Questions: Society & Politics

The suspect, Jacob Wenske, explicitly emailed a threat stating: 'Death to Erika Kirk... Every Christian nationalist shall perish in the bombing that will take place.' Coming less than a year after Charlie Kirk was tragically assassinated, trying to downplay or excuse an active bomb threat because you dislike someone's faith or politics is unconscionable. Vote Yes if you condemn this extremism outright. If you vote No, you are validating targeted political terrorism.

Why do you think people hate Charlie Kirk, Erika Kirk, and Christian’s enough to do this?

Feminism because the economic argument falls apart under scrutiny. Historically, people raised large families through far worse financial crises, and even today, wealthy Nordic countries with massive government childcare subsidies and strong safety nets are seeing their birth rates crater. The root issue is an ideological crisis, not a financial one. Decades of feminist messaging have systematically dismantled traditional family structures, trading mutual interdependence for hyper-independence and corporate ladders. It has created a cultural rift where men and women are socialized to view each other as political adversaries rather than cooperative partners. You cannot solve a 'relationship recession' with economic policies when modern culture openly celebrates solitary lifestyles and treats the foundation of coupling as oppressive.

I think they look like long lost brothers

This poll is about ideological consistency. Is your political vote a package deal, or can you separate your personal values from your ballot?
Can a guy truly claim to oppose modern feminism and want a traditional relationship if he actively votes Democrat? That party’s platform expands the exact big-government tax structures, corporate quotas, and policies that fund institutional feminism and dismantle traditional family dynamics.
Is this position pure cognitive dissonance (funding the factory while claiming to hate what it builds), or is it justifiable?