- u1 y01 Reply
- 1 y
It scare me for a second.
Most Helpful Opinions
It is totally bad thing and will never replace the mother’s feelings for carrying her own baby. There's too much going on in pregnancy between a mother and her child that they can never change. These days they’re trying to replace everything natural with fake and stupid technology and make human life’s worse and hard by creating such unnecessary things.
20 Reply
- 1 y
I understand the idea of a surrogate. For men and women who can't conceive because of mother can't for some medical issues.
But that is going a little to far. Never would think that technology has come that far. We need to go back to rotary dial phones if that's the case... lol
12 Reply- 1 y
Yes I agree 💯 it seems like technology will take over the world. I don't blame people for getting things done the old fashioned way.
- 1 y
I wouldn't have sex with surrogate tho. A-I would have to be done.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
8Opinion
- 1 y
this is the ABSOLUTE counter attack against feminists who say we dont need men haha,
men: "Wrong, we dont need women, we can reproduce without a women's womb"
11 Reply- 1 y
Believe me femenist hate this idea. Men can get their own biological baby with having a woman involved 😂😂😂😂 I have net a lot of single dad's who do a much better job in raising a child then woman. Lol
- 1 y
That is so creepy. The world is more effed up than I thought. Just have kids the natural way. If you can't, adopt them. But don't create robot babies or artificial babies. That's just creepy.
02 Reply- 1 y
This is what they want the future to be like.
- 1 y
You are right these babies are creepy looking. I don't blame you.
- 1 y
Never heard of it. What is it?
119 Reply- 1 y
It's an artificial womb doctors used in the lab so that woman don't have to carry the child for 9 months. I've heard that a woman giving birth baby coming out will be a thing of the past. The fetus can be developed and be the parents biological child without having the mom carrying the child and woman not having to go to Gynecologist for trimester check ups. Scientist have invented this. I've heard that woman giving birth to babies will be a thing of the past.
- 1 y
I don’t even think I can render an opinion. One part of me sees it as a useful too for people who might not otherwise be able to have a baby, but another part of me sees it as unnatural and bizarre. I’d have to think this one through. To give you an answer without carefully braking it all down my answer is I disagree with the concept right now.
- 1 y
According to this they want to make pregnancy to be a thing of the past.
- 1 y
That’s crazy. What do you think of this technology?
- 1 y
Honestly I think that it goes against The Lord's will. It's gone to far.
- 1 y
I don’t know that I can say this is a sin.
Take for example the Catholic teaching on birth control. I think the basis for their teaching if I’m not mistaken is that birth control is a sin because it interrupts the process God designed for pregnancy, therefore it alters the way God designed the process and therefore it is a sin.
By that logic then, so does any surgery or pretty much any medical practice, and therefore those are sins. God created everyone, and designed all the body parts to work as they do, so altering any of those is basically the same thing as their position on birth control and is sin. God designed the mouth and throat to be the mechanism by which we drink, but for example if someone gets an IV, by the same logic that’s sin because God did not create people with intent to infuse fluids into veins, otherwise we’d be able to drink with our veins also. Or created the heart as he did and any surgery on it alters it as God designed it, and if said surgeries extend life beyond what they would probably have otherwise, man has altered the pattern God put in place for the function of the heart and the length of life. As I see it these things are no different than using birth control in any form. They’re no different than taking medication for any reason as they all change or alter any body parts function from as they were created from day one by God. You can carry this logic further to anything that does not pertain to the body. Did you use a telescope to look at that stars? Well that’s a sin because God designed the human eye with the magnification power it has at the day of birth and we have now altered the ability of sight beyond how God designed the human eye to work. Or if a baby is placed in an incubator we can say we have defied God’s will that the child die, because otherwise that’s what would happen. - 1 y
So I find this line of thinking to be beyond absurd and totally misguided.
That brings us to this matter. This matter is really not any different than all those others by the same logic.
So would this be a sin? I’m extremely doubtful. It’s strange, it’s unnatural, but is it a sin…. from what I can see? I don’t think it is.
That doesn’t necessarily mean I approve of this, but yet as far as I can think I can’t necessarily disapprove of it either.
I’m willing to admit its possible I could be entirely wrong in my understanding of all these things, and my logic about them but I seriously don’t think I am.
