Are issues always two sided?

[OddBeMe]

Obvi depends on the issue. But this is what bogs down climate change. There are no scientists on the other side. Just oil magnates.

Yes

No

A total of 14 votes were cast: 3 girls and 11 guys. See detailed results

[Stoner710]

Yes there can be 2 sides to an issue, You bring up climate change. There is climate change, I think it’s natural and there nothing humans can do about it. For example during the Jurassic period there were no Polar ice caps the average temperature was about 4°C higher then what it is today which is the upper end of the climate scientists expect the planet to be in 100 years. Things got big during this periods and both animal and plant life thrived. We’ve haven’t been burning oil that long in the grand scheme of things. Not to mention the only way to get people out of property in carbon based fuels. By saying we need to get rid of carbon based fuels Your basically telling the people in Africa and Asian to stuff it they have no choice but to remain in poverty. Not to mention you’re telling the west we have to stop growing in order to save the climate. This is not once racist but impractical.

Not to mention if you’re saying the world ends in 2028 (ten years after AOC said it would). You would have no choice but to at a war with China and idea over their carbon use because they’re not gonna stop. Not to mention you guys refuse to look at nuclear energy. Windmills cost more energy than they produce so it make no sense but to produce them. Solar is also a joke especially I’m the more attic regions of the globe and you have no way to storm the energy. Plus you need lithium which do to regulations it’s impractical to mine in the United States. So now you either are going to have to deal with communist who kill there own people because they now control the lithium deposits in Afghanistan and your have to deal with a group of people that rapes women constantly because of Joe Biden.

So we are stuck with fossil fuels especially since democrats and so against nuclear energy

[jshm2]

There is your side, their side, the truth, and the media portrayal.

Hence there are always 4 sides to any story.

Climate change is also four sided. There are a lot of emotional and political players involved. The truth is that we cannot do jack shit about the damage that has been done.

It's why some are hoping we "get to Mars, Moon or Phobos" before shit really hits the fan. But as always, that would cause panic and it means only the wealthy and connected get to leave the planet. AI and robotics means they will not need so many "servants" for them.

[Astarlessnightsky]

Even the Oil companies are now officially and openly acknowledge climate change and the impact CO2 from fossil fuels has on it.

They won't do something about it, and you sadly can't sue their tiny balls for reperations... but at least they put it on their website.

[Anonymous]

One quarter of one percent of greenhouse gasses are emitted by humans. "Climate change" is natural and normal, the leftists are full of shit.

[Astarlessnightsky]

You can see the source of CO2, because there are two isotpes of carbon, one is slightly radioactive, thats the one thats natural emitted, by breathing animals, the other one is not radioactive and thats the one coming from burning fossil fuels, and its only the fossil fuel CO2 thats been increasing by a huge amount.

Even if its only 0,25%, it still has a huge impact on the climate.

[OddBeMe]

@Astarlessnightsky please, feel free to link evidence.