Why would women think that they would make better leaders. Even though they're celebrating someone's death right now?

[chris_987]

Basically or women forget that they're capable of evil too

[Chazmatazz269]

It’s 100% lies and misinformation.
When you actually compare female leaders to males over ANY stretch of global time, female leaders have been FAR more likely than their male counterparts to initiate war and perpetuate war when peaceful options are presented. One of the contributing factors previously debated is the fact that women have never been conscripted to war efforts. Who could possibly oppose war when they have literally nothing to lose, and everything to gain?
This is one of the stone cold facts that feminists refuse to acknowledge, let alone debate. Simply because their rhetoric is diametrically opposed to the facts.
You can even examine the empirical evidence of IPV to make a natural conclusion about the fundamental condition of our species.
https://www.cdc.gov/intimate-partner-violence/about/index.html?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/index.html



An entire class of people who can declare war, while remaining entirely unaffected by that decision is pure privilege by ANY reasonable standard. THAT is modern feminism, in a nutshell.

[Hardon-Collider]

Because they're celebrating a death that is an expression of the very same force that would create that kind of leader. That force is an intensely personal, personality-based one. It's the force that created a group of children and had them guided by a single father. The ideal of a female leader is a memory of that kind of group-soul consciousness, where decisions weren't made by individuals but by a collective. The celebration of this death is the modern manifestation of that same principle.

[SecretsofKB]

I really do hate this whole gender against gender thing. I have seen absolute dog shit leaders of any gender and I have also see incredible leaders I would follow through hell for any gender.

Gender does not decide the quality of the leader. Personality characteristics do.

[chris_987]

I've always said that. But the sentiment lately has been if women were in charge. There would never be any war. That kind of flies in the face of what's currently going on where women are just as capable of celebrating a man's death.

So oftentimes we forget that women are these perfect creatures that are incapable of doing any wrong. The truth is, they're just as imperfect as any man

[Anonymous]

Maybe you miss the point. Ask the woman celebrating the death.

[chris_987]

No, I didn't miss the point. There are genuinely people that believe that every woman is this perfect creature. That's incapable of doing anything. And that men are are nothing but these wild creatures that harm women.

That's literally why we had the whole man versus bear argument. It's them from the fact that women are better human beings than men. But if one woman displays the capability of being happy that somebody died, then that would be not true for any women. Because that would mean all women have the capacity for evil.

[Anonymous]

and they have the audacity to say men are being radicalized by the alt-right pipeline or Qanon conspiracy theories or manosphere or whatever bullshit they can come up with to avoid accountability

I hate to break it to you but the red-pill doesn't recruit... it lets our gynocentric society do all the talking to do all the recruiting for the red-pill

[chris_987]

Right. If there is an alt-right pipeline then there's all left wing pipeline that indoctrinates women to believe they are equal to a man and can get tattoos and have lesbian relationships. Everybody is a victim of their own group Think.

[DrPepper12]

ALL WOMEN? Kind of a blanket statement there, no? In an ideal world any political representative would have 51% women and 49% men

[Anonymous]

Hey, don't throw all of us in there.

[chris_987]

The "all" argument is used to justify women in the first place. You do realize that a lot of women think that women are just better human beings than men. So they've already used the "all" argument to prove their point.

If one woman is showing the capacity for evil then that means all women have the capacity for evil. So you can never again say that women are better human beings than men and would make better decisions.

Like or for example war is caused by one side believing the other is evil and we have to defend or take them out. Now if women are capable of evil I. e celebrating a young man's death. That means even if they were leaders, they would also justify going to war against another evil woman. So the point still stands. You can't say generally that women would make better leaders than men based on the fact that only men are evil. When it's obvious that women are just as capable of doing evil too.

[Opinion Owner]

Pick any group of people, you will find people in that group that think their group is better than other groups. Women don't have that market cornered.

We are all capable of evil, men and women alike. What matters is what we do with that. And, I agree that celebrating a man's murder is giving in to that evil nature. Do you think that every person that is doing that is a woman? I don't think so.

I don't think women make better leaders. I don't think men make better leaders. I look at people as individuals.

[chris_987]

Well, let's take women's presents. For example, I was once told that because there's no violence in women's prisons, that means that women are better human beings than men.

But in women's prisons straight women go in there and because they want companionship so much they become gay for the duration that they're in there. That would indicate to me that women gravitate towards having a weaker sense of self and are willing to do whatever just to fit in.

So some people are don't see the negative aspects of being follower by that would indicate that they have less leadership qualities than men

[Opinion Owner]

Whoever said women's prisons aren't violent has never been inside one. My mom worked in one. It was a brutal place.

[chris_987]

Well according to my research men commit more violence towards each other in general e. i gang fights/ scuffles. Whereas women commit more sexual violence towards each other e. i domestic abuse. So I'm still not wrong because man will have large-scale fights with each other. While women will have intimate fights with one another. Which is what I thought the data would say. Women don't generally join gangs

[seeyounexttuesday]

It’s pussified men too

[Metaworld]

It's not a gender thing.