If we see a crime, everything we do after AUTO-supports either the “Victim” or the “Suspect”, True?

[OddBeMe]

Not saying your forced the judge the crime. But you are involved automatically, right?

True: basic physics: any action you take henceforth is either FOR or AGAINST the criminal or victim.

False, it has nothing to do with you. It’s separate from your world.

Other

[msmissydc]

I would say yes. So if you witness a crime you have a binary option: be a witness in the investigation early or even directly after, or doing something else beforehand.(not at all is obviously later to the point of too late) The more you do before, the more you distract yourself and depending on the crime even cloud your mind to the memory (maybe even consciously).
Even if you are not a deciding factor in the investigation an adiditonal witness can help one side and being able to recall what has happened more closely may help too.

[Juxtapose]

No, I'm under ABSOLUTELY no obligation to put myself in danger for the sake of a stranger.

[Snakeyes7]

False, this is called a False Dilemma fallacy.

[OddBeMe]

Not really, you can only help or hurt the situation. By either telling authorities what you know or not. Telling authorities the wrong thing.

[Snakeyes7]

You shouldn't be telling the authorities anything without a lawyer present.

[Sevenpointfive]

no. i hope you're never on my jury

[OddBeMe]

Why?

[Sevenpointfive]

you seem to have no in-between, reasonable doubt, not guilty until proven innocent attitude

[OddBeMe]

I do auto go for the black in white and then head to the middle in arguments.

[Sevenpointfive]

it's okay. you're still learning

[msc545]

Not everything

[OddBeMe]

Of course it’s everything

[msc545]

I know that's your hypothesis. Here with the truth is that you can do nothing at all and it's unclear as to who would helps or harms if anyone. Sometimes not being involved in things like crimes on either side is the better part of valor.

[OddBeMe]

But it still affects either