
In the era of mass and instant information, if a person is misinformed is the mainstream media to blame or is the person responsible to get informed?

Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
In an age when both mainstream media and social media giants have common goals and manufacture the appearance of consensus by deluging people with one narrative while blocking and censoring other points of view, it's not difficult to understand why so many people are clueless. They don't even know what questions to ask, let alone where to find answers.
What IS unforgivable is, when people are presented with alternate information but flat out reject it because it doesn't conform to the narrative that they have been force fed.
I'm continually surprised by people who think they know all there is to know on a subject and refuse to consider the possibility that there is more to know. They're threatened by anything that questions the manufactured consensus.
I can't understand what's wrong with asking common sense questions and doing research. But a lot of people have been programmed resist doing so.
Brilliant answer.
Well said. Do your homework.
No way 9f knowing because education system sucks. The ability to filter the bull shit from fact has been degraded. Bullshit has been pumped into our youths from a very young age so they're clues less. I am Gen-X guy, been raised in analog era, but been an adult most of the digital era, and I am relic at 46 and have no say or impact on the programing of our youths through social media. I have been silenenced.
So fuck I don't know. I am just trying to hang on and die with dignity. That seems the best to hope for at this piont.
I've never liked the idea that they can have incorrect information as a headline, then later on post a correction that is tiny and hard to find somewhere.
I've always though the law should say it has to be the same. If the incorrect information is posted as a headline, the correction needs to be given the same amount of time and space.
If the incorrect information is some tiny hard to find back page, then the correction can be too.
Makes it too easy for main stream media to flat out lie, then later on post a correction to meet the current law... knowing full well they accomplished what they were looking for.
I say media because that is where most get their information, even if someone manages to find it on their own (big if) they'll be alone and isolated and made fun by the others who believe main stream media.
Opinionated "news" and misleading websites are much more to blame than the mainstream media.
Thing is mainstream 24 hour cable news is mostly opinionated "news" LOL
Only local news gives you the Who, What, When and Where and let's you form your thoughts and opinions.
Oh, yeah I'm thinking print media. I don't even watch that crap
Opinion
14Opinion
Anyone and everyone spreading incomplete, inaccurate or outright false information is responsible. Most people don’t get a quality education. They don’t know where to look for quality information even if that’s what they really want. They don’t know how to challenge information they already have, even if they were so inclined. Beyond that, most people don’t want quality information and they never challenge what they think they already know. People would much rather feel right, emphasis on the “feel”. So if they seek out information at all, they seek confirmation of what they likely decided before they sought said information. Confirmation bias and echo chambers, that’s what people want these days. Everyone thinks their feelings equate to facts. And they’re all wrong.
You should never believe anything from the media, they have always just been interested in certain things like; controlling fear and making money. It is your responsibility to double check something you might say to others first in my pov.
Unless you hear it from someone you really trust wouldn't be bullshitting you 😁 anyway just my pov 👍
I'm sorry, who do you believe? Where do you get your information?
Personally I think it's up to the individual to check the facts whoever's reporting to them especially on issues they're concerned with don't accept you know they said he said get names packs dates times just because I know how to set up a blog and webcam and talk s*** and a loud voice and laugh at everybody on the planet doesn't mean I know anything
The media. To be fair media has NEVER been completely unbiased. But there was a time when credibility meant something. Now even that can be bought with enough money. And while reporting may not be straight out bought with corporate funds it is highly influenced. They don't have to tell you to think. You'll do it on your own with a constant subtle narrative. And the avg. Joe CAN'T stay informed as much as he needs to to make THE BEST informed decision. Not working 40+ hrs a week to pay his overtaxation and rising debt. And they know it!
Both, most people usually won't care enough about a topic to research it deeply enough. Mainstream media is mainstream mostly because it's the first thing people see and so it's the first thing people believe.
Whose to blame, the Nazi government for feeding the propaganda or the German citizen for believing them?
A better question to ask is: “Why is there a need to mislead people?” Like why is this necessary at all? Why the need to steer peoples opinions?
The Germany citizens in that era are to be blamed.
We aren't talking they manipulated innocent children, but rather full grown adults for their BS.
If you give your credit card number, bank account number and social security number to someone random person over the phone because they seem nice and promise you stuff and they wipe out your bank account, it's your fault for being a dummy.
As far your 2nd question, because they want the people to accept whatever agenda they are trying to sell.
It's up for the people to accept it or not. People are naturally evil and like evil. You know that already.
@hispanic
So I just want to be clear here, the one who has been lied to is at fault, not the liar?
Depends on the context. If someone lies to you concerning a contract then the liar is at fault.
If you allow someone to influence you and tries to manipulate you into evil and you go along with it then you are at fault.
So blame the victim. Copy.
Still the mainstream media, I think. They should be reporting the facts, but they'll paint policies that are desired by large majorities of both parties' voters (like raising the minimum wage, or a public option for health care) as extreme, simply because they would upset their advertisers.
I would say both parties are to blame. It's a meaningful for spread and false rumors. It's the other person's fault for not studying and researching more into the subject to find out if it is true or not.
when it comes down to the fountain of misinformation, its platforms like meta and twitter where if someone rebuts a false claim with actual facts, the rumor spreader will report the person stating actual facts followed by the facts being censored. When it comes down to the mainstream media traffic and weather are the non-fake news i care about to start my day Happy Monday Everyone
It's always the responsibility of the individual to decide what to believe and what to question.
People are responsible for doing their own research.
The person who is not informed, because if everyone was, the media couldn't get away with what it is. They would be forced to investigate and report the truth.
We have whole segments of the population that don't know what they don't know. If they do not have cable or a computer they may never have access to a viewpoit that differs with what the democrats want them to know.
Nearly all misinformation comes from uncredible sources on the internet, facebook, hacks on you tube, etc, not mainstream sources.
Probably both except people often don't realize they have been misinformed.
The media is to blame for the misinformation they lie on top of their lies, nothing but propaganda
we would all be more informed if the media was just gone wouldn't we?
You wouldn't know shit. Investigative journalism uncovers all kinds of things those in power don't want you to know
@holdem4884 the media doesn't do investigative journalism
Sorry that's wrong by definition. Anyone doing investigative journalism is part of the media. There are elements of the media that does a poor job with this and others that are spectacular. Look for Pulitzer prize winners. 24 hour cable news channels aren't good sources
@holdem4884 adults don't play with definitions. the media industrial complex does not do investigative journalism
pulizer prize winners are the worst. they are awards given out for fitting a narrative, hell the award is named after a man who lied and covered up the holodomor. read about him.
the media is a broken institution.
The worst? So for example, you think when The Boston Globe had a team of journalists work for years to uncover the Catholic Church pedophile scandal, publishing over 600 articles and bringing that evil to light, that was a waste, eh?
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions