Turks are not indigenous to the land they currently are squatting on.
Ask to an AI Persona
Athletic Chloe
Whether you need tips on improving your game, insights on fitness and nutrition, or just want to...
Love Doctor Brad
Welcome to the heart of understanding and transformation. I am your guide on this journey to...
James The Foodie
From savoring Italian classics to discovering the bold flavors of Japanese cuisine, I explore...
Laura
Have questions about GirlsAskGuys? I'm here to help!
Cinematic Lily
With my rich background and passion for the arts, I share insights on films, TV shows, and...
Advisor Smith
With years of experience guiding individuals in their education and career paths, I'm here to...
Travel Buddy
I'm your go-to travel companion, passionate about exploring new destinations and experiencing...
Fashionista Amy
I'm here to inspire and guide you with a touch of latest trends or advice on personal style.💅👒
Gamer Bella
With my passion and experience in hobbies and leisure activities, I'm here to offer personalized...
Click "Show More" for your mentions
Continue reading
Did the Turks kill the Armenians?
Most Helpful Opinion(mho) Rate.
Learn more
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
3Opinion
Insofar as the Turks are descended from the Hittites, they're not from anywhere NEAR Mongolia, and are in fact the people who the Greeks (and Romans before them) stole Anatolia from in the first place, the Greeks have no right to complain. If conquest is valid, they lost fair and square. If it's not, they have less right to the land than the Turks do. Try another line of reasoning.
Also, humans are indigenous to East Africa. The Turks are no exception.
Hittites no longer exist. Greeks and Armenians do.
So do Turks- and as the descendants of the land's "rightful" owners, it belongs to them. As conquerors of the land, it belongs to them. What right do the Greeks have to claim it beyond "we want it" that the Turks don't?
That's a dumb excuse. Something that was done in the long past shouldn't be done today. The Yamnayas killed and mass raped Europeans 5000 years ago but that doesn't mean something similar done to a population say 400 years ago is justified. Humans have came very far in the time in between.
@OneManOnly01 It's not an excuse, it's a rebuttal. The only claim the Greeks have on the land is that they took it by force from the people who lived there. If the Turks then come around and do the same, why is that any less valid?
Why don't humans still kill everyone and steal their wives and rape them? Because these are modern times. The more recent something like this was done, the more wrong it is..
@OneManOnly01 That doesn't make any sense. Morality may change based on CIRCUMSTANCE, but not merely on the passage of time. Starving today is no different from starving six thousand years ago.
The ancestors of Turks come from Central Asia. This has been genetically proven. Islam is alien to civilization.
The ancestors of the Turks come from all over; look at where Anatolia IS. It was a very cosmopolitan place under the Greeks and Romans, too. The Turks aren't EXCLUSIVELY Hittite-descended, but they are the biggest group.
Your religion-bashing doesn't change genetics.
@NamerOfStars You know what? You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Turks are no more related to Anatolians than the Iranians or Greeks or many other groups are. The only relation between Turks and Hitties is that Turks have Anatolian Neolithic Farmer autosomal ancestry but that ancestry is also found in Greeks.
And it is very silly to compare something done in the common era with something done in prehistoric times. Humans used to mass rape each other in prehistoric so does that mean it's fair if you rape people today? What kind of obscene logic is that?
Your logic of "they conquered that place so it's fair if someone else reconquered their place" is far from logical.
@NamerOfStars What a terrible example. Starving is not an example of morality but human biology. If someone intentionally starves someone else however then yes. People used to starve each other in prehistoric times but that doesn't make it valid for you to do it today. The more recent such atrocities were committed, the more wrong and immoral they are.
Have you ever heard the tale of the Americas?
Have you ever heard about the Romans, the Huns, the Chinese?
Do you have the slightest idea how often Europe's internal borders shifted in the last 1000 years?
Didn’t know, don’t care.