If we want to deter mass shooters, why don't we just mock them relentlessly when they die and torture them to death on live TV when they don't?

[OldWorldOrder]

Oh yeah, because these brutal animals have "rights" in this stupid country. It would make too much sense to be able to use applied violence for the purpose of promoting civil safety & security. I guess we can't deter mass shootings. Oh well. 🤷‍♂️

[Rob1n]

They already know they are going to die and in most cases were already aware of how they would be portrayed. I think no one ever has said: gee, those mass shooters really are helping the people. Maybe the mass shooters themselves, but you are not going to change their opinion by ridiculing them further. That is like telling pro trump voters that trump sucks, or democrats that their ideas are fucking stupid.

Instead what you will achieve by torturing them publicly is that you make a martyr of them, and make yourself look bad. Furthermore: it is usually not the fault of their family. I doubt the parents would be thrilled to see their child publicly tortured.

[OldWorldOrder]

I would pull a man's intestines out his asshole if it meant saving children in the future. I am actually pretty disgusted by average people's lack of conviction in that regard. You're either willing to do what's necessary to protect the defenseless, or you're not. Most people are not, I guess.

And yes, there are communities of mental defectives that support mass shooters. They should all be tracked down and tortured into publically renouncing their support for mass shooters, in my opinion.

[Rob1n]

If I thought pulling someone's intestines out and feed it to them would help, I would happily do so. But giving testimonies under torture does not. People would say anything if they would otherwise face unimaginable pain.

Nope, I honestly believe it is better to take care of the root cause of why they are doing the shootings, than trying to fix it afterwards. Maybe it is just genetics that makes them do this. Easy fix then, just take their guns away. Try a mass shooting with a pocket knife.

[OldWorldOrder]

A gun grab starts a civil war.

"Mission failed. We'll get 'em next time."

[NamerOfStars]

So you want to get rid of both the fifth and eighth amendments? Then you'll be happy ho hear that the one President who's made real progress on doing just that is the one in office right now! Be sure ho vote Biden in 2024, and you just might get your wish!

[DarkWinterNights]

It would be better to not name them, never show their picture or face and stop glorifying them for weeks cementing their infamy in the history books. Then we can focus on helping young men before they have the chance to become monsters. We didn’t have these problems in these high numbers before the last 25 years. What changed? It wasn’t guns.

[CloudMassacre]

Why not look into the roots of the issue and work to solve the illness instead of the symptoms

[OldWorldOrder]

The root of the issue is dysgenia, poor mate selection and lack of a genetic filter for mental defects. We used to have asylums and mandatory sterilization programs for that, but once again, the "human rights" bullshit ruined all that.

[WhiteBoyChill]

How about we not make them famous and put their names out everywhere?

[OddBeMe]

Actually you totally mock and even lie about dead people all you want. No one can sue you.

[jimmy2]

Bring back public excutions and out it all online so it scares the hell out of some who wants to do that

[BCA6010]

How about we not make them famous after the fact?

[Intothevoid666]

That pesky thing called the 7th amendment