Does an unborn child’s right to life outweigh a woman’s convenience?

[Anonymous]

[888theGreat]

Abortion is murder and a one way ticket to Hell , and Hell is forever

[OneViewpoint]

Yeah, right. Except for the part where Hell doesn't exist and it's only a fairy tale from a primitive religion that's a complete lie.

[888theGreat]

@OneViewpoint Just because you believe that , doesn't mean it doesn't.

[exitseven]

I think so. Life is precious.

[Asker]

It is indeed

[exitseven]

Thanks for the MHO

[TonyMetal___86]

It doesn't outweigh a woman's life, to me both are lives and i have to save both, because i care about both!

I am a pro life person but i think that there's an excuse for an abortion in harsh situations which can be validated by the doctors!

I really feel sorry that some women considers a fetus that it's just a "clump of cells" and that she has the right to kill it 🤦🏻‍♂️

Plus, women do not have the right to make this decision about abortion alone, even if it's your body, especially if she's married, the baby is yours and your husband too, any actions towards the baby is only legal when both agrees on it!

STILL, an abortion shouldn't be made except for very harsh reasons!

For the feminazis out there who might attack me now with their stup*d slogan "my body my choice", when you get pregnant from the air, come say this to me!

A feminist once asked me: "what are you going to do if you had a pregnant wife and told you that she's going to abort your child whether you like it or not?" Well i still have the same answer and if she does that without my will than i'm going to abort her, fair game right 😏

[TonyMetal___86]

@sage2021 what's your opinion?

[sage2021]

If she doesn't have an abortion does it still remain a clump of cells?

[TonyMetal___86]

@sage2021 well this question is for the ones who thinks that a baby is just a clump of cells or worse, they call it cancer now!

[Maybe_Maybe_not]

*Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious*

💃 A FEMINAZI COMES BACK FROM THE GRAVE 💃

Hello @tonymetal___86
Their bodies, their choice indeed, I believe in that. But I am not attacking you, until proven otherwise. Women, but not all, do have the right to make this decision about abortion alone. This right is, indeed, guaranteed by several jurisdictions on this planet.

[TonyMetal___86]

@Maybe_Maybe_not who's this feminazi and why haven't i seen it? Is it possible that she's on mt block list but hey if she's blocked than she can't see my answers, i'm confused 🤔

[Maybe_Maybe_not]

... Well, maybe I failed my entrance, again, it's so hard to satisfy all these different audiences 😐

[TonyMetal___86]

@Maybe_Maybe_not and i'm not here to satisfy them, i'm here to speak my mind 😏

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

Does a fetus have the right to leech off a woman's body if she has no desire to carry a child whether it be for financial, emotional, mental, or health reasons?

Why prioritize its life over the mother's?

This is what I don't get from pro-lifers. They only care about a person when it's in the womb then they don't give one single damn about that kid anymore. They advocate for taking away social programs like WIC, they advocate to take away free school lunches, and to take away affordable healthcare so that kids can be seen when needing medical care. Bunch of sadistic hypocrites they are.

[Asker]

If you have sex, you assume the risk of getting pregnant, but that does not give you the right to commit murder.

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

So we counting rape as just going out and having sex?

How about incest?

How about in cases where the baby will suffer physically because of hunger or abuse?

We should just say "fuck them kids at least i can sleep good tonight feeling like a goddamn hero for stopping an abortion from occurring"?

Pathetic.

[Asker]

Since when does being raped or being sexually abused automatically entitle you to commit yet another crime, which in this case would be murder?

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

Because it isn't murder anymore than killing cancer cells. It isn't a baby yet.

You want to talk late stage abortions when the mom's life ISN'T at risk. Fine. I will be willing to entertain that conversation.

Early stage though. Nope. You'll never convince me a clump of cells is a baby yet.

[Asker]

Of course it's murder. You just want to dehumanize it by comparing it to cancer cells, which is really pretty disgusting.

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

🤷‍♀️

Good thing I dont live by my life by what you think of me.

It's not murder, and if it were a person, it would have the same rights as a born child. It can't inherit property, be claimed on taxes, get insurance and many other benefits. You can't have it both ways. Either give them all the same treatment or stfu about how they are not a clump of cells.

[Asker]

It should have the same rights. Criminal that it doesn't.

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

Well until they do then get off women's backs. You know what? Get off our backs anyway. It's our choice whether or not we want to use our bodies for that purpose.

I guarantee if men got pregnant, abortion would never be illegal.

[Asker]

Don't have a sex if you want to murder babies

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

So your plan is to regulate women only? Where is your plan to make sure men get vasectomies so they can't get women pregnant?

[Asker]

When men have a vasectomy they don't kill another human being. When women have an abortion, they do.

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

That's not the point. You said don't have sex if you don't want a baby. That is trying to regulate women's sex lives. How about men show some responsibility for once and prevent pregnancies from even happening with a vasectomy?

[Asker]

Instead, why don't you have a tubal ligation if you are being responsible and not getting pregnant so you don't have to murder babies?

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

So basically you are putting the onus on women AGAIN. You want us to get IUD's, birth control, making sure the guy actually uses a condom and now a tubal ligation? Why not a full on hysterectomy at this point?

How about men take responsibility for once?

If not, stop bitching when we take care of our bodies the way we choose and yes that includes abortion if we desire/need it. Besides, as I pointed out earlier, early stage abortion is no more murder than removing cancer cells.

I mean, let's call it like its: an invasive clump of cells that physically alters a woman's anatomy in some way, that grow rapidly, invade surrounding tissues, require their own dedicated blood supply to survive, and actively suppress the body's immune system to avoid being attacked and rejected

Now ask yourself, am I talking about a fetus or cancer cells?

