Should Trump be allowed to attend his wife’s mother’s funeral?

[SolitarySolace]

Judge tells Trump lawyer Alina Habba to 'sit down' in tense exchange after he denied adjourning E. Jean Carroll defamation trial so ex-president could attend Melania's mother's funeral - www.dailymail.co.uk/.../...jean-carroll-trial.html

Yes

No

[DryGermanGuy]

He is and always was allowed. His attendance in the courtroom is not required and only used by him for campaigning reasons.
Typical fake news, making him a victim.

[FunkyMonkee]

I don't see why not! Or, is that gonna hurt someone's little feelings? Are we gonna have to break out a puppy and a crying towel?

[Miah04]

I don't know the law enough to know if there is something against it.

But i don't think it would hurt anything to let the man go to a funeral

[Notherndude84]

I think if Trump wanted special consideration from the court he could conduct himself like an adult instead of a petulant child how believes rules don’t apply to him

[RainbowMarinade]

Allowed?
Who is not allowing him?

[SolitarySolace]

The judge in the E Jean Carroll Defamation case

[RainbowMarinade]

The judge said Trump cannot attend his mother-in-laws funeral?
Can you provide a link to some information that may support that claim, because the one you included above doesn’t do that.
Thanks

[exitseven]

He is doing it anyway.

[RainbowMarinade]

@exitseven
Of course he is, because nobody is trying to stop him.

[exitseven]

@RainbowMarinade Yes, besides if he is there he cannot be in New Hampshire.

[RainbowMarinade]

@exitseven
What’s that got to do with anything?
He said he wants to go to the funeral. 🤷‍♀️
Nobody is stopping him from going to the funeral.
That’s the point

[exitseven]

@RainbowMarinade If he wasn't at the funeral he would ve in New Hampshire campaigning for the primary next week.

[RainbowMarinade]

@exitseven
Okay
He’s free to be wherever he wants to be. Nobody is telling him otherwise.
So what’s the problem?

[exitseven]

@RainbowMarinade the problem is that democrats are engaging in election interference by requiring him to be in court during important primary elections

[RainbowMarinade]

@exitseven
Should all criminal defendants who wish to run for office get their prosecution delayed so they can launch their campaign?

[exitseven]

@RainbowMarinade I think that the leading candidate should absolutely get it delayed. People have trials delayed for year. It is obvious how these trials were scheduled to fall on Super Tuesday and other important events that this is just a case of electron interference.
Our election process is sacred and is protected under the constitution putting the leading candidate in prison for charges that would not even be filed for anyone else will further divide this country, The election process should be allowed to continue unfettered.

[RainbowMarinade]

@exitseven
What do you think about Trump announcing his candidacy super early, knowing these investigations were wrapping up and indictments were imminent?
Dats cool, huh? Using the American election process and his supporters in an effort to curb his own prosecution? 🤔
What if it came out that there was evidence that the leading candidate committed murder? Does he get a pass because he’s the leading candidate? What if they commit a crime WHILE being the leading candidate? Still immune?
“.. putting the leading candidate in prison for charges that would not even be filed for anyone else.” Well, you can’t know that until you have seen all the evidence. Are you privy to all the evidence?
Having the evidence displayed in court is the only way to know the entirety of the accusations. If you truly believe that it’s all bullshit, why are you not eager to see the prosecution fail spectacularly on a national level?
Unless you fear what that evidence might expose.
And please don’t come at me with the idea that the entire government is out to get him. I just don’t buy into Trump’s claim of being America’s Biggest Victim.
He deserves all that is coming at him in this moment, as far as I’m concerned.

[exitseven]

@RainbowMarinade The indictments only happened because he was running and they really popped up once he started beating Biden in all the polls. Fani Willis and Fat Alvin made multiple trips to the White Hose about that time while they plotted with Biden's people how they were going to "Get Trump"

[RainbowMarinade]

@exitseven
So there was no investigations going on before he announced? Are you saying the indictments were from out in left field?

[exitseven]

@RainbowMarinade There were investigations as soon as Trump went down the escalator. The democrats went with the indictments when it was determined that Trump would beat their guy like a rented mule.

[RainbowMarinade]

@exitseven
Trump announced early because he knew what was coming. He wanted to be in the running so any attempt to hold him accountable could be billed as “election interference.”
Worked like a charm because here you are, crying that it’s election interference.
Trump knew it was coming BEFORE he announced. HE brought the election into this. Willingly. Because it’s the best chance he has to save his own ass. A patriot wouldn’t do that.
So? Should suspected murderer not have to answer to the charges in court if he’s a front running in a political campaign?
That’s pretty much what you’re arguing for. You know that right?

[exitseven]

@RainbowMarinade It is obvious by the timing of the trials that this is election interference or else the indictments coincided with every new revelation that came out on the corruption scandal that is now going on with the Biden crime family. They were used to distract the public from the real problem in our government. Judging by people like you it has apparently worked.

[RainbowMarinade]

@exitseven
Yes. I know how deeply invested you are in Trump’s victimhood, but that’s all it is. Victimhood. It causes you to see conspiracies where none exists. It doesn’t help that these connections are made, repeatedly, by many right wing commentators.
If it’s bullshit, the evidence will show it. Trump’s crack shot team of lawyers should be able to tear it all to shreds. 🤷‍♀️
So? Murderers and leading candidates? What say you?

Stop avoiding.

[exitseven]

@RainbowMarinade It is still tampering with an election. When a person has a clear majority to woin the next election and the opposing party weaponizes the justice system to have him imprisoned is something that only happens in communist totalitarian state.
Putin had his political rival thrown in jail. He was buried so deep that it took 2 weeks to find out where he was. It's the same thing.

[RainbowMarinade]

@exitseven
Are you fucking kidding me? How much time has Trump spent in jail? He has the opportunity to address the charges in court and launch a defence. That’s not the same thing as Putin’s secret trials with limited legal representation for the accused. Trump is not the victim he’s portrays himself as. He’s not a political prisoner ffs. 🤦🏻‍♀️

Your repeated neglect to answer the question posed to you is amusing.
I bet you’d want to see a leading candidate brought into court if there was credible evidence of murder.
Except for Trump. Any attempt to hold him responsible would be election interference, even if it was murder.
It’s okay. We already know. You can admit it.

[exitseven]

@RainbowMarinade There is a possibility that he will be convictedcand sentenced to prison they may even put him with the Jan6th protesters , many of them have been in prison for almost 3 years without being charged with a crime. I think there are some that are denied legal representation

[Dargil]

By whom?