
Why is it that women are labeled as the more “emotional” sex when males commit 98% of mass shootings, 99% of sexual assault, and 80% of violent crime?

Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
men commit crimes because they are more reckless, impulsive, act before you think types. men are also more insensitive to others. Nobody is unemotional. Men are not unemotional. All humans are emotional beings. Its just that women are more emotional than men. It does not mean at all that men are not emotional.
Men tend to like to disguise their emotions because they have huge egos. They think crying, talking about how they feel deep inside will make them seem sensitive and weak which in turn may affect their egos. Men have significantly bigger egos than women. Men also have a higher tendency for narcissism than women.
Study shows men are more narcissistic than women. This surprises no one. - The Washington Post
That’s according to a study in the March issue of the Psychological Bulletin, the journal of the American Psychological Association. In a review of three decades of survey data from nearly half a million participants, researchers found that men are more likely to demonstrate narcissistic behavior than women, regardless of generation or age.
Those seem anger and frustration expressed in a destructive way. I guess for those people, they didn't have a healthy outlet for their feelings. They should have taken advantage of their counseling resources at school or with their health insurance. This also stems from people who are saying: "Oh boys will be boys" or "Be a man and suck it up!".
Also, I don't believe in this stereotype. Never have. We are ALL human beings with emotions and feelings and it's time people STOPPED with the stereotyping, it doesn't help anyone.
99% of sexual assaults…. do you have a nonpartisan source for that statistic? Yes there are more reports of men doing this which doesn’t surprise me but 99%? Also I think many incidents of female sexual assaults go unreported.
For example female pedophilia was literally considered nonexistent until very recently. Does anybody remember Edward Furlong (the young john Connor in terminator 2). He was in a sexual relationship with a 29 year old woman when he was 13. She didn’t get in any trouble though. The state of California didn’t even have any female to minor statutory rape laws until 1994. I also don’t think all female teacher/minor sex scandals was a recent phenomenon. Rather they just recently started being reported.
Again I acknowledge that men are overall more violent physically and sexually than women. But don’t give us some exaggerated bullshit “99% of all sexual assaults” statistic.
Psychologists believe that anger stems from the primal need to react to situations that threaten one's survival or the survival of one's offspring. It's debatable if it can be labelled an emotion. In the human world, it is the male who is tasked with defending against threatening situations, and therefore the laws are biased against males. Let's pass a law that says a lioness shouldn't get angry when you threaten her cubs, and suddenly you'll see a feminist uproar, no pun intended. Or better yet, make it illegal for a female to be promiscuous, if that's her nature -- not going to happen. But, it's perfectly permissible to penalize that which comes naturally to men. I'm not saying we shouldn't penalize mass shooters and rapists, but society needs to do a better job at helping men understand their nature rather than penalize it.
Anger is an emotion. Therefore natural in everyone. But that is irrelevant. We should all have control of our emotions. Being natural is not an excuse.
Clearly you've never thought deeply about anything, and I don't need a lecture on controlling emotions. I'm arguing that in a world with no laws, such as the animal world I evolved from, if I felt threatened or if I needed to eat, or if someone were trying to procreate with my mate, I would kill them. Why? Because my body floods with adrenaline that causes me to act against a threat in behalf of my own survival because a male is wired that way. Have you never observed primates? It's only humans that call it "anger" or an "emotion" which is a bullshit man-made way to describe the fact that the body floods with adrenaline in order to act violently. Laws, then, are an artificial and unnatural construct designed to protect ourselves from our own nature and are biased against the male gender.
Dude…. How can it by boast against men when those laws were made by men… sound like a lot of excuses for choosing to be violent and impulsive
So don’t rape and murder people are anti men laws? Seriously?
Yes they are. If you divorce yourself from man's law and look at natural law, you will see that it is the males who are killing each other and screwing females. Which means your argument is a completely moot point. It's like me asking 'Why is it that men are labeled as murderers when 100% of people who get abortions are women?" It's a completely biased viewpoint from someone on a feminist high horse.
Because abortion isn't murder... just like you refusing to donate blood or bone marrow isn't murder. The lengths you are going to to justify rape and actual murder is alarming...
But that is true for any emotions that you have. What do you think emotions are? If you see the people you like happy you feel joy. That makes you more likely to want the good for your society. If you eat, rest, fuck, things that are important to your surviv, you feel good. If you are betrayed, hurt, angry you feel bad.
Literally every emotion you have, anger included, is made to help you as a social animal thrive and survive. Anger is not special in that sense.
