3.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. The assumption has been that a large segment of the population is "against" the COVID vaccine. Perhaps the answer is simpler. It is as likely that it is not so much that people are against the vaccine as that they are indifferent to it.
First, make allowance for the fact that some segment of the population will be against the vaccine on principle. Some for religious reasons do not accept vaccines of any kind. This is true, for example, of Christian Scientists and some strands of Islam. There are also those who have pre-existing conditions and cannot get the shot on medical grounds.
Then there are those who object for political reasons. Indeed, it bears repeating that both President Biden and Vice-President Harris, when they were presidential candidates, said that they would be opposed to any vaccine developed under the auspices of the Trump administration. Changing their views only after they won election, at which point they went to the opposite extreme.
That extreme being that the Biden administration wildly overpromised. President Biden's speech declaring that anyone who got the vaccine would not have to wear a face-mask anymore - ever. That now, of course, being undermined by the new CDC guidelines.
In a nutshell, one of the ironies is that Mr. Biden's approval rating on handling the pandemic has been one of his bright spots - but it is unwarranted. In fact, from the outset, the Biden administration's communications strategy on the pandemic has been erratic and unprofessional.
This sewing distrust among political partisans and also, interestingly, in the African-American and Hispanic communities. The African-American community being particularly resistant perhaps due to the lingering historical memories of the medical experiments conducted on the Tuskegee airman.
This being made still worse by the failure of the FDA to cut through the bureaucracy and give its final approval to the vaccine. It cannot be a selling point that, in effect, the government is effectively using the public as giant lab rats.
To be sure, the COVID vaccine has pretty much proved itself, but the occasional stories of side-effects and the administration's inept comms strategy cannot, in context, have reassured those who are prone to doubts. In that sense, an FDA endorsement would not be a disadvantage.
Yet for all this - and there are other reasons - the most likely reason is that people do not see COVID as a threat to themselves and they want to get on with life. For a parallel example, how much of the population fails to avail itself of the flu vaccine every year.
The flu can make a person feel quite sick. Yet people are busy with the daily business of life and as the chances of getting sick seem slight and abstract, they don't make time for it.
All the chatter about a segment of the population being "against" the vaccine is, in that sense, an exaggeration. The likely truth is that most people are ignoring the government, the media and all the chatter. They are just tuning it out and moving on with their lives.
That is not likely an argument that you will hear made very often if for no other reason than the it is hard for the government and the media, the medical community and other such entities to imagine that the public is not hanging on their every word. If true, it would also mean that any outreach will have to breech a wall of intellectual, social and emotional indifference - and that is VERY hard, if not impossible, to do.
Yet Occam's Razor applies. Sometimes the simplest answer is he correct one. In this case, for all of their preaching and pleading, those pushing the vaccine may have yet to come to grips with the fact that a large segment of the population is simply shrugging and saying, in effect, "Yeah, whatever."10 Reply
Most Helpful Opinions
+1 yGood.
I respect the fact that they aren't believing all the information that's shoved down their throats from the totally honest media and politicians, because there's never some kind of agenda from them (!), especially when people's freedoms are being taken away for not wanting it or refusing it - I'm doubtful that the media are even being honest about the un-vaccinated causing new strains and mutations too, assuming it's coming from them, it's probably just another attempt to guilt people and turn them against each other.
This really makes me question whether or not something dodgy is going on regarding it, whether it's linked to population control or something else.
If nothing else though, the long term effects vaccine are still unknown and I don't see what's so unreasonable about holding off until then.
Whilst I'm not expert on vaccines, what's so useful about one that doesn't stop you from transmitting it to others anyway or protect you from it properly.00 Reply
- 343 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yUnpopular, but honest opinion here: it should be optional, not required or forced on people.
My job will be mandating the vaccine as soon as it's FDA approved 🙄
In the meantime, they're forcing it on us by punishing those that are not vaccinated: mandatory weekly covid tests, pointless training online, wearing K-N95 masks...
Oh, and unique badge holders and lanyards that ostracize who is and is not vaccinated. So everyone knows the ones who aren't vaccinated yet! The looks you get from others is... amusing to say the least.
No, I'm not "anti-vax," as I have no issue getting any other vaccines or tests.
