If Jonathan Ross is prosecuted for the murder of Renee Good, and you are on the jury, what would your initial inclinations be?

[msc545]

On January 7, 2026, Renée Good, a 37-year-old American citizen, was fatally shot in Minneapolis, Minnesota, by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent Jonathan Ross. If he were prosecuted for her murder, I would:

I would initially think he was guilty based on the video I saw or other things I know.

I would initially think he was not guilty based on what Trump and Noem said.

I would initially be unsure and want to see further evidence.

Trump and Noem both said he's not guilty, and that's good enough for me. There does not need to be a prosecution or even an investigation..

A total of 23 votes were cast: 7 girls and 16 guys. See detailed results

[RandomGirl42]

Ty for inviting me to share but I'm quite sure they would never find me fit for jury duty especially after I told them about the aliens that are among us which people often mistake for cats.

[msc545]

My cat Allister wants you to know that he will be in contact with you shortly.

[exitseven]

I always say that if the perp got this far through the system he's gotta be guilty

[RandomGirl42]

Again? 🤣

[Sevenpointfive]

just hear me out. without an investigation you don't have questions.

if that woman was shot (i think 2 of the bullets) in the head, she could not have sped off. she would have died instantly. but that car was accelerating. it was possibly maneuvered as well? that doesn't make any sense.

[Sevenpointfive]

it's exactly like how they didn't investigate charlie kirk. these things aren't adding up because i don't think they really happened.

[msc545]

I think she was shot after she drove a short distance away.

[Sevenpointfive]

watch it again. 3 shots and then she drove off

[Spencer10]

I would calmly listen to all the evidence. Listen to the directions from the judge then make a choice based on the preponderance of the evidence.

[msc545]

Thank God we actually have one person who intends to be fair. Bless you.

[exitseven]

I would vote not guilty because of the video evidence and the medical report that said he sustained internal bleeding.

[msc545]

Really, how come that medical report has never been published by anyone?

[exitseven]

You are suppoedly a medical professional. Why do you think?

[blackeagle007]

Suppoedly?

[exitseven]

@blackeagle007 i can spell I just cannot type

[msc545]

So, there is no medical report. Contrary to what you might believe, we don't fake medical reports or autopsies. We actually tell the truth. It is the rest of you that misinterpret and lie about these things. In this case, you are choosing to interpret the non-existent medical report to serve your own political ends and your cognitive bias. That's on you, not me, not any doctor, nobody else. Just you.

[blackeagle007]

MAGA will always be in love with ice

[blackeagle007]

@bayoubob be quiet already. No MAGAs allowed

[bayoubob]

@blackeagle007 We MAGAt's do indeed support the blue. We support Law Enforcement Officers in general. Amazing right? You people wanted accountability for officers, and you got it right? All officers have body cams.

[blackeagle007]

@bayoubob didn’t look like that on Jan 6th bucko

[blackeagle007]

@bayoubob why doesn’t ice have body cams?

[msc545]

Bob's not going to answer you but I will. The reason they don't have body counts is because in general they do not want there to be any sort of record of what they do because what they do is generally cruel and against the law. Also, they are mostly too fat to be wearing cams and the images what be distorted anyway.

[blackeagle007]

Makes perfect sense

[msc545]

@bayoubob yeah, sure. Is that how you supported law enforcement on January 6? You fuckers caused the deaths of multiple people on that day, including law enforcement officers. Don't give me any bullshit about how you support the blue. You support thugs.

[888theGreat]

it is called CYA

[exitseven]

@msc545 he went to the hospital and threre is a report. like most medical reports there are confidentilaity laws that keep privacy

[msc545]

He never went to any hospital. He was not treated for anything and there were no injuries. You are once again pushing lies.

[blackeagle007]

Trump spreading bullshit so everyone can bow down to him

[exitseven]

www.fox9.com/.../jonathan-ross-injuries-renee-good-jan-14-2026

[bayoubob]

There were 4 deaths on January 6th. All 4 were Trump supporters. 1 died of an accidental amphetamine overdose. 1 suffered a heart attack. 1 suffered a stroke. And of course Ashli Babbitt, an unarmed white woman Air Force veteran killed by a black Capitol Police officer. That officer was never tried for murder, in fact it was the opposite. He got national air time with Lester Holt and seen as a hero. I'm not saying the guy is guilty or not. I refuse to be a Monday morning quarterback in that situation. I'm just showing the insane hypocrisy.

[bayoubob]

January 6th happened over the course of 24 hours, that's it. BLM on the other hand, you people love to say "it's mostly fiery peaceful protests," that nationwide caused 2 billion dollars in damage. Riot/loot/burn/murder all for George Floyd. There's no justification for that. Floyd died via having 3 to 4 times the lethal limit of fentanyl in his system. You folks say you love videos and seeing all angles. If you watch The Fall of Minneapolis, you see Derek Chauvin did nothing wrong. In fact he was just doing his job to the t according to police department manuals and protocols. You don't see him as hero though, because it simply doesn't fit your narrative. What ended up happening is Chauvin got stabbed 22 times and somehow survived when he should have never spent one day in prison at all. This is all politics, the Governor, the AG, the MPLS mayor, and chief of police threw Derek under the bus. For doing his job. These clowns should be the ones in prison, and I would love tooth for a tooth and eye for an eye. Problem is? Minnesota is too corrupt, too stupid. At least people are seeing the light and now Minnesota is known as the biggest piece of shit state with those leaders as opposed to California. Why? Minimum $9 billion in fraud via Somali's, plus Walz somehow squandering $19 billion in surplus money. Changing our state flag to represent Somalia. You folks turn a blind eye to it all. After all, as Walz was quoted as saying "one man's socialism is another man's neighborliness." How long do you think these clowns can get a way with it?

[blackeagle007]

How about ICE leaves Minnesota? I know, wild idea isn’t it?

[888theGreat]

He was fine , running around

[blackeagle007]

@bayoubob are you done

[exitseven]

@blackeagle007 So everyone gets to decide what laws they want ot obay and what ones they will ignore? Some states could just decide black people cannot vote. Some states could decide that nobody has to pay their credit card bills. There would be chaos.
No, America voted to deport all the illegal aliens that Biden let into the country. This is happening whether they like it or not.

[bayoubob]

@msc545 @blackeagle007 I don't know how gag works. I don't know who can moderate, delete, or allow messages and responses. All I know is, a lot of my messages have been deleted. If you want to create an echo chamber where you delete what I say and pick and choose what to keep whilst you continue to reply to me. It doesn't help you. In fact it has the opposite effect. You need to realize as much as you don't like me, we did win the popular vote and all swing states. It behooves you to see why. Not manipulate.

[blackeagle007]

@bayoubob approval rating in the dumps. Popular vote wasn’t won by much. Harris was a poor choice to run. Only reason why ur president won

[msc545]

@bayoubob a lot of your messages need to be deleted because you're basically talking bullshit.

[bayoubob]

That's where I tell you, you are wrong. You don't want to hear it. You can create your echo chambers to your heart's desire where you huff your own rainbow colored farts. That doesn't accomplish anything. You need to hear the other side. I will never delete you. In fact, that's our number one bread and butter tactic against you folks. We don't need to do anything, besides show videos of you being you. You should see the irony and hypocrisy. It's in front of your face. Smack dab.

[bayoubob]

We ask you, what are your grievances towards our Orangeman Rad? What is he doing to you specifically, what is he doing to you personally, that you have qualms with him, versus the Democrat leaders of whom you support? It'd be one thing if you claimed you were anything other than Liberal. But you don't claim that. Democrats have a fun side to them. They use you, to get votes for what? For commonsense? It starts out that way. Then they turn it on the dime. Whether you like it or not past Democrat leaders are indeed Conservative. But, now they spin it different. Why? Because they need to earn millions on a paltry salary. Just support your minions who should have the same networth as you, but they love insider trading. So, TOUCHE? Is in order. However, Trump does it right. He does. His political endeavors loses him money. Not earn money. That is a Stallion. For the People. Democrats do not do this. All Democrats do is earn money, and flaunt it. You know the thang? Global warming. For thee and not for me. Bitch about Trump backing out of global initiatives, where the most stalwart liberal asshats use their private jets to fly around the globe for any reason they see fit. Where as they tell the commoner they cannot fly. I can't fly because cow farts. I can't eat cow because? That one I don't get. Libtards glue themselves to tarmac. For animal rights? What do they eat? Plants. Aren't plants life? Sure they are. In fact, trees are allegedly commies. It's been shown that trees can indeed take care of each other and divert sustenance to trees that aren't doing so well.

[msc545]

@bayoubob rant elsewhere and get the fuck off my questions with your lies.

[bayoubob]

@blackeagle007 Why? Did you complain when Obama's ICE force deported over 3 million? You did not complain. Biden deported more than Trump. These are unequivocal facts. You should be complaining that Trump isn't holding up to his promises to be the new deporter in chief, instead of complaining about his paltry deportation numbers.

[bayoubob]

@blackeagle007 Popular vote isn't relevant. Electoral College is relevant. It was just the cherry on top with Trump winning the popular vote and all 7 swing states, and he didn't even need Pennsylvania's 19 electoral college votes.
Besides the point. Harris being a poor choice is the only reason my guy won? Why was Harris a choice in the first place? No new open nomination process. Not one single American decided she should be the primary. Fake news media and George Clooney finally told you what we knew all along. Biden is just not there up stairs. He isn't. But he got a record 81 quadrillion votes in 2020 and therefore he will win again, no questions asked. He's a shoo-in. At the same time, you see he can't win. Not again. Not possible. So? You have to ask the question, was he legit in the first place? Answer is no. Biden couldn't have received more than 68 million votes vs Trumps 74 million. Simple math. The number of registered voters plays this out. 2024 if God descends from the Heavens and tells you Trump will receive just 77 million votes, you'd be ecstatic. You'd scoff, and say, shit, we GOT THIS IN THE BAG! What did Kamala get? 75 million.

