

Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 

Because men tend to be more logical in their decision making, and women tend to be more emotional.
The overwhelming liberalization of politics in the US has been largely enabled by female voters. And we are seeing the consequences of that.
Emotions are very important
@Babygirl_S Emotions should not be a factor in deciding who to vote for.
Men tend to want to control others, a sign of conservatism, while women are usually far less judgmental than men about people's habits and discrete characteristics, a liberalism trait.
@beefcakebradybatson Hey "Brady", thanks for outing yourself as another of the many women with blue GAG accounts.
You are sort of right about men, but it's not about controlling people, per se. It's about being strong and assertive rather than weak and passive. As a woman, you're more comfortable with the latter, which is understandable.
I believe it boils down to logic based decision making vs emotional based decision making. Human nature summed up in a vote. I think vs I feel.
Opinion
28Opinion
Men tend to be angrier and feel more threatened, and have less empathy if any. Women tend to be calmer, more nurturing, and more empathic.
Like this:
Historically, men and women have been socialized into different roles that shape their worldviews. Men were often raised to value tradition, competition, and self-reliance—qualities associated with conservative ideologies. Women, on the other hand, were often socialized to prioritize nurturing, empathy, and community, which align more with liberal values.
The shifting of gender roles in recent decades has influenced political attitudes. The increased participation of women in the workforce and higher education has been linked to greater support for progressive policies and gender equality.
Some theories suggest men are more inclined to seek stability and maintain the status quo, which conservatism often represents. Women may be more supportive of social welfare programs and community-based initiatives due to their historical roles in caregiving and family nurturing.
Economic Policies: Women may be more supportive of government intervention and welfare policies that benefit children and families, aligning them more with liberal platforms. Men, traditionally seen as economic providers, may be more focused on policies that support individual economic growth and lower taxes.
Studies show that men and women often differ in certain personality traits that can influence political orientation. For example, women tend to score higher on agreeableness and compassion, which may make them more inclined toward policies that emphasize social support and equality. Men, who might score higher on traits like assertiveness and conscientiousness, may prefer policies that emphasize order and tradition.
Research in psychology suggests that men might be more attuned to perceived threats and prioritize security and stability, aligning with more conservative positions. Women, in contrast, might prioritize inclusive and empathetic responses to social issues, aligning with more progressive or liberal views.
@msc545 I agree with your assessment. As far as an ideological stand point. But when it comes to practice... voting for liberals is in essence replacing masculinity with government... and a feminine one at that. Which is why I believe we have such a divide between our genders. If your assessment is accurate... which I believe it to be... republican policy is masculinity and liberalism feminine. So ultimately it boils down to who should be in charge... man or woman?
@Ariesman81 I agree with that. I think it's deeper than pitting masculinity against femininity, though. I think the questions that we need to start asking are: "Why is toting guns purely masculine in our culture (a generalization, but bear with me)" and "Why is caring for the poor a purely feminine ideal (another generalization). My mindset is that if we are ever going to figure out a way to ease the tensions in this country, we have to start with dissecting the heart behind the politics of the constituents.
For example, protecting their own is ingrained in men (real men; I'm not referring to those who have abandoned their families). The chord being struck by gun rights advocates is the emotional one of protecting one's family. But then the talking heads don't go any deeper than that with solving the issue of teenagers walking into schools and shooting their kids. That area is being covered by the feminine side; the emotion of women being mother bears and blaming animate guns for randomly walking into their child's school.
The point I'm trying to communicate is that both men and women care; they just have different reactions to how to control outcomes that they don't want. Men want to fight, women want to control. So how do we balance these tendencies rationally? How to we meet the needs of both men and women emotionally? What is the driving force behind the voting decisions people make? We know people make decisions that are primarily emotional, so how do we connect with that and meet both the fear and the anger with understanding, so that people have the opportunity to think through the issues? I don't really know what the answer is. I just know that I have to take a step back and not assume that everyone who disagrees with me is an evil person, you know?
@TheRealPepperPotts I think you nailed it actually. As a man... I don't want emotion to be the primary determining factor in my leader's decision making process. I want a leader that's willing to make a logical choice for the good of the country. As I would do for my family. I understand that good can feel subjective, but ultimately a decision needs to be made. My experience is that conservatives/Republicans/men seem to make better choices as a whole, sure they can seem painful, but just because something feels wrong... doesn't make it so. This is the part I think Democrats have the biggest issue with. Kind of like a parent saying..."it's for your own good". It usually is.
@TheRealPepperPotts Thanks
All other things being equal we are innately different according to our biology, and there is a very real biological difference between men and women. Like all biology this was evolved over time.
Because humans are a male dominated species, women's innate political judgement to the extent it is influenced by their biology never really evolved for being in charge as strong men took that role.
So female minds to the degree of their female are thinking with brains that instead evolved for the managed environment of the home & family with the same strong domineering man controlling.
Such is the existed for the last several million years of human history in which our intellect developed
As such when a woman doesn't have that in her life she tends to seek that stability and control. Government often provides that if she is single. If she is securely married under anther man, she is more likely to see the goverment as he does and as an outsider she is with him for or against.
This is just the circumstances for which the female brain HAD to evolve, men did not leave women much choice in this for the last few million years.
Interesting question as to why. South Korea is very noticeably diverging strongest with becoming conservative faster than women becoming liberal. The differential rate of the point gap looks somewhat consistent in US, UK and Germany at around 25 points.
Female market value is much higher in the 20's so it might be making hay while the sun shines sexually.
Women are more fashion oriented. They are happiest when their life looks most like what they are told it should and they are evolutionarily disposed to conforming to group female think.
Men on the other side may be considering that women are offering a bum deal now and be more inclined to look for conservative values.
Because most of the conservative views these days aren't really pro women at all. You're talking about a group that pushes for women to basically forego their careers and return to traditional, stay at home roles of solely supporting the husband. Also that side isn't really big on respecting women's choices as far as our bodies are concerned. re-state//background_color_rgba (0, 0, 0, 0), font_color_rgb (77, 77, 77), justifyLeft
@mandyfire98 History couldn't care less about the people who leave nobody behind either.
A career is a means to an end, not the end itself. Ultimately whatever boss you work for will cease to exist within 100 year or so not long after you do.
Thus whatever you do for him will mean not a thing to anyone thereafter and you might as well have never done it at all. The same thing goes for most of your friends. it is your children that will hopefully, if you do the work that your parents did for you, go on to carry your legacy as an indispensable part of history.
If your efforts are not invested there they do not much matter at all in the long run.
As far as our civilization and the state which manages it is concerned that is ultimately the enterprise we work to maintain and keep running.
Because of biology in that enterprise you as a woman are far more important in the home in those early years with your children than you will ever be to our people in the workforce.
Anyone who says otherwise is ignoring the dire global consequences of that believe:
www.ft.com/.../3862923c-f7bd-42a8-a9ea-06ebf754bf14
Phys,
If you haven't noticed, evolution has not only stopped, it's going backwards. DEI is nice in an artsy world, but when I'm getting my ass handed to me in a dark corner, I want this guy stepping in.
@saraupstairs
Evolution never stops whether we like it or not, it usually simply moves too slowly for people to observe.
The advantage of evolution is it regardless honest in that it only cares about what works vs what doesn't work in terms of producing children.
So for example we are seeing extremely rapid evolution right now as women who don't want children and have the ability to prevent it are being rapidly taken out of the gene pool. As such all future women will be all the more obsessed with children or too dumb to prevent it.
If you want to call that "backwards" movement fine, clearly evolution doesn't share your opinion on what is "forward". Ultimately your opinion dies with you and nobody will care about it 100 years from now.
Men are more self reliant. Women more want to be taken care of even if lawyers or government entitlements. Why I recruited from Offshore.
https://th.bing.com/th/id/R.0c8b5dbdd10c82e4bec3bff904b8aa49?rik=HHb6QKwzGTv0cQ&pid=ImgRaw&r=0
because men believe in free speech, self-defense, innocent until proven guilty etc.
they are taught to be selfless and thus tend to be more conservative
women (especially modern women) are raised to be selfish, narcissistic, think only of themselves rather than the community and thus tend to be more liberal
Do conservative people think like that? 🤔
@babygirl_s It has more to do with the fact that If you're just talking about the difference between men and women. Then for millions of years women have basically not been in a position of making political choices their distinct biology never evolved to do so wisely out side of what they did controls.
@Babygirl_S yes and you'll find in male dominated jobs, there's more conservatism there
jobs such as construction, trades, agriculture, police, military, sports etc. all require teamwork, sacrifice and selflessness
Guys are closer to where the rubber meets the road. They work in law enforcement and unions jobs and see the results of liberal policies. Crime and unemployment are real things to them. Women that work in office jobs or have rich husbands are insulated from a lot of this.
Women are emotional and can be manipulated. Men use cold logic and it will take cold logic to change their minds.
The world is driven by finance and finance is driven by logic. people that make poor decisions are poor. People that make wise decisions are well off. That is the way of the world.
women are followers. it is in their dna to follow and mirror all the women they look up to and unfortunately because our society is plagued by reality drama shows and music that encourages women to be liberal and does a good job and convincing them that having conservative values is "oppressing" then they obviously will seek just that
feminism by the way is not helping out a bit
Only in US, maybe. I've never noticed super positive sentiments to whole program of the left among my friends with exception of their desire to change abortion laws and getting rid of the influence of the clergy in politics. Especially self destructive immigration politics of the left find lot of disapproval among people I know.
Maybe it's because we see parties as tools to get what we want instead taking their entire ideology packets which are always shit with sugar glassing.
We're two different types of beings women go through certain things in life that men don't understand because they have gone through them and same with women so we see things different doesn't mean one of us are right or wrong it just means that we are different and we believe in different things there's nothing wrong with thatre-state//background_color_rgba (0, 0, 0, 0), font_color_rgb (77, 77, 77), justifyLeft
Women like the idea of being sure of things. Liberal progressives promise that. The reality is that progressives want to control every aspect of your life because they think most people are stupid and can't think for themselves. Men are the opposite of that.
Men probably don't like the liberal perspective that sees them as the enemy. I'm liberal or conservative depending on who I'm talking to because I don't give a shit, but I understand as a man why liberal rhetoric is a turn-off.
Women have that luxury. I've said before most young people are liberal because when you're young you're idealistic and foolish and don't really understand how the world works fully yet. Women can be liberal because they do not have the same expectations on them that a man has. The world will always treat them with kids gloves simply because of thier gender. So a woman never has to fully mature.
I guess you never heard of Candace owens.
She is woman and many loud pro life are women.
Those polls probably played word games about meaning of liberal in questions.
Need fair questions.
In my polls women voted to ban abortion after your baby brain starts to function... whichbis just 14 weeks coincided with modern french law.
Men are more likely to be skeptics, and they view the world through bottom up processing as opposed to women who are more likely to view the world through top down processing.
More men have better morals, and more women want to behave immorally and don't want consequences for their bad actions. Also, more women want free handouts that they didn't earn.
It wasn’t always like that- it’s a relatively recent development. Lots of reasons- lots of single moms/family breakdown, women are employed more in left-dominated jobs
@Apple1996: You’re making an assumption there that also doesn’t explain why men are voting differently than before 1980.
Educational attainment
Emotionally better adjusted
Well traveled
Increasingly urban
Self reinforcement from girls living life with little male input
Abortion
#MeToo movement
Social justice
Lack of maternity care
Lack of paid leave
Lack of affordable child care
Increasingly unionized
Increasing disposable income
Polylingual
"Sandwiched" with child & elder care
Inheritances from dying boomers
Well, that's a good start...
Conservative people are usually racist, homophobic, misogynistic etc. and most women are sensible enough to avoid being like that. I don’t think anyone should be made to feel bad for who they are or even their choices because everyone has the right to live happily as long as they’re not harming anyone. A lot of men believe in controlling other’s lives. PS that bald guy is so irritating 🤢
In America Conservatives are the Liberals and the Liberals are actually Conservatives.
Why? Cause American Liberals want to revert back to a dictatorship banning free and rip up the Constitution. Which wouldn't make them liberal at all.
A good many white men believe in the patriarchy, or a fatherly right to dominate everyone not a cisgender straight white male, something which discomfits many women, who were treated as chattel when the paternity was legally codified. Since patriarchies tend towards conservatism, men who believe in them are usually right-wing, while women, POC and LGBTQAI folk who oppose them are as likely to lean left.
Politics are man made created in a society, which is also a man made system. You’re agreeing to submit to all of it. Which is totally cool, that’s your choice. I don’t vote, I don’t know what any political category means and I never have looked them up either. I respect everyone’s choice to be their own individual.
Just be nice and share sugar with your neighbors.
Women are more likely to want a socoal safety net. Like the one of the current safety nets alimony or child support.
Because conservatives primarily attempts to advertise to men which leaves women to make a more informed decision without being influenced by at least 1 side of the political spectrum.
