Hear me out on this one, as it is about gender equality, western mindset and when your heavy set start to feel like they're in a bra zoo whilst men are free to walk around topless.
Several indigenous communities around the world maintain cultural traditions where women go topless as a normal, non-sexualized part of daily life. Prominent examples include the Himba and Koma in Africa, the Yanomami and Zo'é in South America, and the Dani and Korowai in West Papua.
Yes
No
Depends on...(Please specify)
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
Should it be socially normal for women to go topless in public like men?
Don't get me wrong. I'd certainly like young women to walk around with exposed breasts.
Gender equality is a nonsense in pretending sexual dimorphisms aren't real and should somehow be made equal against nature. so i voted NO against gender equality nonsense. Not against exposed breasts however.
In cultures where women are culturally bare breasted, the man still like boobies and have sexual interest in them but are probably more selective in what they like.
It is probably like that we are more taken by some girls legs (& stare) than by other girls legs. Men in those cultures will find some sets of boobies very fine and not others.
Women are of course free to expose there breasts as much as they like. The only reason they cannot is that men will like looking at them and it seems women don't like that.
It is really just a restriction that women have put on themselves so don't blame us for it.
The idea that women “can’t” go topless because men will look is basically admitting the problem isn’t women’s bodies — it’s men’s behaviour. You’re describing a social double standard and then acting like it’s a natural law.
Women aren’t avoiding toplessness because their breasts emit some kind of male‑summoning beacon. They avoid it because society has spent decades sexualizing their bodies to the point where a bare chest becomes a public event instead of… a chest.
And saying “women don’t like men looking” is just another way of saying: “Men refuse to behave normally, so women must adjust.” That’s not freedom — that’s conditioning.
If men stared at women’s elbows the way they stare at breasts, we’d be having a debate about elbow modesty. The issue isn’t anatomy; it’s social habits.
Women’s comfort shouldn’t be held hostage by how much self‑control men choose to exercise. If toplessness were normalized, the staring would fade — just like it does in cultures where breasts aren’t treated as forbidden fruit.
So yes, women are free. But pretending the only barrier is “men like looking” is just admitting the culture needs fixing, not the women.
Where you are going wrong is summarized in the last para. "the culture needs fixing".
It isn't culture at all. It is two (2) million years of evolution in which selection of fertile mates was rewarded. We are all descended from men who liked a good rack.
Most of the female breast is not milk producing glands but just fat. Breast size has little to do with milk production so women evolved to trick men with more fat in their breasts.
It is all in the unconscious 4F brain and nothing to do with culture.
Wearing tight tops, push up bras - or not wearing bras, and cleavage is where culture kicks in. All intended to draw attention to... breasts. Women are in fact quite quick to take their top off in some settings and show no concern with men looking at them
Absolutely!! I see no reason why they SHOULD keep their nipples covered! It's utterly ridiculous that women are allowed to show off every single portion of their tits in public, the parts only they have (so to speak); EXCEPT their nipples, which EVERYONE has and knows exactly (more or less) what they look like!!
Exactly FunkyMonkee, bare ankles are no longer risque, so it may just be a matter of time until we feel the same way about topless women in public, if most countries follow a European summer nude beach approach
There's already a number of states that allow women to go topless as long it's not done for monetary gain and they do it only where men are allowed too. It's just that most women never take part in it.
No because I don’t think it’s good for kids to be exposed to topless women, especially kids going through puberty. Female breasts are not the same thing as a male chest. Anyone who says yes must not care for their kids, little siblings, or nieces and nephews just so they themselves get to see some titties 🤷🏻♀️
What is one of the first things a kid sees after birth? Naked tits! If you don't TEACH your kids that naked tits are wrong, they won't think that way, will they? But, you have NO PROBLEM letting the WORLD see all the parts of your tits that men DON'T have and only want to keep hidden the parts EVERYONE HAS? Why would letting my kids see naked tits be uncaring of me? What do you think they spends hours a day sucking on for their first several months/years? Exactly, it DOESN'T disappear completely so, what's wrong with letting the twins come out and play? What could it possibly hurt? If ANYTHING, letting kids see naked tits will make them MORE well-adjusted!! If it's good enough for Rio, Bali, San Tropez and many parts of Africa, why wouldn't it be good for the rest of the planet? Besides, if god really DID create us, he OBVIOUSLY WANTED US to stay naked and got really pissed at us once we started covering up! Why do you want to go against god? Are you a sinner? Naughty, naughty!!
@choco-latte finally a smart lady like you can give me a rest from explaining this to others 😄
The high percentage who said yes, clearly in majority are men because that's what they want, it makes me laugh when they left all the women's rights aside and focused only on this one 🤣🤣
@Ronald_25 you have started it wrong, women's boobs are different from a man's chest, they are never the same, even when it comes to how they function, men's chest has no function at all while women's breasts produces milk, a woman's boobs are private for a reason!
You don't get to make it sexual whenever you want and not sexual whenever you want too!
There's a whole category for women's boobs on every porn site why? Plus every man feels aroused seeing a woman's boobs and dreams to use them for a specific sexual act, why? Cut your nonsense, you and all these acting stup*d guys plus feminazis who are just h*es in their own ways! 😏
That's the truth miss choco loco, no matter how much they try to twist it and give it other explanation, the reality will remain the same!
Same as these transexual people, or pansexual or homosexual or i don't know what else is there too, there are only men and women, period! A man will always be a man and a woman will always be a woman!
@TonyMetal___1986 I said yes BECAUSE I think it's only fair for them to go topless, too and because it's just stupid that they can walk around showing every other portion of their tits but NOOT their nipples, when EVERYBODY has nipples! Why is it okay for little girls to run around topless until their tits start to grow, but the parts that ARE growing are the parts we're ALLOWED to see! It makes no sense at all!!
@FunkyMonkee you're right because some stupid women thinks that only their nipples should be covered while the majority of their boobs shall be covered plus for kids i think that the society made it normal even to see them fully naked, no sane person would think about anything sexual when they see kids fully naked but personally i think that girls should be taught since young age to cover their boobs, even when still aren't developped yet!
@TonyMetal___1986 I think kids should be taught to be okay with their bodies. There's nothing wrong with them. Who decided that naked arms were okay but, tits, ass and crotch weren't? About 40 years ago, it was quite a sexual turn on to see a girl's naked ass but, today, girl INSIST on showing their entire naked ass as much as possible and men don't go nuts over it! The same thing would happen with naked tits.
@FunkyMonkee where are you living man? Are you sure that men don't go nuts seeing a woman's butt? You're very wrong about it dude! Men go nuts and act like idiots even when seeing a woman's ass in a tight jeans or leggings 🤣🤣
@TonyMetal___1986 Just some dinky little country nobody's ever heard of. It's called, America. Do you see guys staring at a woman's naked ass or chasing after her because of it? I never do. It's so common, nobody gives a shit, anymore. It's just an ass. Everybody has one! Yeah, tight jeans or Spandex but not naked.
TonyMetal, this question is not about the function of male and female chests, it's about why women's bare chest is taboo and mens isn't. Another question would be, how would men feel on the back of this discussion, if it would be socially taboo to show our chest in public? If we were to be fined for partial nudity?
@MrChinaski for a woman to go topless in sime places in the world, it's not an act of empowerment, it's an act of lowing morals and being cheap, plus it's unhealthy for the kids seeing such things, women there had lost their integrity, i'd never support such acts!
TonyMetal’s take doesn’t just miss the point — it sprints past it, trips over its own shoelaces, and face‑plants into a puddle of outdated moral panic.
The idea that topless women in indigenous cultures are “cheap” or “low morals” isn’t a moral stance; it’s a textbook example of projecting your own cultural hang‑ups onto people who don’t share them. The Himba, Yanomami, Zo’é, Dani, Korowai — these communities aren’t sitting around thinking, “Oh no, TonyMetal from the comments section disapproves of our integrity.” They’re living their lives with a relationship to the body that’s normal, non‑sexualized, and culturally coherent.
Calling them immoral is like walking into a Japanese onsen and yelling that everyone is “cheap” because they’re not wearing swim trunks. It’s not righteousness — it’s ignorance dressed up as virtue.
And the “unhealthy for kids” line? Come on. Kids in those communities grow up seeing bodies as bodies, not scandalous objects. The only thing unhealthy here is the idea that children must be shielded from the existence of women’s chests while men’s are apparently fine. That’s not morality; that’s a double standard doing cosplay as concern.
As for “women there had lost their integrity” — no, Tony. Integrity isn’t measured in square inches of fabric. If anything, insisting women must cover up because you feel uncomfortable says more about your worldview than theirs.
So if you want to talk empowerment, morality, or cultural norms, at least start by acknowledging that the world is bigger than your personal sense of modesty. Otherwise you’re not defending values — you’re just yelling “degenerate!” at people who aren’t living by your rulebook.
Also, Choco‑latte’s take is so backwards it should be delivered by horseback. The idea that kids will spontaneously malfunction at the sight of a topless woman is peak “I learned biology from a Victorian pamphlet.”
“Female breasts are not the same as a male chest.” Correct — one feeds children, the other struggles to bench 40kg. Only one is sexualized because society keeps insisting it must be.
Saying people who support topless equality “don’t care about kids” is wild, because kids aren’t the ones having a crisis here — you are. Children in cultures where toplessness is normal grow up fine. They don’t suddenly turn into feral goblins because they saw a breast. The only thing getting corrupted is your WiFi connection every time you Google “why do boobs exist.”
And the “people just want to see titties” argument? That’s projection so strong it could power a cinema projector. Not everyone is thinking about breasts the way you apparently think about breasts. Some of us are talking about equality, comfort, and cultural norms — not whatever PG‑13 fever dream you’re imagining.
If your entire worldview collapses at the sight of a woman’s chest, that’s not a societal problem. That’s a you‑need‑to‑touch‑grass problem.
You're funny because your wrote up a whole journal not based on facts but only based on your imaginations and personal opinions, backed it up by the lifestyle of tribal people who had never seen a civilization out there except for their own, good job for twisting the whole subject just so it suits and be compatible with your own claims...
You could of spared all this effort and just say "i love seeing women's boobs" 😂😂
You didn’t catch me “twisting the subject,” Tony — you just didn’t catch the subject at all. You’re accusing me of using “tribal people who never saw civilization,” which tells me you didn’t even bother to understand the cultures you’re talking about. The Himba, Yanomami, Zo’é, Dani, Korowai — these aren’t people “without civilization.” They have their own civilizations, their own norms, and their own social structures. The fact that they don’t match your personal comfort level doesn’t make them imaginary. And the “you just love seeing women’s boobs” punchline? Cute. But if that’s the best counter‑argument you’ve got, it means you ran out of facts before you even started. I’m talking about cultural norms, gender equality, and how societies sexualize women’s bodies. You’re talking about… my alleged horniness. One of us is having a conversation; the other is having a fantasy. If you want to debate, debate. If you want to joke, joke. But don’t pretend your personal discomfort is a universal truth.
There is no such thing as universal truth, it's my personal opinion and the norm for the majority of people, yes people are different and we have our personal opinions and beliefs, i was just stating my personal beliefs before having tou attacking me and standing your ground like a superman that you're the one and only, keep your truth for yourself and i'll keep mine to myself, i can't debate with you because it's easy to counter all what i'm saying since you are personally against my ideology, i have some close friends, FEMALE friends who are the total opposit of my beliefs but we like each other more than anything, it's because they respect and understand my ideology and i respect their choices even if i'm against them, the difference between you and them is that you came not to have a debate or stating your personal thoughts, you came to attack me, make fun of me and shout out loud that you're legit and i'm fake, you came to cancel my thoughts to replace them with yours and this ain't going to happen not now and not in a million years, cause you are simply what you are and i am what i am, i have listened to you and knew how you think, in this world there's a place for you and a place for me and places for everybody but to try erasing me, you're going to erase yourself believe me, don't say that i didn't warn you!
Tony, you just wrote the philosophical season finale of a show nobody asked for. I pointed out a cultural fact, and you responded like I tried to overthrow your personal constitution.
You say there’s no universal truth — fair. But then you treat your opinion like it’s the official operating system of humanity. That’s the contradiction I addressed. Not your existence, not your identity, just the logic you used.
And calling indigenous cultures “uncivilized” wasn’t “your ideology,” it was just incorrect. Correcting a fact isn’t an attack; it’s literally what a debate is.
Your female friends respecting your ideology is great — but they probably respect it because you present it calmly to them, not in a 47‑paragraph prophecy about being “erased from existence.” I promise you, nobody is trying to erase you. I disagreed with one argument, not your entire soul.
You say I came to “cancel your thoughts.” Brother, I don’t have the time, the energy, or the budget to cancel anyone. I just replied to a comment on the internet.
You keep your beliefs. I’ll keep mine. But if you’re going to drop a manifesto every time someone disagrees with you, at least admit you enjoy the drama a little.
It decreases sexual value to a degree, not eliminates. As I already commented before.
There’s a reason children are not allowed into R rated movies. Curse words are normalized in our society and not treated as a big deal in our day to day lives, is it still acceptable for a children to watch a movie with foul language? Most families would say no.
Also I don't know why you’re being so defensive about me saying that female breasts are not the same thing as a male chest, if it’s just factually right? Are you saying I’m against women, being a woman myself with a valid opinion on this topic? Of course female breasts are more valuable than a man’s, as you said they nurture babies. Who is denying that?
And I can’t speak for you, but believe me most of the people who answered yes just want to see titties. Let’s not kid ourselves.
@Ronald_25 FYI 4 women answered yes, 5 answered no while 22 men answered yes, and 10 answered no in the poll results 😂
You tell me, as of right now the debate is more even among women with “no” taking a slight lead, than men who are all for topless women, for equality’s sake right? But this isn’t a real problem to many women and we deserve to voice our thoughts as to why not as well, if the question is about us. Right?
@Ronald_25 i think that i'm cool now with you since you were respectful in your last paragraph and wanted peace, though you and me will never get along, i'm 100% convinced about everything that i have told you... sooo 🤷🏻♂️
Since you're correcting yourself now and being respectful, i wanna ask you to do the right thing, how about you apologize from @choco-latte because you have been rude to her and don't say no, the lady was just stating her opinion with all respect but it seems that you didn't like it because her ideology is identical to mine, you have burst in anger and insulted her by saying that her opinion was "so backward should be delivered by horseback" you have been offensive, that's not how you're supposed to treat a respectful woman who took her time to share her opinion with you, i'm not ordering you, i'm just suggesting...
@TonyMetal___1986 it’s okay Tony, I don’t need an apology from him. As long as he respects my opinion and I will respect his. If I replied to him was because I didn’t see him as a crazy person trying to start a problem, just that maybe he misunderstood my comments.
The only thing I wanted to say is that my opinion was objective and in no way trying to treat women as having lesser rights than men, cause I’m a girl myself lol. And I will always be one of the first people who stands for fellow women, or anyone, who have actually been wronged or treated unfairly. But I just don’t see wearing a shirt as an inconvenience personally, it’s just second nature for me… all my clothes are usually comfortable anyway and protect me from exterior elements such as bug bites or the AC feeling too cold. That’s just my own personal opinion.
But thank you for the support, I appreciate it very much as always. You’re a true friend 🙏👍
The poll results don’t “prove” anything except that men and women respond differently to a question that’s been culturally loaded for decades. Men saying “yes” doesn’t magically mean exposure can’t reduce sexual fixation — it just means current norms still sexualize female chests. That’s the whole point of the equality argument: norms shape reactions, not biology alone.
And yes, women absolutely deserve to voice their thoughts. No one said otherwise. But personal comfort — like preferring shirts, liking protection from cold AC, or avoiding bug bites — is not the same thing as a universal rule about what all women should be allowed or forbidden to do. Your preference is valid. It’s just not a law.
As for the “female breasts are more valuable” line: nurturing infants doesn’t turn a body part into a moral or social liability. Saying women must cover up because some men sexualize them is exactly the double standard people are pushing back against. Protecting women shouldn’t mean restricting women.
And the “most people who answered yes just want to see breasts” argument? That’s not a reason to limit women — that’s a reason to question why men’s reactions are treated as the deciding factor in women’s freedoms.
Finally, on the apology: respect goes both ways. If someone felt misunderstood, that can be acknowledged. But disagreement isn’t disrespect, and calling an opinion “backwards” isn’t an attack on the person — it’s a critique of the idea. Everyone here has clarified their stance calmly now, so dragging the conversation back into policing tone doesn’t help anyone.
The bottom line as I see it: Women can have different comfort levels. Men can have different reactions. None of that justifies maintaining a double standard. The debate is about choice, not forcing anyone to do anything — and certainly not about treating women as fragile or men as uncontrollable.
If we’re all respecting each other’s views now, then the conversation is already in a better place than where it started.
100%.. this double standard isn't fair. the burden is always placed on us. instead of telling males to control themselves, we are told to cover up🤷🏻♀️
You don't HAVE to TELL them ANYTHING. Just allow them to get used to seeing naked tits all the time and they'll settle down! It'll take a while but, isn't it worth it?
The tribes I mentioned are real, well‑documented Indigenous groups, but they represent very small percentages of the global population. Their cultural practices matter anthropologically, not because they’re numerically dominant.
🌍 Population
- Himba (Namibia/Angola): ~50,000 people - Koma (Nigeria/Cameroon): ~55,000–61,000 people - Yanomami (Brazil/Venezuela): ~35,000–40,000 people - Zo’é (Brazil): ~330 people - Dani (Indonesia): ~100,000–250,000 people depending on subgroup definitions - Korowai (Indonesia): ~3,000–4,400 people
With the world population at roughly 8 billion, these groups represent:
So yes — far less than one‑hundredth of one percent of humanity.
🧠 Why mention them then?
Because the question wasn’t “what do most people do?” It was about whether toplessness is inherently immoral or harmful, and these cultures provide real‑world counter examples showing that toplessness can be: - normal - non‑sexualized - socially functional - and not harmful to children
Their small population doesn’t erase the fact that they disprove the claim that toplessness is universally immoral or damaging.
1. Since i don’t know anything about these groups, i also don’t know whether they have no sexual assault crimes, a rate that is comparable to the rest of the world, or an even higher rate. You are asking me to assume that because the practice exists in that culture, it exists without any harmful consequences.
If the subject was incest, you could cite cultures in which invest is normalized, but that doesn’t mean The invest that occurs is “healthy” or without harmful consequences.
2. Even if you show that toplessness is harmless in those cultures, it doesn’t mean that we can safely start practicing toplessness in western cultures. That world requires re-engineering our culture and that would result in consequences other than the intended targeted behaviors.
1. “We don’t know their sexual‑assault rates.” True — but that cuts both ways. You’re asking me not to assume toplessness is harmless, but you’re also assuming it might be harmful without evidence.
The correct position is: Toplessness alone does not predict sexual‑assault rates.
We do have anthropological data showing that in many societies where breasts are not sexualized, toplessness is not linked to increased assault. Assault correlates with power dynamics, social norms, and enforcement, not with whether a chest is covered.
That’s why researchers studying body‑norm cultures focus on social structure, not clothing. If you want to explore that angle, we can dig into anthropological norms or sexualization patterns.
Your incest analogy doesn’t apply because incest has biological and psychological harm independent of cultural acceptance. Toplessness does not.
2. “Even if it’s harmless there, it doesn’t mean it’s harmless here.” Correct — cultural context matters.
But that’s exactly why these examples are relevant: They show toplessness is not inherently harmful, which means any harm in Western contexts comes from social meaning, not anatomy.
