yes
No
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News Yes, there are plenty of people and lots of situations that call for lethal force.
yes of course
Opinion
19Opinion
Yes as their lives are on the line at any time, so they are touchy people... it's an awful job in this society. In China, it's a lot safer.. because of the strictness and culture.
Never "jack" with police. Putting them on edge is a bad move... life ending.
Then when they have to make split second decisions, sometimes they make the wrong ones... or ones that are too aggressive. Who knows what they were dealing with 10min before, or days before... or over the last 20 years that conditioned them.
Most "normal" people don't have this reality.
People were warned not to do what they did in Minneapolis and it cost a life. Learn the lesson from it, to avoid more.
"People" who are an imminent deadly threat to the officer or innocents, yes. About like the UK, where police shot and killed about 3 people a year in the 2020's. Not like the US where the police shoot and kill three people a day.
"People" as in just anybody who says a mean thing to them, no. Not even if they think they're a "fucking bitch". Not even if they're trying to get away.
Of course you're talking about the murder of the woman who could trivially have been arrested, charged, and probably convicted with assault or attempted assault had the murderer simply followed protocol and stepped to one side rather than shooting her, at least two of the three shots coming from a position of complete safety, next to the car.
Killing the driver didn't affect the car at all, other than letting it carry on out of control and cause a crash, so he wouldn't have suffered any worse injury than he did (and he clearly walked away).
all of those 400+ cops with guns at the Uvalde school... and none of them went after the shooter for almost two hours
they should have shot that psycho... period
they had 400 chances to do so... and they didn't do it
they, should, have
That's an odd story, I've wondered time to time what was wrong with them. Didn't give a shit, cowardice, told not to? Cops don't usually act that way.
@DonaldDarko Uvalde is a very small town... not even 20k people, so their police department was also small, and not trained at all "nothing ever happened there"
most of their forces though, were heavily armed, fully geared and all that, but absolute no idea of what to do with any of that so they just chickened out, plain and simple
by the time that the Sheriff, the State and the Feds arrived... the chaos was already out of control, and all the police force was more focused on the parents trying to break into the school themselves, some of them with their own guns...
400 officials arrived... but none of them received an order, there was no leadership, no protocol... and just no soul apparently...
they all just stood there for over an hour, hearing shots after shots and more shots and they just those kids die unnecessarily
Amazing that could happen. No standards.
Of course. Who else is going to stop the people that shoot people?
No, shooting someone should be the absolute last resort after all other options are exhausted, and even then, the police should only shoot to disable someone by wounding them, they should deliberately avoid trying to kill the person if it can be avoided, for personal defense, people do have the right to self defense.
They should be held to the standard that citizens are held to.
https://archive.ph/M87ZN The Daily Mail (a UK tabloid newspaper) has a bias, but it's a right wing bias, so I trust it on this.
In genuine self-defense, yes, I think that police have a right to have their own lives, too. However, they abuse that privilege horribly on a routine basis, and I don't know what we should be doing about it.
Only in the USA are you 8 times more likely to be killed by a cop, than a terrorist.
Only if absolutely necessary (I. e. the suspect is threatening them).
The last people who should have guns is cops. They shoot the wrong people more then citizens and they are dumber then the average person.
Can it be doubted that police need to shoot to kill in extreme circumstances?
If people can shoot police, and they can, then police should be able to shoot people.
Yes and we should to, make stand your ground national. Anyone fucks with you blast away.
Then you should be in prison for good
@blackeagle007 What if I was robbing a bank at the time? What if it was because I just arrived in the country from Somalia and was undocumented and didn't have any money? Those dirty capitalists were hording all that cash in that bank and I didn't have anything. Shouldn't I shoot them?
Thatโs a different story. But shooting someone because youโre scared of their race, itโs what cops in this country has done. I mean a 6 year old was killed over a toy gun? I doubt the child aimed it at the cop
@blackeagle007
So cop shoots someone, that's murder, gulag for him.
Somalian robbing a bank, shoots the security guard that's a different story.
Got it. See, I know my commie math.
Any killing unjustified is murder, pea brain
Lately it seems to be getting out of control with ICE and it is getting worse. I'm scared for our country.
yeppers.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
only when threatened , and that means they have a weapon. Like Renee Good didn't have a weapon. So, that was murder.
not instead of a court hearing, i. e., as punishment, only if the perpetrator puts other people in danger of death.
Only the ones that are like killers or gangsters should be shot by police and not inasent people
Shoot or be shot
If they need to, yes! It's part of the job!
When it's necessary yes.
Yes.
Obviously
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions