What do you think about Nick Fuentes?

[Anonymous]

I like him

I don’t like him

[Hardon-Collider]

I first time looked him up to verify the accusations of him doing this to this person How did Charlie stop a bill to enslave US manufacturers to Israel just days after his jew mentor Horowitz died? But similar passed on his killing day?

Which i quickly confirmed is nonsense.

I also found that he said that men who date women are slightly gay in comparison to men who don't.

This statement, like most of his jokes, provoked a lot of retards. Yet that statement was half serious. And i understand what he meant, while most critics seem confused, trying to decide if he uses "gay" as a slur or to mean homo, neither of which is appropriate to men who date women.

Simply, gay can mean having more things in common with women than average. Many women want to only spend long hours only with men that agree with them about what some third wave feminist posted online and validate them, have similar hobbies.

I think @d_bone_steak said something similar. Straight men hook up with women, marry them. But going out on dates, gossiping, posting on Instagram, all of that for a man is more feminine than healthy. And it's therefore gay.

[D_Bone_Steak]

You're on the right path and have the skills to logically check everything that gets said. I think you'll probably have it more figured out than I in 2 weeks time.

[Hardon-Collider]

@d_bone_steak you mention that ring switching... i heard it on the very first day. and i never mention it because.. so what? what conclusion does the ring teleport lead to? it might be weird, but i don't want to describe bizarre stuff that leads to nowhere.

no, i am not trying to troll you. check my final video now... it is beyond simple "video evidence."

there is a key element called "logic and reasoning"

all these bullshit conspiracy videos, especially a flood of them on twitter? really counterintelligence. just like the flat earth shit. do you know how much money is drained into conspiracy theories... just to keep us dumb?

and i am not as autistic as it looks, investing time into producing videos every day that get watched by 15 people. i actually post on other channels that have some sort of larger audience. which i aim to receive feedback from with each video. but at the end the comments are never helpful. people who bother to comment only ever agree on what i propose.

so i have to think for myself, unfortunately.

which implies being so autistic that i faked a chat message exchange... conveys the idea though:

i.ibb.co/.../...nshot-from-2025-09-19-19-04-47.png

it actually is a conversation i had with other people.

watch this video now, it is really short, and has NO BULLSHIT finger pointing at insignificant video glitches, i promise that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HztM1EHxKAY

At the end my mind is open, and you can convince me that a tranny lover killed Kirk. I just need this narrative to find the answers to all the inconsistencies that my video answers.

[WhiteSteve]

Piece of shit. It’s funny he and Charlie Kirk were at odds, because I see as the same kind of evil.

These two are/were the poster-children for why I fear for my young female cousins going forward. I do NOT want them living their lives subserviently in a country or world such as what Fuentes or Kirk would envision.

If your worldview has anything to do with tacitly accepting, fostering, or forcing any sort of inequality, particularly based on your identity, then I am strongly anti-“you.”

[Joshydavid25]

Charlie Kirk thanked a Trans individual for telling him their story, and even though he disagreed with them, he treated them with respect and wished the best for them.. I wouldn't call a guy like that "evil".. People take a few of his opinions out of context and paint him as some far right activist.. When really he was more a moderate, very Christian, conservative..

[D_Bone_Steak]

Wow... So you're justifying someone doing the same to you for your shit opinions? I mean according to your logic, it's just justified because you hold a different opinion and tried to argue your point. That's amazing. You'll feel the same if it happened to Hassan Piker or Destiny?

[WhiteSteve]

@Joshydavid25 well, as respectfully as possible, I’m seeing Christianity, at least Evangelical Christianity, taking a bad turn causing a lot of roadblocks to necessary social progress to the point where we might need to have some tough conversations about it. Christianity (and any other religion) needs to remain 0% of any conversation pertaining to society at large. I don’t think Jesus would rock with what’s being pushed by a lot of the so-called Christians in this country. Like I feel like I do a MUCH better job adhering to REAL Christian values without even being a Christian, frankly. I see a lot of Christians using religion to justify hate instead of promoting love. And that sucks. I know that might ruffle some feathers, but I’m serious.