Western culture sexualizes breasts heavily. Those cultures do not. So toplessness functions differently.
That’s not an argument to “import” their norms overnight — it’s an argument that our discomfort is cultural, not biological. If Western society ever changed its norms, the outcomes would depend on how those norms changed, not on the existence of breasts.
3. “Re‑engineering culture would have unintended consequences.” Absolutely — any cultural shift does. But that’s not a reason to dismiss the conversation; it’s a reason to analyze it properly.
The point isn’t “let’s go topless tomorrow.” The point is: Toplessness is not universally harmful, so any Western debate should focus on social meaning, not moral panic.
In my opinion: You’re right that cultural context matters. You’re right that norms can’t be copy‑pasted. But the existence of cultures where toplessness is normal shows that the harm isn’t inherent — it’s contextual. And that’s the factual basis for the discussion.
I really don't care, but generally women are not going to do it anyway. Therefore, it is not relevant. We don't want our boobs hanging out for all to see, and unless we are much smaller than average, we need support.
Here’s a reply that’s sharp, grounded, and pushes back on her point without attacking her personally or crossing any lines.
---
Saying “women aren’t going to do it anyway, so it’s irrelevant” is basically admitting the norm exists because women have been conditioned to treat their own bodies as public liabilities. That’s not a natural preference — that’s decades of social messaging telling women their chest is inherently inappropriate while men’s is just… a chest.
And the “we need support” argument? Sure, many women do — but needing support doesn’t magically turn toplessness into a universal impossibility. Plenty of women are comfortable without it, plenty aren’t, and neither group gets to declare their personal comfort level as the global rule.
What you’re describing is current behaviour, not a timeless truth. Women “don’t do it” because they’d be judged, sexualized, stared at, or shamed — not because their bodies come with a built‑in moral dress code. If society treated breasts the way it treats male chests, the conversation would look very different.
So yes, women may choose not to go topless. But pretending that choice is purely biological rather than heavily shaped by culture, stigma, and double standards is exactly why the question is relevant.
I'm a young guy so of course I'm going to answer yes. It is a duel standard. But it also is a cultural thing and a comfort level for women. In Europe, Australia, Scandinavia etc. they are so much more chill about it than the USA
I'd answer yes more carefully Alex as a young guy, because it would be normal for ALL women, which means if a young guy were to walk down the street in the summer with his sister (s) and mother and they felt hot, in all fairness you have to be chill if they decide to go topless...
I think a man's muscular chest has also been sexualised by some women, but it's just more acceptable to be seen in public, take European nude beaches as an example of more equality. But I agree, and would go as far back as the Y chromosome during conception that differentiates us.
I've been to Spain to numerous nude beaches and honestly it was the tourists that were staring, the locals seemed cool with chests of all genders, shapes, sizes and colour 🤷🏽♂️
10.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
Maybe in Africa they do it but not in America or any other place. Boobs on a woman are sexualized and should be appreciated when you’re having sex. You don’t want to see that every day because they’re not men you want something to look forward to in the bed or wherever you have sex at and they are very special and they should be appreciated and not be seen every day by anybody just walking around
12.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
With certain guidelines, yes. Due to men having testicles, women in certain settings can draw out sex crimes. They would then be contributorily negligent FEELZ will not change human nature. Women would have to practice good judgment. But I would welcome it in certain public settings like the beach or (!) the mall where people want to be seen safely
Dargil, your argument is basically saying “women going topless causes sex crimes because men have testicles,” which is a very creative way of admitting the problem isn’t women’s bodies — it’s men’s behaviour. You’re blaming the target for the perpetrator, then calling it “guidelines.”
That’s not biology. That’s just outdated thinking with a lab coat on.
And “contributorily negligent”? Come on. Women existing isn’t negligence. Women having breasts isn’t negligence. Women choosing comfort isn’t negligence. If your logic requires women to pre‑emptively protect men from their own impulses, that’s not human nature — that’s an excuse.
Your “certain settings” idea also collapses instantly. If toplessness is supposedly dangerous, why would the mall — the place with the highest concentration of teenagers, families, and bored men — be your safe zone? That’s not a guideline; that’s a plot twist.
You’re trying to sound pragmatic, but the core of your argument is simple: You’re treating men’s lack of self‑control as women’s responsibility.
That’s the part that doesn’t survive scrutiny.
If you want to talk actual behavioural science, we can dig into social conditioning, sexualization patterns, or risk factors. But blaming topless women for sex crimes isn’t a guideline — it’s just a very old idea wearing new punctuation.
I remember being on holiday with my ex and her family. We went to the nude beach with her two sisters. I had thought her youngest sister now 15 was just putting on weight. She was up top. Here was this skinny short little girl with comically big tits on her little body. I couldn't help getting hard and my ex had to give me a blowjob behind a sand dune for my erection to go down. I ended up dating snd marrying her little sister.
This isn’t a shocking story — it’s a disturbing one. You’re describing sexual behaviour involving a minor, and then presenting it like it’s some kind of chaotic romance plot. It’s not. It’s harmful, predatory, and absolutely not something to brag about or treat as a quirky life event. A 15‑year‑old is a child. Your reaction wasn’t normal. Your ex’s response wasn’t normal. And the fact that you later married her sister doesn’t magically rewrite what happened — it just adds another layer of discomfort. If you think this is something to share casually, you need to take a serious step back and understand why everyone else’s reaction isn’t laughter — it’s concern.
How do you figure they're sex organs? They just hang there! Unless you get a bit kinky about sex, they have no sexual function at all. Yeah, I can see all the social problems they cause in places like Rio which caused them to stop letting girls run around topless so many decades ago!! Oops! No, I guess they haven't!! Hmmmm, imagine that!! Well-adjusted people that don't freak out at the sight of naked tits every single day!! Probably has a lot to do with the fact that they've all grown up with the sight of naked tits every day of their lives.
@FunkyMonkee rouch her boobs it activates mating circuits. They are sensitive, females protect that until want to be close. They produce milk for offspring. Yes she can. Ask women if they think they are a sexual aspect of their body.
It does for me, too but I'm allowed to walk around topless! I never protect mine and they still feel great when my love touches them and plays with them! Mine (and yours) can produce milk, too. They just have to be sucked on a lot longer to get it started. Okay, how does she fuck you with them? Aside from the mouth, what hole does she put them into? Do they ejaculate after a certain amount of shoving them into said hole? Being a sexual ASPECT is NOT the same as a sexual object! Mine have a sexual aspect, too but, I can't fuck anybody with them.
If topless equality ever gets a government subsidy, Mr. Chinaski, society will finally have its priorities straight. Honestly though, your comment made me laugh — imagine the paperwork: “Reason for application: enhanced social harmony and reduced T‑shirt laundry.”But hey, if we’re recognising social benefits, maybe it’s time we also recognise that comfort and equality shouldn’t need a grant proposal to make sense.
Yes, and Canadian topless law was effectively challenged and defeated in 1996, when the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that being topless is not considered an indecent act under the Criminal Code. However, even so it is a rare sight in Toronto, almost ALWAYS in summer at festivals only!
I think it’s ok for women to go topless just like a man BUT I don’t think it’s ok for men to go topless unless at the beach or working around their homes. Men shouldn’t be going in stores or other public places without a shirt… no reason for it.
I don't really care. Pop those puppies out and let them breathe. Go braless. Or strap em down and keep them from flopping all over the place. Not anything that I spend time thinking about.
Cultures differ from continent to continent and country to country. Yes, a lot of it has to do with the affordability or even necessity of clothing in poor/hot climates.
I don't know, hat about it? What if that was a man with large tits? Why is it okay for guys with large tits to walk around topless but not women, even if they have smaller or no tits at all? My cousin, Jeff, had to take some kind of medicinal stuff that caused his tits to grow huge!! He was a tad beefy but never fat!
Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
Most Helpful Opinions