I DO have an issue getting something that's still relatively new and we're not sure of its long terms effects. Not to mention, you can still get covid if you're vaccinated. Yes, REALLY. The effects are just not as severe if you're vaccinated (or so they say).
And yes, I will eventually get the vaccine... when I absolutely have to, and not a moment sooner! And I point blank told my boss the ONLY reason I am getting vaccinated is because I like getting a paycheck and paying my bills.
But it's sad companies are using scare tactics and intimidation to make people get something they rather not.43 Reply- +1 y
Way to sell your morals and beliefs for a check. Bye bye soul
590 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I think vaccination should be required for certain places and lines of work like for people who are essential workers and for students who are going back to school. But I'm unsure about forced vaccination for other occupations where essential workers are not involved and in public places like grocery stores. If those people refuse to get vaccinated then they should at least wear masks
211 Reply- +1 y
Thanks for your comment and opinion.
- +1 y
@Cherry234 if forcing everyone to take the shot is okay. You should also think rape is okay
- +1 y
@Cherry234 so cause I dont want to inject myself with chemicals that aren't even tested probably where People have died from that would have survived the flu you want to take away my right of free breathing.
Yep you obviously support rape - +1 y
@Cherry234
Unwanted penetration of the body is rape
So getting a shot you don't want is rape
Forced covid test is rape
You support those so you support rape you nazi
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
43Opinion
- 9.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
u +1 yI disagree with their decision but I do not disrespect people for not trusting the government, particularly in the wake of the previous lies we have been told about this pandemic.
70 Reply
+1 yDid you know in the USA, the government has made it so you cannot sue the vaccine makers if you have any severe side effects?
If it is so safe, why not remove that protection and let people sue? I know lots of people who plan on getting the vaccine in 2024, the year that protection expires and they can sue if something goes wrong.
Three more years and they'll get it... that is the ONLY reason they are not getting it right now.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/16/covid-vaccine-side-effects-compensation-lawsuit.html
This isn't a topic that you hear a lot about in the news or online. I'm sure the unvaccinated prior to covid would not matter in this case, but many who had other vaccines up to date before covid that are holding out, would get them vaccinated and closer to the goal of more vaccinated people.
As for forced vaccination, only if we want to give up our rights and let the government decide what kind of medical procedures we should have done to our bodies.20 Reply- 5.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yOne thing about GaG is the strange way folks ask questions about the government.
The Federal government cannot mandate vaccination. We are a nation of sovereign states. States and local jurisdictions can. To date no state has mandated vaccination for citizens. But as an employer, state, local, and federal jurisdictions can.
My clients, building management, myself and other tenants have come together to create one policy. If you are vaccinated, you do not have to wear a mask on premise. If you are not vaccinated, wear a mask and utilize work from home guidelines when appropriate.
The funny thing is, vaccinations and/or negative tests are being mandated for overseas travel.20 Reply If they forced people to vaccinate I would view that as the government taking away peoples rights to their bodies. As an extention, I would see it as democracy having failed or been overthrown and I would either organize or join a militant opposition using any means necessary to destroy the ones currently leading.
That said, I'm not against vaccine in general. Just the covid vaccine wich utelize never before tried technology. This is not a classic vaccine with dead cells or similar portion of the actual decease. No, this one injects you with an rna strand that produce, in your body, a foreign protein. There's no telling the longterm sideeffects and no company will take legal responsibility for any. On top of that, taking the vaccine doesn't garantee you stay healthy, nor does it give adequate protection from mutated variant. All in all it seems to me like taking an awfully huge risk getting the vaccine before it's been tested though and through.11 Reply- +1 y
Thanks for your comment and opinion.
5.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. They will live lives like normal humans with no more risk than they ever had from illness.
Those who get the jab will be subjected to any number of debilitating injuries and deaths over the next few years.
Scroll down through the following information for up to date stats on injuries and deaths so far, just in the U. S.
https://www.thecompleteguidetohealth.com/takeaction.html
Forcing people to participate in an untested, gene modification experiment is part of an evil eugenics scheme.10 Reply10.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. If they are unvaccinated and have no good reason for being so (like being immunocompromised and can prove it), I don't give a shit about them at all and I am sick of their stupid fucking arguments, "statistics", conspiracy theories, "natural immunity", and all the rest of their bullshit. They are people who are stupid and lazy and don't know what they don't know - the epitome of Dunning-Kruger syndrome.