I heard Charlie Kirk before he died. I thought his opinions were loathsome. I still do. And I heard them in context, I don’t feel better about them. He was free to say it, he shouldn’t have gotten sniped in the neck over it, and I’m sympathetic for his loved ones, and him. I didn’t want him to die, I wanted him to go away or just become a better person with a better message. I don’t want to smite enemies, I wanted Americans to rediscover common decency and stop trying to re-negotiate for a lowered bar of humanity and empathy. I much preferred the world I grew up in BEFORE Trump, where we just didn’t say mean and stupid things out loud and disrespect the spirit of our First Amendment. Speech being free doesn’t make all speech good, valid, or socially acceptable. You just aren’t supposed to be harmed or imprisoned for it. But we absolutely SHOULD, as a society, call out hate and bigotry and ignorance for what it is, and never make the environment comfortable for it, or push for its societal acceptance.

[WhiteSteve]

@Joshydavid25 As for “context”…. this video really explains well the tactics behind Charlie’s (and others’) communication style, what he’s doing, and the cover he gives himself…
https://youtu.be/wRz_31MWwYc

We can’t ever mistake a peacefully-delivered message as inherently non-toxic. You don’t have to yell or make physical threats to push evil. I appreciate that he hd a debate with a trans person, but it doesn’t undo the stuff he pushes that contributes to negative societal attitudes towards trans folks that they have to live with everyday. He’s still went on his podcast and would call them “abominations to God.” He’s free to say it, and I’m free to think he’s a terrible person for thinking that way🤷‍♂️

[WhiteSteve]

@D_Bone_Steak Not at all, man. Life is way more spectral than that. That’s kind of my beef with how the right is responding to this. Nobody that matters is saying anything that disrespectful, everyone has done the minimum of saying “this shouldn’t have happened.” The absolute worst I’ve heard is “My feelings on it are complicated”, and they were almost entirely people who were in Charlie’s crosshairs as far as speaking negatively of them, so why SHOULD they be mourning him? I haven’t heard a single “good riddance” except from internet randos. And we don’t even need to start with comparisons of some of these same people reacted to violence against liberals.

It’s not as simple as “Charlie Kirk was killed and I feel terrible/great about it.” No one is required to mourn anybody, and not doing so isn’t an endorsement of the violence. It’s completely valid to acknowledge the murder as deplorable, condemn the killer, broadly denounce political violence…. and that’s mostly being done, we’re just adding “I was no fan of the guy.” And honestly, “free speech” dictates that I could bathe in his blood and dance on his grave, but the whole reason I’m liberal in the first place is because being an at least passively-good person to all people is the most important value I hold, so that’s not my angle.

What’s not being done is pretending that he was a better person in life than he was. I honestly think most of the 40+ right wingers barely even knew the guy, and he gets killed in gruesome fashion on camera, so now we’re apparently just sanitizing and mainstreaming his ideas, and he’s suddenly St. Charlie Kirk, Patron Saint Of Free Speech?

[WhiteSteve]

@D_Bone_Steak Just be honest about who he was and what he said. If he was that great, we shouldn’t be having to defend his quotes, or act like it’s disrespectful to just highlight the things he said that made him famous. Not for nothing, delivering words calmly and in a normal tone of voice doesn’t make your words less harmful. He was influencing the young men of this country to adopt mentalities that I don’t want my young female cousins having to experience in their lives.

I’m not going to celebrate him or his words. I’m going to acknowledge that it shouldn’t have happened, I don’t care if he was right or left or part of this 4Chan meme blackpill community, I don’t care what Charlie said for him to snipe him…. it was wrong. That’s all I’m required to give, and general human respect to those who care for him. But I can’t pretend the stuff he was championing was good for either America or humanity.

I’ve heard of Piker and Destiny but don’t know them. I don’t know what they stand for, but if it’s hateful towards harmless people like Kirk’s messaging, I wouldn’t endorse it. If it’s the opposite, more likely, but I’d have to hear it. I don’t let “debate bros” shape my opinion, I went to college, lmfao, I’m way smarter than that. But I think we can just call it a rule that we shouldn’t sever spinal cords and carotid arteries in front of a live audience. I’m just saying that you own your words both in life and in death, and I’m not going to switch gears because someone died. If 2Pac wasn’t your best rapper of all time in August ‘96, he shouldn’t become it the next month because he got killed, with all due respect, just an example.

[WhiteSteve]

@D_Bone_Steak I feel like if a left wing commentator died, the outrage and outpouring of support from the right wouldn’t be what is being demanded by them for Kirk now. I think Biden will probably tap out before Trump is gone, if I’m guessing, and I don’t think they’re going to pull out all the stops for him. Like I wonder if he’ll get a typical Presidential funeral, because Trump is THAT petty. I guess I’m comparing a president to a debate bro/podcaster, but you get what I’m saying. I don’t think the right extends the same courtesies to the left that they seem to expect back from them. It’s like if your attitude isn’t “We are all Charlie Kirk✊🫡🇺🇸”, then you might as well have pulled the trigger yourself🙄

[D_Bone_Steak]

You wrote so much only to say so little.

The right is this or that, yet no real examples. Why did you feel the need to bring Kirk into a question about Nick at all? You said Nick is a piece of shit and then started rambling on about Kirk which is what I'm wondering what brings you to these conclusions? Do you even have any true premise to your conclusions?

From what I wrote and out of what you wrote, I think we only align on finding the religious stuff as cringe... you do that with Islam too?, because I do. Or, are you just parroting the Amazing Atheist still and think you're an edgy leftist that's still carrying on the tradition of banging on Christians all the back in 2015?

[Joshydavid25]

I do agree that a lot of so called "Christians" don't espouse for the Love of God and to bring as many people to him as possible.. But just try to seem morally superior.. But you could say the exact same for the left.. They're even worse TBH, and their beliefs are backed up by big institutions..

Charlie Kirk is one of the more milk toast right leaning people who don't say a lot of the harsher truths about the issues he talks about.. I think society has leaned far too left to the point where any right talking points is deemed hate..

The video you showed me seemed strawmanning.. He was putting idealogy into Charlie Kirk that wasn't there.. His initial premise was designed to catch attention so that he could explain himself.. The guy then explains the general requirements for pilots, but don't go into how they were helping all the "Black" aviator trainees cheat.. Or the statistics and whatnot.. That's just like mentioning the requirements of Harvard and that students have to have a certain SAT score, but fail to mentithat they let "Black" students with lower test scores.. He calls Charlie Kirk manipulative, but he's content is definitely trying to manipulate his viewers in a way.. At worst Charlie Kirk made a few provocative comments that dug into a certain group of people.. But, if you actually listened to the man he never sounded hateful..

[WhiteSteve]

@D_Bone_Steak sure, that’s a fair question. I brought up Kirk because, at least at the time I wrote it (I’m just going to kick back and wait for the trial at this point rather than listen to politically charged scuttlebutt about the killer’s leanings, because it’s been all over the place, and ultimately it doesn’t matter because the killer’s actions don’t speak for their entire political fellowship, whoever it is, if anyone), there was evidence pointing to him being some 4Chan edgelord, carving meme quotes into his casings. 4Chan edgelords and Fuentes followers, from what I understand, are often one and the same.

Fuentes, his little “your body, my choice” rant after the election…. that is EXACTLY what I don’t want my young female cousins encountering in men. So anyone who pushes misogynist messages, we’re done, immediate clean cut.

Likewise for Charlie Kirk, all the “submit to your husband”, kept woman shit…. also the opposite of the world I want my cousins becoming adults in. Most Gen Z men I meet are fucking CLOWNS. My cousins are intelligent young women with good hearts who have extremely bright futures ahead of them, and I fear for them due to the male peers they have to choose from.