@bean2k21
About laws. Animals have them. They don't write, but they have them. Take gorilas. When fighting for dominance or females they never beat up a rival more than necessary. Wolves do the same. Social animals avoid killing members of their own society. They sometimes ki each other, of course, just like we do, but that is rare and the ones that do it are often times expelled for doing it. We are social animals too. Of course we will have laws that don't allow murder. That is not anti men. That is our biology as social animals.
@Subarugirl Where the fuck do you get that Im justifying murder? The lengths you will go to make apples and oranges , ridiculous comparisons to piut the male gender in a negative light is what is truly alarming here.
@Subarugirl What you and others who eat up you garbage viewpoints need to understand is there is no such thing as "Men are bad because of this blah blah blah bullshit." There are scientific reasons for why men are prone to aggression and violence. It's not a justification it is a fact. So society needs to stop condemning male behavior and look at root causes of violent crime and rape etc. And stop focusing on punitive measures. The justice system is not going to do this.
@bean2k21 everyone, literally everyone can be prone to violence and aggression. Women can be extremely violent too. To punish people for being overly aggressive is not an attack on us, is an attack on anyone that constitutes a danger to society. We happen to be more likely to be violent. That is irrelevant the moment that not just men are punished for it.
They would stop condemning male behavior if it wasn’t such a big issue…. Your get upset at me for pointing it out instead of at the people exhibiting that behavior
@Subarugirl Fine then, if we're not going to solve anti-male bias in our justice system, let's at least fix your argument. You're committing the fallacy of composition, inferring something is true of the whole from a fact that is true of part of the whole. One might call it prejudice against men, but in your case it's probably just the fact that you're a woman and can't be logical.
@Subarugirl he is not very coherent. He began this conversation with me and now he is just addressing you. He probably just gets off on feeling like he is winning an argument with a girl online. Even if is not making even the slightest bit of sense.
@This_Is_My_Opinion8 and of course somehow I’m the bad guy for talking about it… you know, instead of the actual bad guys.
@Subarugirl the bad guys that should be put away. I have no clue how someone can advocate to not punish criminals.
Talking about the facts… doesn’t make me a hater… that fact you’re trying to justify and down play what’s happening is very concerning
You are comparing women who are labeled 'emotional' to men who commit violent crimes -- and you call that laying out facts? Sorry, no, you are insinuating that you can make logical conclusions based on a subset of the population. That has nothing to do with fact. It's faulty logic. Furthermore, let me pose this question: if 80% of convicted criminals were women, do you not think it would be questioned? But, the fact they are men, well, who gives a shit right? They're just men. I would think in light of how our criminal justice systems works, you could at least be more intelligent about the conclusions you make.
Because Fear-Based Anger Is the Primary Motive for Violence…. You should read up on General Strain Theory
www.google.com/.../fear-based-anger-is-the-primary-motive-violence%3Famp
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5472615/
www.sciencedirect.com/.../S0047235217301460
Opinion
65Opinion
Lmao, I get emotional as all get out. Big tantrum guy, HUGE😂😂😂



Two of those numbers are wrong. Women that commit violent crimes are often ignored by society so the statistical numbers don't match reality.
As far as sexual assault goes, millions of women are guilty of rape and never charged.
When a person is under the influence of alcohol they can't legally give consent. Every single time a woman meets a guy at a bar or club that has been drinking and she hooks up with him, she has actually raped him.
I do agree that men are more emotional though. They usually feel things deeper. Women just show it more openly because society gives them sympathy more often and society ridicules men for showing emotion.
The wind blows both ways….
And who established that system I wonder…
Actually I do care otherwise I wouldn’t have brought it up..
When legislature has influence from or is even co-written by members of, say, NOW, the National Organization of Women. Kinda like the piece of shit Duluth Model and the Ellen Pence-headed feminist thinktank that saw to its implementation throughout the US and the UK. You know, where it deems it's only possible for men to be the perpetrators and women to be the victims of DM. Kinda explains why when men called the police to report being physically abused by their wives/girlfriends, it was still the men who got arrested and soon after had to leave the house despite visible wounds revealing the contrary. "Oh, men who were victims of DM didn't report it because they were ashamed." Or maybe because they legally couldn't be victims.
Thanks to the widening use of commercial/residential cameras and video recording-capable smart phones over the past few years providing clear proof that this absolutely asinine practice was indeed absolutely asinine, it has diminished greatly.
It's because we live in a society where people don't think being angry is a emotion. Which obviously it is. They think emotional is only sad/crying. There are so many emotions and both genders show all the emotions. But yes men seem to act on their emotions a lot in violent ways cuz their testosterone makes them angry.