If they weren't risking the lives of all of us who ARE vaccinated via the creation of mutations and breakthru infections, I would probably not care if they mostly died. I am ashamed of actually feeling that way, even knowing they wouldn't care if vaccinated people died. Then again, I am not an arrogant narcissist with no brains who is filled with rage and ignorance.315 Reply- +1 y
lol, you're blaming the unvaccinated for your shitty, leaky vaccine?
- +1 y
Apparently, you can't read. The vaccinated carry as much of the virus as unvaccinated and it's not even protecting you from serious symptoms.
The fact you don't understand (what you put in quotes) natural immunity shows you've completely lost all sense. - +1 y
Your pals at the CDC
www.cdc.gov/.../mm7031e2.htm?s_cid=mm7031e2_w - +1 y
lmao. It explicitly states that vaccinated people are just as likely to pass on covid as unvaccinated. Same viral load. That's why you dummies have to wear masks again. That's what I stated and that's the reality of the situation. You're claiming I stated something I didn't.
But let's be real. It's not a vaccine. It's gene therapy. - +1 y
@joeldalton The part about being contagious is true, but keep in mind that the Delta variant produces a comparatively higher viral load in the upper respiratory tract, regardless of vaccination status.
If the vaccine contained DNA then you might be right about "gene therapy", but it doesn't. Do you know the difference between messenger RNA and DNA? - +1 y
Do you know the difference between a vaccine and whatever this is you injected into yourself?
- +1 y
A vaccine is inactivated virus that is injected in a person that gives that person an immune response and makes them immune to the virus. These things are not inactivated virus, and doesn’t appear to do much to stop you from getting it.
- +1 y
This from the guy who doesn’t understand natural immunity? Really? Laughable.
- +1 y
I see you conveniently can’t explain what natural immunity is. Not a shock. I hate to disappoint another caring branch covidian, but I already had covid-19. It was no big deal.
Do YOU think that despite the mounting evidence you’ll ever swallow your ego and admit you’ve been bamboozled? It actually shows great bravery and growth as a person.
1.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. When the government rounds up every single illegal immigrant that they've released, or bussed or flown into the interior of the country, and they've vaccinated all of them, and then deported all of them, THEN they can come and talk to me. Until then, they can eat the peanuts out of my shit.
Letting in over a million unvaccinated people - around 20% of them being COVID-positive, tells me that this isn't about COVID at all. No government that was concerned about COVID would do such a thing.30 ReplyMany vaccines are useful. The COVID vaccines are an ongoing human experiment with the most dangerous vaccine candidate in history. They were released under emergency use authorization while ongoing studies continue. Those that participate in human experimentation are suppose to be well informed of the risks associated with the vaccine, but there aren’t many people that have taken the vaccine that seems to have been made aware of any of the risks. Big pharma has total immunity from legal responsibility… As of August 4, 2021 there are still a slew of exclusion criteria for safe administration and study in humans, but it’s being pushed on those high risk groups regardless of the medical recommendations… I would say that is medically unethical, but it is happening anyway. Forced or coerced human experimentation is a violation of section one of the Nuremberg code. They hang you for that...
00 Reply
+1 yI believe in people's right to decide for themselves and their children whether they get vaccinated or not
104 Reply- +1 y
@Brainsbeforebeauty TOTALLY!! They have EVERY RIGHT TO CHOOSE, but only if they are getting ALL OF THE FACTS!!!
If they are choosing not to be vaccinated, because of the myriad "anti-vax" MORONS on here, and they don't do their own research, then God bless, and pray for the best.
If they get infected, refusing the vaccine, then they get what they deserve.
It's like Smallpox, and Polio!
Get the vaccine, and live, or take the chance and get infected, tax our medical system because of stupidity! - +1 y
@JackSmy You know my one niece had a horrible reaction to her first shot, puked for 24-48 hours and has a burning pain through her whole arm so now doesn't want the serving shot, my other niece (her sister) is pregnant with a very high risk pregnancy which is why she won't get the shot. Not everyone is making those decisions because of conspiracy theories or GAG.🙄
- +1 y
@Brainsbeforebeauty NO, I DID NOT KNOW, HOW COULD I?
I was not talking about those! RE-READ my post, and I am talking about the ones that are AFRAID of it, don't want it because "the gov'ment is trackin' me" and some ignorant crap!
I NEVER said ANYTHING about being pregnant, and other medical reasons!
I NEVER SAID THAT "Not everyone is making those decisions because of conspiracy theories or GAG."
YOU READ INTO what I posted, and got offended, and posted this attack against me!! - +1 y
@JackSmy how was my reply an attack? It wasn't... And regardless of why people make that decision, it's still THEIR decision
1.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I have always been about people having free choice. They aren't testing or vaxing the illegals that are entering the U. S. Oh no, they don't have to get vaxed ! Their job is to come here and spread the virus's to everyone. How will we ever end COVID if they are spreading around?
30 Reply23.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Everyone should be able to choose what they think is right for their own bodies and their kids. My wife and I have been vaccinated for months. I spoke to my physician about it and my son is a scientist that works with viruses and he explained mRNA to me in a way that reassured me it was not a way to cause mutations. But the decision should be left up to the individual. Nobody forces the flu vaccine down anyone's throats. This should be treated the same way.
20 Reply
+1 yNothing forced is good and as far as the un-vaccinated, at least if they get it they will know. The problem is now the Vaccinated people that get Covid and do not realize they have it and then walk around spreading the virus.
The super spreaders now will be Vaccinated people. Anyone that got vaccinated should be required to wear masks and put a sign around their neck so we know to stay away from them.
In a few months it really will not matter if you are vaccinated or not as a new strain will come out that is vaccine resistant, then you will have to get another jab to stay current.
Have fun getting the JAB every year.00 Reply11.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Unvaccinated is tantamount to "unwashed" these days.
You can wash the unwashed, but then does it really count for anything? They'll just become filthy again.
Same with vaccinating these idiots. They'll just try stupid shit to "detoxify" the vaccine or some other snakeoil shit and cause bigger problems for everyone.10 ReplyIf you want to get the vaccine go ahead but if you don't then don't. It should be that simple. If you really think this vaccine is gonna protect you than get it and don't try to force others to get something they don't want. If it leads to them dying from the disease so be it they made there choice.
20 Reply1.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. As for the ones who have no medical issues regarding the vaccine, I wish they'd get it. But the vaccine is new, it's long term effects haven't been studied. It's still not officially approved by the FDA, to my knowledge, rather it has been temporarily accepted for emergency use. So I support their right to not get the vaccine. And honestly, even once it is fully approved by the FDA, I still support their right to not get it. It's their body. Needless to say, I do not support forced vaccination.
216 Reply- +1 y
This here💯
- +1 y
FDA just approve the vaccine
www.msn.com/.../ar-AANDkZM?ocid=msedgntp - +1 y
@NorthwestRider Glad to hear it.
@goaded Virtually none. I haven't suggested there aren't any, so you haven't gotten me with a "gotcha." I'm aware there are things indicating prolonged issues from the virus. That doesn't change my answer. Innocent people have, or should have, the right to not be forcefully vaccinated. - +1 y
I agree with you about being physically forced to get the vaccine, but "it might have long term health effects" is not a good argument when the virus has both much worse short term health effects (as in it might kill you), and likely as bad or worse long term effects, for everyone who gets it.
![What are your thoughts on the unvaccinated? ?]()
"Long-term effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The meta-analysis of the studies included an estimate for one symptom or more reported that 80% of the patients with COVID-19 have long-term symptoms. CRP C-reactive protein, CT computed tomography, IL-6 Interleukin-6, NT-proBNP (NT)-pro hormone BNP, OCD Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, PTSD Post-traumatic stress disorder. This figure was created using Biorender. com."
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-95565-8 - +1 y
I'm glad we're in agreement.
But I disagree with the gist of your argument (I think). My argument isn't simply "it could have long term side effects," instead, my argument is "the government could be forcing these long term side effects onto unwilling citizens who otherwise would not have been subject to these side effects." I firmly oppose government enforced mistakes that harm people. To be explicitly clear, I'm not regarding the vaccine as a mistake. It might be, but as of now I don't have much reason to suspect that it is (if it hasn't already been mentioned, I am vaccinated). But the government has been wrong before, they have made mistakes before, they have also been nefarious before, and they will do so again. Due to this, I don't think it is right for someone to enforce a potential life-changing mistake onto people. If people want to willingly get the vaccine, great. Because if something goes wrong, it was their choice. People make mistakes all the time and they have to live with them. What I'm not okay with is people forcing their potential mistakes onto others. This is especially horrific when the unwilling victim knows better and is cognizant of the possibility of it being bad.
And whether the "long term health effects" is a good argument is not only debatable but seems to be highly contextual. I don't know about recent studies but there was one not too long ago stating that like 70+% of covid hospitalizations were obese and/or elderly people. This could render it more dangerous to get the covid shot as a young, healthy individual, as you may be unlikely to have any issues with covid, and more likely to have issues with the vaccine. But to be entirely clear, I'm not necessarily stating this definitively nor taking this stance. I'd imagine the getting the vaccine is overall safer. All I'm saying is people who question whether it is right for them do have many different reasons as to why they're unsure. - +1 y
Like I said, we are in agreement about it being voluntary; my problem is with all the people who are making out that not taking it is a reasonable decision for lots of people, not just those with good medical reasons to avoid it. (I was in favour of giving the one vaccine that had a 2 in a million chance of killing young women to men and the elderly - I had that one.)
As to "70+% of covid hospitalizations were obese and/or elderly people", aren't something like 42% of Americans obese? And that still means 30% of hospitalizations were neither elderly or obese. - +1 y
I'm not sure what percentage of Americans are obese. I've heard roughly one third but you may be correct. And I don't really have anything to say about your opinion. In many ways, I agree, but I simply wouldn't go as far to say that the proper decision is indisputably apparent, or anything like that. I think you and I would agree on what the vast majority of people should do, but I don't think the people who disagree with us are all idiots. Not to mention, according to a recent study, vaccine hesitancy is allegedly highest among PhDs. Granted, I think it is rather difficult to find a study nowadays regarding political topics that is void of any sort of bias or agenda, so feel free to take this with a grain of salt. https://imgur.com/a/XS3v7NU
- +1 y
Some salt for you...
"The research did not determine that PhDs are “the most vaccine hesitant,” it appeared to indicate that among definitively vaccine hesitant individuals, PhDs were least likely to change their views. The headline and its claims are not true."
www.truthorfiction.com/.../
(By the way, the "Autopsies Reveal Death By Vaccine" story is interesting, but I suspect most of the outlets you're looking at downplay the fact that the pathologist says vaccinations are essential in fighting the pandemic.) - +1 y
Assuming by "salt for me" you meant I'd be bothered in some way, and assuming that first paragraph is true, I can't say I'm bothered in any way. Like I said when I mentioned that study, I'm rarely trusting of politically relevant studies nowadays as they all seem to harbor bias or some sort of agenda. So if it is incorrect, I wouldn't be surprised, and I indicated at possibly is. I'm also vaccinated so I can't think of many reasons as to why this study's alleged invalidity would bother me.
None of the outlets I follow downplay the vaccine, at least not that I've noticed. The main one that I follow is explicitly pro-vaccine. I don't know who or what you assume I watch but I don't think I watch what you think I do. - +1 y
I did worry that might not work, but decided to go for it anyway. My mistake, I apologise. (I don't really know what "salty" means outside food, anyway, so it was doubly risky.)
I was just going by the list of stories in the picture you posted, they seemed to be typically anti-vaccine.
1.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It is unnecessary to take such extreme measures. If the authorities had been consistent in their statements, shown evidence instead of making unsupported statements, refrained from censorship via corporate “partners” (makes it look like there is something to hide), and used persuasion instead of coercion and ridicule, people would be much more cooperative.
10 Reply
+1 yWell if courts rule in favour of favor of governments then by that logic the government's of countries can do whatever they want and fair enough. Given that pandemics are like war-time things you know they give considerable weight to more powers during a crisis or emergency and I guess the worldwide pandemic counts as that. Ah well.
00 Reply
+1 yI believe it is there choice to be unvaccinated forcing someone would be against basic human rights. Just as it is someone's choice to do drugs or not, it should be someones right to be vaccinated.