Also, most people I care about in my life who I don’t share blood with are not white people. I also have some friends who are LGBTQ, and one is even a trans-man. Neither Fuentes or Kirk express opinions that make America a better place or Americans better humans. Their messages, albeit with different degrees of energy in their statements, are divisive and teach people that folks not like them are, essentially “doing life wrong” while Kirk and Fuentes claim that being all kinds of shitty things in your worldview are “doing life right.” And that’s honestly objectively preposterous.

[WhiteSteve]

@D_Bone_Steak Basically, any movement or person who is. perpetuating any sort of bigotry or cloaked bigotry disguised as “common sense” or “logic” (it never is🙄🤦‍♂️) that seeks to elevate or solidify the social superiority or advantages of white people, men, or straight people is my sworn enemy who I roll out of bed every morning to do battle with. And I didn’t need to go to a “liberal” college or watch “liberal” media to figure that out. It’s floor-level human decency, and to violate it is INdecency. I can’t have ridiculous arguments about “who’s to say?”, I’m sorry.

Don’t be racist. Don’t be sexist. Don’t be homophobic. Don’t be transphobic. Don’t be xenophobic, etc, etc, etc, the FULLEST of fucking stops. We’ve completely lost the plot if we’re negotiating if bigotry is ok or not.

I have the same issues with Sharia Law, yes. It’s important to know that Sharia is not the law in most sects of Islam though. Sharia Law Muslims are the Islamic equivalent of Christian holy rollers. They’re both extremists. Most Muslims aren’t going around stoning gay people to death or throwing acid on women’s faces for not concealing them. I respect people’s right to follow Islam and Christianity alike….. but it’s supposed to inform 0% of our laws and social norms. I just don’t go after Sharia Law because it’s halfway across the world and I’m trying to get our own house in order. Christian Fundamentalists are the problem WE have.

I’d call myself “doubtful Agnostic”, not atheist. I could never say for sure, so I can’t truly claim atheism. I don’t really think any humans have hit the bullseye yet though, so the world is kind of fucked, following the wrong things.

[WhiteSteve]

@D_Bone_Steak None of my shit is meant to be edgy. I’m the anti-edgelord. I’m not running around perma-offended, I have a great sense of humor. You can call things “gay” or “retarded”, I’m not gonna kick up dust. And I have some close Gay friends and “retarded”, if you will, half brother who I’m a legal guardian to. I have some skin in those games, but I’m not trying to word police people. I know a joke from an insult. I don’t agree with a lot of your memes in principle but I think some are funny. I’m not a stiff, you know? I’m fun at parties, I like tits & ass, and eating meat, and throwing weights around, and playing sports, and all that happy horseshit. I just don’t understand people having unprovoked problems with groups of people who aren’t doing anything but existing as they are, and OTHERS trying to make their lives less comfortable because they don’t fit some totally frivolous standard they think others need to adhere to. The only broad standard anyone can legitimately argue for is “no standard”, just universal acceptance, minus like pedos and some shit we can all agree is fucked.

I’m not trying to bang on anyone. If someone uses Christianity (or Islam, or whatever) to bring the best out of themselves, I’m all for it. I just find it’s very often not the case.

Bottom line: I brought up Kirk because in that moment the rumor mill was saying the shooter was a “Groyper” follower of Fuentes, which my understand is pretty alt-right. I think of Kirk as alt-right as well. Like once “well the Bible dictates that…” comes out of your mouth related to law or society, you are officially alt-right. And that kind of seems to be some of Charlie’s messaging, Bible-related. I’m not sure if Fuentes is as religious, but it all ends with the same message of “white people, men, and heterosexuals” are the gold standard, and everyone else is here at our behest and should fall in line with our standard as the only way to truly be considered a full-fledged “American.”