We are conditioned to lean towards tradition by those who raise us. I was raised without the stereotypical male framework, and thus I grew up more liberal and slowly became more centrist as a result.
Because conservative policies tend to negatively impact womenre-state//background_color_rgba (0, 0, 0, 0), font_color_rgb (77, 77, 77), justifyLeft
Attached doesn't mean it's part of your body. A part of your body means it serves a function in your normal body processes. And I agree with you, no one has the right to use another person's body without their permission. But banning abortions isn't using another person's body without their permission. On the other hand, abortion seems to be using another person's body without their permission, the foetus'. You're ending the foetus' life.
Banning abortions takes away our rights and choices and forces this on us against our will. And regardless of intent or lack of, an unwanted fetus is using the body without permission. Something you agreed nobody has a right to do.
Tough shit, our lives actually matter and we didn't consent to it being there in the first place. Like any other situation, using another person's body without permission, regardless of intent or circumstances, can get the offending thing killed.
No, the foetus isn't using your body without permission. A foetus forms when a man and a woman procreate, triggering a series of reproductive activities. If you didn't want to have a foetus growing in you, then you shouldn't have procreated in the first place, or in the least, you should have used birth control. In all, you and your partner are the reason the foetus is growing in you. So you are the instigators, not the foetus. You know intercourse will likely lead to a pregnancy, yet decided to do it anyways.
Is it in me and using my body to survive? Yes. Does it have permission? No.
Dude I got pregnant twice while on the pill. The shit does fail sometimes. And consent to fucking does not mean I'm consenting to pregnancy. If I consented to it, I wouldn't be seeking an abortion. Common sense.
It's not about consenting to the pregnancy. It's about doing something with the chances of leading to a pregnancy, with the hopes of not leading to a pregnancy, but when a pregnancy does occur, you want to affirm a right to abort, at the expense of another life. Why not avoid intercourse in the first place, and in the very least, be careful and use protection?
I never said protection is a guarantee. I just said in the very least. Do you know what is a guarantee? Abstinence. Now you see why people advocate against those that are pro-abortion? "... but I'm still enjoying myself here." It's all about themselves, and never the life they abort. So someone has to step in on their behalf.
Why would I go without? Sex is fun and a good way to connect with a partner.
To be fair, a fetuses life is worthless to me, removing it is worth the $500. Much cheaper than the tens of thousands and various problems that can arise from birthing it.
Fine by me, I'd happily pay a few grand to hunt a couple sex offenders. Sounds like fun tbh
Again, it's not about going without intercourse. Plenty of people have intercourse, and don't get children. On the other hand, plenty of people have intercourse and get children. And they become responsible for them. What you're doing is having intercourse for fun, and then you end the life which is a result of your intercourse. If you were never ready to accept the consequences of the pleasure you are chasing, especially when it involves a life, then you shouldn't pursue it in the first place. It's that simple.
Yes, we know a foetus' life is worthless to you, and many others who support abortions, but their life isn't generally as worthless as yours is. That is why many people are against abortions, for people like you who considers foetus' life worthless.
No, what I meant was, if I commit a murder, then paying a couple of thousands of dollars for the murder I committed should be enough to cover the life I took. And I can live on to be free of any crimes.
And from your reply, don't you think you've made a reasonable case for people who are against you? You don't care what they think or value, yet here you are, discussing with someone like me. And you should, because if you don't, what they think or value might just be the reason your "right to choose" will be taken away from you.
Women are pussies... so they want the pussy way out.
@Gym_Bro Don't forget having the wrong political opinion. They froze up all my shit for having the wrong opinions. They took Trump's picture off of V_Injector's profile pic, so my basic logic tells me exactly what all of this bullshit is really about. It's all political. That Trump picture didn't matter until just before elections with like at least a year of using that picture that breaks no rules? They're fucking pathetic losers. Like silencing him and the rest of us was going to make a difference.
They're people that can't have a logical argument without the use of force. Straight up pussies bro. Their brains stopped working.
Comes down to men being hard headed/controlling and women being open and wanting to have freedom. Since right is more traditional and left is more modern
Probably because conservative is more logical and liberal is more emotional
According to these graphs, British men are not conservative.
Because conservatism favors men while liberalism favors women.
Why be part of something that doesn't benefit you at all?
to preserve our status and keep others below us.
Men are logical, women are emotional.
UK take your garbage from Romania right NOW.
How could you forget centralists?
Penis?
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions