I know government vaccination programmes can be controversial so what's your thoughts?


Good. Keep going with vaccination programs. Also, even if the effectiveness is only 30% that is perfectly fine. Vaccines does not eradicate diseases by being 100% effective, they eradicate diseases by lowering the diseases R0 value to the point where it slows down and dies naturally.
The R0 value of gonorrhoea is not very high which means a slight push might be all you need to push it into extinction.
Wow lol, this example is so perfect !
This answer brings so much context that the OP's question takes a whole new meaning !
I don't know much about it, but I wonder what the complications are if the vaccine is only 30% effective.
Is this going to be a voluntary thing, or are people in those groups required to get the vaccine?
As I understand they're going to be encouraged rather than forced
@purplepoppy We're "encouraged" to pay taxes, aren't we?
Thanks for MHO
Easier to just start chopping off dicks. Avoid multi STD's in one slice.
Opinion
21Opinion
Any vaccination that is only 30% effective should not be administered unless there is an imminent and overwhelming threat to pubic health.
If sex workers count as ''high risk'' - then I wonder about their 'customers'...
Gonorrhoea reminds me of two things:
- proper English spelling,
and
- Alex Harvey
https://www.youtube.com/embed/J4zgED9Vhb4... apparently, the topic isn't a new one.
Although I wasn't aware of a gonorrhoea epidemy, people taking more risks in their sexual life should in any case accept the vaccination. Let's still keep in mind there are many other sexual transmissible deseases !
I personally haven’t heard anything about this, but I can tell you this, there is no way I would trust it let participate!
Back in 2019 I was anti vaccine, COVID 19, well apparently two vaccine's knocked up in a matter of months were supposed to do the job. I am still anti-vaccine and I don’t care if people stick their noses up at me.
Unless a vaccine has been tried for years until it is properly approved……never ever even consider it.
30% is better than zero. And eliminating 30% of new cases gives you 30% less carriers of the disease to spread it, so it's effectiveness really compounds over time.
As long as they’re just making it available and not forcing it on people, i support it.
I study medicine, however, the truth is I am against the government promoting treatments for sexually transmitted infections; these infections are necessary to purge society of so many promiscuous people.
Probably the vaccine will cause an increase in gonorrhoea. Since people will think that they are protected from getting the virus.
At only 30% efficacy I would really have to consider the unintended side effects or, and hear me out, I know it's crazy, but what if we just practice safe sex?
There is a simpler solution to this supposed 'spread' of gonorrhoea and that is to practice Safe Sex,
There is no way that I would accept a supposed 'vaccine' that is only 30% effective.
It should be a good idea as the promiscuity epidemic brought about by feminism on steroids is out of control.
Sounds like another reason to wait for Labour to get voted out before I come home. What's "available" today will be mandatory soon...
I did not know that there was a vaccine for the clap.
There isn't. It's the meningitis B one you give to kids. Apparently it works on the clap too.
Interesting !
I'm sure the government is clapping.
as long as it's not forced, vaccines are completely fine.
I do favour the government being vaccinated.
Blacks are at high risk for gonorrhoea? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...
That's what the government says.
I think everybody in the UK needs to stop eating dirty crotch
vaccines failed against measles. Sugar cube with polio eradicated polio. Go back to that.
Good programme.
I had no idea there was such a vaccine
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions