195 Republicans Vote AGAINST Right To Contraception. Are you looking forward to the contraception ban?

[Anonymous]

[Avicenna]

leftists will believe anything except reality. I know math and logic aren't a strong suit of leftists, but 198 votes against doesn't equal a ban.

Contraception Bill

Anyway, this bill had the following in it:

(11) The United States has a long history of reproductive coercion, including the childbearing forced upon enslaved women, as well as the forced sterilization of Black women, Puerto Rican women, indigenous women, immigrant women, and disabled women, and reproductive coercion continues to occur.

(12) The right to make personal decisions about contraceptive use is important for all Americans, and is especially critical for historically marginalized groups, including Black, indigenous, and other people of color; immigrants; LGBTQ people; people with disabilities; people with low incomes; and people living in rural and underserved areas. Many people who are part of these marginalized groups already face barriers—exacerbated by social, political, economic, and environmental inequities—to comprehensive health care, including reproductive health care, that reduce their ability to make decisions about their health, families, and lives.

(22) As of 2022, at least 4 States tried to ban access to some or all contraceptives by restricting access to public funding for these products and services. Furthermore, Arkansas, Mississippi, Missouri, and Texas have infringed on people’s ability to access their contraceptive care by violating the free choice of provider requirement under the Medicaid program.

(25) In June 2022, Justice Thomas, in his concurring opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (597 U. S. __ (2022)), stated that the Supreme Court “should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell” and that the Court has “a duty to correct the error established in those precedents” by overruling them.

Sounds like electioneering, not lawmaking.

And maybe they didn't agree with this Democratic interpretation:

(16) Congress has the authority to enact this Act to protect access to contraception pursuant to—

(A) its powers under the Commerce Clause of section 8 of article I of the Constitution of the United States;
(B) its powers under section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States to enforce the provisions of section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment; and
(C) its powers under the necessary and proper clause of section 8 of article I of the Constitution of the United States.

I don't have any problem getting contraception (in my case, condoms). Does anyone on this thread have trouble getting contraception?

[MCheetah]

Even knowing this video is a misrepresentation, I'm done pretending like most of y'all on the left and right aren't complete fucking idiots. I used to think only the radical left was full of so many idiots. Then this stupid pro-life abortion BS came up. And all the other stuff following it; both the clickbait and all the other useless arguments and distractions. The pendulum is swinging back from the batshit insane left, over to the batshit insane right.

Now I know... 95% of Western humanity really are complete fucking manchildren dumbasses who don't deserve the right to breed, let alone vote. And to think... Most of these people have children. I'm starting to think how hasn't this species nuked itself out of existence yet?

The older I get, the more I start to think the evil elitist scum had it right all along with the Great Reset and enslaving humanity. Maybe this species really is too stupid to deserve freedom and liberty. It's not even really limited to America; Europe and Asia are hardly any better than this. I never would've thought this before 2020. But man, every day I get older...

[Mess96]

I know there’s reasons why lots of women use birth control especially hormonal because that’s what helps multiple things not just pregnancy prevention, and I used to take it for a long time for period issues like heavy, irregular, painful periods and all I was trying to do is have light, regular periods but nothing worked go figure. But I personally don’t have an opinion because of other peoples needs and also me not wanting anything to do with birth control no matter what. I’m never gonna try it again and no one can convince me otherwise. Yes it helped with the horrible acne I had as a teen but that’s it. It has side effects too of course

[Mess96]

Thank you for the MHO

[MzAsh]

Evangelical republicans have been seething for decades over how little they get to control people, namely women and lgbt. They cannot STAND it. They are dreaming if they think they take birth control away from the 47 million women currently using it.

[OlderAndWiser]

195 Republicans voted against making an issue like this a matter of federal law. They agreed that this is none of their business. To say that they voted AGAINST contraceptive access is disingenuous, but typical of how the left casts conservative ideology.

[SecretsofKB]

You know where I stand on things. You're wise enough to have figured it out by now lol.

But honestly, if this was a few years ago, I might be able to believe that Republicans are voting for that reason. After everything I have seen and heard over the last few years, I truly don't think that is the intention for their vote. And I say that knowing fully that the other side doesn't vote out of the kindness of their heart and for what the law should be either.

I want to believe that that is the reason for the number of Republicans voting that way, but I just can't with how outspoken they have been on things that seem as controversial as this. I really want to.

[Echosoul]

This means it's down to the states a number of which are republican anti-women ones. They know exactly what they're doing.

[OlderAndWiser]

@Echosoul So all you care about is the result, and limiting the reach of the federal government means nothing to you. That is a position that many people take, unfortunately.

[Avicenna]

The underlying false assumption that there are "anti-woman states" and an entire party is "anti-woman" is the problem here. Simplistic thinking like that keeps people from taking a look at the actual legislation and the real intent behind it, which as Older points out, is not benign.

[supercutebutt]

Sure. Republicans don't want to control us. That's why they tried to overturn a free and fair election on January 6th by attempting to destroy democracy by storming the Capitol and hunting down Mike Pence so they could hang him for not following the plan.

[OlderAndWiser]

@supercutebutt Republicans tried to overturn the election? Or SOME Republivan voters?

That's like saying Democrats rioted and destroyed cities when it was actually Antifa or some other fringe group.

[supercutebutt]

@OlderAndWiser Trump is a Republican, right. I mean have you been asleep for the past couple years?

[OlderAndWiser]

@supercutebutt Not asleep, and no need for insults.

By your logic, U. S. Rep. Steve Scalise was openly and blatantly shot by Democrats.

[OlderAndWiser]

Why can't you stick to the question that was posed?

[supercutebutt]

@OlderAndWiser
"but typical of how the left casts conservative ideology."

YOU typed that. So I am sticking to the flow of the conservation. And the conservative in charge on January 6th needed zero Democrats to "cast" his ideology. His lies were totally his own. And his cultists ate up those lies with a spoon. Find me some evidence that the shooter of Scalise was sent there by former President Obama and you will have an argument. I want photos and video of him waving a flag with his cult leader's name on it right before he shot him. I want to hear audio of President Obama telling him to march there. OK?

[OlderAndWiser]

@supercutebutt The question is about 195 Republicans "voting against" contraception. I don't need any more "conversation" with someone who is OD'ed on leftist KoolAid.

[supercutebutt]

"typical of how the left casts conservative ideology."

You are the one who made this claim, friend.
I argue that conservatives cast their own ideology. Or they create a boogeyman from "the left" to do it, completely out of thin air. Conservatives simply have no solutions. They only have complaints and playing the blame-game. If a conservative doesn't like reality, it becomes "fake news."
No Kool-Aid needed to see reality. :)

[OlderAndWiser]

@supercutebutt You are hopeless. Good bye. No more. Don't bother me. Go away. Understand?

[supercutebutt]

LOL!

[OlderAndWiser]

@supercutebutt So you don't understand. I am not surprised.

[Sabretooth]

you know damn good and well that they don't believe in small government... unless you're a straight white Christian male, anyway.

[OlderAndWiser]

@Sabretooth Do you remember the original question? "195 Republicans Vote AGAINST Right To Contraception." You have drifted off target.

[Sabretooth]

do you even know what that means? it6 means banning birth control.

[Sabretooth]

You need to hear this: https://youtu.be/msa46INDaTQ

[OlderAndWiser]

@Sabretooth Do you believe everything that the MSM tells you. 195 Republicans voted against a law that would make access to contraception a FEDERAL right. A vote against that bill is not a support for banning contraception; it is a vote to restrict the extent to which the federal government meddles in our lives.

Grow up and stop having a knee jerk reaction to every inflammatory statement issued by the MSM.

[Sabretooth]

I believe in what I see. Unfortunately, there's tons of evidence to back up such claims. You may not like it but a man your age should be used to such things.

[OlderAndWiser]

@Sabretooth Did you read the bill that was being voted on?

[Sabretooth]

@SecretsofKB a little. ''The Right to Contraception Act passed the Democrat-controlled House 228-195 on Thursday, and it now faces an uncertain future in the Senate. The bill affirms an individual’s right to access and use contraceptive methods, health care providers’ right to prescribe them, and allows for the Justice Department and individuals harmed by the refusal of contraceptives to seek legal recourse''.

lemme ask you this... why? why defend a party that doesn't give a fuck if you live or die? a party that doesn't care if you can have basic necessities to live? and has repeatedly told you that they don't care?

[OlderAndWiser]

@Sabretooth Why do leftists feel entitled to put SO MUCH spin on everything? Do the facts even matter?

[Avicenna]

The narrative (i. e., the party line) is all that matters to leftists.

[SecretsofKB]

@OlderAndWiser Both sides put spin on everything and then think that only the other side does.

[Sabretooth]

I'm not a leftist. however, I can easily pose the every exact same question to conservatives... otherwise known as the party of conspiracists... like, it was Antifa that stormed the capital... even though video evidence show that they were supported by Trump and his allies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rp59FkbyULY . unlike, I can prove my claims... Texas being a great example. Texas failed due to low maintenance on their power grid www.texastribune.org/.../ . where were their Republican ;leaders when they had no power--no heat... no nothing? well, we know Cruz was heading to Cancun. wanna keep going? I've got all night.

[Sabretooth]

@Avicenna that's projection.

[OlderAndWiser]

@sabretoothh Apparently, you are an expert on conspiracy theories. Are you familiar with the psychological defense of projection?

[Sabretooth]

not nearly as much as you are.

[OlderAndWiser]

@Sabretooth I'm glad you respect my level of expertise!

[Avicenna]

@Sabretooth: Keep dreaming. It's dead-on accurate and you know it. And projection is a perfected art of leftists.

[Sabretooth]

@Avicenna your party believes that all dems are pedophiles. what famous person said this about his 13 year old daughter: "Is it wrong to be more sexually attracted to your own daughter than your wife?"?

[Avicenna]

@Sabretooth: You are dishonest about everything, including the fact that you are obviously a leftist.

You don't speak for the diverse beliefs of tens of millions of people who you obviously hate and who you deliberately misrepresent, but let me ask you this- are you comfortable with young elementary school kids (grades 1-3) being explicitly taught about sex, transgenderism, and homosexuality?

[Sabretooth]

@Avicenna don't be stupid! neither you nor me were ever taught that so there's no reason to believed that was changed and every attempt to pass a story where a child was being groomed has fallen apart. besides, even if they are taught these thing... so what? sorry if these things make you uncomfortable but such people exist... deal with it! I've dealt with far worse than petty culture war bullshit... your political leaders don't even care about this shit.

[Sabretooth]

@Avicenna listen to this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbVqKKDnq2U

[Avicenna]

@Sabretooth: Do I understand correctly from your tap dancing that you DO NOT oppose explicitly teaching children in grades 1-3 about physical sex, transgenderism, and homosexuality? That you support it?

Silly me, I thought elementary schoolkids were supposed to be learning Math, English, Social Studies and Science, and perhaps starting to learn a foreign language. And to be allowed to be kids.

[Avicenna]

Let me guess, you aren't a parent...

[Sabretooth]

@Avicenna not about sex.

[Avicenna]

@Sabretooth: And what do you think they should be taught about transgenderism and homosexuality? And why do you think they should be taught that at such a young age?

[Sabretooth]

@Avicenna to be more understanding of them. I can't claim I always was accepting of them, myself. I'm ashamed to admit. if you really care about the safety of kids... then you shouldn't appose this. how many how many have taken their own lives because of people like us?

[Sabretooth]

@Avicenna oppose

[Avicenna]

@Sabretooth: I don't think you should be projecting your guilt onto innocent young kids.
And don't make me laugh with that "... if you really care about the safety of kids..." nonsense, which translates to "my way is the only way and you're a bad person if you don't go along with my way".

No one has taken their life because of me, I can tell you that for a fact. But you are vague about what exactly you'd teach kids. And there is no need to single out transgenders and homosexuals for special treatment- you can teach kids to respect all other people and treat them as they would want to be treated. And that's what they should be taught.

[Sabretooth]

@Avicenna least I'm man enough to admit my mistakes.

[Avicenna]

@Sabretooth; Don't project your guilt onto others. Your "reasoning" has been eviscerated.

Now tell me why kids shouldn't just be taught what I suggested? It's simple, effective, all children benefit and all parents would support it.

[Sabretooth]

@Avicenna you're not interested in a real debate. you can't handle it.

[Avicenna]

@Sabretooth; Is that how you avoid answering questions?

[Sabretooth]

@Avicenna sometimes, you gotta know when to walk away.

[Avicenna]

@Sabretooth: In this case, when you've been exposed as being full of BS. Now what's wrong with teaching kids what I suggested? Kids of all ages for that matter?

[Lliam]

That's some Taliban shit. It's fucking insane. It makes my head explode.
If they oppose abortion, why in fuck would they oppose contraception? Are they trying to discourage people from having sex? Are they trying to destroy people's lives with the financial consequences of unwanted children and wreck the lives of children in the process?

[OlderAndWiser]

The vote is NOT for or against contraception. It is about whether this is something that the federal government (rather than the states) should be regulating.

[Lliam]

@OlderAndWiser. Oh, thanks. I haven't followed the debate.
In my opinion, if the government can fund school lunches, it should provide funding for free or very discounted prices on contraception. More clinics should be opened everywhere to provide confidential contraception, education, and testing.

When I was a teen, "free clinics" were all over the place.

[Soteris]

Putting aside the whole attempt to suppress women which has a lot to do with it, my favorite reason for why some Republicans support this is because they are afraid of being "replaced" and are desperate for white women to keep their kids rather than abort them or use contraceptives. Be it for fear of "racial extinction" or because they think they are losing potential voters, its at least an honest reason.

While I have only heard some Republicans say this, I wonder how many more of them believe it but are not saying it out loud. Either way, an interesting although horrific point of view.

[AmandaYVR]

@Soteris THIS. 👌

[RiseofArtemis]

First of if we use logic the moment we would lose our modern technology we would lose a lot of things we deem as "rights." So a right to contraception doesn't make sense in the least as how can you assure that right if the grid would be permanently dead and never be able to be rebuild. The same with a right to abortion again modern tech. Would you do it if the risk of death was higher suddenly in an abortion. And we would lose the ability to have vaccines as well. There shouldn't be a right that is only possible due to modern technology as it can become useless or inapplicable the moment a certain part is missing. On top of that sex is meant for procreation so anything that stops it is by natural logic unnatural.

[dustybiker]

Contraception (especially hormonal) is used for more than just birth control. One of them is cancer control. This will not be banned. The medical profession won’t allow it.

[Asker]

We are already seeing legislation that targets many of these medications regardless if they are used for non-birth control medial reasons.

[dustybiker]

Anyone can file. Doesn’t mean they will win.

[Anonymous]

I do not think they're going to stop making birth control for women. Some women that must have birth control to have a normal life. A good example is endometriosis. It is very painful for women. It helps balance the pain and the and slows the scarring. Do we always have to believe the media. Just because the media doesn't like what's happening and certain groups of people. They will tell you anything prevent things happening. Research things out for your own. Yes there's a bunch of stupid ass people out there they'll tell you anything that you want to hear. Again research things out.

[Asker]

Medicine is already being denied to women

www.newsweek.com/woman-says-she-cant-get-vital-heart-medication-after-roe-wade-ruling-1720056

www.newsweek.com/anger-woman-denied-abortifacient-medication-roe-v-wade-abortion-1721428

www.popsugar.com/.../viably-fertile-people-denied-medication-post-roe-48872588

[Asker]

progresstexas.org/post-roe-world-patients-are-being-denied-live-saving-medical-care

The treatment for miscarriages is the same as the treatment for elective abortions, but most states with abortion bans claim to allow for exceptions only if the pregnant person’s life is in danger.

In Louisiana, a woman was forced to endure a painful, hours-long delivery of a non-viable fetus, hemorrhaging in the process.

In Missouri, a pharmacist denied a woman who miscarried medication she needed to prevent an infection

In Texas, an OB-GYN watched as their patient became sicker and sicker due to a dangerous womb infection but was unable to do anything because of the presence of a fetal electrical impulses.

Doctors are being forced to wait until symptoms from a miscarriage are so dire that they can justify providing life-saving medical care.

A recent study at two Texas hospitals reported on 28 women who were treated for dangerous pregnancies. Due to Texas law, all of the women were denied immediate treatment because fetal electrical impulses were detected. Nearly 60% of these women developed serious infections, bleeding, or other severe complications.

Childbirth is about 14 times riskier than having an abortion, and a recent study found that abortion bans would increase maternal mortality by 24%. In addition, people who are turned away from getting an abortion are more likely to remain in contact with an abusive partner and homicide is a leading cause of pregnancy related deaths.

[Opinion Owner]

www.verifythis.com/.../536-fe3373e3-1b16-49c6-8cf9-bc786e54b03b

[Asker]

@opinion owner - Roe vs Wade is not Griswold v. Connecticut. Griswold v. Connecticut is what we are talking about here. Griswold v. Connecticut is what the Supreme Court said they intend to consider next, which is why this new bill was created, which 195 Republicans voted to not protect.

[lightbulb27]

what, is that true?

that be hilarious. you have a right to a gun to kill others, and might have one stuffed into your hand to kill the "enemy", but you can't prevent humans from being created because of your crazy hormones given by God and corrupt hormonal and emotional environment.

Good luck with that... Better go back to church and get those emotions re-programmed before get into trouble...

[Anonymous]

Meh. Just because some nimrod labels a bill the "Right to Contraception" bill doesn't mean it has anything to do with a right to contraception. I think we all learned that during the "Don't Say Gay!" bill excitement only to find out that--SURPRISE!!!--the bill didn't ACTUALLY say "gay" anywhere in it.

So pardon me for not getting my panties in a bunch over some ginned up outrage over something that I'm sure means precious little to any reasonable person and most likely absolutely nothing to me.

[NewsReader]

Here is a more informative and neutral explanation about the bill:

https://www.albanyherald.com/news/contraception-bill-passes-in-u-s-house-with-eight-gop-votes/article_80645716-0c1c-11ed-80cb-a71ae532f859.html

[laurieluvsit]

Rights come from God. Privileges come from Man.

The US Constitution is not about granting privileges, it is about reaffirming Rights.

It also does not require that people get educated, thus the world is not perfect.

[Asker]

The US Constitution also doesn't grant you the right to have clean drinking water or fire departments.

[laurieluvsit]

Correct. The government is the people. That is the job of the people. The federal service contractors contract with the people is limited.

[Wade12345]

Yes. We need more babies to grow up and pay taxes to pay off the Federal Debt.

Without a reproductive rate of 2.3 children per woman, the government will eventually collapse. We currently have only 1.7 children per woman, w which is not enough to sustain a world government.

[thisluv]

You got to be joking 💀

[Wade12345]

@thisluv

Spread your legs to balance the budget.
Ask what you can do for your country!

[thisluv]

Alright but don't call me a hoe for doing so

[Wade12345]

@thisluv
I'm referring to married women. I don't promote premarital sex and other irresponsible sex acts.

[RasmusAiken]

The bill requiring that the government buy your contraception was introduced by Dems and was purposely named "Right to Contraception" to smear anyone voting against it. See how politics works?

[ElementoP]

This, just like everything else, is probably being blown way out of proportion. It's probably a vote against *government funded* contraception and making women pay for it themselves instead of taxpayers. Then the left takes that and says "Republicans want to ban contraception!". Knowing my own party, they're against publicly funded solutions to people's own problems. Raising your taxes so poor people can fuck worry free. I'd be against that too

[Zeus_66]

Another misguided person. Read the bill, and you'll see why they voted against it. And the bill was written the way it was for Republicans to not vote in favor of it so the propagandists that have their claws in people like you would consume it and take it for gospel.

[BadRepresentative]

Interesting. I have to fact check this. Wording does matter a lot.

[Zeus_66]

They do this all the time. Nothing new. Republicans do it to Democrats as well. This is why line item veto should be in place, bills should be transparent with the People, and bills should be "clean."

[HighValue]

Yeah, I wanted to read the actual bill too since most of the media lies. Do you have a link to the actual bill? I can't find it so far.

[Zeus_66]

@HoghValue: As requested:

www.congress.gov/.../text

Pay close attention to the definition of "contraception" when you read it. Then you'll see why Republicans voted against it in the House, and why it doesn't even stand a chance in the DemoKKKrat-controlled Senate.

Good on you to ask and want to see how these globalists manipulate the sheeple.

[HighValue]

Thanks. When I get time I will read it. I like to see the actual bills proposed because the news lies way too often.

[EarthRealm]

Getting pregnant is caused by not wearing a condom since you females want a dude to Raw Dog you and Wanna keep getting Pregnant by Chad and Tyrone so you can Get Abortion so you can keep Not using condom because you want to be raw dogged without Having to give birth


They should just ban condoms as well and I would Vote for the ban of condoms

[EarthRealm]

I’d also vote for gays to not have the ability to get married because when I go outside I don’t wanna see a bunch of gays making out or gays wearing gay shirts and talking gay it’s disgusting and immoral
It was Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve

[EarthRealm]

I happen to like Going to a store and Looking at the mens section of clothing to find a new T shirt and I simply don’t want my shirts replaced with gay shirts and gay pants would make it harder to get clothes

[EarthRealm]

They need to put gay dude shirts in the female section because gay dudes aren’t dudes they are dudes with female dna 🧬 a Abomination not natural

[EarthRealm]

Even NATURE AGREES THE CREATOR AGREES
Man cannot fuck another man and get each other pregnant it’s not possible if heterosexual men and females stopped being a thing and they were gays only and not willing to fuck bitches then the human species would die off and humans would cease to exist
Therefor Being gay is not natural and is against Nature

[EarthRealm]

Therefor it’s Immoral Gays won’t make it to heaven if there is a heaven because there against nature

[MAC1983]

You're all over the place today, aren't you?

[Anonymous]

And people actually want to vote for these morons.

[WhiteBoyChill]

According to who?

[Exterminatore]

Yes. I don’t vote for people who think having a threesome with their neighbors wife and a goat is reasonable.

I also don’t vote for people who think I should compete against foreign nationals who have illegally entered the country for jobs.

I don’t vote for people who think women should compete against biological males in their own sports.

I don’t vote for people who want to disarm me.

I especially don’t vote for people who poison the minds of children with tranny story hour or endorse it.

I don’t vote for people who say I’m an oppressor because I’m a male and white.

I don’t vote for people who hype up a pandemic and try to make me get injections I don’t want.

I don’t vote for people who want to increase my taxes.

I don’t vote for anyone who has dementia.

I don’t vote for people who teach hatred for my country.

I don’t vote for people who pull out of a war in an undignified way, and leave behind multimillions in equipment and contractors who supported us.

I don’t vote for people who increase my taxes and give it to illegals.

I most especially and undoubtedly do not vote for people who allow cities to be burned and mobs to rape, kill, beat, steal, and assault police at will and all the while call it a peaceful protest…even when it’s too dangerous to go to church, work or have family gatherings because of Covid…. but it’s ok to riot.

I don’t vote for people who try to impeach the president twice, and have Jan 6th hearings, and come up with a collusion story just because that president is a political rival.

I don’t vote for people who endorse voter fraud.

I don’t vote for people whose Supreme Court nominee doesn’t know what a woman is.

I don’t vote for people who weaken our military with woke advertising and pronoun training and make a mockery of our military.

Save your reply. It will fall on def ears. If you vote for people who do these things YOU are the problem.

[Cubus]

How is voting against lowering drug prices bad?

[Cherry234]

Those Republicans really are evil. They won't get away with this. People are going to fight back. I'm glad I didn't vote for that orange clown and the rest of those rednecks.

[BlueScorpio]

Boy they are going hard, I really think this has something to do with birth rates dropping to fast in America mainly among white americans. I used birth control to balance out my horomones and not so much to prevent pregnancy.

[Asker]

Many Americans don’t want babes for several reasons - the world is shittier than it’s been in a long time, and the crippling costs of raising children is higher than ever.

[Soteris]

The Republicans sure are insistent on fulfilling my prediction of pushing USA down to a 3rd world status. Maybe they will push for covering women in public next like in the religious extremist Islamic countries?

[Waldoe]

"Elections have Consequences!", win more elections and then you can pass any 'Stupid Laws', that you wish, otherwise, as always 'Majority Rules'...

I say this without knowing or caring about this issue, I had a vasectomy after my 3rd son, so I made my choice.

[AmandaYVR]

I think it's time to bring cock cages back and give women the keys. That would be a fair response to contraception and abortion bans.

[Asker]

Lawmaker men cry like little bitches when vasectomies are mentioned but have no problems writing laws that force women to breed.

