It would seem 94% of claims are rejected for many reasons, one among them because the person has not been '60% disabled'. Looking at the case below, this person had a clot, had a cardiac arrest and had to be put into a coma/onto a ventilator, he nearly died. He has life limiting consequences from taking the jab.
Presumably the 60% disabled requisite would mean you'd have to be pretty much, dead as a person, to be able to qualify for a measly £120000. And in that case, how is that figure going to cover your condition and severely diminished quality of life.
Furthermore, should the UK taxpayer be footing the bill? Should should you and I pay for something that was clearly extremely dubious and unnecessary at best from the start, if not quite obviously dangerous. Why did no one have any basic critical faculties. It was obvious to anyone who has been alive for more than a few years that you would be 'doing the right thing', only to be left to fend for yourself from the 'benevolent' and 'omniscient' government, and its highly crooked, cowardly and myopic advisors and scientists, when invariably the shit hits the fan. This whole thing is a disgrace.
