If there’s 1% chance a country will attack us should we strike first?

[OddBeMe]

Yes!

No!

A total of 14 votes were cast: 3 girls and 11 guys. See detailed results

[Avicenna]

Statistically speaking, anything with less than a 5% likelihood of occurring is generally considered not possible, so it’s an insane idea.

As the CCP and leftists have shown, there are many other ways to attack the US that a traditional military assault.

[blackeagle007]

What’s ccp

[Avicenna]

@blackeagle007: Chinese Communist Party

[OddBeMe]

As the rightist Maga have shown... destroying our economy by presidential edict is quite a threat.

[blackeagle007]

And maga supports disobeying the courts. They think Trump is above them

[OddBeMe]

@blackeagle007 it's down to what a judge is willing to do to enforce his ruling.

[Avicenna]

Wow, now we have Marxists cheering on leftist judges who are causing a constitutional crisis by violating separation of powers and other constitutional principles with dictatorial rulings. Funny how a judicial dictatorship isn´t a problem for Marxists who demand obedience to corrupt and dictatorial "judges".

Marxists gonna Marxist.

Odd, I know you´re too dumb to understand anything about economics, but do try not to embarass yourself with your ignorance and pathetic propaganda (actualy you´re reading from a script).

[blackeagle007]

Your president is a convicted felon. I can’t believe you’re dumb enough to support that. You really need serious help. Trumps racism is encouraging magas to act terrible towards minorities. You’re a redneck. Karma will come

[OddBeMe]

And Avi still doesn't know what the Zfuck a Marxist is

[blackeagle007]

I noticed more and more conservative judges are saying to Trump “no you can’t do that” and Trump acts like a baby. I’m gonna see if I can find the Trump baby balloon lol

[ProbablyClueless]

As you know, the war on terror was an undisputed success. There certainly hasn't been any insanely costly, ultimately unsuccessful conflicts. No generations have been permanently scarred. Nothing was ever lied about.

[DrPepper12]

Well said! 😁😂

[OddBeMe]

Strange how you're sane one moment and manically insane the next. Lol

[ProbablyClueless]

I like to remind myself that we're all just trying to make it work, at the end of the day!

[FreyaRed]

It depends if a country capable to raise the bar on escalations ladder after preemptive strike. I guess Iran and North Korea can because they are prepared to respond.

[Anonymous]

If that was the case we'd have carpet bombed most of the middle east and africa 20 years ago... oh wait.

[Sevenpointfive]

america doesn't have any enemies. that's stupid propoganda

[Agape93]

We definitely do lol

[blackeagle007]

Are you kidding?

[Sevenpointfive]

@blackeagle007 imagine if you will, a country with no tariffs. i mean seriously. matching a 10% tariff is the same as a 0%. just do it for a year

[blackeagle007]

Tariffs aren’t the subject. It’s overall. Do you consider Russia, North Korea and China friendly countries?

[Sevenpointfive]

@blackeagle007 i do. i find them very friendly

[blackeagle007]

Ran by dictators? Now I know you’re a troll. You do know why Trump is trying to hit them high with tariffs? They been ripping us off

[Sevenpointfive]

@blackeagle007 trump is the anti-dictator! he will show you greatness!

[blackeagle007]

I haven’t seen it last term. And I don’t see it currently, maga troll

[Sevenpointfive]

@blackeagle007 it's like trump not being able to stop another year of USAID fund because asshole biden made it his grand fuck you! to the new administration.

[beefcakebradybatson]

No, unless it's a nuclear attack. THEN a pre-emptive strike may be necessary.

[Dargil]

There is.

No.

[NathanDavis]

that's insane

[Anonymous]

No, that's just insane.