Is voting for the lesser of two evils, still voting for evil?

[llorando]

Yes

No

[RetroReviews]

Not enough people care enough to ask for a paper and pen palette so therefore they just go to the voting machine which is easily to change the votes so I don't think I'm going to vote ever again. There's no way that potato Head Brandon got 81 million votes but the Dominion voting machine said he did. Thinking about it this way Barack Obama got 10 million less votes when he was going for reelection but he still won Trump on the other hand got 10 million MORE votes that he did the first time but he somehow loses isn't that something that makes you go hmmmm? 🤔

[RetroReviews]

Thanks for choosing my reply as the superb opinion

[llorando]

I didn't choose G@G system did.

[RetroReviews]

Oh ok sorry

[AviatorTom]

Not necessarily. The lesser could just be bad, not evil.

[Anonymous]

Yep. But because there's no viable third party or no viable third party candidate (whichever), one of the evils will win so ending the evil may never be realistic.

[handsomelad70]

Because both main parties are parties of the wealthy.

[laly520]

ts pretty pointless at this point

won't be voting

[Anonymous]

don't vote liberal, don't vote conservative, vote red-pill

no ideology, no philosophy, just pure facts

[Pete671]

Yes you are supporting a system that is inherently corrupt,,,

[handsomelad70]

"The lesser of two evils" often means "the evil of two lessers."

[Fireguy17]

yeppers, but it is a gooder evil.

[jahaims]

You answered your own question

[NathanDavis]

I don't vote