For example David Sinclair claims he has found a way to add 50 years to human life by adding in extra SIRT2 genes, he just can't prove it works because of ethical "concerns".
No. At some point people would get death row worthy sentence for walking over red light or speeding 5 miles too fast, if demand for test subjects will be high.
I honestly would need to know the crime the person committed to get on death row.
I would even agree to use them for unethical experiments and wouldn't require their consent. Human garbage doesn't get any of my sympathy.
Opinion
2Opinion
No. Because they still have human dignity and deserve to be treated with respect. If you kill them, make it quick and painless.
I say yes, let them do some good for a change.
The only opinion from girls was selected the Most Helpful Opinion, but you can still contribute by sharing an opinion!
You can also add your opinion below!
