601 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It will eventually die, but it got to this point because of how empathetic the Western word is but they ha e pushed it so far its now getting backlash, plus it really would die anyway because those that are in that community would eventually die out anyway.
10 Reply
Most Helpful Opinions
10.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It’s a shame that they keep pushing LGBT I don’t support it and I’m a Christian
41 Reply
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
30Opinion
1.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It's a long story, but I'll try to make it as short as possible.
A group of Jewish intellectuals, mostly Germans, created a set of utopian ideas based on Socialism, but with some added specifics. This set of ideas was what we call Communism, or Marxism, because Karl Marx wrote a book representing these ideas and was a leader in that group of German Jewish intellectuals.
Their idea was that the state (essentially the government) should own everything "in the name of the people" and the state should run everything via centralized management, and that everyone would do what they were good at and the state would compensate everyone based on the state's determination of their needs. And thus, everything would be "fair."
Of course, in the real world, the things that people were good at rarely lined up with the jobs that actually needed to be done, so places that put this system in practice quickly had to force people into jobs. And a person who was really good at their job and was more productive often received less than a completely useless person who barely knew anything and pretended to work just hard enough to stay out of trouble, but perhaps had more children or was close friends with someone politically connected. This demotivated the productive people and encouraged the lazy and ignorant to remain lazy and ignorant. The economy collapsed and the state was forced to subsidize things by selling off resources - but the resources are finite and the workers needed to extract them were also finite. Eventually the hole thing collapses.
The Marxists figured this out quite early, and by the 1920s they'd already figured out it would be very difficult to spread Marxism to places that had a capitalist society, because those societies would be better off. They concluded that they would first have to destroy the existing, successful capitalist society, and THEN, when standing in the ruins of Capitalism, would then offer Marxism to the people and they would happily vote it in. And Marxists wouldn't have enough money to rely on using money to motivate huge changes in behavior, so they had to figure out an inexpensive way to destroy western civilizations from within.
Their solution was SUBVERSION - to use propaganda and indoctrination to slowly change the thinking of society over time, in order to cause society to reject the things that were pillars of strength, and instead embrace their weaknesses, which would be relabeled as "strengths" and "moral goodness." They would need to infiltrate all branches of media, education, and government, indoctrinate as many people as they could, and promote destructive policies. And one of the key pillars that they identified as needing to be destroyed was the nuclear family. An individual alone is weak, but someone with a family supporting them is much stronger, and would resist much longer, and they couldn't have that.
Russia had Marxists agents in the US as early as the late 1920s training gullible or easily manipulated Americans, without using words like Communism or Marxism - just teaching them about "fairness" and "equity." Those ideas spread in the fertile ground of the Great Depression in the 1930s, but WWII was a speedbump for the program, but once that ended, it was full-speed ahead again. By this time, they had enough people trained and indoctrinated to infiltrate the media, the government, and education. By the 1960s, there was a much larger group that had been indoctrinated by the first group, who had by then moved up into positions of power. That's when this stopped being a fringe movement that could be dismissed and started to really spread. This was also when Feminism was quite literally taken over (by the Red Stockings - a group of Marxist Feminists who literally forced the non-Marxist Feminists to either convert or leave - most converted to maintain their power and influence).
15 Reply- 2 mo
The big push for LGB rights started in the 1980s, but really grew in the 1990s due to the AIDS crisis. And while the narrative was that they just wanted to be able to legally marry, the reality is that the agenda was much larger than that. Still, most people didn't care if gay adults wanted to get married, and that was ultimately passed. Of course, that wasn't nearly enough - the Marxists immediately moved on to the next phase: expanding "the community" to include not just LGB people, but the many other alphabet letters as well. But they made a big strategic error - they tried to compel people's speech and they tried to make people accept transing kids. That was WAY too far, and the pushback has been intense, setting back the agenda by 20 years or more.
- 2 mo
But the ultimate goal of all of this was to destroy the nuclear family, by any means necessary. If you have to trans a kid, fine. If you have to make women hate men, great. If you have to make women think that having a career is far more important than having children - even to the extinction of the species - fine. All of those things would weaken and ultimately destroy western society, allowing it to be replaced with Marxism. And Marxism - in every single place it has ever been attempted, almost immediately becomes a totalitarian dictatorship where nearly everyone is a powerless peasant that has no influence on the world and is not allowed to criticize the regime - those that do either find themselves in forced labor camps or taken out behind a shed and shot.
6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Equal rights for people who happened to be gay (or lesbian) was one thing. I supported nondiscrimination. But then weirdos - transgenders, trans-sexuals, transvestites, and people of every sexual kink and proclivity attached themselves to the successful LGB movement to demand equal acknowledgement and acceptance.
But I don't think there were large enough numbers to achieve what was accomplished in getting LGBT into elementary schools, film, TV and even cartoons. They didn't have the numbers needed to legislate trans rights to women's only facilities and sports. It wasn't grass roots.
Something else happened.
I think anonymous people with massive amounts of money and influence paid people who were not LGBT or activists to show for large rallies. They paid for transportation, flags, signs and banners.
It was the same nefarious people who funded millions of Central and South Americans to travel thousands of miles to cross our borders en mass.
People like those behind the World Economic Forum have an agenda to destroy national and cultural identity, cause chaos, create a population of confused weaklings, and diminish the global population.
Transgenderism/trans-sexuality also has a trans humanist element in which people are convinced that reality only exists in your mind. Those people become avatars who exist outside of reality and can be easily controlled.
The end game is Human 2.0/The Great Rest/The New World Order/One World Government where governments aren't elected, don't represent The People and are, instead, run by faceless AI that can't be questioned. And people are managed like live stock.
20 Reply1.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. One of the best parts about being me is that Society could have all their rules all their judgments all their games all their labels and titles that they want I don't care
I don't even know what LGBT means because I don't care
I look at women like this if they want something go get it if you are capable of getting it you're going to do it but if you have to play games and really didn't think about the game you were playing shame on you
There are women out there that have came up the ladder because they worked hard for it and they deserve whatever they get I believe in that I believe in being equal in every relationship that I'm in we are equal I don't care about the money part of it I don't care about the title part of it but if you want to use that title to get what you want instead of hard work well you're going to fail because you're playing the wrong game
Would you go after something that has titles involved then you're going to be put to the test you want to be treated like a man then go out on an oil rig and work like a man you have a child it's a 50/50 deal you both have the child for the same amount of time you go get a job if you want to support that child just like the man has to
When you put yourself in a roll to have a title then you have to own up to it you have to follow through just like a men does10 Reply- 6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
2 moQuestion for you to consider Melanie: Do you actually think, and I'm using the word "think" here to define that process in your brain where you access information and try your best to process it without bias, that children growing up who feel attraction to their own sex have been manipulated or brainwashed by LGBTQ groups to believe they're queer?
Do you actually THINK that parents who do not tell their kids " it's a SIN and you'll burn in hell" are responsible for their children's burgeoning preferences?
And not least of all, if God doesn't make mistakes, and God created everyone, are you saying that God screwed up and created a whole shitload of LGBTQ folks just for the hell of it?
What you call a "movement" is nothing more than a response to being told by people like yourself, and people of other religions, that they are mentally ill, sick or abominations because they're not attracted to the opposite sex like you are. Families are weakened by this in any way unless they choose to be.
I don't believe you've ever "thought" about this, but rather, you're regurgitating what your religion tells you to think and accepting it without question because, like all religions, yours is infallible.
31 Reply- 2 mo
typo** ... families are NOT weakened by this in any way, unless the choose to be.
- 436 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
2 moYou know, considering a lot of your posts, I wouldn't get on some kind of high horse about your morals.
As far as your question, the success of the LGBT movement was a combination of many things. First off we started to see many groups come together. Like the Gays, Lesbians, Bi people and Trans folk. Together they were a lot stronger. Many people in the movement had reached high social status. Some were beloved celebrities. They also managed to equate sexuality and gender identity with racial identity. If you were gay, you were born that way.
Then add the fact that the ANTI LGBT people didn't have any decent arguments. It made no logical sense to bar LGBT people from marriage or make consensual actions behind closed doors illegal. All they really had was "if you let gay people get married then soon you'll be allowing people to sleep with dogs" Which is not a really convincing argument.
10 Reply 2.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I cancelled Netflix last year due to their show choices. I haven’t missed it as there are so many options now. I think gay/trans/bi went through a huge fad stage driven by media and movies & shows. I saw stats recently that shows it going down among high school students.
311 Reply- 2 mo
What options are you using?
- 2 mo
@arizonasunshine there are a bunch of them. Prime, Hulu, Disney, Paramount, HBO, AMC, Peacock, Tubi, Fubu, others and many are free with ads or low cost. Some are names ypu haven’t heard of but a google of Grok search will pull them up.
- 2 mo
I use Netflix, Tubi & Prime.
- 2 mo
I’ll check out the rest. I think I used crackle once but the commercials were just too overwhelming. Netflix shows about a minute worth of commercials and you’re good for a half an hour. This crackle was a half an hour of commercials and one minute TV.
- 2 mo
@arizonasunshine there are a lot more choices for when you want something new. Plus Netflix are a-holes anymore.
- 2 mo
Tubi’s pretty impressive for a free service
- 2 mo
@arizonasunshine Here are the free options with ratings:
1. Tubi (Highest overall ratings & content library)
• Ratings: ~4.7–4.8 on App Store/Google Play (millions of reviews). play. google. com
• Huge on-demand library (movies, shows, originals), live channels, easy interface. Often ranked #1 best free service. Great for movies. cnet. com
2. Pluto TV (Best for live TV channels)
• Ratings: ~4.8 on App Store, ~3.7 on Google Play. play. google. com
• Hundreds of linear/live channels (news, movies, classics) + on-demand. Feels like cable. Strong for channel surfing. cnet. com
3. The Roku Channel (Most watched free service)
• Ratings: ~4.0–4.7 depending on platform (strong on Roku/Amazon). play. google. com
• Extensive on-demand + live channels. Tops viewership charts. Excellent if you have Roku devices. cordcuttersnews. com
4. Plex (Good all-rounder with personal media)
• Ratings: ~4.6 on App Store, ~3.4–3.8 on Google Play. play. google. com
• Free movies/TV + 600+ live channels. Bonus: Stream your own media library. channelstore. roku. com
5. Xumo Play
• Ratings: ~4.6 on App Store, ~3.7 on Google Play. apps. apple. com
• Live TV, movies, and on-demand. Solid customizable experience. consumerreports. org
Other Notable Free Options
• Sling Freestream, Amazon Freevee (now integrated into Prime Video as “Watch for Free”), FilmRise, Crackle, ViX (Spanish-language focus), and library apps like Kanopy/Hoopla (require a participating library card for premium ad-free content). consumerreports. org
• YouTube (free section) is always available and highly rated but more user-generated/video-focused. - 2 mo
Wow! I had no idea there were so many free services. Good to know!.
- 7.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
2 moit was heavily promoted over the prior governments... I don't know why. Clearly a plan by someone to embrace the society and make it normal.
I agree with you, such people cannot maintain a society. But If that's how someone is, it's their choice. What I don't approve of is the corruption of minors which is happening. Seen it up close.
10 Reply
2 moThe media is trying to push Islam since Muslims invested in their companies and buy their advertising. Muslims want to normalize Muhammad getting ass blasted by black men in homosexual orgies.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/jtTYxxmVpvA12 Reply- 2 mo
As recorded in a real hadith of al zutt.🤔
2 moBecause it was forced on us. If you speak out against it the left will try to find out who you are and Doxx you.
There are foriegn groups that hate us and have created ideologies like the LGBTQ+ movement in an attempt to weaken us by destroying the moral framework that holds our societies together.
10 Reply
Anonymous(25-29)2 moWell LGBTQ has been extended to the point where you can be completely Hetrosexual and lgbtq by claiming one of the new socially constructed genders or sexualities.
Being white Christian Hetrosexual can get you discriminated against or targeted.
To get into college after multiple rejections I had to pretend to be Hispanic gender neutral lesbian on the my application. Like my pictures I had fake tan on, dyed my hair jet black and got brown contacts in.
10 Reply
Anonymous(45 Plus)2 moThe MSM overrepresents homosexuals, lesbians, etc. because they are part of a leftist agenda to normalize that lifestyle. They want to shape our attitudes by constantly exposing us to representations that show those alternative lifestyles in the best possible light. If they had the means, the far left would simply control what we think about that subject.
I do not care what two consenting adults do with their genitals behind closed doors, but do NOT tell me what to think about it.16 Reply- 2 mo
You literally contradicted yourself
Opinion Owner2 mo@SmokinAces2000 I could have worded that more precisely.
"I do not care what two consenting adults do with their genitals behind closed doors" = I recognize that people have the right to do whatever they want in the privacy of their own home; there is no requirement that they conform to my morality. I do not chase people down to tell them that I disapprove of their behavior, because my opinion is irrelevant to them. But I do not approve of their behavior.- 2 mo
Still... these statements don't belong together... " I do not care" and "I do not approve". If you didn't care, you truly wouldn't have an opinion one way or another, but you DO have an opinion and a rather strong one, which is " I don't approve".
I often say what you did when asked "Do I approve of homosexual behavior or same sex marriages", and my response is "I don't CARE what two consenting adults do in privacy as long as children aren't involved". When pressed and they ask " Ok, but do you approve or condone that behavior". And I repeat:
I Don't Care, and I mean it. You care.
Opinion Owner2 mo@loveslongnails I do NOT care as long as I do not witness the interactions and as long as I am not told what to think or what to feel. But I appreciate your help in trying to explain to me what I really mean.
- 2 mo
No one is telling you what to thing or feel about it.
No one is requiring you to witness the interactions.
I stick by my statement however much you want to deny it... if you really didn't CARE, you wouldn't have the NEED to express your disapproval of it. That's my OPINION of your statement, which you claim is wrong. OK. That's your story, stick to it.
Just to be clear, I would extend this to anyone who makes a claim not to care about anything, and then pronounces a judgement on it. Makes far more sense to me to just say "I don't approve of it" than to argue " I don't care, BUT I don't approve of it". Again, that's my opinion.
Opinion Owner2 mo@loveslongnails I have an opinion but I don't chase after people to tell them I disapprove of their lifestyle. I don't volunteer the information unless they ask. So if that isn't "I don't care" in your book. . . I don't care!
318 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Whereas I have nothing against the LGBT movement, I'm put off by the oversize of their media footprint in society. It is a fact, that they represent about 10% of the population.
There are other larger groups representing their repressed people. What about old people? For example, 12% of the world population is over 60yo and this proportion is expected to nearly double to 22% by 2050.11 Reply- 2 mo
True so that hints the goal is to troll christians
- 376 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
2 moIt's because the millionaires who happen to be closet LGBTQs from the 1950s spend their millions promoting the stuff to children.
This wasn't tolerated in the past, because LGBTQ was correctly classified as a mental illness.
20 Reply
2 moWhether we like it or not, LGBT people do exist, and let's keep in mind they did not really choose to belong to that group. Peace starts with having respect for different and other ways of life.
12 Reply- 2 mo
Did you say they lost self control?
- 2 mo
@strateguy632 No, I did not mention self control, which nevertheless may also be involved, but then, self control should be learned by every living human. Let me stress the point that most of our tendencies are genetically determined, inclusive our sexual preferences. Whether to indulge, LGBT or not, is a matter of choice depending on circumstances and common sense.
5.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. From a religious standpoint, do you agree with women not being a man's property?
It's about progress. Why do you think you should be able to decide what other people say or do?
31 Reply- 2 mo
What a shocker this right wing bot account is homophobic too... wait not shocking at all lol.
1.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It's unfortunate you've been raised to be bigoted. It's not a sin, nor is it bad. It's natural for some people to prefer to love the others of their own gender.
10 Reply
2 moa fucked up society is far more easier to control and manipulate than a normal ordered one.
and what's a better way to fuck things up worst than convincing people that is normal to go against their own biology?10 Reply11.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Because a lot of us exist. And nobody gives a fuck what you believe, dude.
20 Reply- 4.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
2 moExactly it is promoted to trigger christians.
10 Reply - 482 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
2 moI know. It's outrageous. These 'people' expect to be treated as 'people'. With rights. As if they were 'people'.
10 Reply 12.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It is rebellion by leftists against normalcy.
20 Reply- 5.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
2 moDEI policies. But why they chose to implament DEI policies in the first place, that I do not know
10 Reply - 1.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
2 moHaven't you found a new schtick yet. this is soooo out of fashion now lol
10 Reply 373 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It's just streaming platforms. There's plenty of other things to flip your shit about.
10 Reply- 4.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
2 moBecause it’s more accepted then it ever has been even though there are still idiots like you
20 Reply
2 moBecause of feminism and the groups who supports such communities!
10 Reply
2 moI agree with you 100%. But I don't care what the asshole thinks on this thread.
10 Reply
2 moThey have not, lots of straight people bullshit have
10 Reply
Anonymous(45 Plus)2 moLGBT and people that have affairs or many sex partners will all be treated the same by God , and that is a one way ticket to Hell for eternity.
10 ReplyI don’t have a clue
20 Reply1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Because they want to be popular
10 Reply- 718 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
2 moLiberalism and political correctness taking over.
20 Reply 393 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Because they are all mentally challenged.
10 Reply- 1.5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
2 moNow that they’re out, they’re everywhere
10 Reply
The LGBTQ+ continues to grow, do you think this is a trend of openness, or cultural pressure?
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News
Most Helpful Opinions