[WhiteSteve]

@Joshydavid25 ok, so, in the interest of brevity (mark the date, this is a record for me, lmao)….. What is “too far left” in your opinion? To me, I see it as “right = exclusion; left = acceptance”, frankly. That’s maybe slightly too cut-and-dry, but for the sake of the argument, that’s what I see and the entire reason I oppose the right.

Short of maybe pedophilia, I can’t think of a single thing in life that’s “existing as you naturally are” that human society should ever oppose. Anything goes. If you like it, I love it, as long as it stops short of harming anyone else…. and “being annoyed or weirded out by it” doesn’t qualify as harm. And all the “tHeY’rE pUtTiNg KiTtY LiTtEr BoXeS iN sChOoL bAtHrOoMs!” isn’t a real thing, I hope everyone knows😂😂😂

I’m just trying to figure out what your angle is. You seem like a good dude, I’m just not sure what you think is going on

[D_Bone_Steak]

You were singing music to my ears, but this is where you flicked that switch off "I just don’t understand people having unprovoked problems with groups of people who aren’t doing anything"

Really? Unprovoked even though they're statistical factually provoked by killing us. I'll continue to read but I already feel like you're not in good faith at all by saying that.

I almost rage quit you... I kept reading. I get it that you were fed a shit sandwich that the shooter was a groyper, because the libtards badly want you to think it was one of them or MAGA or anything other than them. I hope you get pissed off that you get manipulated like that. Nick Fuentes claims Catholic by the way... he talks about it all the time, so I know you haven't listened to him.

Look at the sources of the message that "white people, men, and heterosexuals" are to be murdered. Look at them and convince me that they're morally better or even living in reality. I happen to be all those things so I don they want me dead. You any of those things? White, male, straight? The left hates you if you are... and you realize that right?

[D_Bone_Steak]

I have to deal with left wing media lying their asses off so I want to make sure it's clear I'm not trying to bang on you. I get told Melissa Hortman a left wing politician is shot dead by a far right Nazi fascist. Go ahead and fact check that like I did. The killer was appointed to his position by Tim Waltz and had flyers in his back seat to support the No Kings Protest. How is he far right? Dig further... she voted against giving health care to illegal immigrants. Wasn't left enough so the leftist killed her. Fact check these dirty fuckers. What you'll find out with the truth will make you hate them just as much as I do.

[D_Bone_Steak]

I brought her up for a reason by the way... because her being killed by a far right Nazi fascist gets thrown in my face as why the right didn't throw a pity party for her like they're doing for Charlie Kirk. Maybe they should have in my opinion. I mean she voted against free health care for illegal aliens while nobody gives a shit about veterans like me or our citizen homeless. I commend her. But some leftist loony goes and kills her over it in reality... and then her death is used as, "why didn't you treat her death like you treat Kirk's?" ... sick fuckers... the fucking mind games make me sick. It's like dealing with selfish women times ten. I'm done talking and I hope you sort of figure it out. You can write a lot like me and I just hope you are doing that effort while properly informed from now on. Use AI, fact check everything. The "debate me bro" fucks are falling off because I can give them 3 sources that back up any claim in 5 minutes. The only choice I made was to be honest about everything. I'm not choosing sides outside of my side being chosen for me outside of that. I'm told I'm shit by a certain group and that group lies and murders. Simple as that. Want to talk about Jan 6th, oh I bring up nobody was murdered except some female on the right and the conversation stops. Dig and fact check. Don't trust me and really stop trusting whoever fed you that shit sandwich and just start fact checking the shit out of them.

I wish you well... I was just speaking my mind on this one.

[FreyaRed]

He changes his mind too often. I think he is some kind of YT populist who just changes his political opinion according to social indignation to gain more subs and viewers. He is really good in superficial argumentation and it sound credible but after a while you will notice lot of contradictions in his personal ideology.
For me he is indifferent.

[avery58]

I don't like the far anything, so there's that. Also, how is he a white nationalist? He literally looks like any Hispanic's Tio Miguel. But at least he called for his followers to tone it down a notch and stop the psycho rhetoric that could lead to more violence. I'll give him credit for that.

[AI Opinion]

Nick Fuentes is a controversial figure known for his far-right views and inflammatory rhetoric. He's a political commentator with a divisive presence, often criticized for promoting white nationalist ideology. Many people find his ideologies offensive and problematic. It's crucial to engage in discussions critically and be informed about various perspectives while ensuring respectful dialogue. 🗣️

[D_Bone_Steak]

I enjoy his content. I don't agree with everything that comes out of his mouth, but show me someone that I do agree on everything with. Plus sides of him... race realist... and you might notice he has a lot of blacks that follow him, can't argue with facts unless you're a die hard leftist that lives in a cartoon land. Calls out the bullshit that is on the right about as much as he's calling out the bullshit on the left. Unapologetically honest. I suppose if I were Catholic and had the same stance on abortion, I would agree with him more so... but I'm pro-abortion/pro-choice af. I want lefties to murder their children and I don't mind if the criminal class of people do it as well... just a helpful byproduct of planned parenthood.

[D_Bone_Steak]

I forgot to mention he's anti-Israel and I am starting to think about the Jewish question... just not as much as I have black fatigue and woke fatigue.

Look... I think watching someone like Nick requires a mature mind, because an immature mind is gonna fly off the handle with an emotional response to it. Basically they're not listening with a critical mind. Shame on the fuckers that's never even watched him and they think they know exactly what he's about and could argue against him. Here is a video for one of those fuckers that will put me on blast just for enjoying his content... here is the last thing of his I just watched.

https://youtu.be/VwYSclTMVHk?si=cqVIB1_IQ-5bQMXx

It's not all that bad now is it? Maybe a little like your Dad chewing you for being a retard if you even have a Dad that has the balls to chew you out about shit. If that hurts anyone's feelings... they need to go back to their safe space and keep their opinions to themselves. Mature minds need to think, and these emotional weaklings should do our dishes and laundry while we think.

[Hardon-Collider]

lmfao netflix

[Hardon-Collider]

I don't get it. Kirk really was killed by jews, why would Nick be confused about that?

And i mean trump is a jew's puppet. and look at this, i verified this is NOT edited:



And it really was public knowledge that kirk was afraid of jooze x.com/HarrisonHSmith/status/1955705962964111425

if you watched the crap i put on youtube, charlie really did say that he treats his donors like Germany in 1930s just to be extra careful, their control over his speech.

[Hardon-Collider]

I am not a know it all. I want to learn the most truthful model.

@d_bone_steak what's that about nick calling people "low iq anti semites" at 32:17 those who say "it is israel, not jews"

that's exactly what i say. "it is israel, not jews". how is it not so? why is this low iq?

[Hardon-Collider]

besides that twitter link, there really were multiple videos, also posted before the assassination, where kirk complains about israel threatening him for speech.

[Hardon-Collider]

fuck, wtf https://ibb.co/yFKPzpYN

[D_Bone_Steak]

@Hardon-Collider Beware of falling for the false rhetoric out there. I like some Jews. So I totally understand the difference between Jews and Israel as a state/country... As I saw on 4chan/pol today, they're tanking down the last buildings on the Gaza strip... they went scorched earth and they did it with the U. S. help. Now keep in mind I hate Palestine and any sand nugga more than like them, but I'm just recognizing what is being done... I mean Bacon is fucking tasty and I like to drink alcohol... I also don't like fuckers that rape kids. But don't assume I know anything you don't... fact check every damn thing I say.

Here is the thing in my brain... Kirk was a total cuck for Israel for the longest and he questioned it just a little bit with Ben Shapiro.
He questioned some things before he got shot by a tranny lover. I personally think that's just a coincidence and not something the Jewish state would take him out over. Left wingers on the other hand would totally love for you to believe that so it takes the heat off them and their vile reaction of blood lust and joy in a murder. I suggest you stop... and take a real hard look at the people putting out the information you're finding. You're on Twitter so look at their past tweets... lefties right? I mean any far right fascist nazi isn't going to push that it was the Jews unless they're grifting as in getting money or fame off of doing so. Just remember we are not cucks, so don't let them cuck you with false naratives. Check their background like past tweets... modus operandi will become super obvious after doing so.
... research them first, instead of what they're saying. It's the quickest way to figure out why they're saying what they're saying. Everyone has motives... and even though some seek the truth, it's easy to get misled out there.

