Do you support women in armed combat?

[Sal_Monella]

Updates

1 mo

Do you support training women to kill people?

Updates

1 mo

Would you support your sister or daughter being in armed combat?

[Anonymous]

No. I wouldn’t support a majority of women being in combat roles. There’s a few who could handle it, but I don’t think a majority of women could. I spent my first enlistment in the infantry. Sucked ass big time. So I don’t see why a girl would want to be out in the field for weeks at a time. Wearing the same shitty clothes for 2-3 days straight, maybe longer. Hoping it rains so you can run out in the rain w your little ass bar of soap and try to shower as quick as possible. Otherwise your ass smells like baby wipes the entire time you’re out there. BDUs white at times from all the salt you sweat out. Eating MREs that make you constipated. Camo paint on your face which makes it even worse being uncomfortable. I don’t support all men either being in infantry roles. A lot of feminine men these days. Even some of the toughest dudes I knew broke down at times physically. Shin splints, bone spurs, plantar fasciitis. I served in a weapons platoon, as an 0331 (machine gunner). Carrying a machine gun that was 25.6 lbs, plus 500 rounds of ammunition w all your shit in your ruck. Torn up feet. Scars on my soles from blisters. Bad knees. Walking miles on a hump, dip shit Lt. getting you lost. Crawling in cold, muddy water in South Korea and all different parts of the world. Times have changed for sure. I was in toward the end of the 90s into the 2000s. But no I wouldn’t really support it unless they let the same standards as the men.

[SteveSmith1985]

I support women in armed combat, in the same way I support men in armed combat. It depends on who one is fighting for. But I have no issue with women in armed combat, that would differ from my issues with men in armed combat.

I would support my sister or my daughter being in armed combat, if that's what they wanted to do. Just like my brother or son. I see no difference when it comes to this particular issue.

I would feel just as safe, with a group of highly trained combat-ready women... as I would feel were the soldiers male.

I think that there may be an argument; in then days of swinging a giant sword or battle axe. I don't think it matters at all with todays weapons.

[wynning]

Not really a case of supporting the idea more so than a case of supporting the women who want to do it.
You could argue that men are the sole reason we need and have armies in the first place. I find it difficult to understand why women would want to be in a place where we're on average treated quite differently and often worse than men, by men but it is their choice and I support that freedom of choice.

[msc545]

Men do not cause the problem of war. Women do, with their unreasonable demands.

[wynning]

If we look at things from a purely historic point of view, women have never been in a position where realistically their opinion on, say, whether to colonise a country, would have mattered. Let ALONE would have had enough weight to start a war.
If women with our unreasonable demands (which are?) were the cause of the problem of war, it seems way more likely to me that most armies would not be the way they are now and the wars. The wars we have to show off to aliens wouldn’t look the way it does - completely perpetuated by men, for men’s goals (including their goals for women) and with men front and centre. Women are, in a wartime context, seen as something that “can be lost to” to the other side and therefore need protection from (the men of the rival side) whereas men who are not at the very top are essentially cannon fodder who “can be lost to” the cause.

You cannot seriously be saying that women have been able to even partake in wars to the extent you seem to be implying lol. If you are, please elaborate because I’d love to hear it.

[Sparklight]

@wynning I agree with that. I don't have to put a response, because I couldn't have put that any better.

[msc545]

Women's unreasonable and materialistic demands are the ultimate cause of wars, especially in the US.

[wynning]

Thanks for your live report from Planet msc545. But... I guess you're not big on the history of Planet Earth are you? It's a bit different here you know!

It's ok, at least you're good at hitting a record number of fallacies in under 2 sentences. Even I couldn't do that in the best of my troll days. Go get em, aul fella milad.

[msc545]

You are a 19-year-old troll. I don't expect you to understand this. You can keep the insults to yourself, however, I'm really not interested in your opinions.

[wynning]

@msc545 How do you get offended at such stupid words... They're meant to be ridiculous! You know, just like yours. That's new. Must be a generation thing since you pointed out my age. Only thing understandable in your words is how inane they sound. Different strokes I guess.

[Danny_dan92]

I blocked this moron for a reason.

Hey smartass, have you not noticed that both the leader of Russia and the Leader of Israel are both men? Get your head out your ass you liberal nutcase.

Typical unenlightened moron making a claim when all things point to the opposite being the case

[FreyaRed]

Yes. If they want do that and have no moral problems to eliminate enemy combatants. Women have usually good hand eye coordination, this makes them predisposed for being potential drone operator or precision shooter.

[MisterWack]

Do I support women in armed combat? It isn’t my say.

Imagine if this were flipped towards women a hundred years ago, “Would you send the man you love into combat before he even fathered children? Would you send their Daddy into combat and leave them without a father?”

This isn’t our daughters and sisters or wives, this is a woman choosing to fight overseas for freedom. Let women, men, or whatever fight if they want to fight especially since it helps the great American story continue to be written.

[MisterWack]

Again, I’m against drafts in general. If a man or woman is patriotic enough to risk their life in the call of duty then let them. The more boots on the ground, the better I say.

[Theodish_Warrior]

1. Fighting used to always be an obligation men gave to the state so their family could have freeman status. Though now relaxed, still was commonly understood even into more modern times.
2. When women die the population struggles to recover because men can impregnate multiple women (not desirable but women often aren't too loyal to their men anyway).
3. A squad of men & women in the military will lose against a squad of just men.
4. Teams of men tend to be less competitive &, more supportive with each other in the absence of female presence. This isn't just if they're attracted to her. It's an instinct. Men value their worth through the female perception of themselves.
5. When the draft comes usually men are targeted more. So why should women have equal rights when it comes to joining the military but men themselves aren't allowed those equal rights.
6. Men return home as heros & impress women. If women typically served in the military his status drops back down to just being some dude. Why did he even choose to fight in the first place? For a corrupt government that wants to eradicate his people & reduce the population?

[NicholasRedone]

@Sal_Monella No, as I'm a world peace guy for all things military, however except aid or true military self defence like the Japanese Self Defence Force as opposed to the way some countries use the term self defence - not that I'm naming any nation names that claim self defence lol - however I for one believe only butch women or masculine women/bravado women who are already "one of the guys, spits like a man, swears or curses like a man, takes it up the butt, etc" now those women sure why do I care if they join even lesbians.

[NicholasRedone]

@Sal_Monella my opening sentences refer to alien invasion, extraterrestrial, or zombies or even bears.

[Danny_dan92]

Absolutely not.




I was in the marine corps infantry. We need to be realistic and honest… most if not all women will not be able to fireman carry a full grown man. That can weigh anywhere from 170-250lbs on top of his flak, kevlar, rifle, ammunition, water…




I just don’t see it happening.




Not to mention from a psychological perspective… I rather see a wounded man than a wounded woman. I wouldn’t want to see a woman with a severe gunshot wound or worse.

[RingOfFire]

Absolutely not. Men are designed for this job by nature both physically and mentally. They are the protectors of society. Women are designed to give life not take it. Plus they are a distraction to the men who need to get the job done.

I'm sick of seeing these 5' tall female cops and firefighters trying to prove they are "just as good as a man." Do your fantasy experiments somewhere else. It may work in fantasy movies but not in real life.

Who do you want to see when you are caught in a burning building? Some 5' tall woman who has her hair in a bun? Or a 6' 5" man who looks like an Olympiad?

[Aztecwarrior480]

On one hand, I can understand men in these fields of work not wanting women in there because they see them as a liability.

[Aztecwarrior480]

On the other hand, because women in the US just get voting rights handed to them on a silver platter while men have to register for selective service as soon as they turn 18, to get them, women have do some sort of service for the country or make a compromise to earn their voting rights.

[RingOfFire]

I'm fine if women want to serve in the military in NON-COMBAT roles. I don't want to take away their honor to exclude them from serving, I am just opposed to them serving in combat. In small countries, like Israel for example, they have no choice but to let women serve in combat. But in America that is not necessary or desirable.

[Zack-Bann]

I’m the son of one such woman
And I couldn’t admire my mom more for enlisting when she did


She never went to an open war zone but she was trained for it
That part was scary as a kid


But I definitely support the notion of capable women being allowed to do capable things

[purplepoppy]

If they want that career and pass the fitness tests who am I to stand in their way. You don't need to be strong to pull a trigger.

[NicholasRedone]

@purplepoppy you're a feminine woman. Or a tomboy lol 😂😆 so on the plus side poppy, no need for you to enlist - nail polish is forever 💅🏻💅🏻♾️

[Kingofkings1992]

It’s not just about strength. Women and men are different mentally.

[NicholasRedone]

@purplepoppy think you borrowed a line from the late Pope Francis infamous "gay who am I to judge comment" there popps - 🟣 : @Sal_Monella

[Chichi90]

Id second the last part of what you said lol.

[NaultD]

There is like what 1 to 10 ratio. To make a single combat operative ready there's 10 support operatives.

So it's not about can women be combat ready it's the fact that the vast majority of men are not capable of combat in the first place.

So what is the point of the question in the first place?

[WindAtMyBack]

I think it's a military decision - as long as it's strictly military and not political.

My own opinion is that a woman is perfectly capable of deciding what she wants. A young 18 year old girl doesn't really know what she's getting into. But neither does an 18 year old guy.

"Would you support your sister or daughter being in armed combat? "
I'd stand behind my sister, daughter, or SO 100%.

[HawkPerception]

Ehh... mixed feelings. Women don't have the same physical capabilities as men, but those gaps are being closed by technology every day. I think that if you have the will to sacrifice for your country, then by all means you should be allowed to. But I would always rather have men behind me than women.

[ProbablyClueless]

I'm against women serving in combat roles for anything short of situations where the shit is totally hitting the fan. History has taught us this lesson many times; women get nasty when the claws come out, but it takes a fair amount to get them there psychologically.

If I'm on the attack, I don't want my invading force to be full of empathetic people. If I'm on the defense, I want my troops full of patriotic fervor.

[Miristheiss]

Does having women in live combat make your fighting force stronger or weaker?

Weakening the capability of the military is not the goal so I think we have our answer

Not for the front line roles but do you think women should eligible for the draft just like men are?

[Joshydavid25]

No, and I think it would be a bit silly for them to be there.. Now this is not the same as being in the armed forces altogether.. I commend women who want to help out and do their due diligence.. But armed combat is another animal and even most women in the armed forces would rather not be in armed combat.. It's just not advantageous for women.. I wouldn't mind if my daughter went to the armed forces, but not to get into combat..

[Oncewildtwiceburned]

No, but women often do support men and armed combat.

A better question would be;

Do you support bringing back dueling?

If so what set of rules/laws should there be surrounding dueling?

In Texas they’re already is a form of this. It’s called. Mutual combat, It’s obviously less lethal than it’s predecessor of dueling with pistols or Sabres.

[lyrem04]

If it’s for self defence yea. If it’s military battles or wars related let’s let the men fight the issues they created themselves, there’s no need to have women risking their lives for no reason.

[RavVid]

In some roles but, despite feminism claims to the contrary, women aren't as strong as men. There are funny videos of women failing badly at the physical side of things.

There must be something they can do though.

[lightbulb27]

some of them would enjoy killing people.

yes. However, not everyone. If have to draft everyone, it's a bad day. Some people have no business being in that situation... including men.

[AviatorTom]

I wouldn't want women in a situation where they are involved in hand-to-hand combat, but other combat duties would be fine, if they are fit and pass all the relevant training.

[XXblack88]

Well even the lowest ranked soldier has to know how to fight hand to hand don't they?

[AviatorTom]

@XXblack88 Knowing how to fight hand-to-hand and knowingly being put in a situation where hand-to-hand fighting is required are two different things.

[Anonymous]

They rarely position woman on the front line. Supporting your country requires understanding possible ultimate sacrifice. If woman want to then that is their choice, not the choice of those around them.

[Sachem]

Pulling a trigger is as easy as opening a door. There is nothing extra special about women in combat. If that is the role they want, go for it.

[Drumlin2001]

If they are held to the same metrics as their male comrades and are capable then fine. But they should be there on merit, not just making up a quota. Same as any other demographic.

[SotiCoto]

"Support" how? It has nothing to do with me. I don't care. They can do what they like as long as they don't ask me for money or whatever.

[alice55]

Anyone wanting to serve their countries are good and needed.

[glennos89]

Definitely feminists should be supported in armed combat. Just to show them how how equal they really are to men

[Anonymous]

Men are generally stronger than females and faster because their testosterone levels are higher. Strength and speed is really important for these roles

[glennos89]

Say to any feminists. They will burn you for saying that😂🔥

[jshm2]

No, as we need the men to fight.

Not go to the shops, take out the trash, and kill "big" spiders.

[bddddd]

If she is physically capable, and let's be honest the difference in physical capability between men and women is about 10% on average, then of course yes. And kudos to her.

[msc545]

Sure, why not. If men have to take these risks at least in the US in order to support rich people making even more money, why shouldn't women have to take the same risks?

[236color]

If women expect equal rights, they should have equal responsibilities.

[ariadneR]

Absolutely.

My dad was in the Royal Army, my uncle was in the RAF, and my man is an ex Marine.

[14gurlz2gagonit]

Just like women's sports, men are going to dominate it.

[XXblack88]

Yes if they are willing to put their life on the line if needed and they pass basis training I don't see why not.

[Maybe_Maybe_not]

Uhhhh I'm not women's daddy, why would I have a say on this topic, I have no legitimacy.

[Anonymous]

No. When things get ugly in battle, most women will be more a liability than an asset to their fellow soldiers. DEI has no place in combat.

[exitseven]

I do but they must be able to pass the same physical requirements as men.

[Shiprex]

If they are on my side yes, if not they're a target.

[Shiprex]

Update yes to both

[DrPepper12]

Without a doubt!!! My neighbor is ex IDF and she can fuck your life up 17 different ways before you blink.

[Pohjolan]

Ideally no but practically yes.

There would be way less medically trained people to recruit from if we'd bar women from serving in front line units.

[LiamJHayden]

No, mainly because enemies are prone to rape captured female combatants and women are more important to the pertuation of the species.

[BDRick]

Yeah in certain positions, certainly. I mean there are done bad ass women who could kick my ass in a sliver of time

[Blackcat1952]

Hard question I feel 🤔 YES And No For the women it should be obvious why

[TwoToTooTutu2]

I am all for women volunteering, but not conscription unless absolutely necessary.

[Babygirl_S]

Not my cup of tea but those who like can go for it

[Staximus]

Women are naturally better shooters than men

[Reina04]

Sure, why not if she is capable, plus not everyone has arms.

[Twalli]

If they're willing to fight to protect my freedoms, I don't see why I should have a problem with it.

[Godihateyou]

I dont support anyone in combat. Stop killing each other for Israel.

[Anonymous]

Well, I'm not militant, but I like dominant girls ;)

[Chichi90]

A wise man once said trauma makes men more experienced. But it breaks women.

[Dіlԁοphοbe]

I pay taxes so yes

[Fireguy17]

sure, they can kill someone just as well as a man.

[adventurous-1]

yes, its common in many parts of the world.

[soe11]

• Absolutely yes.

[WonderingManII]

I have mixed feelings about this.

[Jackblue]

Yes, they do well in the Israeli military.

[Jeff51]

Of women want to join then why not.

[seeyounexttuesday]

I don't think it's a good idea.

[Agape93]

Yeap.

[SaoirseS]

Yes.

[Kingofkings1992]

No, I absolutely do not

[DawnB]

Yes I do