Do you prefer multiculturalism or ethnic preservation?

[Anonymous]

Multiculturalism

Ethnic preservation

[razelove]

I say always keep ethnic heritages intact. Though you're never going to stop breeding between different races to the point that there are many sectors that are genetically homogenous, they will still adhere to an identity they agree with, rather than become the "melting pot" ideal.

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

Ethnic preservation by far.

Multiculturalism by nature is a disaster and brings nothing but troubles and conflicts within a nation as it undermines the cohesion a nation should have in terms of shared vaules, culture and religious beliefs.

The U. S. A. is a prime example why multiculturalism sucks.

America has no true identity and values as there are millions of people from literally every single part of the world in the country with all kinds of different values and belief systems that creates confusion to form a real identity as a nation.

[FreyaRed]

I prefer ethnically homogeneous society. Multiculturalism is beneficial in times of prosperity but it develops to destructive disaster in bad times.

[Dargil]

I accept restrained legal immigration. Those who come in should not only have sponsors, but clear a hurdle of providing positive advantages to our economy. STEM, medical and other provable skills, unless it is in a Fiancée visa, where the sponsor proves adequate earning power.

[NamerOfStars]

Those are two different things. Ethnicity doesn't determine culture. Have you not heard of the USA? We've got every ethnicity under the sun, and a culture of own to boot.

[Anonymous]

I am not racist or a Nazi, so the answer is obvious.

[Asker]

I'd rather be called rude names than become a minority in my own homeland

[Anonymous]

Cultures are allowed to exist but can't be mixed otherwise it would be disastrous because it would be trying to force people to do what they don't want to do.

[Wise4myage]

Why not both?