10 Reply- 4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yCynicaldreamer already nailed it, so I won't rehash that part,
The smart money is on NovaVax coming in October- a true vaccine from dead/attenuated virals which simply takes longer to be produced.10 Reply
+1 yWe’ll be fine. 99.8% survival rate.
Forced vaccination would lead to civil war.40 Reply- 4.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yI think it’s their right to decide, I just wish they got their information from their physician/medical professionals, and not from random idiots or conspiracy theorists on the internet or TV.
30 Reply 4.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I don't want to see people held down and jabbed, but I don't think they should be allowed into places they can harm other people.
31 Reply- +1 y
Typical racist.
They’re Americans choosing what to do with their bodies omg the left could just be normal for once
21 Reply
+1 yI see them all the time, young, old, mem , women , they all look the same when I'm working in the morge.
We have litteraly PILES Of the unvaccinated.
Stacked to the ceiling with the unvaccinated.
Every day
..013 Reply- +1 y
They are on racks, but we call it the "pile" I just work on the electric, I'm not a healthcare provider. Last year we had to make space and hook up more refrigeration equipment to handle the load.
I also live across from a cemetery, I've seen more funerals last year than in my entire life combined. They litteraly bought more land to expand.
- +1 y
@Guffrus one of the largest hospital complexes in the USA. (I work here I'm not giving specific info out online for obvious reasons)
It's amazing how fox "news" and other misinformation outlets have managed to convince people that covid is some sort of as trump called it "democratic hoax"
Like the report by lancet that said we could have prevented %40 of the deaths if we would have had a REAL RESPONSE to covid from the trump administration.
Instead we were told, during the first critical weeks , nothing but lies about covid from the trump administration.
Then they tried to push a quack treatment hydroxychloroquinine while hosting covid spreading (and disturbing to any student of history) "rallies"
Then trump got the virus and of course got treatment from the real doctors who were saying all the things trump was opposed to.
So now, thanks in large part to the lies of the failed trump administration stuck with a second variant that is now killing younger people who bought the propaganda.
Fyi fox" news" had it's own covid app and vaccine mandatory , in fact tucker Carlson was one of the first people to get the vaccine!!! - +1 y
Perhaps you could tell me which State you are in?
I understand if you are not comfortable sharing specific information, I was just hoping for something more specific than 'some where in the US'.
Here's the thing though:
Deaths aren't all that high, this isn't like Ebola or the Black Death.
If you take a look at this information (perhaps this information is wrong? If you have alternative information you would like considered thats fine)
www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries
www.ons.gov.uk/.../deathsintheukfrom1990to2020
You can see that the United States has a comparable death rate to the UK and that the death rate in the UK is not particularly abnormal; its not even as high as it was in the early 90's (this could have been flu? not entirely sure) and the country didn't shut down and get into a wild panic over that.
So as these death rates are not particularly high vs the baseline death rate it is strange that you are saying that you are struggling for capacity.
Perhaps the deaths have occured in large batches followed by abnormally quiet periods so that on average the increase is only slightly higher than baseline and these spikes have caused the problems you have seen?
- +1 y
@Guffrus so you found a website with unqualified and unreviewed data while ignoring John's Hopkins, lancet and other real sources if information?
Let's just do a quick search and see what I can find with a simple Google search...
Ok I found a half dozen REPUTABLE sources that completely contradict the obviously made up data on the link you gave..
And thus article in the website.. www.google.com/.../&ved=2ahUKEwjMz7CrkcryAhXBXc0KHaeEAS0QFnoECAMQAQ&usg=AOvVaw14DB9XNkPjXlCBm7MdJocl&cshid=1629824579525 - +1 y
@Guffrus here's another thought for you, every year mist countries including the UK and USA compile data on the death rate.
If last year was a normal year, why is the number if dead so much more in 2020 than in 2019?
If covid didn't kill hundreds of thousands, what did? We know how many deaths occured in 2001 - 2020 in the USA and in the UK so what killed all those people?
- +1 y
https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths
This is the UK government website and the data matches with the originally presented data. - +1 y
That data is exactly what I have shown you and it clearly demonstrates that the number of deaths is not in fact 'so much higher' that is in fact the core concept I trying to get across to you.
Is it higher than some of the previous years? Yes.
Is it higher than the early 90's rate? In absolute terms, just, but proportiate to the population? No. - +1 y
@Guffrus sorry about the editing and typos. My screen is cracked and it often switches i's and o's.
- +1 y
@Guffrus from UK and us death rates about 100,000 extra deaths in the UK from 2019 to 2020 and about 400,000 more deaths in the USA in 2020 compared to 2019.
This if course dies not include the more common long term disabilities caused by covid, a friend I rode 1000 miles on my bicycle with over the summer of 19 still can't reach his second floor flat (he lives in London now) without a pause for air he got covid last may.
- +1 y
If you had bothered to look at the supplied data you would have seen that there were approx 80k deaths more in 2020 than 2019 but more importantly what you would have seen is that this sort of variance isn't even abnormal.
Does that mean I am saying the virus isn't real or hasn't killed anyone?
No, what that means is that the amount of people who have died is quite small.
80k more deaths BUT 600k overall.
And a per 100k population rate which is lower than in many of the previous years, most noteably the early 90s period.
So while the figures are higher than they sometimes are they are no so high as to explain a capacity problem at the morgue.
- 2.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 ythat would be grounds for civil war. you can't force people to take a medication. i am not even anti vaccine but i am not going to be told what to do
40 Reply
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yI think it’s their choice.
And I think forced vaccination validates everything they think about government authoritarianism and more. The reason the anti vaccine movement came about was because the UK government tried to force vaccinations of people. As much as the government is comfortable with oppressing people, I also think they’ve learned their lesson.00 Reply- 2.5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yAgainst trying to force ANYONE to do ANYTHING. Provide information so that people can choose what's best for THEM.
I'm vax'd, so I could careless what they do. Vax'd or not, it changes nothing for me.00 Reply Forced anything goes against my values. Its unfortunate that people don't want to get vaccinated but there isn't a whole lot we can do about it.
10 Reply
+1 yIt's total BULLSHIT. Nobody should feel threatened, intimidated, manipulated or coerced into doing something they aren't sure about.
20 ReplyI think you can take your vaccine and shove it up your ass, sideways.
30 Reply416 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Nothing, normal unless they start forcing themselves on places that only allows vaccinated people to enter.
It's becoming annoying now.10 Reply684 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. They have the right to choose and think for themselves. America is turning into a communist country with these vaccine mandates
41 Reply1.5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Hello, Big Brother! Already herd on the news a bunch of companies are requiring employees to vaccine or be out of a job. May as well play the game otherwise the government is going to screw you more than they already do. :(
00 Reply
+1 yDoesn’t matter let everyone make their own decisions it’s a waste of time to convince people
10 Reply- 3.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yTheir choice to not get the vaccine but we should not feel sorry for them if they are dying from the virus because they refused to get the vaccine
11 Reply
Anonymous(18-24)+1 yI believe it is a human right to chose what the hell we want or don't want in our bodies
10 Reply18.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. My body my choice. But it’s our public places that we can demand vaccines or get out.
No shoes
No Shirt
No vaccine
No service00 Reply7.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Forced vaccination is pretty fascistic if you ask me. Your rights would depend on consuming a product from a "private company".
00 Reply
+1 yI'm not bothered. I'm double-vaccinated so I'm reasonably safe. Anyway I've had a good life for the most part.
00 Reply
+1 yTake it if you want to. Don't take it if you don't want to. Simple.
00 Reply
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yForced vax is for pussys that wanna give up all there rights. there's no reason for it and your still gonna have to wear the mask and get more of them cause it doesn’t work and people know that
00 ReplyNot my business if someone is vaccinated or not. I would be against forced vaccination.
00 Reply
+1 yI disagree completely.
10 Reply860 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Why are they forcing us lols
21 Reply4.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Most had a choice, 79% in America are unvaccinated going to hospitals
01 Reply
+1 yForced vaccination is evil.
30 Reply
Anonymous(36-45)+1 yThey are wise and if anyone tries to force vaccinate someone they are a nazi, period
00 ReplyWe unvaccinated are the smart ones
20 Reply
Anonymous(25-29)+1 yTheir choice, their consequences!
00 Reply
Anonymous(36-45)+1 ySelfish people
11 Reply
+1 yI respect their decision.
00 ReplyI disagree
10 Reply
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Holidays
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 