I would say crime rates are a way to highlight the outliers.
A more representative way to phrase it may be using mental health statistics instead, given how this can be linked to violent crime and shootings, as well as other emotion-related issues. Men bottle up their emotions. Do that for too long and you will eventually be mentally affected, and will not be in a good state of mind, leading to rash decisions which include crime.
can't really be applied to sexual assault, and I do believe the number is less than 99%. Sexual assault is a result of improper education about sexual misconduct and boundaries in schools and by parents.
But then there are more male police officers, marines, fire fighters. And when there's a tragedy, whether it be a life threatening accident, a natural disaster or even a mass shooting like you described, I would say 99.9% of the time, the one who responds to save your ass is a male.
Now why is that?
Well it's partly biological... because men are driven by the will to act, and sometimes this also means acting without thinking first. Whether the act is heroic or pure evil.
Women are naturally more cautious than men, which is why they act less and think more, which can be good in some ways... but also makes them effective at planning getting away with certain crimes, but also less reliable as first responders.
Lets play a game.
Look up "Real Life Heroes" on YouTube, and try to count how many of these heroes are female. :)
Anon... she doesn't care about how men make the world in which she lives, her emotional self simply wants to shout about an irrelevant point.
Well, first of all, violent crime is a subset of all crime and is a tiny portion of the interactions that people have daily, so it's way too narrow of a dataset to use to determine that.
Second, you're assuming that violent crime is caused by emotion, but nothing else is related to emotions.
actually no im not assuming anything, just looking at the facts
Facts that lack so much context that they are useless. You can't cherry pick like that and get any kind of reasonable or useful conclusion. Those facts are indicative of males being much more violent than females, which is almost certainly due to higher levels of testosterone. So, yes you are assuming A LOT.
If that were true we would see higher rates of crime in individuals that have higher testosterone levels across the board…. But we don’t
You sure about that? You must have failed statistics if you ever took it. Maybe you could pass a misandrist statistics class.
What’s definitely not true is your claim of emotions explaining higher crime rates. Now, as a population, who has higher testosterone levels, men or women?
I never made that claim... you are making assumptions
Im not the one getting upset over statistics
Men are very emotional creatures but sometimes act it out in destructive ways. That can be due to testosterone that makes men a little bit more aggressive. It's very true, it's men that starts wars and do horrible crimes but it also takes men to stop those who are out of control and to bring back some level of peace and balance.
Emotion doesn't mean taking action, most women are more emotional in normal day to day things, and panic under too much pressure, yet they do nothing, dudes who rape and shoot people out of frustration have reached their limit, they don't just need help like the 14 year old girl threatening to kill herself, it's even bigger than that, a monster has been unleashed after huge huge frustrations, huge difference, also let's make sure we state that 99.9% of men don't do that shit...
How do you know that they're actually men though and don't identify as none-binary or women, since you also seem to buy into that kind of thing?
A bit ignorant to just assume that, eh?
This is clearly just another question to take some kind of dig at men, nothing new on here and it's not the first time it's come from you either.
Tell me why you and people like you support the Apartheid State of Israel and all its crimes against the Palestinians and I'll tell you why women are labeled as the more “emotional” sex when males commit 98% of mass shootings, 99% of sexual assault, and 80% of violent crime.
Do you ever get tired of making stupid baseless statement that you cannot prove?
So emotional means actual committing of crimes violent and sexual? It doesn't mean a quick fluctuation or knee jerk change from one emotion to the next in a situation that brings stress or drastic swings for the individual in question?
Can you be emotional and not do any of those things you stated, or is that defined as something different?
because people love to just throw words and phrases just like that... without actually looking into the actual meaning of it, or the reality of things...
Care to elaborate or are you purposefully being vague?
it isn't vague at all, it is what it is...
some people just say women are " too emotional while men are the logical ones"
it is a very simplistic take on matters that are complex as well as complicated, and instead of diving into the reality of things and the specific situations of each situation... they rather go with these phrases " women are just emotional"
like you said it is a label, and a traditional blanket statement, or like I personally like to call them, bullshit
I’m glad you agree
yep...
Because trait aggression and trait neuroticism are two different things. The first is quantifiably somewhat more prevalent among men on average but the bell curve for men is wider, meaning that almost all excessively aggressive people are men. This is an effect of biology (greater variability among males than females generally speaking) more than it is of social conditioning. Neuroticism is markedly higher on average in women.
Men do it because It’s Natural to men it’s What Men do it’s The Primal Nature of Man.
Rape is a Primal Urge in every man
Morals in a man can say it’s wrong but It doesn’t matter who the man is if a man rapes A female it will feel good. That’s not saying It’s okay to rape it’s not okay to rape but just saying that It would feel good Because That’s What happens when a man has a Brain and when the penis is stimulated all sorts of Feel good Things happen in the brain and body of the man
Because women emote their feelings better in words, gestures and actions.
Most men are POOR at reading and/or expressing themselves through words and gestures, and end up taking mismatched actions.
Unfortunately, sometimes in the extreme. Those committing these crimes are FAR from NORMAL.
because women are more into wishy washy romantic bullshit and "emotional" is the perfect description for that. of course both genders are equally emotionally capable meaning they'll both have emotional issues too but different ways to handle them.
i mean "emotion" is largely positively connotated. it's a nurturing trait that women strive for and therefore like to label themself with.
The moment I saw this question on the Live Feed, I already knew it was from old broke down Subaru before I even clicked it. Lmfao.
Men who commit those crimes are lacking in emotion, especially emotions like empathy. But don't let that get in the way of your emotional rant here. I'm sure it must be cathartic for you.
Why are women labeled as the more “emotional” sex? Because they are, obviously.
People don’t just beat, abuse people, or shoot up schools others because they are devoid of emotion…..
Of course not. It's a combination of personality flaws and a lack of empathy.
I think it is because guys are taught from birth that they need to not show emotions. They keep everything inside until one day they get an assault rifle and shoot up a shopping center.
Crime doesn’t meme emotion in fact crime is usually committed by people devoid of emotion and empathy, lustful people acting on instinct or hormones or greed so those crimes aren’t dependent on men nor are they dependent on emotion, men are idiots who will commit crimes but we also get caught in those crimes, there are plenty of crimes here committed by women, they just either aren’t reported on or they don’t get caught
This is the 1st question you've posted that I really agree with I don't think women are the more emotional sex I think men are and I think because we're taught to not cry and keep everything bottled up we're a ticking time bomb and that's why men do these things. Great question! 👍
Lmao, watch how they react when things go wrong or disagree with something.
They claim their temper tantrum is keeping it real
Because males do those things as quiet, cold, calculating killers.
Whereas women traumatise the street, and next generation, with their screeching, and bitching - when they do it.
Emotional isn't the same as being violent. besides, men are far more capable of employing violence than women are, who pursue aggression in other ways.
Women vote democrat more often, showing a lack of critical thinking skills and their preference for things that feel good, unable to use logic and see that such policies are destructive and backwards
The cause and root of every problem is women attitude and behavior. They don't talk but give attitude and face shapes, they're the one who start fighting, yelling, being rude, not saying hi, their attitude remain premature throughout their life.
Id say that those things account for men being more violent. A lot of the men that commit those atrocities lack emotion, antisocial.
I really want to know why as well because men definitely can be way over emotional and yes they are much more violent
But aren't they physically doing those things and often without thinking (aside from the mass shooting which is often plotted ahead)? So i dont think emotions tie in with most of that. I could be wrong 🤷♀️
The men you're referring to are the products of single motherhood and a society that sees men as human garbage. Exactly the things you're worshipping.
Because men don't cry when they shoot.
They gave women a quiz to answer regarding their emotional state & compared it to men expressing emotion observing sports. 😑. Lol.
I think my article is better. You probably didn’t read it did you. 😞
If you watch Mindhunter based on the invention of psychological profiling every male serial killer was abused and mistreated by their mother.
it has nothing to do with emotion
men basically involved in everything , they build everything around u , they fly to sky , they go the moon , and they commit countless crimes too of course
Yeah honestly I don't know either. Women are indifferent as fuck
Well then you have to add in another label women are also smarter than men that's why LOL
Being irrationally overemotional with every emotion and being violent (and potentially angry), are two different things. But this is just more man-hating feminist bullcrap.
Because the men doing those things are psychopaths. They aren't representative of normal, psychologically balanced men.
Whereas women are NATURALLY emotional. That's normal for them.
But men are just as emotional
@Subarugirl Um, no. That's false.
Not according to science and decades or research h…
Actually, the science backs up my side completely.
Good Q. I guess it is that outside of those three categories we tend to find girls more emotional.
This is the best question I've seen in a while, tbh.
I don't think most men (and some women) realise that anger is infact an emotion.

Exactly.
It's probably because they cry all the time.
Women commit far more than 1% of sexual assaults, but I can see why you would feel the need to make that false claim, you being a stereotypically overly emotional woman and all.
Not according to the statistics put forth by U. S. Dept. of Justice, Violence Against Women Report, 2002.…. An estimated 91% of victims of rape & sexual assault are female and 9% male. Nearly 99% of perpetrators are male.
Clearly if you look hard enough you can find a source to support whatever agenda you want to push, lol. Not only is your source two decades old, it also ignores the well-accepted fact today that sex offenses committed by females are rarely reported to police. A more accurate and reliable source are victimization surveys, which show females commit 12% of sexual offenses, with some showing as high as 24%.
The Proportion of Sexual Offenders Who Are Female Is Higher Than Thought: A Meta-Analysis:
"The current meta-analysis found a small proportion of sexual offenses reported to police are committed by females (approximately 2%). In contrast, 12% of sexual offenses reported in victimization surveys are committed by female sexual offenders."
www.researchgate.net/.../305384459_The_Proportion_of_Sexual_Offenders_Who_Are_Female_Is_Higher_Than_Thought_A_Meta-Analysis
as you stated... Clearly if you look hard enough you can find a source to support whatever agenda you want to push, my source just happens to be the DOJ
Your source also just happened to be decades out of date and based on very old methodology. If we go back a little further we can find sources to support the notion that marital rape is legal. Should we go there too?
Less than a facade actually
I think those crimes show a serious lack of emotion or, at least, empathy.
Anger is an emotion
I think you're trying to compart apples and oranges, or in this case, mental illness to basic emotions.
... zzzzzzzzzz...
Those crimes are not passionate. They are deliberate, cold and evil.
Science totally disproves that…
www.sciencedaily.com/.../160617105045.htm
Violent crimes are generally committed by those devoid of emotion so I think the stats you provided kind of prove the point you are trying to contest.
That's very closely linked, I think. Men are expected to be less emotional, so they bottle it all up. Then when it's too much and they don't know what to do with all those emotions.. It explodes.
Because self reflection is harder than deflection
Because you bitches get so worked up about it. Jeez.
So mass shootings are womens fault because were upset that the schools we send out children to aren’t safe?
Women express their emotion publicly and men lock it in themselves. Which results in unhealthy outbreak.
Apples and oranges. Women "in general" vs. the infinitesimal % of men who are psychopaths.
This wasn’t even a question but you are actively showing your hatred towards men.
It's nothing to do with emotion, it's to do with power and ego.
and ego and lust for power isn't emotion?
Not really, it's not love or hate emotion, it's more satisfying a need.
The ego is driven by emotions. If man's ego is crushed or challenged, it may make him become enraged or depressed.
@BlueScorpio I can't argue with that. However, I'll pick out part of your question, "males commit 98% of mass shootings". Is that due to emotion or lack of it. I know it can be driven by hate, but how many seem to have no reason and show no emotion?
It's a great question and you've got me questioning myself, so thank you.
Oh this isn't my question. Violence definitely is fueled by emotions, ever see men get into bar fight cause one guy popped off at the mouth, hit on the other guys girlfriend, or just got into a fight cause their team lost? Its the same with shootings, young boys are probably facing bullying or forced into being an outcast. After while this boils anger, frustration, and tension within themselves thus you get the response to act violent. It's sad cause society keeps proving that sometimes the only way to be heard or listened to is when violence gets involved.
@BlueScorpio It's a shame more people on here don't debate like you. A face-to-face debate with you sounds as if it is fun and a challenge. On this one, you win, I'm sitting here arguing against myself. I look forward to the next one which I'll endeavour to win
99% of sexual assault
nah that number is way too high
no way only 1% of females do sexual assault no way
yeah. the problem is that men don't report sexual assault, cause they're supposed to "like" it when a woman does that.
@ODC2112 fun fact: there's more rape and sexual assault in the lesbian community than gay or straight.
@genericname85
Domestic abuse is also more common among lesbians too. With the rape situation, I think a lot of people leave out cases where female teachers get with their students and other cases similar toom
@letuswaltzforthedead exactly lol it’s only
The men who get on the media smh
Yeah and its usually when they're the perpetrators and not the opposite.
@letuswaltzforthedead yeah. as the recent court case showed, where a female pedophile teacher was barely punished for raping a young boy over the course of several years... a guy in that position would die in prison or on the electric chair for that.
I didn't know about that case but that's definitely another issue, women tend to get off lighter with their sentences than men do. Undoubtably, rapists and pedophiles deserve worse.
Women cry all the time. They also attempt suicide more often but fail to actually do it.
They shit bricks when they see a bug.
You do have a point there!
Maybe “unstable “. Is the word describing men.
Women initiate 90% of divorces and kill babies 97% of the time.
Cuz they mean girls cry more not killl more,
You can also add your opinion below!