[D_Bone_Steak]

@Hardon-Collider Iryna Zarutska is a good example of what I'm on about that just happens to match with the Kirk situation. The left's reaction was the same... blame the victim... They took joy in it. She deserved it because white... and then their media just tried to ignore it completely because they knew it didn't fit their narrative.

Really matches the Kirk situation right? Then their news articles went on to blame MAGA or anyone for just noticing. Their goblins are what they are and their media serve them to the best of their ability. You even heard about the story either because you're around people talking about it or you're connected to the internet over cable television. I already know you're internet inclined like myself.

[Hardon-Collider]

naw the job was 100% inside job. as i say, 100.0% to bastardize a scientific mathematical emphasis that it is not rounded up to 100% but full 100%... it is an inside job.

I am not convinced charlie died at all, it could possibly have been staged. Like the neck had a pressure-burst disk behind a pipe, a solenoid remote controlled valve of pressurized blood, causing that sudden jerk of the t shirt upward...

I suggest watch the whole thing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otNolbXS22Y

i mean i could list all the raw videos if you want to verify if there was a chest plate, i think it is possible, like look at the very last frame: packaged-media.redd.it/.../m2-res_480p.mp4

this time, i double checked that none of my claims in my video are based on digitally manipulated videos.

but you saw the agent behind charlie doing the hand signal. the same.. probably a jew... who was with donna trump at the shooting moment.

and then you get multiple witnesses talking about a shooter with a tactical helmet: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/vu5xVVFzfa0

[D_Bone_Steak]

@Hardon-Collider *D_Bone_Steak is staring at you. "Figure it out" he says. Then puts his head down on his desk and sits in silence. Deep inside D_Bone has faith you will logically come to the greater conclusion.

[Hardon-Collider]

i mean that fox news video playing a witness talking about a tactical helmet, video was published on sept 11th, i checked the metadata of this video, it was published at 1:45 pm after noon (of utah's time zone). which means about 25 hours after the shooting. the dispatch audio probably was recorded immediately right after the shooting. so the tranny was not caught. so hypothetically, just to rule this out, liberals didn't know yet to push against the narrative of a tranny doing it. the witnesses of a black tactical helmet are authentic.

[D_Bone_Steak]

@Hardon-Collider Bro... You know I had close ups of the guy 4 to 30 minutes after it happened flooding in. The dude was in love with a tranny... not a tranny himself though. Also the tranny was a furry too. I didn't see no tactical helmets anywhere.

That Tranny snitched on him hard... you'll see when he goes to court. The shooter is just a f*****.

[D_Bone_Steak]

@Hardon-Collider Wished I could show you the private pics of the tranny... the dude must've sucked some good dick to get the guy to get that political in the opposite direction of his parents. The Tranny wasn't even as political as him or his parents. Just a dick loving furry homosexual that dresses like a girl.

[D_Bone_Steak]

I'm watching Nick right now
https://youtu.be/VhMIyXXGLoE?si=81cwIvbig-5TZjSf
I remember when I first started watching the Hodge twins... They were a work out channel and had nothing to do with politics. They weren't famous enough at the time to hang with me and I was hanging out with the guys from Jackass instead. But I was into weight lifting. Which WAS what they were all about before they became the conservative twins. Is what it is I guess... Look at at how they take dealing with Nick though... just like me and sheeeeeeeeit.

[D_Bone_Steak]

I wake up to this...
https://youtu.be/_IBOlYQ8CFU?si=3y9Wrz0q868qau3V

[D_Bone_Steak]

I can see how Asmondgold/Sargon of Akkad consumers like me are leaning in the Nick direction rather than Tucker Carlson.

[Hardon-Collider]

i still don't fucking get it how anyone would deny that the Kirk case is an inside job. 100% was one, just like 9/11. Who was behind it? extremely, extremely likely that it was the same people as those behind 9/11. which were jooze.

again, i don't get why the fuck fuentes says "low iq anti semites distinguish zionists from jews but high iq anti semites don't."

[Hardon-Collider]

see, that bulge lover did not have a helmet. what was that report all about then?

i just watched nick talk about cucks, dykes, trannies, how they celebrate it. but none of this excuses the inconsistencies committed by the same fbi infamous for staging other false flags.

it is a fucking joke. tranny inscriptions on the bullet. another with "fascist, catch." how much more staged could that be?

[D_Bone_Steak]

@Hardon-Collider Trying to troll me with the inside job stuff... har har. If not, someone is trying to troll you with that bullshit. I recognize troll bait and I'm not trying to troll myself right now, so I'm not worried about our lines getting tangled which would fuck up both our troll lines as well as the fish we would catch. I've already seen all these things you're bringing up on X. I'm surprised you didn't bring up how his ring switched fingers... I've seen these things brought up already and watched them all one by one torn down already... they're old conspiracy theories that's already been debunked by other autists on the internet.

Look into his ring if you haven't... it's pretty interesting about that trick ring he had. Hopefully you run across the video of him using it like I did.

[Joshydavid25]

I don't think about him at all.. I've listened to him and some the things he says aren't bad at all.. But I've mostly heard bad things about even on the right..

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

I heard the guy happily compared himself to Hitler so…

[Iron_Man]

I can’t follow every Tom Dick, and Harry that comes along. I follow President Trump not Nick Fuentes I keep myself quite busy hearing about Trump

[Iron_Man]

I never even heard of him before Fuentes

[DrPepper12]

Dickless bag o dicks. More of an ass actually. No wait. A pussy. I don't know. Just a POS 💩

[Anonymous]

people hate him because he speaks the truth far more than even Charlie does

[AngryCarl2]

I don't know who that is, but he looks like a tosser.

[qwerty2469]

The fact that 86% dint like them adds up. 86% of the world is unhappy and in danger. Life is hard. Its even harder when you are stupid

[Danzigdawson]

Well, you should know. 😥 Hang in there.

[qwerty2469]

I wouldn't know. I've never been depressed. Married the love of my life early. Lived by the lord. Had 6 kids. 3 girls and 3 boys. All smart, socially loved and successful. I invested heavily in bitcoin since 2014 and retired happily at 43 years old.

[Nikki1989]

Typical right-wing asshole.

[Syntosi]

Is he not that right wing nazi who everyone hates?

[BCRanger10]

I don't think of him at all.

[Agape93]

He's a piece of shit.

[DrPepper12]

Hey!! Don't demean shit!! Shit is WAY better than him!!

[exitseven]

I just looked him up on line. Not a fan

[D_Bone_Steak]

Watch him a little bit if you didn't. I'm not saying you'll become a fan, but if you passed judgement on what is written about him instead of hearing him out... you'll never now. Then again maybe you have and I'm still right that you're not a fan. Shit, I'm not either, but I enjoy listening to him. I posted a video on my answer if you haven't had a real taste.

It's 100% cool if you don't like him after hearing him out a bit instead of what others write that he thinks. I'm only saying this because I passed judgement on him for the longest and then finally just listened. I still don't agree with everything... but I found myself agreeing with a lot.

[douride2]

I have no idea who he is.

[beefcakebradybatson]

He's a white supremacist POS. F**K HIM !!!

[Anonymous]

I think you far wingers can stop

[Wodens_Apprentice]

He's a gimp. I prefer Hitler.

[seeyounexttuesday]

I don't know much of all about him.

[Anonymous]

Not worth thinking about.

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

Who is he?

[RedInnocent69]

I don’t

[Anonymous]

i dont know him