Which Issue Concerns the Former President Most?

[Anonymous]

Trump pleads the 5th at recent NY AG civil probe deposition.

Tax returns released to Congress

Probe into the 16 fake electors

Shift of popularity to Ron DeSantis as presidential hopeful

Subpoena of Alex Jones' entire cell phone communications

Evidence seized from FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago

Real estate appraiser hands over thousands of documents to NY Attorney General in real estate scam probe

Investigation into "Stop The Steal" fundraiser scam

A total of 4 votes were cast: 1 girls and 3 guys. See detailed results

[Anonymous]

His biggest concern is to not let mail-in-ballots be abused the way they were in 2020 election. He is also concerned with the 30+ million new illegals entered into the country and the drugs, crime and human trafficking they will bring. The last thing would be the complete destruction of the economy caused by failed leadership and corruption. I don’t think he cares much about the democrats endless war against him to prevent him from running for election. That’s been going on before he was ever president.

[Asker]

How's that coolaide tasting?

[Opinion Owner]

I’ll tell you if you let me know how the copium feels.

[888theGreat]

Funny because all the Republicans have flown in to ask Trump to announce he is running for President 2024 . They didn't ask DeSantis to run. Trump received 99% of the straw vote at CPAC. DeSantis would be a complete fool to run. But you keep believing your hate speak.

[supercutebutt]

[supercutebutt]

Kindly apologize for your rude comment.

[lightbulb27]

Talk about a total attack to ensure he never shows on stage again. They had no concerns when they thought he was their buddy.


Just makes him stronger. My guess is… he’s concerned about business attack. He knows this game which is why he’s well suited to it and why so many saw him as hope for the country….

[abc3643]

H

Desperately staying out of prison which he try and do be re-running for President in 2024.

[exitseven]

He still is trying to prove the election was stolen. He might do kit after he gets elected.

[Asker]

He still is trying to prove the election was stolen. He might do it after he steals the election.

[goaded]

So that's when he's going to release all the evidence? Wouldn't it be more effective if he released it, say, November 2020?

[Asker]

Former guy is planning to bundle all his evidence with Kraken Lady's and Mike Pillow's.

[goaded]

Sounds about right.

[Anonymous]

[OddBeMe]

there's so many…

and there's more coming down the pike. He may have to run for president just to escape being investigated.

[Asker]

It's not a good sign when he publicly states he's running for president to evade the law.

[OddBeMe]

Did he say that? Seriously, to cause so much investigation as an ex pres is unprecedented. DOJ has an unofficial rule not to prosecute ex pres’s.

[Anonymous]

Good luck maintaining a free republic, when you make it personalty dangerous for any sitting president to give up power to political rivals.

[goaded]

Trump literally made it physically dangerous to accept the result of the election. Or to investigate crimes.

[Opinion Owner]

@goaded You mean by telling people to peacefully protest? By offering National guard forced to guard the capital?

The only people physically in danger on January 6 were the unarmed protestors several of whom were murdered by incompetent capital police.

[goaded]

OMG, do you actually believe any of that? Name the "several" "unarmed protestors... murdered by incompetent capital police"

[Opinion Owner]

@goaded
Ashli Babbitt unarmed girl shot to death by incompetent capital police.
Roseanne Boyland woman crushed to death in the insuring panic as a result of the incompetent Capital police.
Kevin Greeson died of a heart Attack triggered by again failed crowed control of capital police.

A police force I remind you that is SUPPOSE to know something about crowds given they show up on the Capital grounds ALL THE TIME!

[goaded]

"Ashli Babbitt unarmed girl shot to death by incompetent capital police."
... while climbing through a broken window into a barriacaded room of VIPs (carrying a backpack on a day when bombs had already been found). Sounds pretty competent to me.

"Roseanne Boyland woman crushed to death in the insuring panic as a result of the incompetent Capital police."
Crushed to death by whom? By rioters.

"Kevin Greeson died of a heart Attack triggered by again failed crowed control of capital police."
FFS, seriously?

"A police force I remind you that is SUPPOSE to know something about crowds given they show up on the Capital grounds ALL THE TIME! "
How many times did they turn up with weapons and intending to invade the Capitol to interfere in the legal counting of votes? Oh, once.

[Opinion Owner]

@goaded Not one was carrying a weapon in the capital they were let into.

Although the 2nd amendment does make it rather difficult to see how congress has the right to prohibit the carrying of such weapons anywhere in D. C. It does in fact say Congress shall make NO law.

Regardless outside the capital weapons have always been there.

[goaded]

"Not one was carrying a weapon in the capital they were let into."
Except for all the ones that were. Do you think people can't believe their eyes?

How many times did protests turn up with weapons and intending to invade the Capitol to interfere in the legal counting of votes? Once.

[Opinion Owner]

@goaded You mean like the time Puerto Ricons actually shot congressmen in the capital?
Or the numerous times democrats attacked political leaders broke windows and set fires in the last 10 years?

If you expect me to care about this insolent when nobody cared about the others, and frankly some of which actual threaten people i cared about. Your delusional.

I don't care this sort of thing happens quite regularly in Washington D. C. and increasingly other places.

P. S. I dont agree a walking Cain is a weapon, although if you want to be literal everything can be used as a weapon but whats the point of even bothering with the term if your going to define things that don't give a person such an advantage.

Regardless I don't even see the point of such an argument as I already made clear I don't see how under the 2nd amendment congress can ban people from having weapons in the capital.

That is in fact what we would be talking about congress disregarding the clear limits of the Federal Constitution in attempting to ban such weapons if there were actual arms there.

[goaded]

Literally no sitting president (or vice president) has sought to overturn an election in the history of your country until Trump. Not even when it came down to 500 votes in one state. Maybe Gore should have just decided not to count Florida's votes and won the presidency. Isn't that what you're proposing as being reasonable?

[Opinion Owner]

@goaded The fact that there was significant fraud and many states outright ignored their own laws in accepting mail in ballots. Warranted serous investigation and challenge. Even still Donald Trump thou Donald Trump and the cheated voters protested the rather clear abuse, neither made any effort to overturn an election.

[goaded]

The only real problem with the 2020 election was the lies about it, which you're still repeating, while ignoring the facts.

[Opinion Owner]

@goaded Ignoring the evidence we have while deliberately not preserving or collecting any other evidence does not make the fraud go away.

[goaded]

Ignoring the fact that nobody's got any evidence does? Nobody's shown any evidence of fraud that would have changed the result of the election in even one state, and it would need many to change the overall result. I suppose you think the Fraudit people in Arizona were working for the Democrats, too, when they counted more votes for Biden?

[Opinion Owner]

@goaded Perhaps you should watch 2000 Mules, its fairly well established there is wide spread and organized fraud. The true extent of which cannot be known for want of collected or retained evidence.

The fact that politicians elected by such fraud have little interest in investigating it, retaining or collecting evidence of it as to verify the election is both hardly shocking and hardly unusually in this country.
In every case of fraud said fraud worked in favor of the politicians actually elected and presiding over said election or at least failed to sink their chances.

[goaded]

2000 Mules is a fraud, produced by a Trump-pardoned convict. It's been well debunked.

Your attitude that "there must have been fraud because there's no evidence of it" is just ridiculous. At least half the places you claim there was fraud were run by Republicans. Arizona "investigated" in their fraudit, and simply found more votes for Biden and no fraud.

[Opinion Owner]

@goaded The fact that Democrats choose to out law and selectively prosecute Dinesh Joseph D'Souza speech does not make him a criminal nor legitimately convicted of anything.

But rather demonstrates the lawless abuse of Democrats in the Federal Government. There are no exceptions to the 1st amendment for a good reason.
Dirty politicians particular those with a history of being in bed with the news oligarchs and thus tolerance for any speech against them. Have have no respect for the equal much-less faithful applications application of any law.

As such any one who offends or threatens their power is almost always seen as a criminal no matter how inconsistent with the law or equal application thereof it is.

[goaded]

Tell it to the judge: "The court concludes the defendant has respectfully submitted no evidence he was selectively prosecuted."

"D'Souza pleaded guilty to one felony count of making illegal contributions in the names of others."

[Opinion Owner]

@goaded I know exactly that democrat in a black robe said.

I also know what the 1st amendment says, and that paying to speak is in fact speech. As such neither congress nor the president's hand picked politicians in black robes have any legitimate right to tell their political enemies what they cannot say against them.

In practice campaign donations go everywhere and under an infinite number of names, indeed it is quite popular to make donations in the names of other people either as gifts or as a form of insult if given to people they dislike.

So prosecuting pretty much anyone when almost nobody else ever is, is a highly selective act demonstrating contempt for the idea of equal application and justice under the law.

[anylolone]

Just the waste of time.