(Hint: the answer is yes to both).

[Asker]

You were uneducated comparison to cancer cells. Simply reveals your complete lack of respect for life.

[Kelley1]

Opinions differ, so there is no right answer. In my opinion, it is analogous to giving first aid. If you see someone injured or dying, you are morally obligated to give first aid, call and wait for help, or take him to the hospital. However, you are not obligated to pay his hospital bill and support him for years.

Pregnancy is the same. If the technology existed for artificial wombs and there existed a procedure to transfer the fetus to an artificial womb. You would be morally obligated to do. However, you are not obligated to sacrifice 9 months of your life, comfort, health and welfare for the fetus.

[Asker]

You also have a moral obligation not to suborn murder which is what arranging for an abortion actually is. I think that is a stronger moral obligation than what you've mentioned.

[Kelley1]

I realize that opinions differ. Your opinion is not wrong. It is what it is--an opinion. Killing worms and other parasites feeding on your body is murder, but that murder you would commit. A fetus is a parasite, but generally a desired parasite. Abortions have saved the world from millions who would have been criminals and other harmful lowlifes. A much smaller number would have benefited society.

[Asker]

You cannot know ahead of time that someone that you plan to abort would have turned out to be a criminal or a low life. It's just a random killing for the sake of convenience most of the time that makes it particularly immoral in my opinion.

[ProbablyClueless]

Considering that "convenience" really IS the right word for it? I would say so.

So much of the pro-choice arguments boil down to women who are either (1) getting forcefully impregnated by their uncles in backwoods sex cults (sex crime abortions are federally guaranteed), (2) life threatening pregnancies (similarly, federally guaranteed), (3) need to fuck their bosses because they aren't even minimally competent at their jobs (the "I need abortion to protect my career" argument, which in the worst case scenario can be dismantled by just working at a different company), or (4) lack the self discipline to not spread their legs for every bad decision that stumbles into their lives (which.

I really don't understand why this subject is spoken about in such doplic manner.

[Miristheiss]

Child sacrifice societies were ones God would wipe out.

Progressive women. Abortion, promiscuity, drunkeness, child sacrifice, out of control immigration, transitioning children, men on women's sports events and in their shower rooms.

They are demon possessed. Evil.

[Orion84]

I think that is a complex issue that can't be covered by blanket statements, nor should it be regulated, due to the myriad different factors that can happen during a pregnancy.

It should remain strictly a medical issue between a woman and her doctor. Laws can't possibly account for every single situation, nor eventuality, and should leave the issue in the hands of medicine.

[goaded]

Early abortions make up the vast majority, and no person is harmed by them. Late abortions are of wanted pregnancies and are end of life decisions by the next of kin almost exclusively due to fetal abnormalities or other complications.

When does the life of a fetus outweigh the life of the woman?

[Asker]

Every abortion is a murder and every murder is a sin and every person born or unborn is harmed by an abortion.

[goaded]

Not really. An acorn is not an oak tree. Name an attribute a person has that neither a frog nor a human skin cell has.

[Asker]

You know, we've had this argument before, and I'm not going to get into it with you. You know my position on these things very well.

[goaded]

Well, I don't, because you're positing anonymously. I've never asked anyone to name "an attribute a person has that neither a frog nor a human skin cell has" before, either. I came up with it just for this question.

[Asker]

I'm really not interested in answering your manipulative trick questions. The destruction of any life is a horrible sin. It's bad enough that we kill animals for food and bacteria to keep from getting sick. To kill a human being, that is, an unborn child, is a sin of incredible proportions.

[Maybe_Maybe_not]

My honest answer: "Overturning of Roe v. Wade challenged the right to abortion in the United States. 2 years later, Another country enshrined the freedom to have an abortion in its constitution."

[Asker]

What difference do either of these things make? None of this even addresses the question, Much less answers it.

[Maybe_Maybe_not]

It informs you about my opinion of anti-abortion madness, do you wish to read more information?

[Asker]

It informs us of nothing regarding your own opinions. It simply tells us about the opinions of others, which we already knew about.

[Maybe_Maybe_not]

Then if you really didn't read fat letters between the lines, my second comment fixed that problem. Also I highly doubt most people here would be informed of world news regarding abortion lol

[Asker]

So in this entire thing, I am supposed to pay attention to your comment about "anti-abortion madness." ? That's all you have?

[Maybe_Maybe_not]

That's all I have for you, yes. Something else you need or am I dismissed?

[Asker]

All you've done so far is tell us what another country did and sort of obliquely tell us what your opinion is. So yeah, I guess you're dismissed.

[Maybe_Maybe_not]

Cool, ciao !

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

The fact that you call the right to deny an unwanted life a “convenience” says so much

[Asker]

More often than not, that is the excuse that is given for murdering it.

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

Your dehumanization skills are flawless

[Asker]

I haven't called anyone names designed to dehumanize them. I think you probably have.

[Asker]

If you are a murderer then you are a murderer. I'm just using the proper name for your behavior, assuming that you've ever done this.

[strateguy632]

no excuse for murder after birth and same kid was inside before birth.

[DonaldDarko]

Sure isn't the government's buisiness that's for sure.

[LazerBean]

Yes.

[Dargil]

Convenience, yes. Live or die, no.

[Ariesman81Nshiiit]

Should.

[NaultD]

Yes.

[Mike_Hum]

Always.

[Snakeyes7]

Very much so.

[Anonymous]

Nope.