So for me, for as much as I know about this I have no opinion either way.
I think it could potentially be a blessing form God, say for example for a woman who desires to have a child, but cannot because it presents a risk to her own life. This could well be a blessing from God that would enable a woman to have a baby who could not otherwise.
As I also know little about this I would say it’s a sin if it were discovered that doing this somehow causes harm to the baby. That by not being in the womb or not being connected to the mother by an umbilical cord somehow negatively affects the child. I think a lot more research and testing would be needed to probably find out if that could be the case, so in that kind of scenario, I’d say it’s a sin because it harms the baby.
My best guess is so long as it does no harm to the child who is birthed that way that this would not be a sin. Strange? For certain. Seemingly unusual? Yes. But sin? I strongly doubt it. As with things not specifically covered in scripture and not covered in ways of similitude this is probably a matter of conscience. If someone is lead to believe doing something is a sin that is not covered in scripture, then for them it is sin. If someone does something with wrong motive, even though the action it self is not sin, than that too is sin. - 1 y
Yes Sir I see what you mean you could be right who knows what if a couple wants a child so bad and for any reason they can't have children maybe this could be a good option for couples that can't have babies. What I am thinking is what makes humans think they can be like God and make life? No only God make a human life not humans. From what I've read His told Eve that she would birth her children with pain. And from what I see here woman don't have to go threw pain. Natural birth or cesarean are all painful. I just think this also goes against biblical teachings. That's what makes me think that this could be sinful and how this babies are made in the lab and no produce naturally could it be against God's will? The Catholic church can be pretty dictation a humans choice if they choose to used birth control. I don't think the bible even mentions birth control it's a religion I no longer believe in. I could never understood why they forbidden people to use birth control.
- 1 y
You make a good point, but I see it like this. It’s not that humans are creating life. We’re powerless to do so. When a man impregnates a woman are they creating life? No. They’re just acting upon the laws of reproduction God put into effect. God created it that when human sperm fertilizes a human egg, human life begins. From there God is sovereign over how that baby develops and the condition of the child’s birth and from there forth.
The same as when we combine certain elements or chemicals to make a new thing. We’re just using what God created and the new chemicals are subject to the laws of chemistry God created.
In regards to Eve bringing forth children in pain, this was the judgment on women for Eve’s roll in original sin, Adam and Eve being our representatives. Adam only had one judgment. That he must work the ground by the sweat of this brow. No longer would everything simply grow without tending. Eve had 2 judgments. The first bringing forth children in pain, the second that she would be subject to Adam, but yet desire to to be the head. That’s still in effect. That’s EXACTLY what feminism is about. Throwing off the rule of men, particularly the husband over them.
I don’t see avoid the pain of child birth as sin, however this is a matter of conscience. If your conscience tells you this is sin as it understands God word to be, then for you to do this would be sin. - 1 y
Okay Sir what about the selfish woman who are aborting there children? I met a very sweet kind couple who can't have children. This one girl was so close to killing her child and yes even if it's still inside the woman i consider it a child. Anyway that girl was about to kill that inocent baby and the couple made a deal with her they will pay for medical expenses and hospital feeds and that includes her meals by eating healthy for the baby once the baby was born she sing a contract to give up her baby to these sweet couple. They even offer to pay ,$40,000 to save that inocent child's life. Now the child is 5 years old with loving parents. I would rather have babies life saved then this technology stuff. But that's just my opinion. I could be wrong. About femenist why on earth would they want to act like a guy they should be worrying about how their hair and make up looks like instead of doing guy stuff.
- 1 y
I get what your saying. To me that would be more sensible, but people want children who have their DNA.
Feminist are sick people. They hate women and hate themselves and are not content to be what God created them to be. They want the power men have and they were not born with. They want to be the head, when when they cannot do what men can do physically they just influence law makers to make laws giving them a handy cap and then walk around with their heads high as if they achieved the same thing a man did.
That’s like me getting a 200M lead in a 400m race, than walking around loud and proud that I beat all the other runners, and acting like I’m just as equally gifted of an athlete.
I see this all the time where I work. Women get equal pay to men where I work, yet when it comes to lifting 50 pound bags of fruit or other things that require the physical strength men have…then they play the “I’m a woman card and you’re a man, so you should do it.”
Nope. That’s not equality. Equality is you do what I do and get the same pay, or work a job you can equally do the duties men do.
Women have a desire in them because of the judgment God pronounced on them due to original sin to basically be men, yet make a poor excuse for one. Likewise they desire to be the head of the house when that is not the designated role God designed them for. - 1 y
Yeah I've heard most people want their own DNA. Anyways this younger generation just keeps getting worst everyday. Yes I agree with you Sir on the subject of femenist. I mean femenist are strange individuals. Why would a woman want to work at a men's job in the first place? Can they just stick with working at a hair salon or fashion retail. Years ago I didn't see this behavior at least when I was younger. Why would they want to be head of the house hold? Could it be that this girls are brainwash? Equality yes I noticed they don't want the hardship that comes along with lifting. Worst of all femenist play the whole oh poor me card. A lot of my employees are called girls I've heard their conversations about how they want equal right and asking for a rise. I tell them it doesn't work like that. Later they called of how they can't make it on weekends making up excuses oh I can't walk at the parking lot at 12 am because it's dark to dangerous for me. Can a guy walk me to my car. Yet they want equal pay as a guy. I agree with you on that subject. Yet they look at me like a Marciano only because I worry about how my hair looks or retouching my make up I see not wrong with wanting to looks presentable. I rarely see this behavior in woman my age most are married with children. This younger woman I will wait and see once they turn 30 they will be lonely.
- 1 y
You totally get it. That’s how it is.
I do think if they can do the same things as a guy, then yeah, they should have equal pay.
They do this stuff because of this:
“To the woman He said, “I will greatly multiply Your pain in childbirth, In pain you shall deliver children; Yet your desire will be for your husband, And he shall rule over you.””
Genesis 3:16 NASB2020
The word desire there does not translate well at all into English from Hebrew. It means that she will want to be the head, and will actively seek to gain headship and usurp her husband. How will a woman do this? Overpower him? No. Thorough manipulation. Through political movements that have set the laws in the favor of women. They want the power men have, but know they don’t have it, so they seek to handicap men. That’s what feminism is really all about. Trying to seize power from the way God ordained things to be in that verse.
It’s better that they should be happy how God made them. But the truth is they hate women and hate themselves and want to have the power men have.
I think in psychological terms they call this penis envy.
They should just learn to be happy in how God created them.
You notice in homes where the wife is not always fighting to get her way things run more smother, when the husband is principled and loves his wife and is not a tyrant, using the authority God grated him rightly, not selfishly and not for his own gratification. Men need help there, but women need to learn their roll.
Is that you in your profile? Did you dye your hair? If so, looks good. - 1 y
Yes Sir that's me. And yes Sir I bleach my hair.
- 1 y
And thanks.
- 1 y
It looks great and you have a lovely smile also!
- 1 y
Thank you Sir , I made changes in my hair after my divorce. Shawn love darker hair. I was also over 80 pounds over lol
- 1 y
You lost 80 lbs!!! Congrats!! That’s no easy feat. How did you manage to do it? I need to loose some weight myself.
- 1 y
Thank you Sir, I cut off sodas completely, Nothing that has sugars. I did became a vegetarian I drank tea and a lot of water. I would wake up at 4am and start my work at first thing in the morning three hours. In the morning I drink natural fruit shakes or smoothie. Becoming a vegetarian help me loose a lot of weight I've noticed the difference.
- Anonymous(18-24)1 y
We have too many people in the world. It would encourage women to have babies instead of abortions.
00 Reply - Anonymous(25-29)1 y
Now, just imagine what they will really use this for
00 Reply - 1 y
Pretty scary, pretty inevitable.
04 Reply- 1 y
Technology is going way to far.
- 1 y
Technology hasn't begun to go too far yet!
- 1 y
The. What do you call this?
- 1 y
Then sorry spell check goes off.
808 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. What's recto baby,?
00 Reply- 1 y
Absolutely not. The plan is to multiply.
00 Reply - 1 y
I don't think this is a good idea.
02 Reply- 1 y
What the hell?
- 1 y
Okay I'm from Mexico and just because someone has blue eyes and blonde that does not mean they are American.
Asi es que CALMATE PINCHE PUTO CABRON!
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!