. Spock...
Fascinating

[haphazard]

Because they promote welfare and an unproductive type of economy, and because they stick up for people who they perceive as victims of social injustice but who do not give a crap about them. These are traits that are generally regarded as feminine. It's more common to see this type of irrational wishful thinking in women.

[TrueConfection]

Because cowards, wimps, weaklings, and pussies always turn out to be liberals.

[hahahmm]

Because they need women to approve of everything they do/say. That said I take people on a case by case basis. It's about how you're behaving as an individual. Not a label somebody who doesn't know you put on you.

[Aimée__LJ]

Unsure it's quite the opposite really. Liberals have the strength to stand up for what's right and not just follow the rules. We question the government not mindlessly follow them like they're a cult leader.

[Asker]

Liberal men

Not necessarily women.

[Aimée__LJ]

I never mentioned women anywhere. Though I don't see how liberal men and liberal women are any different or treated any differently. Both get shit from conservatives.

[Asker]

You just said “we”

[Aimée__LJ]

Yes. Because I am a liberal. Not talking about women talking about liberals as a collective.

[Asker]

Well, I’m not talking about as a collective.

I’m talking specifically about liberal men.

Why does it seem that they get such a bad rap for being the above things? Not all of them, but why does this belief or stereotype exist in memes and other outlets?

[Aimée__LJ]

Because conservatives will make fun of anything a liberal does even if in reality their views are the same.

[Rangers]

Yeah, kinda like they stood up for slavery, opposing the civil rights act, segregation, and keep minorities down in every major city in the country.

[haphazard]

Everyone stands up for what they think is right. The disagreement is about what people consider to be "right". You are very obviously a liberal by this statement. In reality, I see liberals conforming more than anyone else and exhibiting more cult-like behavior. (I don't subscribe to any political group by the way)

[Aimée__LJ]

@haphazard I find that hard to believe have you looked at trump followers?

[haphazard]

I'm not saying all groups aren't cult-like. I'm just saying what I've noticed more in general. In my opinion, Trump is more of a populist. He represents what other people are thinking more than people represent what he is thinking. The media doesn't present it that way so I can see why you would think that.

[Aimée__LJ]

@haphazard I'm not talking about media. I'm talking about actual people who believe anything that man says. Who literally wonder why people who voted for Biden don't have Biden flags hanging in their yards 😬

[haphazard]

Because nobody believes in Biden. Even people who voted for him just wanted Trump out of office. The reality is Trump has a big ass mouth and he says things which many people already think but which rarely get voiced, especially by a president. This emboldens people to voice their opinion more which appears "cult-like".

[Asker]

@haphazard

Yeah, I’m feeling that the majority of people who did vote for Biden did so because they wanted Trump out of office, not necessarily because they agree with Biden’s points or like Biden as a president or man.

Also, Trump is relatable to nearly everyone out there, it’s just that he’s not “presidential.” People expect a President to act a certain way and not like the regular person……. I guess this is true, although I kind of doubt it.

I think it’s just tribalism.

Right versus left.

It’s unjust or intolerant only if it is practiced by the other side.

Type of thinking^

[haphazard]

Tribalism plays a big part of it and the powers that be are pitting us against each other. "Divide and conquer" I guess you could say is one of the oldest tactics in history. It's a shame Trump couldn't act better but keep in mind he's not a normal person. He basically grew up as a millionaire businessman who had no need to take bribes from political organizations. Guess he assumed he could do whatever he wants without consequences which many people disrespected about him. I think what ultimately lead to his downfall was his clash with the agendas of other billionaires in the world.

[Kingofkings1992]

Sigh. So young and naive. Hopefully you’ll learn better when you get older.

[Jfranco12]

Is that why they voted in the biggest government puppet in history that has done nothing but increase government control?

[rcljr]

@Jfranco12 exactly, they want to be coddled, fed, praised, wrapped in a safety net, sit on their asses and collect welfare.

[amandat94132]

They group think and have narratives , that isn't standing up for anything, that is following the crowd

When they as much hear the slightest different ideas , they go into a rage and these are not true classic Liberals , these are narrative driven drones, they are more pro war than anyone , in fact Biden is more pro war than Trump , and I'm not a fan of either

If Liberals question the government , than why do they support a warmonger like Hillary, she is responsible for carnage in Libya and Syria , as far back as when Bill was President she wanted him to do intervention

[CasuallySamsonite]

Because the GOP scud-sucking types forget that just because we are progressive and or liberal doesn't necessarily mean we haven't taken advantage of having just as easy access to the purchase of firearms.

I may be a straight man, but even I know that your average LGBTQ+ Pride parade is packing just as much heat as any neo-nazi militia. lol

[rcljr]

Because they are, there is no “ why” one can assume they were born that way, or raised by an overbearing helicopter mom that made them get perms, gave them a daily enema, took them to Dillards shopping for bras, made them attend tea time, play bridge… or maybe they had a late night sneaky uncle buggering them, who knows, yet the fact remains, liberal males are NOT men, they have too much estrogen and familiarity with femininity.

[rcljr]

And there’s the first thumbs down from a blue haired lefty simp that probably sells insurance and spends his nights cruising the gay bath house while his wife sleeps….

[EternallyCorrect]

Many of them really are weak. The most effeminate men are always liberals.

At the same time there are some who are not, and who have bigger balls than most right wingers, who are mostly all talk.

[worldscolide]

@WowwGirl said it best.. They are also less likely to be able to take care of their family as a man should.. And more likely to support idiotic things like turning 5 year old boys into trannies.

[Dragonpurple]

They have no will, Progressives or Democrats is just another term for more control over our lives.

Liberal men are essentially saying, they want to be controlled by others.

[iBeowulf]

Because science?

[Bluemax]

That article on the left. "Right-wing assholes?"

(WARNING: SARCASM AHEAD!)

Wow! That's some unbiased journalism, isn't it?

I'm not familiar with Broadly. What is it?

[iBeowulf]

Information hipster detected [robot dance]

[Gwenhwyfar]

Only conservative guys (and some conservative girls) feel that way. Tbh some very liberal men are annoying but defo not all.

[normalice]

Because the far right has spent billions of dollars trying to get people to think this.

[Kingofkings1992]

Because of men like you

[normalice]

It is true I participated in the disparaging of liberals at one point. But I wouldn't really say I'm the "cause."

Although, I will say that being a Christian in high school - subject to the ridicule from being thought of as cowardly, wimpy, weak, at cetera - was excellent preparation for being a Democrat in the real world. I know you sad weirdos are posturing because I was a conservative once, too. But I've also been on the receiving end and know how much it doesn't really matter what people desperate for relevance have to say - because in their desperation they dreamed only of having it, not of how to obtain it.

But, to be fair, it's not completely wrong. The whole point of democracy is to allow those who dont want to settle every difference with a melee to be the ones who rule. And perhaps it is being a bit of a pussy to not want to get into a physical fight over, for example, what the municipal speed limit should be. But I'd ask who is the sort of person to whom being a pussy is relevant, in that way? What kind of species do we want to be? We just going to ignore our brain power and live like frightened apes? Especially when you add guns to the mix - no one is weak with a gun in their hand (which is why weak people cling to them). The tiniest chimp has no reason to fear even the largest gorilla if the chimp has a gun. Our ambitions are dwarfed by our potential. But both are stunted by our lust for magic.

[Medlife]

Depends on their actions. Anyone can say whatever they want but only few act on it. So I reckon its more action based

[bobalife]

Not sure why? But I really appreciate them and find some attractive

[Youdumbeotch]

Because they never actually fight, most conservatives are religious and have accepted submissiveness in this life hoping for the next which only allows the government to grow in its collectivist totalitarian state.

[Robbey]

Because it's easier to deal with stereotypes than actual people. And tbf, liberals do that too.

[Ninjazzed]

I’ve met more cowardly pieces of shit that turned out to be conservatives.

[Kingofkings1992]

To be fair, not all liberals are weaklings and pussies. However, if you are a weakling or pussy, then you’re probably a liberal.

[007kingifrit]

well, because they are. they lack masculine qualities or they wouldn't share left wing values which are inherently feminine

[pink_and_inlove]

I’m not sure I never thought of them that way or heard anyone say that off of this site

[WowwGirl]

It's true

[FoghornLeghorn99]

Because they are.

They have willfully been castrated to fit into the woke mob.

[crmoore]

Because of men like this:

https://youtu. be/70iWl3b2y5o

[dolemite89]

https://www.youtube.com/embed/i_D72WK58Pk

because it’s true for the most part 🤣

[KrakenAttackin]

Because they are the definition of cowards, wimps, pussies, etc.

[msc545]

They are only thought of this way by right-wing thugs and illiterates.

[Kingofkings1992]

Right wing thugs? Lol

[msc545]

@Kingofkings1992 Yes, thugs like the assholes that invaded the Capitol. Or were you planning to tell me they were really leftists in disguise or crisis actors?

[liberalsrule420]

Because we are…. I love being a cowardly submissive wimp, it’s a lifestyle.

[rcljr]

Ok, I’ll cheer you on when the Muslims toss your ass off a high rise building

[OlderAndWiser]

Res ipsa loquitur!

[WowwGirl]

🎉🎉🎉

[sage2021]

Cause most of them are!

[RolandCuthbert]

Can you even define the word "liberal"?

[ElizaPam]

Have you seen the news on Afghanistan?

[raw_is_war99]

What about the news in Afghanistan, Taliban took over and? If you are referring to troops leaving because it was Biden's orders, well America should have left the Middle East a long, long time ago when Clinton, Bush, Obama, Trump were presidents.

[snackthatsmilesback]

Because that's what people want us to be.

[FilmGuy93]

Mostly because of how they act

[jamesgoldman]

Because they are surely

[NYCQuestions1976]

Well they're definitely generally annoying.

[IncognitoBandito]

You forgot condescending assholes

[DWornock]

Because that is a good description.

[Dvchill]

I mean have u seen them 😜💁‍♂️

[SuccessfulHornDog]

That comes from observing liberal men

[BokieLoc]

Because they act just like that lol.

[888theGreat]

Because they act like it.

[OddBeMe]

We get all the pussy that’s why.

[Grubhub]

Lol I didn’t expect you to be liberal

[OddBeMe]

@Grubhub seriously? You seen my post history?

[Avicenna]

LMAO... soy boys...

[Grubhub]

Na I JUST THOUGHT you're COMMENTS WERE MORE CONSERVATIVE. That or maybe I had a bad day 🤷‍♂️

[OddBeMe]

@Avicenna I don’t like Asian pussy

[OddBeMe]

@Grubhub but I do like Chinese food. Grubhub: deliver some orange chicken please.

[Grubhub]

Neither do I 😂 no racism. I like women with curves

[Kingofkings1992]

Lmao. Odd be me , you’re an incel

[joeldalton]

Because they are.

[Joker_]

Because they are

[Diya010]

Because they are