I don't know. I don't understand. It. Based on what I understand. Alimony exist. So government don't need to pay to divorced women. In past it used to make sense. Because many women didn't used to work. But now? Hmmm. There should at least be some limit on alimony. Getting half of everything is insane to me. Alimony should be limited to enough wealth that they can live middle class lifestyle. Not billion of dollar.
Are you telling me that giving up my career to stay home and take care of the house and children, while he works to advance his career and increase his earning potential doesn’t make me entitled to half the marital assets in the event of a divorce?
Because that’s what it sounds like you are saying.
Most Helpful Opinions
I don't support the use of alimony for no reason. If a spouse (husband or wife, i dont care who) breaks the contract and id proven to have done so beyond a reasonable doubt, that is when alimony should in place as a punishment for violating it.
Way to often we see it being used against people who didn't break the contract or if they broke it mutually and it is such a disgusting misuse of it.
I think you are confusing Alimony and divorce settlement. Alimony is maintenance $ to continue in accustomed lifestyle for poorer spouse. Not just women
i think whichever one has more money should pay the other one enough to be equal and then all alimony stops after 5 years
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
4Opinion
The primary reason to support alimony or the idea of alimony is it provides an exceptionally good reason to never get married.
Depends. If the wife was a stay-at-home mom, yes. If she earned enough to be independent after divorce, no.
I love how all the women who voted supported alimony lol 😆
Pay for an escort, it's cheaper.
Learn more