[Anonymous]

the fuck is wrong With them? what about the kids in foster care and the kids getting SLAUGHTERED at school? and the embarrassingly low minimum wage. they don't care about the kids infront of them. why are all these old farts changing laws when they're gonna die in like 2 years! they don't care about the country because they're old enough that it won't affect them. they're probably shooting out cum dust

[Agape93]

They do, there will be bloodshed. You've already pushed too hard, don't push again.

[H8INCHES]

The vote is NOT for or against contraception.

[Agape93]

Never said it was. I said if they do ban it, they best prepare for a violent backlash.

[Snsl153]

The video is incredibly biased, and I stopped watching before I even got to the minute mark. The presenter is absolutely obnoxious, and obviously doesn't care about telling the truth.

[Brammer54]

Liar liar pants on fire. They didn't vote to ban it. They just said it should be left to the states to decode and not the federal government. Do you really want a huge out of control government or a smaller and under control?

[Echosoul]

In a republican state it's the same thing

[Smoke-n-Growls]

Oh man, you dumb American.

That you can't already see you have a huge government out of control, and the source of it is the GOP, is so quintessentially American.

It's absolutely amazing to me how dumb American men are.

[Brammer54]

Yes I am aware America has a big government and no matter what party is at control, the size and it's scope must be limited to prevent any further overreach.

Republicans aren't innocent either when it comes to working towards a small government but if you look at the past 2 decades and specially the last 3 years and and blame only or mainly the GOP, you need —and I'm not saying this lightly — some serious help.

[HighValue]

What is the actual bill so it can be looked up instead of only linking very biased and dishonest media sources?

I'd like to see everything in the bill and how it was worded.

[Anonymous]

No, I think birth control should stay. Also, some people need it for hormonal problems. I don't have sex because I'm annoying to men, but I need it, or else I'm really ugly, emotional, and I have my period for 10 days straight. Me not being that way benefits everyone.

[BeMuse]

The fact that you don't know the difference between a right and a privilege is your problem.

[BeMuse]

Congress has no authority to determine American's rights. Rights are reserved to states or people...

10th Amendment
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Only morons would vote for legislation that violates the Constitution at this point in American history. The fourth federal law, 18 U. S. C 1918 outlines penalties for violation of oath of office which specifically notes removal from office and confinement or fine. Those Republicans see the trials that are coming, and they’d prefer not to go to jail. The Democrats are all in on the Great Reset Global Homo Communist plan which is failing... They're all in... That only leads to one grim end... Treason is no joke.

[genericname85]

well america is declining and devolving back into some poor third world country. it was eventually gonna happen with all these decades of cutting education budgets in favour of weapon budgets.

[lucas262]

Being middle right.
Being pro life. That makes no damn sense.

people are gonna fuck. Abortion isn't a means of birth control. But removing the means for people to have safe sex? FFS what are they trying to push here?

[H8INCHES]

The vote is NOT for or against contraception.

[lucas262]

Why the question then

[Anonymous]

I understand the abortion ban but not the contraception ban. What are they trying to accomplish? No women are going to have sex with random men anymore and those are just going to go on massive shooting even more.

[Miristheiss]

Right?

You mean someone else has to buy it for you? The government mandates insurance companies have to buy it for you?

[John_Doesnt]

We're gonna be overpopulated with unwanted kids and a bunch of women are gonna be forced to live at home. Inflation will get a lot worse if we lose women in the workforce.

[captain_voidwalker]

For fucks sake they're just voting to not have the government subsidize it. If you can't afford your own contraception you can't afford q kid so don't have sex. Not hard

[DCooper]

Typical democrats - don't know the difference between rights and goods/services.

[LazerBean]

The bill doesn't ban contraceptives.

[LazerBean]

*the bill not passing does not ban contraceptives.

[Asker]

Supreme Court said they would "reconsider Griswold v. Connecticut next" along with reconsidering rights for gay and interracial marriage, after Roe was overturned. The new bill (which 195 Republicans, the party of individual freedom and small government, voted against), was aimed at protecting contraception rights.

overturned. https://www. oyez. org/cases/1964/496

[Asker]

Legislation in the works for banning contraception

19thnews.org/.../

Here's a far-right news source talking about efforts to ban contreception

www.dailywire.com/.../hammer-pro-lifers-must-focus-more-broadly-simply-josh-hammer

[LazerBean]

The 19th one only specifies Emergency contraceptives and IUDs.

The daily wire one is not even against contraceptives at all, it says they should be made available over the counter instead of being owned by big pharma. I may have missed it, but it didn't mention a contraception ban.

[Mac-One]

The decision did not ban abortion or contraception. It just gives the regulation back to the states as the Constitution did not give that to the federal government.

[Jackblue]

Contraception is not going to be banned, this is over fears that democrats are trying to allow free access to abortion drugs.

[Becca1998_]

Depends on the state. Luckily I live in state where their consequences for rapist etc. and start carrying a gun. Or I’d move to Canada even though I don’t like the cold.

[RationalMale]

Given that the bill in question was probably chock full of leftist add ons for this and that, I'm confident they did the right thing.

[Anonymous]

That’s not going to happen, the condom companies will lobby against it, I don’t think this is even true anyway, I don’t know any republicans against contraception

[Asker]

Here are the official votes from congress. click the. gov link to see for yourself:

Roll Call 385 Bill Number: H. R. 8373
Vote Question: On Passage Right to Contraception Act

Democratic: 220 yeas, 0 nays
Republican: 8 yeas, 195 nays

https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2022385

[Opinion Owner]

I guess they want more people on the planet to create more chaos and fighting for food and resources

[warren_zevon]

You are straw manning here. A vote against the RIGHT to something is NOT a vote to ban it.

Second, I am fine with that if it happens, no sweat off my back.

[H8INCHES]

This question is either an intentional lie or the poster doesn't research there topic before they post.

The vote is NOT for or against contraception.

[Anonymous]

They also voted against funding a pointless war in Europe to prop up a corrupt regime.

Terrible. Just terrible.

[Anonymous]

Not exactly. What they voted against was a bill that, among other things, made it a federal right to use, and healthcare companies able to prescribe, chemical abortion drugs.

[Opinion Owner]

In the future, instead of just blindly gobbling up the divisive rhetoric from one side or the other, why not actually educate yourself on what you're posting about before posting it.

[MAC1983]

I'm curious why you had to be anonymous to write that.

[Opinion Owner]

@MAC1983 I'm curious why you couldn't come up with a more intelligent response. You were obviously bothered by what I wrote, but don't have the whit to come up with anything of value to write. The only thing you could think to criticize is that fact that I posted anonymously on the internet? Think harder, "dude".

[vald9inches]

Everyone knows they are just fucking fascist hypocrites that just want to control people

[Kenzy009]

Maybe this will make women go after guys with quality instead of guys with looks. So yes im looking forward to it

[legalboxers]

why are you hiding anon.. whats wrong? you dont have the guts to say who you are and be troll like the rest of them?

[Echosoul]

I don't know the specifics but this is about punishing the poor and women. Republicans as usual hate anyone who isn't worth millions.

[Pterodon]

What have the democrats done that’s helped anyone?

[Pterodon]

They’ve helped criminals with their no cash bail

[anylolone]

Nope, we kept you guys in check, we can keep them in check.
Gosh, they have and will beg us to keep them in check, lol!

[Anonymous]

What is the role of the federal government? Do you have a clue?

[Snakeyes7]

What fucking idiots. We better vote these morons out this November.

[Pterodon]

This is nothing. The entire Catholic Church is against it but you say nothing about that

[EnglishEuropean]

UK here. Imma sit here with my popcorn and watch your country go to Hell.

[OddBeMe]

I’m looking forward to their Viagra ban vote…wait its been canceled. Damn.

[SmokinAces2000]

The only thing I don’t understand is why we are all acting surprised at this

[Anonymous]

I highly doubt that Republicans want to ban contraception. Maybe abortifaciants; but not contraception.

[Anonymous]

I'm a virgin so it does. Affect me. So I guess yeah

[Anonymous]

It'll make celibacy more popular which is only a good thing in this hyperoverpopulated world

[Anonymous]

Right To Contraception is code for Right To Interracial Marriage

[ChooChooHaha]

I'm waiting for the day it does happen. XD

[Guy13]

Good times ahead...