
So everyones ok with a bloated convict unilaterally starting another war?

Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
With permission from the US, they said they would do it, trump said alright let me evacuate first, then Iran asked one more time for confirmation and trump went yea alright let it rip, they did it and everyone counted that as evening things out and now we got no more beef with Iran from what I heard
It was publicized like this so Iran looks cool in the history books. 💀
You can search it, no casualties, no injuries cause the base was empty
you weren't complaining about a confused old white man doing the same.
nope, I'm not. but don't think he will if plays his cards right. but he could, no doubt.
Iran has been attacking war with the US for decades we've just been ignoring them. How many times has Iran attacked America in the last 40 years?
Is a coup detat possible in America? Would elements of the military or federal law enforcement take over the US Government?
Iran has tried to assassinate Trump, would that count?
Isn't that what former democrat tulsi gabbard was talking about in regards to the US government's foreign policy of perpetual regime change wars and the Democrats branded her a Russian spy as well as her opposition to arming Syrian rebels for fear the weapons would end up in the hands of Islamic extremists
What terrorism so Saudi Arabia or Qatar fund?
No. Maga are not okay. They are freaked the hell out, daily on the mistake they voted for.
Opinion
5Opinion
I am not okay for a bloated career criminal getting released on bail.
www.nytimes.com/.../...bail-smuggling-charges.html
Yes but the difference between the two is that in a month Trump will still be here.
nypost.com/.../
do you really think we live in a "democracy" where that would have been avoided by the will of the people?
and who makes the decisions in congress? your vote? or the most genorous donor? we live in an indirect oligarchy with partly democratically voted representants. there's nothing "democratic" about our policy level decision making.
you don't need to "explain" representative democracy. you need to "understand" it. "representative" demcracy is supposed to work like you vote for the person who's gonna best represent your interest as to then vote on your behalf in congress. we all know this. but what does happen? did you ever follow policy decisions and watched who voted for what policy? in most cases, these votes aren't even transparent. only in special cases. and in special cases what you tend to see is that representants decide wildly different thnigs than what they promised the voters they promised to represent. and what system is there in place to keep that from happening? fuck all. that's why i say we don't actually live in a democracy. cause the representants aren't legally bound to actually represent what the people they are representing actually want.
and i'm not saying either democrats or republicans are doing it any better so don't try to push me in some corner again. i'm a centrist and i think if we have the digital technology to vote for a new representant in a very short time, then why are we not kicking out the representants and just do direct democracy instead of a federal republic that has some pretend democratic elements so the pople just shut up.
the thing is because i'm a centrist and you're far left, i seem hardcore right to you while the actual harcore right see me as a leftist. that's what being a centrist is. being hated by the black and white world of either side xD
it doesn't make a difference who's the president or what party wins. the result is always the same and that's me and you getting fucked and betrayed.
like if you were to completely bash biden and kamala for a change, you'd find that i'd defend them to a degree too. as a centrist, you don't hate 100% of either side but 50% of both. and there certainly is a lot of stuff that we'd probably agree on like for example i think that he's wasting a lot of money trying to deport people that never bothered anyone. not that being an illegal immigrant is ok but there certainly is more pressing issues that the ressources would be much better invested in.
Well he didn't start a war. He retaliated for the attack on an American embassy. Of course that was a crappy excuse to help Israel but as of yet, it's not a war.
get yer fax straight, m8. No war was started by President Trump. But a terrorist nation's ability to make nuclear weapons was blown the heck up. Why are all the anti-Trumpers so insistent that Iran needs to be able to build nuclear weapons?
If it makes you crazy, sure.
War over queer bag
It is?
www.washingtonpost.com/.../
Yes
Queer bag
The only opinion from girls was selected the Most Helpful Opinion, but you can still contribute by sharing an opinion!
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions