
Timothy Simpkins: brings a gun to school, shoots 4 people including a teacher - bail $25k and released in less than 24 hours

It's really simple: Woketardation is the cult that has taken over corporate America. And the narrative must be defended, facts and nuances be damned.
Kyle goes to clean up graffiti and help out a town he has a strong attachment to, from a bunch of paid insurrectionists causing social unrest in order to overthrow the republic and establish communism, under the false pretenses of giving a damn about black exploitation and hatred of Trump.
Alinsky 101: "The issue is never the issue. The issue is the revolution, always."
The black kid being bullied to the point of snapping is an uncreative, desperate kid who simply gave up on the idea that life is sacred, because he didn't feel anyone saw his to be that way.
But that's irrelevant. A poor, beaten-up black kid. That's narrative gold.
A white kid who goes to clean up the community, and is nearly murdered by communists and pedophiles that the lefttards needed for their communist revolution, but shoots back in self-defense, and then immediately seeks out the police?
Not convenient. So he has to be redefined as a monster. Translation: He dared to interfere with the revolution. So he must be made subhuman.
Crapunism is the reason for this double standard. As is the evil in the hearts of those adhering to the double standard.
Lawyers avoid Kyle, because they know that they will be killed or disbarred for political reasons. They are aware of the absolute corruption afoot because the evil false religions of Wokeism and Communism. They know that they will be the next martyrs if they stand up for this kid.
It is funny how the representative of the master race can't even master the English language.
I guess you mean Kyle Rittenhouse had a 2 million dollar bond. Well, the American Taliban took care of that.
Timothy Simpkin's bail was posted by his family. There is no American Taliban to help him. And it doesn't matter how much the bail was, there was never going to be an effort by any community to pay his bail.
As for the cases, there isn't much similar. By all accounts, Simpkins was being bullied at high school, mercilessly.
Rittenhouse traveled to a different state to kill some liberals.
There’s a bit of a difference between murder charges and assault with a firearm don’t you think? That would obviously affect how the court weighs bail. Plus, Rittenhouse sought out confrontation with a firearm, which would have to be viewed as an aggravating circumstance. They are treated differently because the circumstances of the shootings are different and one of them is facing much more serious consequences. Of course you already know these things and deliberately left them out of your post in your attempt to stir up divisive racially charged responses.
@exitseven
what was his motive to show up with weapon? Why not stay home and just watch from afar?
@exitseven He was being chased because he had just shot and killed an unarmed man. That’s a big detail you’re deliberately leaving out. Does getting whacked with a skateboard justify using deadly force? That’s for the jury to decide. The third victim allegedly had his hands up. All 3 of these shootings will be have to weighed on on the facts and circumstances and this isn’t clear cut self-defense by any means.
@exitseven Again, that’s for a jury to decide, not you or I. To use deadly force, you must be under threat of death or great bodily harm. What about the other two shootings? The kid is probably in trouble.
What are you even talking about? He’s not in jail. He was granted bail last year.
@Bigjohn2021 : He went to clean up graffiti. He brought a gun because he knew the area was dangerous. Remember the unarmed young woman who yelled "All lives matter" at BLM protestors? What was her fate again? She should've been armed. Frankly, a full-on machine gun firing incendiary rounds would still have been too kind a fate for those lowlifes that killed her.
Rittenhouse claims it was self defense. But you don't carry around a rifle to a conflict zone in a different state, provoke people and subsequently shoot them. That is no longer self defense.
No idea why the other guy was even released.
he brought a gun to school...
Hence why I don't know why he was even released at all. If you're accused of murdering several people with witnesses placing you there, you shouldn't be free until the trial. Neither of those guys should have been freed at all for any length of time.
Was Rittenhouse within his 2nd amendment rights? Yes? Then yes, he can carry around a rifle.
Not at his age and in that state where the incident occurred. So no he was not within his rights to do so.
Provoking them by putting out a fire they started and trying to get away when they were trying to kill him? by the way they shot at Kyle first as he was running away, they gave him no choice but to fight back.
Yet again you're probably the same person who supports NFAC saying clear as day that they want a black only ethnostate and half of them are felons carrying rifles around while you cry because Kyle went to defend the town he works at from rioters
I don't even know what nfac is. But the fact that you're so quick to label people or assume things about them, inherently makes me not want to talk to you.
Opinion
20Opinion
The only crime Rittenhouse committed was carrying a rifle underage. But other than that why does that somehow negate the fact that he had every right to defend himself? He only shot the 3 people that tried to attack him. The aggressors were the rioters (No peaceful protesters bullshit) hitting him in the back and trying to jump him when tripped on the floor. He was there to defend stores & give medical aid to someone who gets hurt. The rioters approached him and the group that was defending the store. And i find it ironic that 2 of the 3 attackers he shot, had criminal records & one was a pedophile. The media of course won't tell you this because it would go against the agenda
This is all just race baiting and I'm sick of the media trying it. I'm so DONE with this shit. And all of you talking about it are contributing to the problem. I doubt this scumbag will walk. Even if he isn't convicted, someone will go Punisher on his ass. And in this case, I support the violent vigilante.
Oh fuck I'm not touching this one. Wait, ok it's very simple " Racism " one is being judged by the color of their skin. Actually both are being judged by the color of their skin. I understand stand both of their situations and my heart breaks for both. Both are very unique and both were pushed to the point that they felt they had no other choice but to use deadly force. These two young men need our love and lots of support because society has failed them.
I heard Timothy shot people because they were constantly punching him, beating him up, bruising him and threatening his safety and it was either kill or be killed.
Perhaps it has something to do with him not actually killing anyone, and Rittenhouse being freed immediatly to go drink with his whute supremacist buddies on video?
Because once upon a time, ass-wipe Democrats figured out a way of cutting labor costs on their plantations. These same Dems founded the KKK. But nowadays, they feel guilty and want all white people to pay for their sins.
Because the white guy is a gun toting racist, the black guy is just an innocent child victim of the system… that’s what leftist democrap shit stains want you to believe.
Because their events and cases are very different. What sorts of shit for brains do you have to compare the two?
Because Kyle Rittenhouse has the wrong political beliefs according to the judges and prosecutors and it's political persecution
bu.. bu.. but... I thought the narrative was that black suspects in mass shootings were always killed while white suspects were just arrested...
Trust me the media have not been forthcoming about this incident to release an individual who just commit an serious crime…Also the other guy just felt empowered / entitled to show who he is.
It's trendy these days to hold white men to a different standard imho.
Duh, it’s because we live in a white supremacist system.
Which one is which? They're treated differently because they're not the same race.
Ones white…?
They did both bring guns and executed people. Regardless who the victims were.
lol! Yeah, I love when their narrative colapses in front on their eyes.
Rittenhouse was trying to defend himself. Simpkins' shooting was a premeditated crime. So stop trying so hard to make a race issue
*everybody should
I think because on average black people in the USA have a higher percentage of committing crimes compared to white people.
When people see the higher rates of blacks committing crimes compared to other races it makes them feel biased.
Didn't Kyle run away?
Timmy won't be smiling when he goes to prison.
That's definitely some bull. Smh
BLACK FUCKING PRIVELEGE
"White privilege".
You can also add your opinion below!