www.youtube.com/watch
It looks like the judge in the Kyle Rittenhouse case isn't taking any BS from prosecution, I hope he gets acquitted, what do you think?
www.youtube.com/watch
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News Putting aside from the fact that every single person Kyle shot is human scum and deserved to be eliminated, which shouldn't be a factor in a self-defense case, the multiple angles of video evidence paints a crystal clear picture. Every single piece of degenerate filth that Kyle removed that night attacked him and he responded with justified force. He was constantly attempting to retreat and the Doom mob was the one constantly attacking him.
yeah there was a worthless piece of shit on here saying that kyle deserves to die for what he did. Comment removed, user blocked.
That's a great way to create an echo chamber.
Not when the guy chose to threaten me and insult me, He actually told me that my children deserve death because i back kyle.. Nope i have zero tolerance for that shit. Disagree with me all you want, hell even insult me, But tell me my kids deserve death... you're gone.
Well, that's different then, isn't it?
agreed.
Shot three antifa, hit three total degenerate losers. Guy should have gotten a fucking medal not stand trial.
Agreed!!
Opinion
34Opinion
The sad part about it is it takes a civilian to defend the public from attackers. He had great discipline and did well under pressure and maybe he even gets away without having his life ruined.
If he was a policeman instead, he would hang from a lamp by now, justified shooting or not.
I hate that we live in a reality where terrorists can be looked at as "victims."
They already fucked up justice by giving Derek Chauvin a murder charge just to appease BLM terrorists. I hope the same thing doesn't happen twice, and IF BLM does threaten to riot if Rittenhouse is found innocent, then I hope cops finish the job on those assholes.
I'm more worried about the jury an will they be able to sequester them effectively after the way the Woke Mob were able to get details of jurists on the Floyd trial, and that certain members of ANTIFA have threatened to riot if the trial does not go the way they want.
Same here, honestly the trial should be held thousands of miles away.
Edit;
State's OWN Witnesses BACKFIRE On DA PROVING Kyle Rittenhouse Acted In Self Defence!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GolZUeRBzZU
I think the prosecution can totally blow it and the defense can absolutely knock it out of the park. I think it can be a totally one-sided case and the jury still comeback with all guilty verdicts.
Honestly, I do not know if I would choose a jury trial these days. Juries can be intimidated. They are regular people, hand-chosen by the lawyers because they think those jurors are dumb as muleshit and can make a verdict go their way. I just did jury duty, they don't look for the best and the brightest, I promise you that.
I don't trust that the jury is fair and impartial. I don't trust that the law will protect them from the threats they are getting. I don't trust that some of the juror's are not potentially politically motivated. So, yeah. This could be the biggest slam dunk in history and the jury still comeback with guilty on all counts.
The only ones who think he shouldn’t are deranged liberals who will automatically side with the people on their political side no matter what.
Imagine being mad that some pedophiles armed with guns destroying people’s properties, attacking people, and chasing after a kid got shot.
Ffs the Nazis WERE socialist in as much as any political party.
Literally National Socialist.
But forget that bullshit. It's just a divide and conquer bullshit. Those words don't mean anything. The leaders like their ideology early on and mess everything up.
Are you sure you're commenting on the correct question? Though I absolutely don't disagree with you.
My family is super messed up and they watch the 'left wing' media.
And I am like. "Mum. I have studied left wing movements. These political parties you are supporting are so far gone from anything remotely resembling the 'left wing'. It's just a party of power hungry puppets doing what every they damn well please and demonizing the 'right wing' enemy.
The left wing emerged in Versailles as the most radical opposition to the monarchy. So if you support the 'left' party and are supporting some totalitarian bullshit then you have been hypnotized by labels.
As far as the descriptions of the kids Rittenhouse shot, the appropriate term for each one would be 'armed assailant'. Had they not been trying to kill him, he wouldn't have needed to defend himself.
hell yes
It's about time a judge in a high-profile case actually protected a defendant's right to a fair trial.
agreed
I’ve examined every bit of video evidence available. That kid showed better trigger discipline, threat identification and accuracy than most law enforcement and military professionals. You couldn’t ask for a more textbook example of self defense.
I did also. It was remarkable that under such circumstances a kid with no formal training was able to accurately (only 2 of his shots missed) engage attackers with such precision including 1 with a pistol and walk away unscathed. He conducted himself with poise and tremendous skill despite overwhelming circumstances and 0 support.
I served in the infantry in the Marine Corps and deployed twice. Twice I’ve been to war. Though I’ve never faced such a challenging set of circumstances as he did that night I must be fully honest in saying I don’t think I would have done as well as he did in terms of poise and skill. Through it all he walked away virtually unscathed minus the nice bash he caught with that skateboard from Anthony Huber. Despite the fact Huber had attempted to control the muzzle of Kyle’s rifle, Kyle still shot him through the heart clean and managed to regain enough coordination to engage the next target who had a pistol successfully. Kid is a hero and ought to be given a medal for what he did. He’d make a first class warrior in our armed forces undoubtedly. May Almighty God see fit he be acquitted and protect him.
Kyle is obviously innocent, the Defense whooped the prosecution, very well done.
You have to remember that for the democrats it's not about Truth or Fact or Reality (these are a lot of retards who don't believe in Sex, that's what democrats are).
I'm happy about. I was quite afraid for him, but I'm glad to see sanity prevailing. Although, that there was even a fight about this in the first place is the problem, it's the ideological attack on him and the threat of violence if they don't get what they want that is the problem. Things going Kyle's way give me hope that the psychos won't win the grander culture war, but it's not going to be a quiet and easy job.