[Ironco]

He won't be...

She messed up...

This never should have happened, but it was not his fault..

[msc545]

Yeah, maybe we should just let Trump and Noem decide all the legal cases from now on. It would save a lot of money, and since you're all willing to take the word for it, we might as well just keep on going with it, right?

[888theGreat]

All ICE has to do is claim your a Drugs dealer, shoot you in the head, never give any Proof

[bayoubob]

@888theGreat?

[888theGreat]

@bayoubob?

[Dargil]

He won't be. There is no basis for it.

[DrPepper12]

Knowing and proving are very different things

[blackeagle007]

Guilt by association

[beefcakebradybatson]

GUILTY AS F**K !!!

[Pterodon]

There’s been an investigation

[msc545]

If there's been an investigation, where is the result of it?

[Pterodon]

She didn’t get out of the car as ordered and instead tried to elude by weaponizing her vehicle and ramming law enforcement. You have no case.

[msc545]

I see. So does this mean you've done the investigation yourself, or are you quoting something else I'm not aware of?

[Pterodon]

It’s what the DOJ concluded and after watching everything you’ve seen I agree with it

[msc545]

Of course, it's what the DOJ concluded. After all, they are very unbiased, right? Actually, I take that back. That is what they said, however, there's never really been an investigation. They just said it. Do you understand the difference?

[Pterodon]

They’re truthful. Example is Trump says he wants Greenland. You on the left scream OMG he's GONNA NUKE GREENLAND AND CONQUER IT. Far from itreality isn’t it. Cameras don’t lie. She didn’t get out of the car. She tried to elude. Period

[msc545]

Nobody claimed that Trump said he was going to nuke Greenland and conquer it. On the other hand, your correct cameras don't lie, or at least in this case, didn't lie. She did not get out of her car, saying she tried to elude. However, it is based on your subjective impression of what she was doing with her car. You can see her speeding away or running off the road or doing anything. She just drove. She was told to get out of the car and she did exactly that. If that wasn't okay with you, then I don't know what it is you expected her to do, except maybe hop out of the car and lay on the ground or something. The instructions they gave her were contradictory. On the one hand, she was told to get out of the car, and on the other hand, she was told to leave the area. She decided to follow the other instructions: the instruction to leave the area, not to get out of the car. Period. Since, in your estimation, that was the wrong instruction, that, of course, meant that she was doing something nefarious, correct?

[msc545]

I'm sorry. That was kind of jumbled. What I meant to say is that she was given two separate instructions which contradicted each other. She chose the one of leaving the area rather than the one of getting out of the car. And according to you, that was a good reason to shoot her, if I understand you correctly? Because somehow leaving the area was so threatening to others that she needed to be killed for it?

[Pterodon]

Look not much of an investigation is required when cameras tell all. I’m glad she dead. One less liberal

[msc545]

Well, no, there is an investigation required because somebody was killed. The fact that she was shot to death means that we have to investigate it to see if a crime was committed. I realize that you think that Trump just looking at it or other people just looking at it and saying, "Well, there's no crime," is sufficient. It's not sufficient, and I think if you think about this, you'll recognize that. I also recognize that you think that because she's a lesbian or was a lesbian, that somehow that means we don't have to be too concerned about the fact that she was probably murdered. I hope you will recognize that that is just your own idiosyncrasy, and the rest of us don't feel that way.

[Pterodon]

For the last time it’s been investigated you just don’t like the conclusion

[msc545]

No, it's not been investigated. An investigation consists of something more than Trump's opinion.

[Pterodon]

It ain’t Trumps. It’s the DOJ

[msc545]

Yes, I understand that, but that does not change what I just said.

[Pterodon]

So you don’t like the DOJ either. Want to choose the judge and jury too?

[msc545]

Okay. There's not going to be any federal prosecution of Russ because Trump Trump and Bondi don't want that. They don't want it because the evidence is not in favor of Ross. Apparently. They are also refusing to turn over evidence including the autopsy report and the car itself and other forensic evidence to the state in an effort to prevent any prosecution of Ross.

If Trump and Bondi are so worried about any prosecution of Ross and are confident that he did nothing wrong as you assert, Then why are they so anxious to prevent such a prosecution and refusing, possibly illegally, to turn over evidence that would at least allow the state to appropriately investigate.

I think the federal government is trying to cover up this entire incident and I think you have so far failed to argue opposite coherently.

[msc545]

@Pterodon I don't agree with you, and I think I've made that very clear. On the other hand, I also want to say that I appreciate very much the fact that you engaged with me politely and as a gentleman. That is very much appreciated.