What do you think? 🤔

Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
1. Treaty-Based Sovereignty (The Alaska Purchase, 1867)
The U. S. acquired Alaska from Russia through a formal international agreement commonly known as the Alaska Purchase.
2. Effective Occupation and Continuous Governance
After the transfer in 1867, the United States exercised what international law calls effective control, which strongly reinforces sovereignty claims, including:
Continuous civil and military administration
Enforcement of U. S. law
Settlement and economic development
Infrastructure, taxation, and courts
3. Statehood and International Recognition:
Alaska became a U. S. territory in 1912
Alaska became the 49th U. S. state in 1959
No nation has formally disputed U. S. sovereignty
There are several key strategic military bases in Alaska. It’s far more fortified than Greenland, and arguably better protected than most of Canada. It’s too rich in resources and strategic positioning to abandon it. That would be very dumb.
Whatever your day job, don’t give it up for economic or military strategy.
The same basis that assert control over the other states. Alaska was bought off the Russians, just like the Louisiana purchase.
And the island of Manhattan.
On the basis that it is a state. Albeit alone all by itself up there, and vastly empty, but a state nonetheless.
Because unfortunately at this time leader of the United States is a mentally ill criminal who has no respect for the sovereignty of other countries and no respect for our laws and we unfortunately have no method of getting rid of him for the next 3 years. Short of violence which nobody wants. There is nothing we can do to get rid of this guy in any reasonable period of time.
Opinion
24Opinion
Alaska was controlled by Russia until the US purchase was negotiated by Secretary of State Seward in 1867. Why should we now give it away?
WHAT!!! What School did you go to. Make sure your history teacher leaves as they can't teach< Alaska was purchased from Russia and he was ridiculed about it. Sewards Folly. Funny, turn out he could smell the gold and oil plus a very beauticul place if you have total mosquito netting on.
What is William Seward best known for?
William Henry Seward was appointed Secretary of State by Abraham Lincoln on March 5, 1861, and served until March 4, 1869. Seward carefully managed international affairs during the Civil War and also negotiated the 1867 purchase of Alaska.
Nah, the Russians gave it up in one of the worst land deals in history back in 1867 for the sum of $7.2 million. That's about $132 million in 2024 dollars.
Russia fucked itself by walking away from a strategic location, gold, oil, gas, and a huge fishing industry.
You think medieval Tsarist Russia should have anticipated the potential mineral wealth that a rock in the the Arctic might have 160 years later... potential wealth that largely is still not yet economic to exploit... and some conceivable desire to influence geopolitics through nuclear ballistic missile submarines? This is a country that largely twiddled its thumbs and thought idle thoughts while its peonage absorbed wave after wave of famines every few years through the carefully thought through strategy of dying? Okay, I'm using some artistic liberty, but hopefully you understand my point.
@bddddd 1867 was hardly medieval times. Those years were 500 - 1500 AD. And no I don’t expect Tsarist Russia or anyone else of that 1867 period to possess the geology to know oil and gold was there in Alaska in abundance. But having territory in the New World? I’m sure they were that smart.
None of that changes the fact that Russia made a huge mistake. 30 years later the Alaska gold rush kicked off in 1896. 50 years later, the fossil fuel Industrial Revolution was underway in Europe and the US. Canada and the US both wanted the land.
Property values for that chunk of real estate would have skyrocketed.
It's political structure was still medieval... royalty and 90% of the population tied to land. I agree it is unfair to characterise the whole country as medieval. I said I was being artistic.
I agree with your other points.
its an interesting question as to whom owns what, why and should they.
that will be the issue of our time for a while as the deck is reshuffled and hope not too many innocents get killed.
it was a treaty. why didn't Canada buy it?
Mostly because the people living there want to be Americans. That's how it should be, like the Falkland Islands and some Caribbean islands. The people who live there get to choose.
The only exception to that is when a bad actor removes all the residents and floods the area with their people, like Russia's doing in Ukraine.
Alaska was, at one time, part of Russia, and Russia sold it to the US in order to pay for some of its war debts. Considering it's the largest US state in area, with valuable resources, the US is not going to give it up.
Huge military presence. If there is a anti nuke iron dome system it's in alaska. Going over the north pole it's the closest point to Moscow.
Also ancorage has the largest cargo airport.
Alaska is in a strategic place and has vast oil reserves too. Tj3 US should hold on to it.
What are you talking about? If anything Russia needs to give the USA all their gold and oil...
Alaska was PURCHASED from Russia. It is now a state of the United States. What's the issue?
I know you remember from your history class that the USA bought Alaska from Russia in 1867. Don't you?
Ask the British, French. Spanish, Ottomans... Their "legal" authority was incentive and National interest. Ours is that we want and need Greenland. Throughout history, leaders took what they wanted. I hope Trump is not going to backpedal.
We bought it from Russia for a steal of a price. But then nobody at the time knew about all the resources up there. It was called Seward's Folley.
We bought it from Russia. That's why it's part of the US. It used to be part of Russia; we bought it from Russia.
The Greenland issue is different. Greenland isn't "exactly" owned by Denmark in the same way Alaska was owned by Russia. So even if Denmark was amenable to give Greenland to the U. S., they don't really have that kind of power. They let the citizens of Greenland vote on staying with Denmark, becoming fully independent, or joining the U. S. They voted to remain with Denmark. So really Denmark is just honoring their choice.
they bought it from Russia, but really it should belong to the people who live there.
It was legally purchased from Russia for 3 cents an acre. They have zero interest in reclaiming it.
They bought it from Russia some time ago
Alaska is the 51st U. S. State.(Trump thinks Canada should be America's 51st State when we would be {HOPEFULLY, NEVER!!!} the 52nd.)
It’s Greenland that orange dipshit is focused on now. So you’re safe
@blackeagle007 For the nonce.
Bravo! Congrats on posting the dumbest question of 2026 so far.
It’s a US Stae.
Better read up, my guy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaska_Purchase
You're conflating our country with Trump and his souless, spineless Republican cronies believe. Our country is very not nearly in favor of Trump's rhetoric about Greenland.
@Friendlybro79 Exactly. He is just trolling. Nothing more.
Agreed. It's something so many people do. Many Americans do this about other countries and ethnicities. We forget that when one person says something it doesn't represent all of us. Most people are just angry and can't think critically about who to blame.
Only Alaskans can choose that on the elections. Unless you have a time machine.
They bought it fair and square.
Hmmmm - maybe because it is a STATE..
absolutely not. its what protects us
No... it is ours. Stop hating America.
Conquest. Like Julius Caesar. He invaded Britain.
It’s a us state
No, it’s a state of the USA.
No legal claim to Greenland , when was this part of the question?
You must be bored. Baiting actual MAGA is a waste of time as less than 50,000 people are MAGA. It would be like asking a fake q targeting a far left group. Most dems and reps are moderates
We bought it
You can also add your opinion below!