Hell yes 17-year-old kid was just trying to protect himself he was getting the hell beat out of him. It just takes idiots to try to attack someone with a skateboard that's holding an AR-15.
I would go the the parade they will be throwing in his honor. I think he should have a statue too.
Right! i mean if george floyd gets one, and he is a worthless criminal, Kyle definitely should get one cause he was defending him self.
I hope he gets acquitted. I have 0 sympathy for those who he killed. They all had it coming. Kids a hero as far as I’m concerned.
I would also like to add if he hadn’t done that in self defense and was on the offensive I’d still support him. In fact I’m sad he only killed 2 and wounded 1. Death was overdue for what they did. I wish he’d gotten many more. This is what happens when politicians refuse to uphold the law. When they allow mobs to terrorize a city, burning, and looting and attacking people who don’t support them at will. This is what happens when politicians authorize political violence, and make no mistake, the violence that happened in the summer of 2020 was fully authorized. They had police and National Guard stand down. Intentionally not suppress those riots with extreme prejudice.
During the Civil War there were draft riots in NYC. They shot those rioters in order to maintain order. I don’t care how many people were protesting peacefully. Once the lives of the non rioters were potentially in danger as well as homes, property and businesses it’s no longer peaceful. Order should have been restored and strict limitations set where protesting could take place and under what conditions. You don’t get to destroy or endanger the lives of innocent people who had nothing to do with George Floyd or the guy they killed with the knife in Kenosha in a narcissistic fit of rage. I notice these things didn’t take place much in red states. Potential rioters knew better. How dare politicians allow lives and property to be endangered to such a degree and fail to take appropriate action? I keep hearing leftists talk about an insurrection on Jan 6th while wholly ignoring the riots were nothing less than a full blown Marxist revolution. For this reason I’d see it as completely justifiable being on the offensive in such a circumstance. If the authorities refuse to protect the lives of the innocent and their property from
voracious thugs then those willing to do so cannot and should not be held responsible for attempting to protect themselves, property and restore order.
I think people should be able to shoot other people they don't like. Doesn't matter what your political stance is, and we shouldn't waste time with juries and a legal system. If you don't like them, POW. Dead. Weather you're storming the Capital or having a Grand Opening at Antifaville, POW, dead. Bullets all around. Too many people on this planet.
The same liberals who want masses of foreigners to come across national borders illegally are now screaming "He drove across state lines!" It's hilarious.
Watch the videos. It is perfectly, undeniably, irrefutably obvious that he was acting in self-defense.
Proof that it was self-defense is the fact that he didn't shoot when the criminal backed away.
It was self defense. That what guns are for. When multiple people attack you a gun evens the odds.
I hope he gets cleared of all charges, he took out some trash... that's all.
I hope he wins, it was self defense and even if it hadn't been they were punks trying to be thugs.
the crime is that they are putting him on trial for political gain
That he is on trial at all is wrong, it should be the BLM leaders that are on trial, as terrorists.
I don't have a dog in this fight, I just hope justice trumps politics (pun unintended).
Yup Kyle deserves better. FBI won't hand over the Helicopter's number out of fear they will get FOIAD and forced to give it out.
He should be acquitted
I hope he wins and shame on the liberal DA
Gonna be more than acquitted.
They weren't victims. They were rioters.
Fuck Kyle Rittenhouse, he’s a fucking psycho punk
Thanks for being a worthless leftists who is too stupid to understand self defense.
Yeah. He’s the bad guy here. Not 36 year old deceased Joseph Rosenbaum who can be seen in a video aggressively taunting and accosting Rittenhouse, then is found shot with his red shirt wrapped around his face after attempting to conceal his identity with it. After all, if he had no intent to do wrong, why choose to conceal his identity before attacking Rittenhouse? Not that Rosenbaum was unfamiliar with putting his hands on minors in an unlawful manner. Rosenbaum was charged with 11 counts of child molestation and inappropriate sexual activities around children including anal rape. He was convicted under the plea deal he made with prosecutors. This was not the only crime on his criminal record. At the time of his death he was out of jail on bond for domestic abuse which included battery. He messed with the wrong minor that night. Anthony Huber was a convicted domestic abuser. Who strangled his victim. Gaige Grosskreutz was convicted of a crime involving the use of a handgun. Despite not legally being allowed to own or possess a firearm we see him clearly armed with a pistol and committing yet 2 more crimes that night, possessing that pistol and attacking Rittenhouse. All of those men had one thing in common. They were violent men with previous criminal convictions and were attacking Rittenhouse. Meanwhile Rittenhouse has been charged with crimes and convicted of none as of yet. Rittenhouse was on the run from all 3 of his attackers, 2 of which can be seen actively attacking Rittenhouse.
I know why you don’t like Rittenhouse. You fear men like him who would forcibly stop those intending on committing violent crimes. After all, what if he’d killed you instead while in commission of a violent crime? All criminals and cowards prefer soft targets. My only question for you is how does it feel to live as a coward and fear bodily harm and death from those who would not be victims? You are the psycho, not Rittenhouse as you think the innocent should not protect themselves.
A real American hero!
THIS JUDGE IS A HERO
Plus weren't they all convicted pedophiles?
Only one. One of the others was a convicted wife-beater, and the third had a misdemeanor gun charge. He was also the one that had the pistol and expressed regret at not "pretending to help him and then shooting him". Y'know, just casually admitting to regretting not committing what would be a war crime by a state actor.
Make no mistake, the world got slightly cleaner that night.
Good.
Good.
This guy is from my town...
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions