The federal government paying single women more money to not have a man in the house contributing to fatherlessness is a good or bad thing?

[SolitarySolace]

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT8YRMa4b/

It is a very bad thing

It is a very good thing

[Anonymous]

Sadly this has been the case for 60 years now, Reagan mentioned in his 1964 Time for Choosing speech.

" Not too long ago, a judge called me here in Los Angeles. He told me of a young woman who'd come before him for a divorce. She had six children, was pregnant with her seventh. Under his questioning, she revealed her husband was a laborer earning 250 dollars a month. She wanted a divorce to get an 80 dollar raise. She's eligible for 330 dollars a month in the Aid to Dependent Children Program. She got the idea from two women in her neighborhood who'd already done that very thing."

https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/reagans/ronald-reagan/time-choosing-speech-october-27-1964

https://www.youtube.com/embed/_VBtCMTPveA

Shocking what has happened to the family in the past 60 years, and how our culture has collapsed.

The Federal goverment was actually paying women to spearhead this change and it never stopped.

[LazerBean]

That doesn't help, but the main cause is today's lack of values.